LeeCH. Quantitative T2-mapping using MRI for detection of prostate malignancy: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Radiol2019;60:1181–1189.
2.
RocciaEVidya ShankarRNejiR, et al.Accelerated 3D T2 mapping with dictionary-based matching for prostate imaging. Magn Reson Med2019;81:1795–1805.
3.
CuiYHanSLiuM, et al.Diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer by relaxation maps from synthetic MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging2020;52:552–564.
4.
van HoudtPJAgarwalHKvan BuurenLD, et al.Performance of a fast and high-resolution multi-echo spin-echo sequence for prostate T2 mapping across multiple systems. Magn Reson Med2018;79:1586–1594.
5.
NothUShresthaMSchureJR, et al.Quantitative in vivo T2 mapping using fast spin echo techniques - A linear correction procedure. Neuroimage2017;157:476–485.
6.
NguyenKSarkarAJainAK. Prostate cancer grading: use of graph cut and spatial arrangement of nuclei. IEEE Trans Med Imaging2014;33:2254–2270.
7.
YamauchiFIPenzkoferTFedorovA, et al.Prostate cancer discrimination in the peripheral zone with a reduced field-of-view T(2)-mapping MRI sequence. Magn Reson Imaging2015;33:525–530.
8.
SabouriSChangSDSavdieR, et al.Luminal water imaging: a new MR imaging T2 mapping technique for prostate cancer diagnosis. Radiology2017;284:451–459.
9.
SabouriSFazliLChangSD, et al.MR measurement of luminal water in prostate gland: quantitative correlation between MRI and histology. J Magn Reson Imaging2017;46:861–869.
10.
MaiJAbubrigMLehmannT, et al.T2 mapping in prostate cancer. Invest Radiol2019;54:146–152.
11.
PandaAObmannVCLoWC, et al.MR Fingerprinting and ADC mapping for characterization of lesions in the transition zone of the prostate gland. Radiology2019;292:685–694.
12.
ChatterjeeAWatsonGMyintE, et al.Changes in epithelium, stroma, and lumen space correlate more strongly with Gleason pattern and are stronger predictors of prostate ADC changes than cellularity metrics. Radiology2015;277:751–762.
13.
KumarNMFritzBSternSE, et al.Synthetic MRI of the knee: phantom validation and comparison with conventional MRI. Radiology2018;289:465–477.
14.
JungYGhoSMBackSN, et al.The feasibility of synthetic MRI in breast cancer patients: comparison of T2 relaxation time with multiecho spin echo T2 mapping method. Br J Radiol2018;92:20180479.
15.
TanenbaumLNTsiourisAJJohnsonAN, et al.Synthetic MRI for clinical neuroimaging: results of the magnetic resonance image compilation (MAGiC) prospective, multicenter, multireader trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol2017;38:1103–1110.
16.
MaDGulaniVSeiberlichN, et al.Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature2013;495:187–192.
17.
JiangYMaDSeiberlichN, et al.MR Fingerprinting using fast imaging with steady state precession (FISP) with spiral readout. Magn Reson Med2015;74:1621–1631.
18.
ChatterjeeAHarmathCOtoA. New prostate MRI techniques and sequences. Abdom Radiol (NY2020;45:4052–4062.
19.
YuACBadveCPonskyLE, et al.Development of a combined MR fingerprinting and diffusion examination for prostate cancer. Radiology2017;283:729–738.
