Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin and melatonin agonists in preventing postoperative delirium (POD).

Methods

We conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published through December 2022. The primary outcome was efficacy based on the incidence of POD (POD-I). Secondary outcomes included efficacy and safety according to the length of hospital or intensive care unit stay, in-hospital mortality, and adverse events. Subgroup analyses of POD-I were based on the type and dose of drug (low- and high-dose melatonin, ramelteon), the postoperative period (early or late), and the type of surgery.

Results

In the analysis (16 RCTs, 1981 patients), POD-I was lower in the treatment group than in the control group (risk ratio [RR] = 0.57). POD-I was lower in the high-dose melatonin group than in the control group (RR = 0.41), whereas no benefit was observed in the low-dose melatonin and ramelteon groups. POD-I was lower in the melatonin group in the early postoperative period (RR = 0.35) and in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary surgery (RR = 0.54).

Conclusion

Perioperative melatonin or melatonin agonist treatment suppressed POD without severe adverse events, particularly at higher doses, during the early postoperative period, and after cardiopulmonary surgery.

Keywords

Delirium melatonin meta-analysis postoperative surgery ramelteon perioperative treatment

Introduction

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common neuropsychiatric complication in patients after surgery that is characterized by altered consciousness and cognitive disturbances, and its incidence rates vary from 10% to 60%.^1–3 Elderly patients undergoing surgery are susceptible to POD, resulting in prolonged hospital stays and long-term impaired functional outcomes with significant morbidity and mortality.^4,5 The pathophysiology of POD is multifactorial, involving neuroinflammation, altered neurotransmitter levels, sleep deprivation, and physiological changes induced by drugs, surgery, or general anesthesia.^1,3,6,7

There has been growing interest in the perioperative use of melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) or melatonin agonists because of their antinociceptive, anxiolytic, and sedative effects and their association with neuroinflammatory mechanisms related to POD.^8–11 Melatonin, an endogenous neurohormone produced by the pineal gland, plays an important role in regulating the sleep–wake cycle.¹² Some studies demonstrated that low serum melatonin levels are associated with a higher incidence of POD in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU).^13,14 Therefore, the administration of melatonin or melatonin agonists could represent a cost-effective measure for preventing POD. However, recent clinical studies reported conflicting results regarding the effects of melatonin or melatonin agonists on POD.^15–30

This study examined the efficacy and safety of perioperative treatment with melatonin and melatonin agonists for POD prevention, as measured by the incidence of POD (POD-I), length of hospital stay (LOS-H), length of ICU stay (LOS-ICU), in-hospital mortality, and adverse events. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin or melatonin agonist treatment in the prevention of POD.

Materials and methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials was conducted following the guidelines of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions³¹ and was reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 statement.³² This review was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; registration no. CRD42021245806). Ethical approval was not required for this study because all analyses were based on previously published RCTs.

Literature search

In accordance with the protocol recommended by the Cochrane Collaboration, we systematically searched the literature for RCTs that evaluated the efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin or melatonin agonists in preventing POD in patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other sources to retrieve clinical trials involving adults ( >18 years old) published up to December 2022 with no language restrictions. The search used keywords such as “delirium,” “melatonin,” “melatonin agonist,” “ramelteon,” ”postoperative,” “surgery,” and “randomized,” as outlined in the Supplementary Information (Suppl. 1_Data).

Study selection

We included peer-reviewed RCTs that evaluated the perioperative use of melatonin or melatonin agonists in preventing POD in patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Review articles, observational studies, case reports, letters to the editor, commentaries, conference proceedings, laboratory studies, and other nonrelevant studies were excluded. Two authors (Kwak JS and Kim JW) independently assessed the articles to ensure compliance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements were resolved by discussion or consultation with a third independent investigator (Shin HW).

Data extraction and outcome assessment

The primary outcome of this study was the efficacy of the perioperative use of melatonin or melatonin agonists in preventing POD, as measured by POD-I. The secondary outcomes were the efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin or melatonin agonists, which were assessed using LOS-H, LOS-ICU, in-hospital mortality, and adverse events. Using standardized forms, two authors (You HS and Jang YK) independently extracted the following data: first author’s name, publication year, study country, clinical inclusion criteria, number of patients in the control, melatonin, and melatonin agonist groups, patient age, POD-I, delirium assessment scales used, delirium duration, LOS-H, LOS-ICU, and adverse events. The authors of studies with insufficient or missing data were contacted, and data were extrapolated from figures when necessary to obtain the required information. The control group consisted of patients who received a placebo or no drug, whereas the intervention group (Mel-agonist group) included patients who received melatonin or melatonin agonists during the perioperative period.

Assessment of risk of bias

Two authors (Jang YK and Kim JW) independently evaluated the quality of clinical trials. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the quality of the included RCTs, considering seven potential sources of bias: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and others.³¹

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK). Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous variables, and risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% CIs were obtained for dichotomous variables. All reported P-values were two-sided, and P < 0.05 denoted statistical significance. The chi-square test and I² statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. If heterogeneity was observed (P < 0.05, I² > 50%), a random-effects model was used; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. To evaluate the robustness of the results and the impact of individual studies, we performed a sensitivity analysis by excluding one study at a time to examine its influence on the overall estimate. If significant heterogeneity was observed, we performed a subgroup analysis for POD-I. Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias if more than 10 RCTs were included in the comparison.

Results

Literature search

During the initial electronic search, we identified 34 potentially eligible clinical trials (11 from PubMed, 14 from Embase, 9 from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, 8 from other sources, and 14 with duplicate citations; Figure 1). Finally, we identified 16 RCTs that investigated the efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin or melatonin agonist treatment in patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. All studies were published between 2010 and 2022.

Figure 1.

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 flow diagram for this systematic review, which included searches of databases, registers, and other sources.³²

Study characteristics and data

The clinical characteristics of the included RCTs are presented in Table 1. These 16 RCTs collectively investigated the efficacy and safety of perioperative treatment with melatonin or a melatonin agonist to prevent POD in 1981 patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Most RCTs were single-center studies, whereas three studies were conducted in multiple hospitals.^20,26,28 Melatonin was administered orally in all studies, with eight studies using a dose of 3 mg^{17,18,20,23–26} and five studies using a dose of 5 or 6 mg.^{15,16,27,29,30} The other four studies administered ramelteon at a dose of 8 mg.^19,21,22,28 The patients included in this systematic review underwent various types of surgeries, including breast,²⁷ cardiac,^{17,18,20,23,25} pulmonary,²² orthopedic,^{15,16,19,21,26,30} liver,²⁹ and trauma surgeries.²⁴ The screening tools used to diagnose POD include the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM),^18,21 CAM for the Intensive Care Unit,^{18,20,22–24} Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)-4,²⁶ DSM-5,¹⁹ Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist,²⁵ Abbreviated Mental Test,^15,16,30 Delirium Observation Screening Scale,²⁶ and Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98.²⁸

Table 1.

Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

First author, year of publication	Country	Clinical inclusion criteria (anesthesia methods)	Groups	Regimen	Age (years)	Male sex (%)	Postoperative follow-up time	Scale used to assess delirium	Adverse events
Esmaeili, 2022¹⁵	Iran	Orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, and general surgery (general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia)	C group (n = 49)	Placebo	74.6 ± 6.8	33.3%	2 days	AMT
Esmaeili, 2022¹⁵	Iran		M group (n = 50)	Melatonin 5 mg at night before surgery, and 90 min before surgery	74.6 ± 6.8	40%	2 days	AMT
Fazel, 2022¹⁶	Iran	Orthopedic surgery (spinal anesthesia)	C group (n = 36)	Placebo	71.4 ± 3.6	47.2%	2 days	AMT
Fazel, 2022¹⁶	Iran	Orthopedic surgery (spinal anesthesia)	M group (n = 36)	Melatonin 5 mg at night before surgery and 3 consecutive postoperative days	71.4 ± 3.6	44.4%	2 days	AMT
Jadeh, 2021¹⁷	Iran	On-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (general surgery)	C group (n = 30)	Placebo	62.9 ± 8.0	73.3%	2 days	CAM-ICU	ICU stay
Jadeh, 2021¹⁷	Iran		M group (n = 30)	Melatonin 3 mg at morning of surgery and 2 consecutive postoperative days	60.2 ± 9.5	66.6%	2 days	CAM-ICU	ICU stay
Shi, 2021¹⁸	China	PCI	C group (n = 149)	Placebo	71.6 ± 6.6	59%	7 days	CAMCAM-ICU	MortalityICU stay
Shi, 2021¹⁸	China	PCI	M group (n = 148)	Melatonin 3 mg within 7 days after PCI	71.5 ± 6.7	62%	7 days	CAMCAM-ICU	MortalityICU stay
Oh, 2021¹⁹	USA	Primary or revision hip or knee replacement surgery (general and local anesthesia)	C group (n = 38)	Placebo	75.4 ± 5.0	37%	2 days	DSM-5	Nausea, hypotension, dizziness
Oh, 2021¹⁹	USA		M group (n = 33)	Ramelteon 8 mg (oral) for 3 consecutive nights starting on the night before surgery	74.3 ± 5.5	42%	2 days	DSM-5	Nausea, hypotension, dizziness
Ford, 2020²⁰	Australia (two hospitals)	Coronary artery bypass graft or valve replacement surgery (general anesthesia)	C group (n = 104)	Placebo	69.0 ± 8.3	75%	3 and 7 days	CAM-ICU
Ford, 2020²⁰	Australia (two hospitals)		M group (n = 98)	Melatonin 3 mg (oral or nasogastric tube) for 7 consecutive nights starting 2 nights before surgery	67.6 ± 8.0	81%	3 and 7 days	CAM-ICU
Gupta, 2019²¹	India	Orthopedic or urological surgery (combined spinal–epidural anesthesia)	C group (n = 50)	Placebo	70.6 ± 3.7	66.0%	3 days	CAM
Gupta, 2019²¹	India		M group (n = 50)	Ramelteon 8 mg (oral) at 12 and 1 h before surgery	69.3 ± 4.0	70.0%	3 days	CAM
Jaiswal, 2019²²	USA	Pulmonary thromboembolectomy (general anesthesia)	C group (n = 58)	Placebo	56.1 ± 15.8	50%	8 days	CAM-ICU
Jaiswal, 2019²²	USA	Pulmonary thromboembolectomy (general anesthesia)	M group (n = 59)	Ramelteon 8 mg (oral) starting on the night before surgery and for a maximum of 6 nights in the ICU	58.1 ± 14.1	49.2%	8 days	CAM-ICU
Kasnavieh, 2019²³	Iran	Coronary artery bypass surgery without pump (general anesthesia)	C group (n = 70)	Placebo	64.5	81.7%	3 days	CAM-ICU	Headache, vertigo, confusion, drowsiness, GI disorders, etc.
Kasnavieh, 2019²³	Iran		M group (n = 70)	Melatonin 3 mg (oral) before and after surgery	64.0	87.1%	3 days	CAM-ICU
Abbasi, 2018²⁴	Iran	Medical, surgical, and trauma patients in the ICU (no details provided)	C group (n = 70)	Placebo	No details provided	60.0%	8 days	CAM-ICU
Abbasi, 2018²⁴	Iran		M group (n = 67)	Melatonin 3 mg (oral) for 5 consecutive days	No details provided	53.7%	8 days	CAM-ICU
El-Nagger, 2018²⁵	Egypt	Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (general anesthesia)	C group (n = 25)	Placebo	67.8 ± 4.1	56%	3 days	ICDSC
El-Nagger, 2018²⁵	Egypt	Coronary artery bypass graft surgery (general anesthesia)	M group (n = 25)	Melatonin 3 mg (oral) on the night before surgery, night of operation day, and 3 consecutive days after surgery	66.5 ± 4.7	48%	3 days	ICDSC
de Jonghe, 2014²⁶	Netherlands, (multiple centers)	Acute hip fracture surgery (spinal or general anesthesia)	C group (n = 192)	Placebo	83.4 ± 7.5	62%	8 days	DOSS, DSM-4
de Jonghe, 2014²⁶	Netherlands, (multiple centers)	Acute hip fracture surgery (spinal or general anesthesia)	M group (n = 186)	Melatonin 3 mg (oral) at night for 5 consecutive days starting within 24 h after admission	84.1 ± 8.0	53%	8 days	DOSS, DSM-4
Hansen, 2014²⁷	Denmark	Lumpectomy/mastectomy surgery (no comments)	C group (n = 26)	Placebo	60 (49–68)	No details provided	2 weeks	4 Neuropsychological tests
Hansen, 2014²⁷	Denmark	Lumpectomy/mastectomy surgery (no comments)	M group (n = 26)	Melatonin 6 mg (oral) 1 h before bedtime at 1 week before surgery and 12 weeks after surgery	51 (46–66)	No details provided	2 weeks	4 Neuropsychological tests
Hatta, 2014²⁸	Japan (4 university hospitals and 1 general hospital)	Acute medical/intensive care patients (no comments)	C group (n = 33)	Placebo	78.2 ± 6.6	32%	7 days	DRS-R98
Hatta, 2014²⁸	Japan (4 university hospitals and 1 general hospital)	Acute medical/intensive care patients (no comments)	M group (n = 34)	Ramelteon 8 mg (oral) every night for 7 days	78.3 ± 6.8	48%	7 days	DRS-R98
Nickkholgh, 2011²⁹	Germany	Liver resection surgery (general anesthesia)	C group (n = 23)	No substance administered via a gastric tube after intubation	56 ± 11	47.8%		No details provided	ICU stay, hospital stay
Nickkholgh, 2011²⁹	Germany	Liver resection surgery (general anesthesia)	M group (n = 25)	Melatonin 50 mg/kg (high dose, dissolved in milk and administered via a gastric tube after tracheal intubation)	59 ± 10	68%		No details provided	ICU stay, hospital stay
Sultan, 2010³⁰	Saudi Arabia	Hip arthroplasty (spinal anesthesia)	C group (n = 49)	No treatment	72.3 ± 6.4	45%	3 days	AMT
Sultan, 2010³⁰	Saudi Arabia	Hip arthroplasty (spinal anesthesia)	M group (n = 53)	Melatonin 5 mg (oral) at bedtime and 90 min before surgery	70.4 ± 7.1	45%	3 days	AMT

C, control; M, melatonin; AMT, Abbreviated Mental Test (delirium score < 8); CAM, Confusion Assessment Method; CAM-ICU, Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit; DSM, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; ICDSC, Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (delirium: score ≥ 4); DOSS, Delirium Observation Screening Scale; DRS-R98, Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98; GI, gastrointestinal; ICU, intensive care unit; PCI, percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention.

Assessment of risk of bias

The results of the risk-of-bias assessment, aimed at determining the quality of the included studies, are summarized in the Supplementary Data (Suppl. 2_Data 1). All studies described the allocation concealment and blinding of participants and personnel. The risk of bias regarding selective reporting was unclear for several RCTs^{15–17,21,23,25,27,29,30} because no patients were lost during the study period. Some RCTs exhibited a high risk of bias, particularly because of differences in perioperative conditions (e.g., age, opioid use, and operation time)²⁵ and low POD-I, with missing details regarding the methods used to assess delirium.^15,29

Publication bias

Funnel plots were used to assess publication bias. Symmetrical funnel plots indicated the absence of publication bias (Suppl. 2_Data 2).

Efficacy and safety of interventions

POD-I (number of patients)

POD-I was 16.9% in the Mel-agonist group, versus 25.3% in the control group (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.40–0.81; I² = 61%; P = 0.002; Figures 2 –4). We performed a subgroup analysis based on the type or dose of the drug, postoperative follow-up period, and type of surgery. Subgroup analyses for POD-I were based on the type or dose of drug (low-dose melatonin, 3 mg; high-dose melatonin, ≥5 mg; ramelteon, 8 mg), postoperative period (early period, up to 3 days; late period, >7 days), and type of surgery (cardiopulmonary surgery with a high risk of POD, other surgeries). POD-I was significantly lower in the high-dose melatonin group than in the control group (RR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.24–0.70; I² = 0%; P = 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in POD-I in the low-dose melatonin (RR = 0.62; I² = 75%; P = 0.07) and ramelteon groups (RR = 0.55; I² = 57%; P = 0.25) compared with the control group (Figure 2). In the early postoperative period, the POD-I was significantly lower in the melatonin group than in the control group (RR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.23–0.54; I² = 9%; P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in POD-I between these groups in the late postoperative period (RR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.61–1.20; I² = 46%; P = 0.37; Figure 3). Among patients who underwent cardiac surgery, POD-I was significantly lower in the melatonin group than in the control group (RR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.33–0.89; I² = 68%; P = 0.01). However, among patients who underwent other surgeries, no difference in POD-I was identified between these groups (RR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.31–1.05; I² = 58%; P = 0.07; Figure 4). In the sensitivity analysis based on surgery type, we excluded data from the study by Abbasi et al.²⁴ in the other surgery group. Subsequently, a significant preventive effect on POD-I was observed for melatonin (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.27–0.97; I² = 60%; P = 0.04; Suppl. 2_Data 3). Sensitivity analyses for all other subgroups did not alter the results for POD-I.

Figure 2.

Subgroup analyses for POD-I, based on the type and dose of the drug. Forest plot demonstrating POD-I in the control and Mel-agonist groups (melatonin and melatonin agonist). POD-I, incidence of postoperative delirium.

Figure 3.

Subgroup analyses for POD-I based on the postoperative period (early or late). Forest plot demonstrating POD-I in the control and Mel-agonist groups (melatonin and melatonin agonist). POD-I, incidence of postoperative delirium.

Figure 4.

Subgroup analyses for POD-I based on the type of surgery (cardiopulmonary surgery with a high risk of POD or other surgeries). Forest plot demonstrating POD-I in the control and Mel-agonist groups (melatonin and melatonin agonist). POD-I, incidence of postoperative delirium.

LOS-H and LOS-ICU

There were no significant differences in LOS-H^{18,20,24,26,29} and LOS-ICU^17,22,24,29 between the Mel-agonist and control groups. The MD for LOS-H was −0.11 (95% CI = −2.23 to 2.01; I² = 94%; P = 0.92) with 1062 participants across five studies, and the MD for LOS-ICU was −0.09 (95% CI = −0.60 to 0.42; I² = 0%; P = 0.74) with 362 participants across four studies. Additionally, the in-hospital mortality rate^18,22,24,26 did not differ between the Mel-agonist and control groups (RR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.68–1.67; I² = 0%; P = 0.77) with 973 participants across four studies (Suppl. 2_Data 4–6).

Adverse events

No severe adverse events were reported in any of the included studies. The common drug-induced adverse events were dizziness, nausea, hypotension, headache, and gastrointestinal disorders. No differences were reported between the Mel-agonist and control groups regarding the rates of the following adverse events: dizziness^27,30 (RR = 1.51, I² = 31%; P = 0.71; n = 112), nausea^19,27,29 (RR = 1.26; I² = 0%; P = 0.78; n = 160), hypotension^29,30 (RR =1.69; I² = 0%; P = 0.57; n = 119), headache^23,27 (RR = 0.81, I² = 76%; P = 0.81; n = 181), and gastrointestinal disorders²³ (RR = 2.20; P = 0.12; n = 140; Suppl. 2_Data 7–11).

Discussion

We found that the perioperative use of melatonin or melatonin agonists was effective in preventing POD in patients undergoing anesthesia and surgery. Furthermore, our research indicated that the use of melatonin and melatonin agonists during the perioperative period reduces the incidence of POD-I, particularly in the early postoperative phase (within 3 days), when administered at higher doses (≥5 mg), and in cardiopulmonary surgeries. Notably, our study included the largest number of RCTs reviewed to date on this topic.

The incidence of POD increases with age,²³ with a prevalence ranging from 14% to 24% upon hospital admission and potentially increasing to 56% during hospitalization.²³ Therefore, the early detection of POD, identification of risk factors, and implementation of preventive measures are vital for reducing morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Numerous studies have suggested that an imbalance in melatonin levels, resulting from disrupted circadian rhythms and sleep deprivation, can contribute to POD.^33,34 Sleep disturbances are particularly common among patients undergoing major surgeries, especially among elderly patients, who already have low baseline serum melatonin levels that are further reduced by surgery.³⁵ POD is triggered by brain inflammation and dopaminergic dysfunction.^26,36 The perioperative use of melatonin can prevent POD by regulating circadian rhythms and exerting anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects.^26,36 Melatonin is believed to scavenge free radicals and minimize brain tissue damage.³⁴

Melatonin is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dietary supplement. Adult doses range from 1 to 10 mg. Approximately 30 to 60 minutes are required for the drug to take effect, and its duration of action is approximately 5 hours.^37,38 The bioavailability of melatonin varies widely (10%–56%), and it is subject to hepatic first-pass metabolism, being influenced by factors such as age, weight, and supplement type.³⁸ By contrast, ramelteon, another FDA-approved drug, acts as a melatonin receptor agonist with strong affinity for MT1 and MT2 receptors, effectively reducing wakefulness for up to 6 hours.^19,39 Moreover, ramelteon has been reported to be 10-fold more potent than melatonin in promoting sleep. Its peak concentration is reached within 0.75 hours.⁴⁰ Initially, we anticipated that ramelteon would display significant benefits in preventing POD. However, our review revealed that ramelteon did not have effect on POD-I (Figure 2). Melatonin acts on MT1, MT2, and MT3 receptors in the brain.³⁸ Conversely, ramelteon is a selective agonist of MT1 and MT2 receptors in the brain.⁴¹ It does not bind to MT3, serotonin receptors, or BDZ receptors in the brain, which are believed to be involved in the pathways leading to delirium.^38,42 Ramelteon is a suitable choice for controlling circadian rhythms, but it lacks the anti-inflammatory or antioxidant effects essential for preventing POD. Further research is required to determine the efficacy of ramelteon in preventing POD.

It should be noted that the optimal melatonin dose has yet to be determined. In our review, we found that the efficacy of melatonin in reducing POD-I was particularly notable in the early postoperative period and at higher melatonin doses (≥5 mg). Given its short duration of action (4–8 hours) when administered orally, it might be safer to administer drugs closer to surgery to enhance their effectiveness.^1,37 Generally, the incidence of POD is higher in cardiac surgeries (26%–52%) than in other surgeries,⁴³ possibly because of factors such as hypoperfusion or microemboli during surgery.⁴⁴ Our subgroup analysis revealed a lower POD-I in the melatonin group than in the control group. Furthermore, in the sensitivity analysis based on the type of surgery, data from the study by Abbasi et al.²⁴ were excluded from the analysis, yielding statistically significant results indicating a preventive effect of melatonin on POD-I in other surgeries. The study by Abbasi et al. included patients from various categories, such as medical, surgical, and ICU-admitted trauma patients, which might have influenced the statistical significance of the results in the other surgery analysis.

Orally administered melatonin undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism in the liver and exhibits variable bioavailability in humans.³⁶ Therefore, a higher melatonin dose than that used in daily clinical practice might be required to prevent POD in older patients undergoing surgery.

Unlike other sleep medications, melatonin does not cause sleep withdrawal, dependence, or tolerance. However, it can lead to mild and transient adverse events, such as headache, dizziness, confusion, vivid dreams, hypotension, abdominal pain, and cramps.²⁷ In our review, no significant differences in adverse event rates were observed between the melatonin and control groups. In a study by Ng et al.,⁴² hospitalized patients treated with melatonin exhibited a significantly shorter LOC-ICU.

Three systematic reviews and meta-analyses assessed the effect of perioperative melatonin and melatonin agonist treatment in preventing POD in surgical patients.^45–47 However, Wang et al.⁴⁸ reported contradictory results. They omitted previously reported RCTs,^{23–25,27,28,49} including one RCT that examined melatonin precursors, such as tryptophan,⁴⁹ and included another publication of a conference proceeding.⁵⁰ Han et al.⁴⁶ reported that melatonin and ramelteon effectively prevent POD. However, the number of studies included was small, including two cohort studies and one case–control study. Campbell et al.⁴⁷ also found that perioperative melatonin use reduced POD-I. However, they included three RCTs,^26,29,30 two non-RCTs,^41,51 and one conference proceeding.⁵⁰ In the three previously mentioned reviews,^46–48 methodological heterogeneity might have been present because RCTs and non-RCTs were pooled together in the meta-analysis because of the limited available clinical data.

Our study had multiple limitations. First, the incidence of POD-I was low in some of the included studies, and some studies had small sample sizes, making it challenging to obtain statistically significant results. Second, there were significant differences in patient characteristics, delirium assessment tools, the type of melatonin agonist, the dosage and duration of melatonin agonists, and follow-up periods among the included studies. Additionally, the serum melatonin levels reported in these studies might have been influenced by variations in melatonin regimens, such as manufacturer variability, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and pharmacogenomic heterogeneity.⁵²

In our study, the perioperative use of melatonin and melatonin agonists decreased POD without severe adverse events, particularly at higher melatonin doses, during the early postoperative period, and in cardiopulmonary surgeries. However, the conclusions of this review should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice because of the high heterogeneity of the included studies. Further studies using standardized diagnostic tools and designs with larger numbers of participants are required to confirm these findings.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605241239854 - Supplemental material for Efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605241239854 for Efficacy and safety of perioperative melatonin for postoperative delirium in patients undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Hye Won Shin, Ji Su Kwak, Yoon Ji Choi, Jae Woo Kim, Hae Sun You, Hyun Ju Shin and Yoo Kyung Jang in Journal of International Medical Research

Footnotes

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Shin HW, Choi YJ, You HS, and Shin HJ. Data curation: Shin HW, You HS, Jang YK, and Kim JW. Formal analysis: Shin HW and Choi YJ. Investigation: Jan YK, Kim JW, and Shin HW. Methodology: Shin HW, Choi YJ, and Kawk JS. Statistical analysis of the meta-analysis: Shin HW, Shin HJ, and Jang YK. Validation: Kwak JS and Kim JW. Writing the original draft: Shin HW and You HS. Writing, reviewing, and editing: Shin HW.

Data availability statement

All data used in our study are included in this published article and Supplementary Files S1 and S2.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declare that they have no conflicting interests.

Funding

This study was supported by the Korea University Medicine Research (to Hye Won Shin, grant number: 2022AN0283, . The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Supplementary file

S1 File. Search strategy.

S2 File. Data repository files.

ORCID iDs

HyeWon Shin

Yoon Ji Choi

Hyun Ju Shin

Yoo Kyung Jang

References

Jin

Postoperative delirium: perioperative assessment, risk reduction, and management. Br J Anaesth 2020; 125: 492–504.

Young

Inouye

SK.

Delirium in older people. Bmj 2007; 334: 842–846.

Swarbrick

Partridge

Evidence‐based strategies to reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium: a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2022; 77: 92–101.

Salluh

Wang

Schneider

, et al. Outcome of delirium in critically ill patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bmj 2015; 350: h2538.

Kiely

Marcantonio

Inouye

, et al. Persistent delirium predicts greater mortality. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: 55–61.

Nazemi

Gowd

Carmouche

, et al. Prevention and management of postoperative delirium in elderly patients following elective spinal surgery. Clin Spine Surg 2017; 30: 112–119.

Noah

Almghairbi

Evley

, et al. Preoperative inflammatory mediators and postoperative delirium: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2021; 127: 424–434.

Walker

Gales

MA.

Melatonin receptor agonists for delirium prevention. Ann Pharmacother 2017; 51: 72–78.

Ramos

Patiño

Reiter

, et al. Ischemic brain injury: new insights on the protective role of melatonin. Free Radic Biol Med 2017; 104: 32–53.

10.

Marseglia

D’Angelo

Manti

, et al. Analgesic, anxiolytic and anaesthetic effects of melatonin: new potential uses in pediatrics. Int J Mol Sci 2015; 16: 1209–1220.

11.

Esposito

Paterniti

Mazzon

, et al. Melatonin reduces hyperalgesia associated with inflammation. J Pineal Res 2010; 49: 321–331.

12.

Claustrat

Brun

Chazot

The basic physiology and pathophysiology of melatonin. Sleep Med Rev 2005; 9: 11–24.

13.

Gögenur

Ocak

Altunpinar

, et al. Disturbances in melatonin, cortisol and core body temperature rhythms after major surgery. World J Surg 2007; 31: 290–298.

14.

Shigeta

Yasui

Nimura

, et al. Postoperative delirium and melatonin levels in elderly patients. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 449–454.

15.

Esmaeili

Fanoodi

Ebrahimi

, et al. The Efficacy of Melatonin and Clonidine in Preventing Emergence Delirium in the Elderly Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery, Neurosurgery, and General Surgery: A Placebo-controlled Randomized Clinical Trial. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci 2022; 26: e128831.

16.

Fazel

Mofidian

Mahdian

, et al. The effect of melatonin on prevention of postoperative delirium after lower limb fracture surgery in elderly patients: a randomized double blind clinical trial. Int J Burns Trauma 2022; 12: 161–167.

17.

Zadeh

Janatmakan

Shafaeebejestan

, et al. Effect of melatonin on delirium after on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci 2021; 46: 120–127.

18.

Shi

Effects of Melatonin on Postoperative Delirium After PCI in Elderly Patients: A Randomized, Single-Center, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Heart Surg Forum 2021; 24: E893–E897.

19.

Leoutsakos

Rosenberg

, et al. Effects of Ramelteon on the prevention of postoperative delirium in older patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: The RECOVER randomized controlled trial. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2021; 29: 90–100.

20.

Ford

Flicker

Kelly

, et al. The Healthy Heart‐Mind trial: randomized controlled trial of melatonin for prevention of delirium. J Am Geriatr Soc 2020; 68: 112–119.

21.

Gupta

Verma

Kohli

, et al. The effect of ramelteon on postoperative delirium in elderly patients: A randomised double-blind study. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research 2019; 13: 15.

22.

Jaiswal

Vyas

Heisel

, et al. Ramelteon for prevention of postoperative delirium: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing elective pulmonary thromboendarterectomy. Crit Care Med 2019; 47: 1751–1758.

23.

Kasnavieh

Rezaeipandari

Hadadzadeh

, et al. Effect of Melatonin on Incidence Rate of Delirium in Elderly Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery without a Pump: A Clinical Trial. Elderly Health Journal 2019; 5: 32–39.

24.

Abbasi

Farsaei

Ghasemi

, et al. Potential role of exogenous melatonin supplement in delirium prevention in critically ill patients: a double-blind randomized pilot study. Iran J Pharm Res 2018; 17: 1571–1580.

25.

El-Naggar

Sharaf

Nasr El-Din

, et al. A study of the prophylactic and curative effect of melatonin on postoperative delirium after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in elderly patients. The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine 2018; 72: 4919–4926.

26.

De Jonghe

Van Munster

Goslings

, et al. Effect of melatonin on incidence of delirium among patients with hip fracture: a multicentre, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Cmaj 2014; 186: E547–E556.

27.

Hansen

Madsen

Andersen

, et al. Effect of melatonin on cognitive function and sleep in relation to breast cancer surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Breast Cancer 2014; 2014: 416531.

28.

Hatta

Kishi

Wada

, DELIRIA-J Groupet al. Preventive effects of ramelteon on delirium: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. JAMA Psychiatry 2014; 71: 397–403.

29.

Nickkholgh

Schneider

Sobirey

, et al. The use of high‐dose melatonin in liver resection is safe: first clinical experience. J Pineal Res 2011; 50: 381–388.

30.

Sultan

SS.

Assessment of role of perioperative melatonin in prevention and treatment of postoperative delirium after hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia in the elderly. Saudi J Anaesth 2010; 4: 169–173.

31.

Higgins

Thomas

Chandler

, et al. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. John Wiley & Sons, 2019.

32.

Page

Moher

Bossuyt

, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. Bmj 2021; 372: n160.

33.

Fitzgerald

Adamis

Trzepacz

, et al. Delirium: a disturbance of circadian integrity? Med Hypotheses 2013; 81: 568–576.

34.

Bellapart

Boots

Potential use of melatonin in sleep and delirium in the critically ill. Br J Anaesth 2012; 108: 572–580.

35.

Cronin

Keifer

Davies

, et al. Melatonin secretion after surgery. Lancet 2000; 356: 1244–1245.

36.

De Rooij

Van Munster

BC.

Melatonin deficiency hypothesis in delirium: a synthesis of current evidence. Rejuvenation Res 2013; 16: 273–278.

37.

Harpsøe

Andersen

LPH

Gögenur

, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of melatonin: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2015; 71: 901–909.

38.

Kadva

Johnston

, et al. Variable bioavailability of oral melatonin. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1028–1029.

39.

Liu

Weaver

Jin

, et al. Molecular dissection of two distinct actions of melatonin on the suprachiasmatic circadian clock. Neuron 1997; 19: 91–102.

40.

Neubauer

DN.

A review of ramelteon in the treatment of sleep disorders. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008; 4: 69.

41.

Miyata

Omasa

Fujimoto

, et al. Efficacy of Ramelteon for delirium after lung cancer surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2017; 24: 8–12.

42.

Teoh

Khor

AJ.

The effect of melatonin on delirium in hospitalised patients: A systematic review and meta-analyses with trial sequential analysis. J Clin Anesth 2020; 59: 74–81.

43.

Lin

Chen

Wang

Meta‐analysis of factors which influence delirium following cardiac surgery. J Card Surg 2012; 27: 481–492.

44.

Heo

Ahn

Shin

, et al. Risk factors of elderly patients with postoperative delirium following major abdominal surgery for cancer. Korean J Clin Oncol 2020; 16: 104–109.

45.

Fan

Yuan

, et al. The effect of melatonin on early postoperative cognitive decline in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth 2017; 39: 77–81.

46.

Han

Qin

, et al. Melatonin and its analogues for the prevention of postoperative delirium: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Pineal Res 2020; 68: e12644.

47.

Campbell

Axon

Martin

, et al. Melatonin for the prevention of postoperative delirium in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19: 272.

48.

Wang

Zhou

LY.

Melatonin and melatonergic agents for the prevention of postoperative delirium: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Asian J Surg 2022; 45: 27–32.

49.

Robinson

Dunn

Adams

, et al. Tryptophan supplementation and postoperative delirium—a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2014; 62: 1764–1771.

50.

Yamaguchi

Mihara

Taguri

, et al. Melatonin receptor agonist for the prevention of postoperative delirium in elderly patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Intensive care medicine. Springer 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA, 2014, pp. S246–S246.

51.

Artemiou

Bily

Bilecova-Rabajdova

, et al. Melatonin treatment in the prevention of postoperative delirium in cardiac surgery patients. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol 2015; 12: 126–133.

52.

Vural

Van Munster

De Rooij

SE.

Optimal dosages for melatonin supplementation therapy in older adults: a systematic review of current literature. Drugs Aging 2014; 31: 441–451.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.51 MB