Abstract
We herein describe our
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
Introduction
A supra-aortic vessel aneurysm is an uncommon form of aneurysmal disease, and only 3% of such aneurysms are innominate artery aneurysms (IAAs).1,2 We herein describe our experience with an IAA that was managed with a simple surgical procedure and present a literature review on this rare clinical condition.
Case report
A 44-year-old woman was admitted for chest distress. She had undergone a tracheotomy 28 days after birth for unknown reasons, and the tracheotomy scar was evident on physical examination (Figure 1(a)). Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated normal cardiac structure and function, with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 65% and an ascending aorta diameter of 2.8 cm. Computed tomography angiography showed an IAA (3.6 cm) arising from the aortic arch and compressing the trachea (Figure 1(b) and (c)).
(a) Photograph showing a macroscopic view of the tracheotomy scar (TS). (b) Three-dimensional reconstruction of computed tomography showing the innominate artery aneurysm (IAA). (c) Sagittal computed tomography view showing that the IAA compressed the trachea (T) but did not involve the origin of the innominate artery. (d) Operative photograph showing the replaced graft (G) and closed IAA cavity (CIAAC). (e) Histologic examination showed degeneration of the elastic lamina.
With the patient under general anesthesia, the right neck was incised along the medial edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle. The distal IAA was then visualized proximal to the bifurcation of the right subclavian artery and common carotid artery, but the origin of the IAA could not be exposed. Therefore, a median sternotomy was made and the IAA was found to involve the origin of the innominate artery and the bifurcation of the right subclavian artery and common carotid artery; however, the aorta was intact.
After systematic heparinization (1 mg/kg), the distal ascending aorta was side-clamped, and a 5-0 Prolene suture was used to anastomose an 8-mm Dacron graft to the ascending aorta in an end-to-side fashion. Both the origin and distal end of the IAA were clamped, the distal innominate artery and IAA were fully visualized, and the distal innominate artery and other end of the Dacron graft were connected in an end-to-end manner. Next, distal perfusion of the innominate artery was restored; the cross-clamping time was only 6 min. Finally, both the origin of the innominate artery and the IAA cavity were closed by suturing (Figure 1(d)). Histological examination showed degeneration of the elastic lamina of the excised aneurysmal tissues (Figure 1(e)). The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged at 5 days. Repeat computed tomography angiography revealed no evidence of recurrence 6 months postoperatively.
Discussion
Summary of 120 case reports of innominate artery aneurysms.
N/A: not available.
Classification and etiology of 120 cases of innominate artery aneurysms.
N/A: not available.
A: no involvement of the origin of the innominate artery, B: involvement of the origin of the innominate artery but not of the aorta, C: involvement of both the innominate artery and aorta
Previous studies have shown that IAAs are mainly caused by atherosclerosis; other causes may include syphilis, tuberculosis, Kawasaki disease, Takayasu arteritis, Behçet disease, connective tissue disorders, and angiosarcoma.6,7 Among 120 patients with IAAs, the etiology was unknown in 70 (58.3%), trauma in 17 (15.3%), Takayasu arteritis in 8 (7.2%), atherosclerosis in 7 (5.8%), syphilis in 5 (4.5%), chronic dissection in 3 (2.7%), infection in 3 (2.7%), Kawasaki disease in 1 (0.9%), Behçet disease in 1 (0.9%), iatrogenic injury in 1 (0.9%), arteritis in 1 (0.9%), with a proximal false aneurysm in an aorto-innominate bypass graft in 1 (0.9%), Marfan syndrome in 1 (0.9%), and mural aortic angiosarcoma in 1 (0.9%).
Treatment and outcomes of 120 cases of innominate artery aneurysms.
CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass
Although no death occurred among the four patients managed with endovascular treatment, surgical repair is currently the standard approach to IAA. In fact, endovascular treatment is also limited by the classification of IAA. Endovascular treatment is indicated in patients with an intact origin of the innominate artery, while hybrid endovascular repair (full median sternotomy and debranching) is suitable for patients with an aneurysm of innominate artery and aorta. Although no reports have described such a technique, endovascular treatment may be feasible for patients with an aneurysm of the origin of the innominate artery but not of the aorta.
Midline sternotomy is the exposure technique of choice. Among all 64 patients who underwent surgical repair, full median sternotomy was applied in 53 and partial median sternotomy was applied in 5. Cardiopulmonary bypass may be beneficial in such patients. Among all 64 patients who underwent surgical repair, 20 underwent cardiopulmonary bypass. When cardiopulmonary bypass is unavailable, the simple procedure used in the present case is an excellent choice. Surgical repair is indicated when both the aorta and origin of the innominate artery are involved. The extent of involvement was described in 111 patients: innominate artery origin in 26 (23.4%), innominate origin and aorta in 15 (13.5%), and innominate artery distal to its origin in 70 (63.1%). Among the 64 patients who underwent surgical repair, the operation was completed without cardiopulmonary bypass in 67.2% (43/64), including the current case; the remaining 21 patients (32.8%) with aortic and innominate involvement were managed under cardiopulmonary bypass.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81170283 and No. 81470580) and the Beijing Lab for Cardiovascular Precision Medicine (PXM2017_014226_000037).
