Correlation between lifestyle and social factors in functional dyspepsia among college freshmen

Abstract

Objective

We aimed to examine the relationship between the prevalence of functional dyspepsia (FD) and lifestyle habits, to identify social factors that may contribute to psychosocial disorders.

Methods

We enrolled 759 university freshmen in this study, who were categorized into the FD group and healthy group. All participants completed the validated Self-Rating Depression Scale and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale questionnaires, to assess lifestyle and social factors among participants.

Results

The proportion of participants with FD was 16.86%, and 67.97% were women. Diet irregularities and sleep impairment may have an effect on FD. Tea consumption may play a role in preventing FD. Participants with FD were more likely to have mood disorders than healthy participants. Most participants with FD who had mood disorders experienced mild anxiety or depression. Participants’ main sources of stress arose from daily life, development, social life, life events, and participants’ daily schedule.

Conclusion

Sex and lifestyle habits, including sleeping patterns and dietary habits, can have an impact on FD. Social stress and mood disorders also have an effect on FD. FD may be prevented by adjusting lifestyle habits and psychological counseling.

Keywords

Functional dyspepsia lifestyle anxiety depression stress dietary habits

Introduction

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is highly prevalent worldwide. The prevalence of FD varies worldwide; in Western countries, the FD prevalence ranges between 10% and 40% and between 5% and 30% in Asia.^1,2 Although FD rarely leads to death, it can have an effect on patient quality of life.^3,4 To date, no effective treatment to manage this disease is available.⁵ Western lifestyle habits, which include consumption of certain types of food, alcohol, and tobacco, are frequently associated with FD symptoms.^6,7 However, the relationship between Eastern lifestyle habits and FD remains unknown.

The first Rome classification system was published in 1990; subsequently the Rome I, Rome II, and Rome III classifications were published in 1992, 1999, and 2006, respectively.⁸ With publication of the Rome IV classification in 2016, the definition of FD has become clearer and better defined.⁹ The mechanism of FD is not well understood but it is known that FD can be caused by motility disorders, acid disorders, and Helicobacter pylori infection, among other causes. However, a significant association has been identified between psychosocial disorders and FD.^10–12 The physical symptoms of FD may lead to mood disorders in affected individuals, such as anxiety or depression. This adds to health care costs for patients with FD, in addition to those associated with managing their dyspepsia symptoms.^13,14 Psychosocial disorders may result in disturbance of the brain–gut axis, which may lead to FD-associated gastrointestinal symptoms.¹⁵ There are many factors, such as social stress, that are closely associated with anxiety and depression. Thus, clarifying the association between mood disorders and FD and the impact of mood disorders on patients with FD will enable development of effective FD treatment.^16,17 The prevalence of FD and mood disorders and the factors affecting patients with FD in Asia, especially China, remain unknown.

In this study, we aimed to examine the prevalence of FD, to identify the relationship between Eastern lifestyle habits and FD, and to identify social factors contributing to psychosocial disorders among patients with FD in China.

Methods

Participants

In this study, we enrolled freshmen at Xi’an Medical University during September to December 2018. Participants were diagnosed with FD using the Rome IV criteria; other diseases were ruled out based on results of the following physical examinations: electrocardiogram, abdominal ultrasound, X-ray scan, and blood tests. Participants were divided in two groups: the FD group and the healthy group.

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Xi’an Medical University. Informed consent was obtained from all participants before the study began.

Lifestyle factors

All participants were assessed with respect to their lifestyle habits, including sleeping pattern, dietary habits (such as having a preference for spicy, hot, raw or cold, or deep-fried foods, dairy foods or products, tea or coffee, chocolate, and other foods), smoking status, and alcohol consumption.

Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS)

All participants were administered the approved Chinese version of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), to identify participants’ anxiety and depression status. Specialist physicians explained the questionnaires to participants such that they were able to complete the examinations independently, without interference from external factors. Using the completed questionnaires, physicians calculated the standardized SAS and SDS scores using the following formula: Y = int (1.25X). SAS and SDS scores above 50 points indicate the presence of anxiety or depression; a score of 50–59 indicates mild anxiety or depression, 60–69 points indicates moderate anxiety or depression, and a score higher than 70 points indicates severe anxiety or depression.^18,19

Investigation of social stress factors

All participants were assessed for social stress, including academic stress and the stresses of daily life, development, social life, family, life events, and of their daily schedule.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables are expressed as frequency and percentage. The t-test was used to compare continuous variables. To compare categorical variables, we used the χ² test and rank test. A two-sided P value <0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

Results

Prevalence of FD

A total of 759 university freshmen participated in this study, 287 (37.81%) men and 472 (62.19%) women. Participants were aged 17 to 22 years, with mean age 18.39 ± 1.00. A total 128 (16.86%) participants were categorized in the FD group, 41 (32.03%) men and 87 (67.97%) women (χ² = 7.1722, P < 0.05). Female participants experienced FD more frequently than their male counterparts.

Lifestyle habits

Among the 128 participants in the FD group, 44.53% (57/128) had insomnia, which was much higher than in the healthy group (174/631, 27.58%) (χ² = 14.4504, P < 0.05). Freshmen who had sleeping problems were more likely to have FD.

In the FD group, only 58.59% (75/128) of participants ate regular meals; 67.83% (428/631) of healthy participants ate meals on time (χ² = 4.0603, P < 0.05). A total 52.34% (67/128) of participants with FD preferred specific types of food; however, only 40.41% (255/631) of healthy participants had such preferences (χ² = 6.2022, P < 0.05). A preference for spicy, hot, raw, or cold foods and dairy foods or products was associated with FD (χ² = 21.0500, P < 0.01) (Table 1). Drinking tea was associated with FD (χ² = 2829.8800, P < 0.01); however, there was no association between coffee and FD (χ² = 0.6515) (Table 2). There was no significant difference between the FD group and healthy group with respect to smoking and alcohol consumption (χ² values 0.2740 and 0.0313, respectively) (Table 3).

Table 1.

Dietary habits in participants with functional dyspepsia and healthy participants.

Dietary habits	Healthy	Spicy	Hot	Raw/cold	Deep fried	Dairy foods or products
FD group n (%)	61	40	10	4	1	12
(N = 128)	(47.65%)	(31.25%)	(7.81%)	(3.13%)	(0.78%)	(9.38%)
Healthy group n (%)	376	170	24	6	10	45
(N = 631)	(59.60%)	(26.94%)	(1.58%)	(0.95%)	(1.58%)	(7.13%)

FD, functional dyspepsia.

*χ² = 21.0500, P < 0.01.

Table 2.

Beverage consumption habits in participants with functional dyspepsia and healthy participants.

Beverage consumption habits	Tea preference*		Coffee preference^#
Beverage consumption habits	Yes	No	Yes	No
FD group n (%)	55 (42.97%)	73 (57.03%)	44 (34.38%)	84 (65.62%)
(N = 128)	55 (42.97%)	73 (57.03%)	44 (34.38%)	84 (65.62%)
Healthy group n (%)	335 (53.09%)	296 (46.91%)	194 (30.74%)	437 (69.26%)
(N = 631)	335 (53.09%)	296 (46.91%)	194 (30.74%)	437 (69.26%)

FD, functional dyspepsia.

*χ² = 2829.8800, P < 0.01.

^#χ² = 0.6515, P > 0.05.

Table 3.

Smoking and alcohol consumption in participants with functional dyspepsia and healthy participants.

Habits	Smoking*		Alcohol^#
Habits	Yes	No	Yes	No
FD group n (%)	9 (7.03%)	119 (92.97%)	8 (6.25%)	120 (93.75%)
(N = 128)	9 (7.03%)	119 (92.97%)	8 (6.25%)	120 (93.75%)
Healthy group n (%)	34 (5.39%)	597 (94.61%)	34 (5.39%)	597 (94.61%)
(N = 631)	34 (5.39%)	597 (94.61%)	34 (5.39%)	597 (94.61%)

FD, functional dyspepsia.

*χ² = 0.2740, P > 0.05.

^#χ² = 0.0313, P > 0.05.

Prevalence of mood disorders

Both mean SAS and SDS scores were higher in the FD group than in the healthy group (t values 6.944 and 6.751, respectively; P < 0.01 for all) (Table 4). Compared with scores among the general Chinese population (n = 1158, norm score 29.78 ± 0.46), mean SAS scores were higher in the FD group.

Table 4.

Mean SAS and SDS scores.

	SAS mean score*	SDS mean score^#
FD group n (%)	45.3984 ± 7.72086	47.8125 ± 9.18982
(N = 128)	45.3984 ± 7.72086	47.8125 ± 9.18982
Healthy group n (%)	40.2409 ± 7.36609	41.8510 ± 8.70176
(N = 631)	40.2409 ± 7.36609	41.8510 ± 8.70176

FD, functional dyspepsia; SDS, Self-Rating Depression Scale; Self-Rating Anxiety Scale.

*t = 6.944, P < 0.01.

^#t = 6.751, P < 0.01.

A total 59.38% of participants with FD had mood disorders; this was much higher among participants in the healthy group (59.38% vs. 22.98%, respectively; χ² = 68.2974; P<0.05). Most participants with FD who had a mood disorder had mild anxiety (35/39, 89.74%) or depression (54/65, 83.08%) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Mood disorder levels among participants with functional dyspepsia.

	Mild	Moderate	Severe	Total*
Anxiety n (%)	35 (89.74%)	4 (10.26%)	0 (0)	75 (59.38%)
(N = 39)	35 (89.74%)	4 (10.26%)	0 (0)	75 (59.38%)
Depression n (%)	54 (83.08%)	10 (15.38%)	1 (1.54%)	15 (22.98%)
(N = 65)	54 (83.08%)	10 (15.38%)	1 (1.54%)	15 (22.98%)

*χ² = 68.2974, P < 0.05.

Social factors

The proportion of patients who experienced mild social stress was higher among participants with FD than that among their healthy counterparts. The frequency of stress arising from daily life, development, social life, life events, and participants’ daily schedule was much higher for freshmen with FD (z values −3.445, −2.040, −3.151, −3.702, and −3.738, respectively; P<0.05 for all). However, there was no significant effect on FD of academic stress and family stress (z values were −1.684 and −0.932, respectively) (Table 6).

Table 6.

Social stress in participants with functional dyspepsia and healthy participants.

	Academics		Daily life		Development		Social life		Family		Life events		Daily schedule
Cause of stress	FD	Healthy	FD	Healthy	FD	Healthy	FD	Healthy	FD	Healthy	FD	Healthy	FD	Healthy
Cause of stress	(N = 128)	(N = 631)	(N = 128)	(N = 631)	(N = 128)	(N = 631)	(N = 128)	(N = 631)	(N = 128)	(N = 631)	(N = 128)	(N = 631)	(N = 128)	(N = 631)
None	11	79	25	201	21	110	48	318	68	366	72	465	17	152
None	(8.60%)	(12.53%)	(19.53%)	(31.85%）	(16.40%)	(17.43%)	(37.5%)	(50.40%)	(53.13%)	(58.00%)	(56.24%)	(73.69%)	(13.29%)	(24.09%)
Mild	89	445	84	384	50	320	62	272	48	209	44	114	91	437
Mild	(69.53%)	(70.52%)	(65.63%)	(60.86%)	(39.06%)	(50.71%)	(48.44%)	(43.11%）	(37.5%)	(33.12%)	(34.38%)	(18.07%)	(71.09%)	(69.26%)
Moderate	25	96	18	44	53	178	15	34	11	47	6	42	18	38
Moderate	(19.53%)	(15.21%)	(14.06%)	(6.97%)	(41.41%)	(28.21%)	(11.72%)	(5.39%)	(8.59%)	(7.45%)	(4.69%)	(6.66%)	(14.06%)	(6.02%)
Severe	3	11	1	2	4	23	3	7	1	9	6	10	2	4
Severe	(2.34%)	(1.74%)	(0.78%)	(0.32%)	(3.13%）	(3.65%)	(2.34%)	(1.10%)	(0.78%)	(1.43%)	(4.69%)	(1.58%)	(1.56%)	0.63%)
z values	−1.684		−3.445		−2.040		−3.151		−0.932		−3.702		−3.738
P	>0.05		<0.01		<0.05		<0.01		>0.05		<0.01		<0.01

FD, functional dyspepsia.

Note: Values in the table are n (%), unless otherwise noted.

Discussion

FD is a functional gastrointestinal disorder and involves no organic changes. The mechanism of FD is still unknown, but it is very common in populations globally.²⁰ The prevalence of FD varies from 7% to 45% worldwide.^21,22 A large-scale study in France reported an FD prevalence of about 15% to 21%.²³ In Korea, the prevalence of FD is about 46.5%.⁵ Multicenter prevalence studies are lacking in China. In our single-center study, the prevalence of FD in younger people was 16.86%, and most individuals diagnosed with FD were women. Our results are the same as those of a previous study.^4,24,25 Sex-related differences might have an effect on biological factors, acquired risks, psychosocial characteristics of gastrointestinal symptoms, and healthcare-seeking behavior.²⁵

Recent studies have suggested that lifestyle and dietary patterns can modify gastrointestinal motor and sensory function, which may have an impact on FD symptoms. The Western diet, which includes fatty foods, alcohol, milk and dairy products, coffee, and red meat, is frequently associated with FD symptoms.² In comparison, wheat or grain-based foods, vegetables, and fruits are the main components of Eastern diets. Moreover, cooking styles in Eastern countries, especially in China, differ from those in Western countries. In the present study, we found that consumption of spicy, hot, raw, or cold foods and dairy foods or products were associated with FD symptoms. Tea may play a role in preventing FD; however, coffee had no effect on FD. Eating spicy, hot, raw, or cold foods and dairy as well as eating irregularly can induce FD symptoms, which might be related to hypersensitivity to gastrointestinal hormones and the slowing down of gastric emptying. Gluten and lactose intolerance as well as food allergies could be other important factors.^1,6,26 Previous studies have suggested that smoking and alcohol consumption affect the prevalence of FD. Smoking could increase the risk of FD by as much as 50%, and alcohol consumption could lead to the development and aggravation of FD.²⁷ In our study, participants with FD were more likely to smoke and drink alcohol; however, there was no significant difference between these participants and their healthy counterparts.

Sleep dysfunction may upregulate proinflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-1, and IL-6, which can have a profound impact on FD symptoms.²⁸ Recent studies also suggest that sleep impairment and psychological stress might lead to the development of FD and mood disorders.^29,30 In our study, we confirmed that participants who had sleeping problems were more likely to have FD.

FD has been classified as a psychosomatic disease, and the results of the present study showed that anxiety and depression were more common among participants with FD than in healthy people. Most participants with FD had mild anxiety and depression and experienced stress mainly owing to daily life, development, social life, life events, and their daily schedule. Studies conducted in Eastern and Western countries have similarly concluded that Axis I psychiatric disorders might be linked to the complex relationship between the brain and gut disorders.^31–33

Conclusion

This study confirmed that the prevalence of FD in China is similar to that in other countries of Asia. Sex, lifestyle habits, including sleep patterns and dietary and drinking habits have an impact on FD. Individuals with FD are more likely to experience social stress and mood disorders. FD may be prevented by changing lifestyle habits and attending psychological counseling.

Footnotes

Acknowledgements

We should like to thank Rong Li, Hui-min Wang and Shu-yong Meng for their assistance with this study.

Declaration of conflicting interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the Guangzhou Key Medical Discipline Construction Project Fund to Zhen-peng Huang.

ORCID iD

Zhen-peng Huang

References

Mahadeva

Ford

AC.

Clinical and epidemiological differences in functional dyspepsia between the East and the West.

Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28: 167–174.

Enck

Azpiroz

Boeckxstaens

, et al. Functional dyspepsia. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2017; 3: 17081.

Hou

Liu

, et al. Interpreting the Chinese Version of Quality of Life Questionnaire for Functional Digestive Disorders. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33: 869–877.

Lee

Lien

, et al. The risk factors and quality of life in patients with overlapping functional dyspepsia or peptic ulcer disease with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gut Liver 2014; 8: 160–164.

Lee

Jung

Huh

, et al. Current status of functional dyspepsia in Korea. Korean J Intern Med 2014; 29: 156–165.

Feinle-Bisset

Azpiroz

Dietary and lifestyle factors in functional dyspepsia.

Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 10: 150–157.

Göktaş

Köklü

Dikmen

, et al. Nutritional habits in functional dyspepsia and its subgroups: a comparative study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2016; 51: 903–907.

Talley

Ford

AC.

Functional Dyspepsia.

N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 1853–1863.

Stanghellini

Chan

Hasler

, et al. Gastroduodenal Disorders. Gastroenterology 2016; 150: 1380–1392.

10.

Voiosu

Giurcan

Voiosu

, et al. Functional dyspepsia today. Maedica (Buchar) 2013; 8: 68–74.

11.

Adibi

Keshteli

Daghaghzadeh

, et al. Association of anxiety, depression, and psychological distress in people with and without functional dyspepsia. Adv Biomed Res 2016; 12: 195.

12.

Jones

Tack

Van Oudenhove

, et al. Mood and Anxiety Disorders Precede Development of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Patients but Not in the Population. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 15: 1014–1020.

13.

Mapel

DW.

Functional disorders of the gastrointestinal tract: cost effectiveness review. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 27: 913–931.

14.

Lacy

Weiser

Kennedy

, et al. Functional dyspepsia: the economic impact to patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2013; 38: 170–177.

15.

Mayer

Tillisch

The brain-gut axis in abdominal pain syndromes.

Annu Rev Med 2011; 62: 381–396.

16.

Moshiree

Barboza

Talley

An update on current pharmacotherapy options for dyspepsia.

Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013; 14: 1737–1753.

17.

Lacy

Talley

Locke

, et al. Review article: current treatment options and management of functional dyspepsia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012; 36: 3–15.

18.

Zung

WWK.

A Self-Rating Depression Scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1965; 12: 63–70.

19.

Zung

WWK.

A Rating Instrument for Anxiety Disorders. Psychosomatics 1971; 12: 371–379.

20.

Forssmann

Meier

Uehleke

, et al. A non-interventional, observational study of a fixed combination of pepsin and amino acid hydrochloride in patients with functional dyspepsia. BMC Gastroenterol 2017; 17: 123.

21.

Mahadeva

Goh

KL.

Epidemiology of functional dyspepsia: a global perspective. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 2661–2666.

22.

Ghoshal

Singh

Chang

, et al. Epidemiology of uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia in Asia: facts and fiction. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011; 17: 235–244.

23.

Le Pluart

Sabaté

Bouchoucha

, et al. Functional gastrointestinal disorders in 35,447 adults and their association with body mass index. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 41: 758–767.

24.

Huang

Yang

Lan

, et al. Correlation between social factors and anxiety-depression in function dyspepsia: do relationships exist? Prz Gastroenterol 2014; 9: 348–353.

25.

Cain

Jarrett

Burr

, et al. Gender differences in gastrointestinal, psychological, and somatic symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1542–1549.

26.

Duncanson

Talley

Walker

, et al. Food and functional dyspepsia: a systematic review. J Hum Nutr Diet 2018; 31: 390–407.

27.

Ohlsson

The role of smoking and alcohol behaviour in management of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2017; 31: 545–552.

28.

Parekh

Oldfield

Johnson

DA.

Wake-up Call to Clinicians: the Impact of Sleep Dysfunction on Gastrointestinal Health and Disease.

J Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 52: 194–203.

29.

Lim

Yoo

Koo

, et al. Stress and sleep quality in doctors working on-call shifts are associated with functional gastrointestinal disorders. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23: 3330–3337.

30.

Herrick

Camilleri

Schleck

, et al. Effects of Amitriptyline and Escitalopram on Sleep and Mood in Patients With Functional Dyspepsia. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 401–406.

31.

Aro

Talley

Ronkainen

, et al. Anxiety is associated with uninvestigated and functional dyspepsia (Rome III criteria) in a Swedish population-based study. Gastroenterology 2009; 137: 94–100.

32.

Stasi

Nisita

Cortopassi

, et al. Subthreshold Psychiatric Psychopathology in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Can It Be the Bridge Between Gastroenterology and Psychiatry? Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017: 1953435.

33.

Koloski

Jones

Talley

NJ.

Evidence that independent gut-to-brain and brain-to-gut pathways operate in the irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia: a 1-year population-based prospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2016; 44: 592–600.