Abstract
Background:
Overexpression of Aurora B is linked to poor prognosis in various malignancies; however, its prognostic role remains debatable. Conducting a meta-analysis is essential to reach a definitive conclusion.
Methods:
Various databases were searched. Aurora B protein expression was assessed for prognostic significance using pooled hazard ratio (HR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Meta-regression and subgroup analysis identified the source of heterogeneity.
Results:
The study comprised 1384 cancer patients from 10 articles. The result with multivariate data (pooled HR=1.18, 95% CI= 0.71-1.95, p=0.52, I²=83%) and univariate data (pooled HR=1.81, 95% CI=0.92, 3.57, p=0.09, I2=89%) showed that increased Aurora B expression was not linked with poor overall survival (OS). Subgroup analysis showed that sample size, follow-up time, cut-off value, non-Chinese patients, antibody source were not associated with unfavorable OS.
Conclusions:
Aurora B expression could not be used as a prognostic marker in cancer.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
