Expression and prognostic value of CDK1,CCNA2,and CCNB1 gene clusters in human breast cancer

Abstract

Objective

Cell cycle-associated proteins play important roles in breast cancer (BRCA), based on evidence from cell lines, preclinical murine models, and human tissue samples.

Methods

Herein, we used the Onomine, GEPIA, Kaplan–Meier Plotter, and cBioPortal databases to examine transcriptional and survival data pertaining to cyclin-associated gene clusters (CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1) in BRCA patients.

Results

CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 gene expression levels were higher in BRCA compared with control tissue samples and were correlated with more-advanced tumor stage. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses confirmed that elevated CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 expression levels were associated with overall and post-progression survival and recurrence-free probability rates in patients with BRCA.

Conclusion

The results of this study implied that CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 gene clusters may provide potential therapeutic targets and prognostic biomarkers in patients with BRCA.

Keywords

prognosis breast cancer cell cycle

Introduction

Breast cancer (BRCA) remains the most common form of cancer and the main cause of cancer-related deaths affecting women globally.¹ Surgical resection is the standard therapy for BRCA. Patients are generally categorized according to a variety of clinical and pathological factors, including age, tumor size, tumor histological grade, and lymph node metastasis, to assess their prognosis and determine the appropriate treatment options. However, this conventional method often fails to provide a precise prognosis.^2,3 Additional prognostic markers and potential drug targets therefore need to be identified to enhance the prognosis and delivery of individualized treatments.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 1 (CDK1 gene) is the only essential CDK^4,5 required to facilitate the G2–M phase transition. It regulates G1 phase progression and the G1–S transition.⁶ Alterations in CDK1 activity may lead to uncontrolled proliferation of tumor cells, which is a hallmark of malignant tumors. Cyclin A2 (CCNA2 gene) is expressed in most human tissues and is a highly conserved member of the cyclin protein family. It plays a key role in controlling the G1–S and G2–M cell cycle transitions, in addition to being an important regulator of hematopoietic and embryonic cells.⁷ Cyclin B1 (CCNB1 gene) is also a highly conserved cyclin family protein that is ubiquitously expressed in humans, and which is purportedly involved in regulating tumor epithelial–mesenchymal transitions and metastasis.⁸ However, the underlying mechanisms and unique roles of these three genes in BRCA remain unclear.

Dysregulated expression levels of CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 gene clusters and their association with patient prognosis and findings in BRCA have been reported in some studies, but their expression profiles and prognostic relevance are still largely unknown. In the current study, we assessed CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 gene expression levels and mutations in BRCA patients to assess their potential functions, expression patterns, and prognostic relevance using large publicly available datasets.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (Permit No: NO.135) and conducted according to the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. All the datasets were extracted from online public databases and no additional consent was therefore required.

Oncomine analysis

The Oncomine online database (www.oncomine.org) is a public database that can be used to analyze gene expression in various cancers. We searched the database for the genes of interest and analyzed their expression levels in BRCA. We also assessed the expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in different cancers using the same database.

Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) dataset

The GEPIA database combines The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression data, including RNA-seq results from 9736 tumor and 8587 normal samples, thus allowing the assessment of differential expression profiles, patient outcomes, and other factors.⁹ These public bioinformatics platforms allowed analysis of the expression profiles of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in BRCA.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time-PCR

We verified the mRNA expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in eight pairs of BRCA and adjacent non-tumor tissues collected from the Breast Cancer Center of the National Cancer Center (Beijing, China). Approximately 20 mg of tissue was obtained from each sample for RNA extraction using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. All PCR reactions were performed using an ABI Prism 5700 Sequence Detection System (PerkinElmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

Human Protein Atlas

The Human Protein Atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org) contains immunohistochemical expression data for nearly 20 common kinds of tumors, with 12 individual subtypes per tumor.¹⁰ The database allows researchers to identify the expression patterns of certain proteins in a given type of tumor. We directly compared CDK1, cyclin A2, and cyclin B1 levels between normal and BRCA tissues using immunohistochemistry images.

Kaplan–Meier (K–M) plotter

The prognostic relevance of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 expression in BRCA was assessed using K–M Plotter (www.kmplot.com),¹¹ which contains survival information and gene expression data for 6234 clinical BRCA patients. The median expression value was used to stratify patients into low- and high-expressing groups for each gene, and overall survival (OS), post-progression survival (PPS), and recurrence-free probability (RFP) rates were assessed in BRCA patients using K–M plotter, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals and P-values.

Functional pathway enrichment analyses

The online STRING (https://string-db.org/) tool provides investigators with systematic and comprehensive functional annotation tools to reveal the biological meaning behind an extensive list of genes. We conducted Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses for CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 using STRING, with a significance threshold of P<0.05.

TCGA and cBioPortal

TCGA contains sequencing and clinicopathologic data for 30 cancer types.¹² The Metastatic Breast Cancer Project (Provisional, October 2018) and Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA PanCan 2018) were selected for further analyses of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 using cBioPortal (https://www.cbioportal.org). Genomic profiles, including mutations and copy-number alterations, were calculated using cBioPortal’s online tool.

Statistical analysis

Data from the online databases were processed as detailed above. Results derived from samples were analyzed using SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were compared between two groups using Student’s t-test. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Results

CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 gene expression in BRCA

We compared the gene expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in all cancers and normal tissues using Oncomine (Figure 1). CDK1 mRNA levels were significantly elevated in BRCA patients in 11 datasets, CCNA2 was significantly upregulated in seven BRCA datasets, and CCNB1 was significantly upregulated in nine BRCA datasets.

Figure 1.

Transcription levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in different types of cancers (Oncomine). Red: over-expression; blue: under-expression.

Relationship between CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 levels and clinicopathological findings in BRCA patients

Gene expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 were all higher in BRCA tumor tissues compared with normal tissues, as revealed by GEPIA (Figure 2). We also found a clear correlation between gene expression level and tumor stage, with BRCA patients with more advanced stages tending to have higher expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 (Figure 3). We also examined the protein expression patterns of CDK1, cyclin A2, and cyclin B1 based on the Human Protein Atlas. The results confirmed that levels of all three proteins were elevated in BRCA samples relative to normal controls (Figure 4). We verified the mRNA expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in eight pairs of BRCA tissues and adjacent non-tumor tissues collected from the Breast Cancer Center of the National Cancer Center (Beijing, China). mRNA expression levels of all three genes were significantly higher in BRCA compared with normal tissues (Fig. S1). Overall, these results showed that transcriptional and proteomic expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 were upregulated in patients with BRCA.

Figure 2.

Correlation between expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 and tumor stage in breast cancer (BRCA) patients (GEPIA) by box plots. Expression profiles (red = high expression; blue = low expression) and box plots of (a) CDK1, (b) CCNA2, and (c) CCNB1 in BRCA patients (GEPIA). ^*P<0.05.

Figure 3.

Correlation between expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 and tumor stage in breast cancer (BRCA) patients (GEPIA) by violin plots. Violin plots of correlations between expression of (a) CDK1, (b) CCNA2, and (c) CCNB1 and tumor stage in patients with BRCA. P<0.05.

Figure 4.

Protein expression levels of cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1), cyclin A2 (CCNA2), and cyclin B1 (CCNB1) in breast cancer (BRCA) tissues from the Human Protein Atlas. CDK1, cyclin A2, and cyclin B1 were not expressed in normal breast tissues but were highly expressed in BRCA tissues.

Genetic alterations of CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 gene clusters and neighboring-gene network in BRCA patients

The frequencies of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 mutations in BRCA were assessed using cBioPortal, with 1321 patients from the Metastatic Breast Cancer Project (Provisional, October 2018) and Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA PanCan 2018). The percentages of genetic variations in CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in BRCA varied from 0.8% to 4% for individual genes according to these two datasets (CDK1, 4%; CCNA2, 0.8%; CCNB1, 1.6%; Figure 5a). Seventy-seven (6%) samples exhibited gene set/pathway alterations, with mutation rates of 14.35% and 3.97% for the analyzed gene sets (Figure 5b). We explored the relationships among these genes in BRCA by protein–protein interaction (PPI) enrichment analysis using NEST. The PPI network was constructed using STRING. The results showed that CCNE1, BUB1, CDK2, CCNB2, MAD2L1, ANAPC1, CDC20, PLK1, ANAPC10, CDC16, BUB3, BUB1B, CDC23, NEK2, and PTTG1 were closely associated with CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 gene clusters and functions (Figure 5c).

Figure 5.

Frequencies of gene alterations in CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 and neighboring-gene network in breast cancer (BRCA) (cBioPortal). (a) Summary of alterations in CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1. (b) OncoPrint visual summary of alterations based on query of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1. (c) Protein–protein interaction network of cyclin-dependent kinase 1, cyclin A2, and cyclin B1.

Functional enrichment analysis of CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 gene clusters in BRCA patients

We explored the functions of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 using GO and KEGG analyses. GO analysis assesses the biological process, molecular function, and cellular component annotations of the genes of interest. The CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 gene clusters and neighboring genes were primarily enriched for histone phosphorylation, meiotic chromosome segregation, regulation of ubiquitin protein ligase activity, sister chromatid segregation, organelle organization, nuclear chromosome segregation, G2/M transition, cell division, and regulation of cell cycle and nuclear division (Figure 6a). Enriched molecular functions included transcription regulation by protein binding, enzyme binding, ATP binding, protein kinase binding, cyclin binding, histone kinase activity, anaphase-promoting complex binding, transferase activity, catalytic activity, acting on a protein, and protein serine/threonine kinase activity (Figure 6b). Cellular component annotations for these genes included cyclin A2-CDK2 complex, cytoskeletal part, microtubule cytoskeleton, centrosome, microtubule organizing center, spindle, CDK holoenzyme complex, condensed chromosome, anaphase-promoting complex, and cytosol (Figure 6c). The KEGG pathways for these genes are shown in Table 1. Among these pathways, cell cycle, p53 signaling, progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation, oocyte meiosis, HTLV-I infection, cellular senescence, ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis, viral carcinogenesis, FoxO signaling, and phosphoinositide 3-kinase-Akt signaling were involved in the tumor development and pathogenesis of BRCA.

Figure 6.

Functional enrichment analysis of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in patients with breast cancer. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis predicted the functions of the target genes in terms of (a) biological processes, (b) molecular functions, and (c) and cellular components.

Table 1.

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in breast cancer.

Pathway ID	Pathway name	Gene count	False discovery rate	Genes
04110	Cell cycle	17	5.01E-35	ANAPC1, ANAPC10, BUB1, BUB1B, BUB3, CCNA2, CCNB1, CCNB2, CCNE1, CDC16, CDC20, CDC23, CDK1, CDK2, MAD2L1, PLK1, PTTG1
04114	Oocyte meiosis	14	5.40E-27	ANAPC1, ANAPC10, BUB1, CCNB1, CCNB2, CCNE1, CDC16, CDC20, CDC23, CDK1, CDK2, MAD2L1, PLK1, PTTG1
04914	Progesterone-mediated oocyte maturation	12	4.61E-23	ANAPC1, ANAPC10, BUB1, CCNA2, CCNB1, CCNB2, CDC16, CDC23, CDK1, CDK2, MAD2L1, PLK1
05166	HTLV-I infection	10	3.28E-14	ANAPC1, ANAPC10, BUB1B, BUB3, CCNB2, CDC16, CDC20, CDC23, MAD2L1, PTTG1
04115	p53 signaling pathway	5	2.30E-08	CCNB1, CCNB2, CCNE1, CDK1, CDK2
04218	Cellular senescence	6	2.30E-08	CCNA2, CCNB1, CCNB2, CCNE1, CDK1, CDK2
04120	Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis	5	4.38E-07	ANAPC1, ANAPC10, CDC16, CDC20, CDC23
05203	Viral carcinogenesis	5	1.72E-06	CCNA2, CCNE1, CDC20, CDK1, CDK2
04068	FoxO signaling pathway	4	1.52E-05	CCNB1, CCNB2, CDK2, PLK1
04151	PI3K-Akt signaling pathway	2	0.0489	CCNE1, CDK2

HTLV, human T-lymphotropic virus; PI3K, phosphoinositide 3-kinase.

Prognostic values of CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 gene clusters in BRCA patients

We evaluated the prognostic significance of the CDK1/CCNA2/CCNB1 gene clusters in BRCA patients using K–M plotter. Increased expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 were strongly associated with poor OS, RFP, and PPS (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Prognostic values of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 expression in breast cancer (BRCA) patients. (a) Overall survival (OS), (b) recurrence-free probability (RFP), and (c) post-progression survival (PPS) in BRCA patients with high (red) and low (black) expression levels of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 plotted using Kaplan–Meier plotter database at a threshold of P<0.05.

Discussion

Dysregulation of cell cycle-related proteins has been well-documented in several cancers.¹³ However, although the functions of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in tumorigenesis and prognosis have been partially confirmed,^14–16 additional bioinformatics analyses in BRCA samples are warranted. Herein, we explored the expression levels and prognostic relevance (OS, RFP, and PPS) of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in BRCA. The results advance our understanding of BRCA and may provide useful information to improve treatment design and prognostic accuracy in BRCA patients.

CDKs are important proteins involved in cell cycle regulation.¹⁷ Inhibition of CDK1 significantly impaired tumor growth and promoted tumor cell apoptosis in triple-negative BRCA.¹⁸ In addition, BRCA patients with high CDK1 expression had poor 5-year recurrence-free survival compared with patients with low CDK1 expression,¹⁷ consistent with our current findings. Similar results were reported for other tumors, such as renal cell carcinoma,¹⁹ colorectal cancer,²⁰ and lung cancer.²¹ CCNA2 regulates the G1–S and G2–M transitions of the cell cycle, and is a known prognostic biomarker for BRCA patient survival, as well as being linked to tamoxifen resistance.^22,23 Gan et al.²⁴ found that knockout of the CCNA2 gene prevented G2–M transition, while small interfering RNA-mediated CCNA2 knockdown increased the apoptosis rate, indicating that knockout of the CCNA2 gene might disrupt the cell cycle and induce cell apoptosis.²⁴ CCNB1 is expressed predominantly in G2/M phase and participates in the regulation of mitosis. CCNB1 is a potential prognostic factor predicting BRCA patient survival, in addition to being linked with the treatment of resistance.²⁵ In the current study, CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 were expressed at markedly higher levels in BRCA tissue samples compared with normal tissues, with expression levels positively correlated with tumor stage. Interestingly, high CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 levels correlated well with reduced OS, RFP, and PPS in BRCA.

CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 gene clusters play a key role in regulating the mitotic cycle, and disruptions in the cell cycle are common factors involved in the occurrence and development of cancer; however, the mechanism remains unclear. Previous findings, together with the current results, support the vital roles of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 in governing the cell cycle and cell differentiation, and indicate that upregulated expression of these genes contributes to breast cancer development and poorer differentiation.

The current study had several limitations. First, the data were derived from various public databases rather than being generated specifically for the study. Second, the results were web-based and were not verified by biological experiments. Further mechanistic studies are therefore needed to confirm our findings.

Although previous studies have revealed the role of cell cycle-related genes in BRCA, most focused on single genes.^26,27 In contrast, the current study systematically analyzed the expression of cyclin-associated gene clusters (CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1) in BRCA and their relationship with patient prognosis. Our results suggest that CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 may be possible therapeutic targets as well as potential biomarkers for identifying high-risk populations among BRCA patients. These results warrant further studies of the therapeutic potentials of various cell cycle inhibitors.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_0300060520980647 - Supplemental material for Expression and prognostic value of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 gene clusters in human breast cancer

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_0300060520980647 for Expression and prognostic value of CDK1, CCNA2, and CCNB1 gene clusters in human breast cancer by Zeyu Xing, Xin Wang, Jiaqi Liu, Menglu Zhang, Kexin Feng and Xiang Wang in Journal of International Medical Research

Footnotes

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [3332020026].

ORCID iDs

Xiang Wang

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

Torre

Bray

Siegel

, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015; 65: 87–108. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21262.

Muller

Kronenwett

Hennig

, et al. Quantitative determination of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 mRNA in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue–a new option for predictive biomarker assessment in breast cancer. Diagn Mol Pathol 2011; 20: 1–10. DOI: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e3181e3630c.

Paik

Shak

Tang

, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2817–2826. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588.

Malumbres

Barbacid

Cell cycle, CDKs and cancer: a changing paradigm.

Nat Rev Cancer 2009; 9: 153–166. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2602.

Santamaria

Barriere

Cerqueira

, et al. Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle. Nature 2007; 448: 811–815. DOI: 10.1038/nature06046.

Enserink

Kolodner

RD.

An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes.

Cell Div 2010; 5: 11. DOI: 10.1186/1747-1028-5-11.

Arsic

Bendris

Peter

, et al. A novel function for Cyclin A2: control of cell invasion via RhoA signaling. J Cell Biol 2012; 196: 147–162. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201102085.

Song

Zhao

Dong

, et al. Overexpression of cyclin B1 in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells induces tumor cell invasive growth and metastasis. Carcinogenesis 2008; 29: 307–315. DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgm269.

Tang

Kang

, et al. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45: W98–W102. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx247.

10.

Asplund

Edqvist

Schwenk

, et al. Antibodies for profiling the human proteome-The Human Protein Atlas as a resource for cancer research. Proteomics 2012; 12: 2067–2077. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100504.

11.

Gyorffy

Surowiak

Budczies

, et al. Online survival analysis software to assess the prognostic value of biomarkers using transcriptomic data in non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS One 2013; 8: e82241. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082241.

12.

Cancer Genome Atlas N. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012; 490: 61–70. DOI: 10.1038/nature11412.

13.

Garcia-Gutierrez

Bretones

Molina

, et al. Myc stimulates cell cycle progression through the activation of Cdk1 and phosphorylation of p27. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 18693. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54917-1.

14.

Zhang

Kawakami

Liu

, et al. Targeting CDK1 and MEK/ERK overcomes apoptotic resistance in BRAF-mutant human colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer Res 2018; 16: 378–389. DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-17-0404.

15.

Guo

Zhang

, et al. Effect of hyperoside on cervical cancer cells and transcriptome analysis of differentially expressed genes. Cancer Cell Int 2019; 19: 235. DOI: 10.1186/s12935-019-0953-4.

16.

Chen

Qin

Peng

, et al. HnRNPR-CCNB1/CENPF axis contributes to gastric cancer proliferation and metastasis. Aging (Albany NY) 2019; 11: 7473–7491. DOI: 10.18632/aging.102254.

17.

Kim

Nakayama

Miyoshi

, et al. Determination of the specific activity of CDK1 and CDK2 as a novel prognostic indicator for early breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2008; 19: 68–72. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm358.

18.

Xia

Cai

Peng

, et al. The CDK1 inhibitor RO3306 improves the response of BRCA-proficient breast cancer cells to PARP inhibition. Int J Oncol 2014; 44: 735–744. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2013.2240.

19.

Liu

Zhu

Mao

, et al. Triple negative breast cancer therapy with CDK1 siRNA delivered by cationic lipid assisted PEG-PLA nanoparticles. J Control Release 2014; 192: 114–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.07.001.

20.

Thorenoor

Faltejskova-Vychytilova

Hombach

, et al. Long non-coding RNA ZFAS1 interacts with CDK1 and is involved in p53-dependent cell cycle control and apoptosis in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 622–637. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.5807.

21.

Shi

Zhou

, et al. MiR-181a inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation by targeting CDK1. Cancer Biomark 2017; 20: 539–546. DOI: 10.3233/CBM-170350.

22.

Markaverich

Shoulars

Rodriguez

MA.

Luteolin regulation of estrogen signaling and cell cycle pathway genes in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Int J Biomed Sci 2011; 7: 101–111.

23.

Gao

Han

, et al. CCNA2 is a prognostic biomarker for ER+ breast cancer and tamoxifen resistance. PLoS One 2014; 9: e91771. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091771.

24.

Gan

, et al. CCNA2 acts as a novel biomarker in regulating the growth and apoptosis of colorectal cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2018; 10: 5113–5124. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S176833.

25.

Ding

Zou

, et al. CCNB1 is a prognostic biomarker for ER+ breast cancer. Med Hypotheses 2014; 83: 359–364. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2014.06.013.

26.

Condorelli

Spring

O'Shaughnessy

, et al. Polyclonal RB1 mutations and acquired resistance to CDK 4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 2018; 29: 640–645. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx784.

27.

Sabbaghi

Gil-Gomez

Guardia

, et al. Defective Cyclin B1 induction in trastuzumab-emtansine (T-DM1) acquired resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 7006–7019. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0696.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.10 MB