Coronary computed tomography in heart transplant patients: detection of significant stenosis and cardiac allograft vasculopathy,image quality,and radiation dose

Abstract

Background

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is an accelerated form of atherosclerosis unique to heart transplant (HTX) patients.

Purpose

To investigate the detection of significant coronary artery stenosis and CAV, determinants of image quality, and the radiation dose in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) of HTX patients with 64-slice multidetector CT (64-MDCT).

Material and Methods

Fifty-two HTX recipients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) were prospectively enrolled and underwent CCTA before ICA with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).

Results

Interpretable CCTA images were acquired in 570 (95%) coronary artery segments ≥2 mm in diameter. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of CCTA for the detection of segments with significant stenosis (lumen reduction ≥50%) on ICA were 100%, 98%, 7.7%, and 100%, respectively. Twelve significant stenoses were located in segments with uninterpretable image quality or vessel diameter <2 mm; only one was eligible for intervention. IVUS detected CAV (maximal intimal thickness ≥0.5 mm) in 33/41 (81%) patients; CCTA and ICA identified CAV (any wall or luminal irregularity) in 18 (44%) and 14 (34%) of these 33 patients, respectively. The mean estimated radiation dose was 19.0 ± 3.4 mSv for CCTA and 5.7 ± 3.3 mSv for ICA (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

CCTA with interpretable image quality had a high negative predictive value for ruling out significant stenoses suitable for intervention. The modest detection of CAV by CCTA implied a limited value in identifying subtle CAV. The high estimated radiation dose for 64-MDCT is of concern considering the need for repetitive examinations in the HTX population.

Keywords

Computed tomography angiography cardiac transplantation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lund

Edwards

Kucheryavaya

et al.

The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-second Official Adult Heart Transplantation Report–2015; Focus Theme: Early Graft Failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015; 34: 1244–1254.

Billingham

. Cardiac transplant atherosclerosis. Transplant Proc 1987; 19: 19–25.

St Goar

Pinto

Alderman

et al.

Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of “angiographically silent” intimal thickening. Circulation 1992; 85: 979–987.

Mehra

Crespo-Leiro

Dipchand

et al.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy-2010. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010; 29: 717–727.

Rickenbacher

Pinto

Lewis

et al.

Prognostic importance of intimal thickness as measured by intracoronary ultrasound after cardiac transplantation. Circulation 1995; 92: 3445–3452.

Kobashigawa

Tobis

Starling

et al.

Multicenter intravascular ultrasound validation study among heart transplant recipients: outcomes after five years. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1532–1537.

Gao

S-Z

Alderman

Schroeder

et al.

Accelerated coronary vascular disease in the heart transplant patient: Coronary arteriographic findings. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12: 334–340.

Khan

Jang

. Evaluation of coronary allograft vasculopathy using multi-detector row computed tomography: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2012; 41: 415–422.

Wever-Pinzon

Romero

Kelesidis

et al.

Coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a meta-analysis of prospective trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1992–2004.

10.

Gregory

Ferencik

Achenbach

et al.

Comparison of sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography to coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound for the detection of transplant vasculopathy. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 877–884.

11.

Sigurdsson

Carrascosa

Yamani

et al.

Detection of transplant coronary artery disease using multidetector computed tomography with adaptative multisegment reconstruction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 772–778.

12.

von Ziegler

Leber

Becker

et al.

Detection of significant coronary artery stenosis with 64-slice computed tomography in heart transplant recipients: a comparative study with conventional coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 25: 91–100.

13.

Austen

Edwards

Frye

et al.

A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51: 5–40.

14.

Mintz

Nissen

Anderson

et al.

American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1478–1492.

15.

Deak

Smal

Kalender

. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 2010; 257: 158–166.

16.

Lobotessi

Karoussou

Neofotistou

et al.

Effective dose to a patient undergoing coronary angiography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2001; 94: 173–176.

17.

Hernandez

Vazquez de Prada

Burgos

et al.

Virtual histology intravascular ultrasound assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy from 1 to 20 years after heart transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2009; 28: 156–162.

18.

Paech

Weston

. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of 64-slice or higher computed tomography angiography as an alternative to invasive coronary angiography in the investigation of suspected coronary artery disease. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2011; 11: 32–32.

19.

Iyengar

Feldman

Cooke

et al.

Detection of coronary artery disease in orthotopic heart transplant recipients with 64-detector row computed tomography angiography. J Heart Lung Transplant 2006; 25: 1363–1366.

20.

Barthélémy

Toledano

Varnous

et al.

Multislice computed tomography to rule out coronary allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012; 31: 1262–1268.

21.

Mittal

Panicker

Mitchell

et al.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation: electrocardiographically gated cardiac CT angiography for assessment. Radiology 2013; 268: 374–381.

22.

Kepka

Sobieszczansk-Malek

Pregowski

et al.

Usefulness of dual-source computed tomography for the evaluation of coronary arteries in heart transplant recipients. Kardiol Pol 2012; 70: 1111–1119.

23.

von Ziegler

Rummler

Kaczmarek

et al.

Detection of significant coronary artery stenosis with cardiac dual-source computed tomography angiography in heart transplant recipients. Transpl Int 2012; 25: 1065–1071.

24.

Schepis

Achenbach

Weyand

et al.

Comparison of dual source computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of coronary arteries at least one year after cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 1351–1356.

25.

Vavere

Arbab-Zadeh

Rochitte

et al.

Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64–detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification—a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. Radiology 2011; 261: 100–108.

26.

Abdulla

Pedersen

Budoff

et al.

Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28: 943–953.

27.

Vanhecke

Madder

Weber

et al.

Development and validation of a predictive screening tool for uninterpretable coronary CT angiography results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 490–497.

28.

Arnoldi

Johnson

Rist

et al.

Adequate image quality with reduced radiation dose in prospectively triggered coronary CTA compared with retrospective techniques. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 2147–2155.

29.

Earls

Berman

Urban

et al.

Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 2008; 246: 742–753.

30.

Hausleiter

Meyer

Hermann

et al.

Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac ct angiography. JAMA 2009; 301: 500–507.

31.

Hausleiter

Meyer

Martuscelli

et al.

Image quality and radiation exposure with prospectively ECG-triggered axial scanning for coronary CT angiography: The multicenter, multivendor, randomized PROTECTION-III study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 5: 484–493.

32.

Scharf

Bink

May

et al.

High-pitch thoracic CT with simultaneous assessment of coronary arteries: effect of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011; 4: 602–609.

33.

Gordic

Husarik

Desbiolles

et al.

High-pitch coronary CT angiography with third generation dual-source CT: limits of heart rate. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014; 30: 1173–1179.

34.

Bastarrika

Broncano

Arraiza

et al.

Systolic prospectively ECG-triggered dual-source CT angiography for evaluation of the coronary arteries in heart transplant recipients. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1887–1894.

35.

Morsbach

Gordic

Desbiolles

et al.

Performance of turbo high-pitch dual-source CT for coronary CT angiography: first ex vivo and patient experience. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 1889–1895.

36.

Tomizawa

Maeda

Akahane

et al.

Coronary CT angiography using the second-generation 320-detector row CT: assessment of image quality and radiation dose in various heart rates compared with the first-generation scanner. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 29: 1613–1618.

37.

Liang

Wang

et al.

Diagnostic performance of 256-row detector coronary CT angiography in patients with high heart rates within a single cardiac cycle: a preliminary study. Clinical Radiology 2017; 72: 694.e697–694.e614.

38.

Hausleiter

Martinoff

Hadamitzky

et al.

Image quality and radiation exposure with a low tube voltage protocol for coronary CT angiography: results of the PROTECTION II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 1113–1123.

39.

Oda

Utsunomiya

Yuki

et al.

Low contrast and radiation dose coronary CT angiography using a 320-row system and a refined contrast injection and timing method. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2015; 9: 19–27.

40.

Moscariello

Takx

RAP

Schoepf

et al.

Coronary CT angiography: image quality, diagnostic accuracy, and potential for radiation dose reduction using a novel iterative image reconstruction technique—comparison with traditional filtered back projection. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 2130–2138.

41.

Leipsic

LaBounty

Heilbron

et al.

Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: The ERASIR Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 655–660.

42.

Takx

RAP

Suchá

Park

et al.

Sublingual nitroglycerin administration in coronary computed tomography angiography: a systematic review. Eur Radiol 2015; 25: 3536–3542.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.11 MB