The perception of direct gaze provides multiple benefits for the observer. Previous studies have investigated how the information from both eyes is used to estimate gaze direction, showing that the perception of gaze direction differs when only the externally rotated eye versus only the internally rotated eye is visible. We examined the width and center of the area of direct gaze by presenting the observers with either the externally or internally rotated eye, or both eyes with the task to judge whether a computer avatar is looking at them. Two experiments yield evidence for a wider area of direct gaze for the externally rotated eye (around 6°) than for the internally rotated eye (around 4°). The area of direct gaze for both eyes was found to be the same as for the internally rotated eye, but smaller than for the externally rotated eye. When both eyes were present, our results indicate that the perception of direct gaze is more likely to follow the internally rotated eye. The discussion substantiates a new generalization that observers base their judgments on the more rotated eye, which can differ due to angle kappa and vergence, in our study it is the internally rotated eye.
AnstisS. M.MayhewJ. W.MorleyT. (1969). The perception of where a face or television ‘portrait’ is looking. The American Journal of Psychology, 82, 474. https://doi.org/10.2307/1420441
5.
BalsdonT.CliffordC. W. G. (2018). How wide is the cone of direct gaze?Royal Society Open Science, 5, 180249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180249
6.
Baron-CohenS. (1997). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. The MIT Press.
7.
BasmakH.SahinA.YildirimN.PapakostasT. D.KanellopoulosA. J. (2007). Measurement of angle kappa with synoptophore and Orbscan II in a normal population. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 23, 456–460. https://doi.org/10.3928/1081-597X-20070501-06
8.
GamerM.HechtH. (2007). Are you looking at me? Measuring the cone of gaze. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 705–715. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.705
9.
GharaeeH.AbrishamiM.ShafieeM.EhsaeiA. (2014). White-to-white corneal diameter: Normal values in healthy Iranian population obtained with the Orbscan II. International Journal of Ophthalmology, 7, 309–312. https://doi.org/10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.02.20
10.
GibsonJ. J.PickA. D. (1963). Perception of another Person's looking behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 386. https://doi.org/10.2307/1419779
11.
HarbortJ.WitthöftM.SpiegelJ.NickK.HechtH. (2013). The widening of the gaze cone in patients with social anxiety disorder and its normalization after CBT. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2013.03.009
HorstmannG.LothS. (2019). The Mona Lisa Illusion-Scientists see her looking at them though she isn't. I-Perception, 10, 2041669518821702. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669518821702
KobayashiH.KohshimaS. (1997). Unique morphology of the human eye. Nature, 387, 767–768. https://doi.org/10.1038/42842
17.
KobayashiH.KohshimaS. (2001). Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: Comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution, 40, 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2001.0468
18.
LangtonS. R.WattR. J.BruceV. (2000). Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01436-9
LobmaierJ. S.SavicB.BaumgartnerT.KnochD. (2021). The cone of direct gaze: A stable trait. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 682395. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682395
22.
LothS.HorstmannG.OsterbrinkC.KoppS. (2018, November). Accuracy of perceiving precisely gazing virtual agents. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on intelligent virtual agents (pp. 263–268). https://doi.org/10.1145/3267851.3267852
23.
MareschalI.CalderA. J.DaddsM. R.CliffordC. W. G. (2013). Gaze categorization under uncertainty: Psychophysics and modeling. Journal of Vision, 13, 18. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.5.18
NguyenA. T. T.PalmerC. J.OtsukaY.CliffordC. W. G. (2018). Biases in perceiving gaze vergence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000398
26.
OtsukaY.CliffordC. W. G. (2018). Influence of head orientation on perceived gaze direction and eye-region information. Journal of Vision, 18, 15. https://doi.org/10.1167/18.12.15
27.
PalmerC. J.OtsukaY.CliffordC. W. G. (2020). A sparkle in the eye: Illumination cues and lightness constancy in the perception of eye contact. Cognition, 205, 104419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104419
28.
RouderJ. N.SpeckmanP. L.SunD.MoreyR. D.IversonG. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
29.
Sanchis-GimenoJ. A.Sanchez-ZuriagaD.Martinez-SorianoF. (2012). White-to-white corneal diameter, pupil diameter, central corneal thickness and thinnest corneal thickness values of emmetropic subjects. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy, 34, 167–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0889-4
van EijkR.KuijstersA.DijkstraK.IJsselsteijnW. A. (2010, June 21–23). Human sensitivity to eye contact in 2D and 3D videoconferencing. In 2010 Second international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX) (pp. 76–81). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/QOMEX.2010.5518040
32.
van RijnL. J.van den BergA. V. (1993). Binocular eye orientation during fixations: Listing's law extended to include eye vergence. Vision Research, 33, 691–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(93)90189-4
WestR. W. (2013). The effect of head turn and illumination on the perceived direction of gaze. Perception, 42, 495–507. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7343
36.
World Medical Association. (2008). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. World Medical Journal, 54(4), 122–125.
