We investigated whether the perceived attractiveness of expressive faces was influenced by head turn and eye gaze towards or away from the observer. In all experiments, happy faces were consistently rated as more attractive than angry faces. A head turn towards the observer, whereby a full-face view was shown, was associated with relatively higher attractiveness ratings when gaze direction was aligned with face view (Experiment 1). However, preference for full-face views of happy faces was not affected by gaze shifts towards or away from the observer (Experiment 2a). In Experiment 3, the relative duration of each face view (front-facing or averted at 15°) during a head turn away or towards the observer was manipulated. There was benefit on attractiveness ratings for happy faces shown for a longer duration from the front view, regardless of the direction of head turn. Our findings support previous studies indicating a preference for positive expressions on attractiveness judgements, which is further enhanced by the front views of faces, whether presented during a head turn or shown statically. In sum, our findings imply a complex interaction between cues of social attention, indicated by the view of the face shown, and reward on attractiveness judgements of unfamiliar faces.
AdamsR. B.Jr.FranklinR. G.Jr.KveragaK.AmbadyN.KleckR. E.WhalenP. J., … NelsonA. J. (2011a).
Amygdala responses to averted vs direct gaze fear vary as a function of presentation speed. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,
7, 568–577.
2.
AdamsR. B.Jr.FranklinR. G.Jr.NelsonA. J.GordonH. L.KleckR. E.WhalenP. J.AmbadyN. (2011b).
Differentially tuned responses to restricted versus prolonged awareness of threat: A preliminary fMRI investigation. Brain and Cognition,
77, 113–119.
3.
AdamsR. B.Jr.FranklinR. G.Jr.RuleN. O.FreemanJ. B.KveragaK.HadjikhaniN., … AmbadyN. (2009).
Culture, gaze and the neural processing of fear expressions. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,
5, 340–348.
4.
AdamsR. B.Jr.KleckR. E. (2003).
Perceived gaze direction and the processing of facial displays of emotion. Psychological Science,
14, 644–647.
5.
AdamsR. B.Jr.KleckR. E. (2005).
Effects of direct and averted gaze on the perception of facially communicated emotion. Emotion,
5, 3.
6.
AdolphsR. (2002).
Neural systems for recognizing emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology,
12, 169–177.
7.
AnstisS.MayhewJ.MorleyT. (1969).
The perception of where a face or television ‘portrait’ is looking. The American Journal of Psychology,
82, 474–489. https://doi.org/10.2307/1420441
8.
ArgyleM.CookM. (1976). Gaze and mutual gaze.
Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press.
9.
BalasB.PacellaJ. (2017).
Trustworthiness perception is disrupted in artificial faces. Computers in Human Behavior,
77, 240–248.
10.
BalasB.TupaL.PacellaJ. (2018). Measuring Social variables in real and artificial faces. Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 236–243.
11.
BalsdonT.CliffordC. W. (2017).
A bias-minimising measure of the influence of head orientation on perceived gaze direction. Scientific Reports,
7, 41685.
12.
BalsdonT.CliffordC. W. (2018).
Task dependent effects of head orientation on perceived gaze direction. Frontiers in Psychology,
9, 2491.
13.
BentonC. P. (2010).
Rapid reactions to direct and averted facial expressions of fear and anger. Visual Cognition,
18, 1298–1319.
14.
BindemannM.Mike BurtonA.LangtonS. R. (2008).
How do eye gaze and facial expression interact?Visual Cognition,
16, 708–733.
15.
BirdG. D.LauwereynsJ.CrawfordM. T. (2012).
The role of eye movements in decision making and the prospect of exposure effects. Vision Research,
60, 16–21.
16.
BruceV.ValentineT.BaddeleyA. (1987).
The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology,
1, 109–120.
17.
BruceV.YoungA. (1986).
Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology,
77, 305–327.
18.
BrunoN.BertaminiM. (2013).
Self-portraits: Smartphones reveal a side bias in non-artists. PLoS One,
8, e55141. https://10.1371/journal.pone.0055141
19.
BublatzkyF.PittigA.SchuppH. T.AlpersG. W. (2017).
Face-to-face: Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,
12, 811–822.
20.
BurtD. M.PerrettD. I. (1997).
Perceptual asymmetries in judgements of facial attractiveness, age, gender, speech and expression. Neuropsychologia,
35, 685–693.
21.
CamerlinkI.CoulangeE.FarishM.BaxterE. M.TurnerS. P. (2018).
Facial expression as a potential measure of both intent and emotion. Scientific Reports,
8, 17602.
22.
CarlinJ. D.CalderA. J. (2013).
The neural basis of eye gaze processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology,
23, 450–455.
23.
ClineM. (1967).
The perception of where a person is looking. The American Journal of Psychology,
80, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/1420539
24.
ConwayC. A.JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.LittleA. C. (2007).
Evidence for adaptive design in human gaze preference. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences,
275, 63–69.
25.
ConwayC. A.JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.LittleA. C. (2010).
Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women’s preferences for direct gaze. British Journal of Psychology,
101, 109–121.
26.
ConwayC. A.JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.LittleA. C.HayJ.WellingL. L., … FeinbergD. R. (2008).
Integrating physical and social cues when forming face preferences: Differences among low and high-anxiety individuals. Social Neuroscience,
3, 89–95.
27.
CrookesK.EwingL.GildenhuysJ. D.KlothN.HaywardW. G.OxnerM., … RhodesG. (2015).
How well do computer-generated faces tap face expertise?PLoS One,
10, e0141353.
28.
DunstanC. J.LindellA. K. (2012).
Hemifacial preferences for the perception of emotion and attractiveness differ with the gender of the one beheld. Cognition & Emotion,
26, 907–915.
29.
EngellA. D.HaxbyJ. V. (2007).
Facial expression and gaze-direction in human superior temporal sulcus. Neuropsychologia,
45, 3234–3241.
30.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1976).
Measuring facial movement. Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior,
1, 56–75.
31.
EkmanP.FriesenW. V. (1982).
Felt, false, and miserable smiles. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
6, 238–252.
32.
EwbankM. P.JenningsC.CalderA. J. (2009).
Why are you angry with me? Facial expressions of threat influence perception of gaze direction. Journal of Vision,
9, 16–16.
33.
EwingL.RhodesG.PellicanoE. (2010).
Have you got the look? Gaze direction affects judgements of facial attractiveness. Visual Cognition,
18, 321–330.
34.
FarroniT.MassaccesiS.MenonE.JohnsonM. H. (2007).
Direct gaze modulates face recognition in young infants. Cognition,
102, 396–404.
35.
GamerM.HechtH. (2007).
Are you looking at me? Measuring the cone of gaze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
33, 705.
36.
GanelT. (2011).
Revisiting the relationship between the processing of gaze direction and the processing of facial expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
37, 48.
37.
GanelT.Goshen-GottsteinY.GoodaleM. A. (2005).
Interactions between the processing of gaze direction and facial expression. Vision Research,
45, 1191–1200.
38.
GeorgescuA. L.KuzmanovicB.SchilbachL.TepestR.KulbidaR.BenteG.VogeleyK. (2013).
Neural correlates of “social gaze” processing in high-functioning autism under systematic variation of gaze duration. NeuroImage: Clinical,
3, 340–351.
39.
GibsonJ. J.PickA. D. (1963).
Perception of another person’s looking behavior. The American Journal of Psychology,
76, 386–394.
40.
GolleJ.MastF. W.LobmaierJ. S. (2014).
Something to smile about: The interrelationship between attractiveness and emotional expression. Cognition & Emotion,
28, 298–310.
41.
GrahamR.LaBarK. S. (2007).
Garner interference reveals dependencies between emotional expression and gaze in face perception. Emotion,
7, 296.
42.
GrahamR.LaBarK. S. (2012).
Neurocognitive mechanisms of gaze-expression interactions in face processing and social attention. Neuropsychologia,
50, 553–566.
43.
HaxbyJ. V.HoffmanE. A.GobbiniM. I. (2002).
Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry,
51, 59–67.
44.
HessU.AdamsR. B.KleckR. E. (2007).
Looking at you or looking elsewhere: The influence of head orientation on the signal value of emotional facial expressions. Motivation and Emotion,
31, 137–144.
45.
HoP. K.WoodsA.NewellF. N. (2018).
Temporal shifts in eye gaze and facial expressions independently contribute to the perceived attractiveness of unfamiliar faces. Visual Cognition,
26, 831–852.
46.
HuangY.PanX.MoY.MaQ. (2016).
Brain potentials indicate the effect of other observers’ emotions on perceptions of facial attractiveness. Neuroscience Letters,
617, 277–282.
47.
JonesB. C.DeBruineL. M.LittleA. C.ConwayC. A.FeinbergD. R. (2006).
Integrating gaze direction and expression in preferences for attractive faces. Psychological Science,
17, 588–591.
48.
KaislerR. E.LederH. (2016).
Trusting the looks of others: Gaze effects of faces in social settings. Perception,
45, 875–892.
49.
KaislerR. E.LederH. (2017).
Combined effects of gaze and orientation of faces on person judgments in social situations. Frontiers in Psychology,
8, 259.
50.
KampeK. K.FrithC. D.DolanR. J.FrithU. (2001).
Psychology: Reward value of attractiveness and gaze. Nature,
413, 589.
51.
KluttzN. L.MayesB. R.WestR. W.KerbyD. S. (2009).
The effect of head turn on the perception of gaze. Vision Research,
49, 1979–1993.
52.
KuzmanovicB.GeorgescuA. L.EickhoffS. B.ShahN. J.BenteG.FinkG. R.VogeleyK. (2009).
Duration matters: Dissociating neural correlates of detection and evaluation of social gaze. Neuroimage,
46, 1154–1163.
53.
LangtonS. R. H. (2000).
The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A,
53, 825–845.
54.
LangtonS. R. H.BruceV. (1999).
Reflexive visual orienting in response to the social attention of others. Visual Cognition,
6, 541–567.
55.
LangtonS. R. H.HoneymanH.TesslerE. (2004).
The influence of head contour and nose angle on the perception of eye-gaze direction. Perception and Psychophysics,
66, 752–771.
56.
LangtonS. R. H.WattR. J.BruceV. (2000).
Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
4, 50–59.
57.
LassalleA.ItierR. J. (2015).
Emotional modulation of attention orienting by gaze varies with dynamic cue sequence. Visual Cognition,
23, 720–735.
58.
LauS. (1982).
The effect of smiling on person perception. The Journal of Social Psychology,
117, 63–67.
59.
Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015).
The Chicago Face Database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods,
47, 1122–1135.
60.
MaF.XuF.LuoX. (2015).
Children’s and adults’ judgments of facial trustworthiness: The relationship to facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
121, 179–198.
61.
MacDormanK. F.GreenR. D.HoC. C.KochC. T. (2009).
Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. Computers in Human Behavior,
25, 695–710.
62.
MacraeC. N.HoodB. M.MilneA. B.RoweA. C.MasonM. F. (2002).
Are you looking at me? Eye gaze and person perception. Psychological Science,
13, 460–464.
63.
MainJ. C.DeBruineL. M.LittleA. C.JonesB. C. (2010).
Interactions among the effects of head orientation, emotional expression, and physical attractiveness on face preferences. Perception,
39, 62–71.
64.
MaruyamaK.EndoM. (1983).
The effect of face orientation upon apparent direction of gaze. Tohoku Psychologica Folia,
42, 126–138.
65.
MaruyamaK.EndoM.SakuraiK. (1985).
An experimental consideration on “Mona Lisa gaze effect”. Tohoku Psychologica Folia,
44, 109–121.
66.
MasameK. (1990).
Perception of where a person is looking: Overestimation and underestimation of gaze direction. Tohoku Psychologica Folia,
49, 33–41.
67.
MasonM. F.TatkowE. P.MacraeC. N. (2005).
The look of love gaze shifts and person perception. Psychological Science,
16, 236–239.
68.
McManusI. C.HumphreyN. K. (1973).
Turning the left cheek. Nature,
243, 271–272.
69.
MehuM.LittleA. C.DunbarR. I. (2008).
Sex differences in the effect of smiling on social judgments: An evolutionary approach. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology,
2, 103.
70.
MildersM.HietanenJ. K.LeppänenJ. M.BraunM. (2011).
Detection of emotional faces is modulated by the direction of eye gaze. Emotion,
11, 1456.
71.
MorrisonE. R.MorrisP. H.BardK. A. (2013).
The stability of facial attractiveness: Is it what you’ve got or what you do with it?Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
37, 59–67.
72.
MueserK. T.GrauB. W.SussmanS.RosenA. J. (1984).
You’re only as pretty as you feel: Facial expression as a determinant of physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
46, 469.
73.
N’DiayeK.SanderD.VuilleumierP. (2009).
Self-relevance processing in the human amygdala: Gaze direction, facial expression, and emotion intensity. Emotion,
9, 798.
74.
NetaM.DavisF. C.WhalenP. J. (2011).
Valence resolution of ambiguous facial expressions using an emotional oddball task. Emotion (Washington, D.C.),
11, 1425–1433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022993
75.
NichollsM. E.ClodeD.WoodS. J.WoodA. G. (1999).
Laterality of expression in portraiture: Putting your best cheek forward. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
266, 1517–1522.
76.
NummenmaaL.CalderA. J. (2009).
Neural mechanisms of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
13, 135–143.
77.
OosterhofN. N.TodorovA. (2009).
Shared perceptual basis of emotional expressions and trustworthiness impressions from faces. Emotion,
9, 128.
78.
O’TooleA. J.RoarkD. A.AbdiH. (2002).
Recognizing moving faces: A psychological and neural synthesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
6, 261–266.
79.
OtsukaY.MareschalI.CalderA. J.CliffordC. W. (2014).
Dual-route model of the effect of head orientation on perceived gaze direction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
40, 1425.
80.
OtsukaY.MareschalI.CliffordC. W. (2016).
Testing the dual-route model of perceived gaze direction: Linear combination of eye and head cues. Journal of Vision,
16, 8–8.
81.
OttaE.AbrosioF. F. E.HoshinoR. L. (1996).
Reading a smiling face: Messages conveyed by various forms of smiling. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
82, 1111–1121.
82.
OttaE.LiraB. B. P.DelevatiN. M.CesarO. P.PiresC. S. G. (1994).
The effect of smiling and of head tilting on person perception. The Journal of Psychology,
128, 323–331.
83.
PalanicaA.ItierR. J. (2012).
Attention capture by direct gaze is robust to context and task demands. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior,
36, 123–134.
84.
Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy–psychophysics software in Python. Journal of neuroscience methods, 162(1-2), 8–13.
85.
Pelisson, D., Prablanc, C., & Urquizar, C. (1988). Vestibuloocular reflex inhibition and gaze saccade control characteristics during eye-head orientation in humans. Journal of Neurophysiology, 59(3), 997–1013.
86.
PerrettD. I.BurtD. M.Penton-VoakI. S.LeeK. J.RowlandD. A.EdwardsR. (1999).
Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior,
20, 295–307.
87.
PerrettD. I.LeeK. J.Penton-VoakI.RowlandD.YoshikawaS.BurtD. M., … AkamatsuS. (1998).
Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature,
394, 884.
88.
PotterT.CorneilleO. (2008).
Locating attractiveness in the face space: Faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
15, 615–622.
89.
PowellW. R.SchirilloJ. A. (2009).
Asymmetrical facial expressions in portraits and hemispheric laterality: A literature review. Laterality,
14, 545–572.
90.
ReberR.SchwarzN.WinkielmanP. (2004).
Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience?Personality and Social Psychology Review,
8, 364–382.
91.
ReisH. T.WilsonI. M.MonestereC.BernsteinS.ClarkK.SeidlE., … RadoaneK. (1990).
What is smiling is beautiful and good. European Journal of Social Psychology,
20, 259–267.
92.
RhodesG.HickfordC.JefferyL. (2000).
Sex‐typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super‐attractive?British Journal of Psychology,
91, 125–140.
RicciardelliP.DriverJ. (2008).
Effects of head orientation on gaze perception: How positive congruency effects can be reversed. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
61, 491–504.
95.
RicciardelliP.LugliL.PellicanoA.IaniC.NicolettiR. (2016).
Interactive effects between gaze direction and facial expression on attentional resources deployment: The task instruction and context matter. Scientific Reports,
6, 21706.
96.
RigatoS.FarroniT.JohnsonM. H. (2009).
The shared signal hypothesis and neural responses to expressions and gaze in infants and adults. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience,
5, 88–97.
97.
Roy, J. E., & Cullen, K. E. (1998). A neural correlate for vestibulo-ocular reflex suppression during voluntary eye -head gaze shifts. Nature neuroscience, 1(5), 404–410.
98.
RubensteinA. J.LangloisJ. H.RoggmanL. A. (2002). What makes a face attractive and why: The role of averageness in defining facial beauty. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 1–33). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
99.
RuleN. O.AmbadyN.AdamsR. B.Jr. (2009).
Personality in perspective: Judgmental consistency across orientations of the face. Perception,
38, 1688–1699.
100.
SanderD.GrandjeanD.KaiserS.WehrleT.SchererK. R. (2007).
Interaction effects of perceived gaze direction and dynamic facial expression: Evidence for appraisal theories of emotion. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology,
19, 470–480.
101.
SatoW.KochiyamaT.UonoS.YoshikawaS. (2010).
Amygdala integrates emotional expression and gaze direction in response to dynamic facial expressions. NeuroImage,
50, 1658–1665.
102.
ScheibJ. E.GangestadS. W.ThornhillR. (1999).
Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences,
266, 1913–1917.
103.
SchneiderT. M.CarbonC. C. (2017).
Taking the perfect selfie: Investigating the impact of perspective on the perception of higher cognitive variables. Frontiers in Psychology,
8, 971.
SeyamaJ. I.NagayamaR. (2005).
The effect of torso direction on the judgement of eye direction. Visual Cognition,
12, 103–116.
106.
SiéroffE. (2001).
Feature processing and superiority of three-quarter views in face recognition. Brain and Cognition,
46, 272–276.
107.
SittonS. C.WaiteL.RiversS. C. (2006).
Perception of traits from normal, mirror and chimeric images of faces. American Journal of Psychological Research,
2, 14–20.
108.
SutherlandC. A.YoungA. W.RhodesG. (2017).
Facial first impressions from another angle: How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties. British Journal of Psychology,
108, 397–415.
109.
SweenyT. D.WhitneyD. (2017).
The center of attention: Metamers, sensitivity, and bias in the emergent perception of gaze. Vision Research,
131, 67–74.
110.
SymonsL. A.LeeK.CedroneC. C.NishimuraM. (2004).
What are you looking at? Acuity for triadic eye gaze. The Journal of General Psychology,
131, 451.
111.
TodorovićD. (2006).
Geometrical basis of perception of gaze direction. Vision Research,
46, 3549–3562.
112.
TodorovićD. (2009).
The effect of face eccentricity on the perception of gaze direction. Perception,
38, 109–132.
113.
TracyJ. L.BeallA. T. (2011).
Happy guys finish last: The impact of emotion expressions on sexual attraction. Emotion,
11, 1379.
114.
UedaR.KuraguchiK.AshidaH. (2016).
Asymmetric effect of expression intensity on evaluations of facial attractiveness. SAGE Open,
6, 2158244016677569.
115.
WillisJ.TodorovA. (2006).
First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science,
17, 592–598.
116.
WilsonH. R.WilkinsonF.LinL. M.CastilloM. (2000).
Perception of head orientation. Vision Research,
40, 459–472.
117.
WollastonW. H. (1824).
XIII. On the apparent direction of eyes in a portrait. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,
114, 247–256.
118.
YamashitaW.KanazawaS.YamaguchiM. K. (2012).
The effect of gaze direction on three-dimensional face recognition in infants. Vision Research,
68, 14–18.
119.
YoungA. W.BruceV. (2011).
Understanding person perception. British Journal of Psychology,
102, 959–974.
120.
ZaidelD. W.ChenA. C.GermanC. (1995).
She is not a beauty even when she smiles: Possible evolutionary basis for a relationship between facial attractiveness and hemispheric specialization. Neuropsychologia,
33, 649–655.
