CT angiogram findings in carotid-cavernous fistulas: stratification of imaging features to help radiologists avoid misdiagnosis

Abstract

Background

Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are commonly misdiagnosed on computed tomography angiography (CTA).

Purpose

This study sought to identify the most sensitive and specific imaging features of CCFs on CTA.

Material and Methods

A retrospective review identified 18 consecutive patients suspected of having a CCF on CTA and subsequently underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Two blinded reviewers assessed multiple findings on CTA: cavernous sinus asymmetry/enlargement; arterial-phase contrast in the cavernous sinus; proptosis; pre- or post-septal orbital edema; and dilated regional vasculature. Each was graded as positive, possible, and negative; “possible” was counted as positive. A third blinded reviewer served as a tiebreaker.

Results

Of 18 patients, nine were true-positive and nine were false-positive. Superior ophthalmic vein early enhancement and dilatation had 100.0% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI] 40.0–100.0) and 77.8% specificity (95% CI 44.4–100.0); arterial-phase contrast in the cavernous sinus had 88.9% sensitivity (95% CI 44.4–100.0) and 66.7% specificity (95% CI 18.5–90.1); peri-orbital edema had 88.9% sensitivity (95% CI 35.5–100.0) and 77.8% specificity (95% CI 22.2–100.0). The most specific markers of CCF were superior petrosal sinus and inferior ophthalmic vein dilatation/enhancement (100.0%, 95% CI 88.8–100.0 and 88.9%, 95% CI 44.4–100.0, respectively); the specificity of asymmetric cavernous enlargement was 44.4% (95% CI 11.1–77.7).

Conclusions

Among patients in whom a CCF is suspected on CTA, superior ophthalmic vein dilatation/enhancement and arterial-phase contrast within the cavernous sinus are the most sensitive findings. Asymmetric cavernous sinus enlargement has poor specificity and may result in false-positive diagnoses of CCFs. False positive cases were less likely to have an optimally timed contrast bolus.