Triple-split-bolus versus single-bolus CT in abdominal trauma patients: a comparative study

Abstract

Background

Split-bolus computed tomography (CT) is a recent development in trauma imaging. Instead of multiple scans in different contrast phases after a single contrast bolus, split-bolus protocols consist of one single scan of the thorax and abdomen after two or three contrast injections at different points of time.

Purpose

To evaluate and compare image quality and injury findings of a new triple-split-bolus CT (TS-CT) protocol of thorax and abdomen with those of a portal venous phase CT (PV-CT) in the same patient group.

Material and Methods

Trauma patients in 2009–2012 who underwent both the TS-CT initially and a PV-CT during the next six weeks were included. The TS-CT examination was performed as one CT run after application of three contrast boluses (total 175 mL) to enhance renal pelvis and urinary tract, the abdominal organs, and the large arterial vessels. The PV-CT had a fixed delay of 85 s. We measured attenuation in Hounsfield units (HU), evaluated possible organ injury and assessed image quality on a 5-point scale.

Results

Thirty-five patients were included. Attenuation measurements of major abdominal vessels, organs, and renal pelvis were significantly higher with the TS-CT protocol. Performance in organ injury diagnosis and image quality was equal in both protocols.

Conclusion

The overall performance of the TS-CT protocol is similar to the standard PV-CT. Excellent visualization of the arterial tree and the collecting system may eliminate the need for separate scans.

Keywords

Computed tomography intravenous contrast agents trauma

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Stengel

Ottersbach

Matthes

et al.

Accuracy of single-pass whole-body computed tomography for detection of injuries in patients with major blunt trauma. CMAJ 2012; 184: 869–876.

Huber-Wagner

Lefering

Qvick

et al.

Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet 2009; 373: 1455–1461.

Brook

Gourtsoyianni

Brook

et al.

Split-bolus spectral multidetector CT of the pancreas: assessment of radiation dose and tumor conspicuity. Radiology 2013; 269: 139–148.

Gandrup

Nordling

Balslev

et al.

Upper urinary tract tumors: how does the contrast enhancement measured in a split-bolus CTU correlate to histological staging?

Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 761–768.

Scialpi

Palumbo

Pierotti

et al.

Detection and characterization of focal liver lesions by split-bolus multidetector-row CT: diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose in oncologic patients. Anticancer Res 2014; 34: 4335–4344.

Loupatatzis

Schindera

Gralla

et al.

Whole-body computed tomography for multiple traumas using a triphasic injection protocol. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1206–1214.

Nguyen

Platon

Shanmuganathan

et al.

Evaluation of a single-pass continuous whole-body 16-MDCT protocol for patients with polytrauma. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 3–10.

Beenen

Sierink

Kolkman

et al.

Split bolus technique in polytrauma: a prospective study on scan protocols for trauma analysis. Acta Radiol 2015; 56: 873–880.

Yaniv

Portnoy

Simon

et al.

Revised protocol for whole-body CT for multi-trauma patients applying triphasic injection followed by a single-pass scan on a 64-MDCT. Clin Radiol 2013; 68: 668–675.

10.

Moore

Cogbill

Malangoni

et al.

Organ injury scaling, II: Pancreas, duodenum, small bowel, colon, and rectum. J Trauma 1990; 30: 1427–1429.

11.

Moore

Shackford

Pachter

et al.

Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, and kidney. J Trauma 1989; 29: 1664–1666.

12.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

13.

Leung

Jones

. Re: Implementation of a split-bolus single-pass CT protocol at a UK major trauma centre to reduce excess radiation dose in trauma pan-CT. A reply. Clin Radiol 2016; 71: 498–498.

14.

Nellensteijn

ten Duis

Oldenziel

et al.

Only moderate intra- and inter-observer agreement between radiologists and surgeons when grading blunt paediatric hepatic injury on CT scan. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2009; 19: 392–394.

15.

Karlo

Gnannt

Frauenfelder

et al.

Whole-body CT in polytrauma patients: effect of arm positioning on thoracic and abdominal image quality. Emerg Radiol 2011; 18: 285–293.

16.

Gross

Lehnert

Linnau

et al.

Imaging of urinary system trauma. Radiol Clin North Am 2015; 53: 773–788. ix.

17.

Morey

Brandes

Dugi

3rd et al.

Urotrauma: AUA guideline. J Urol 2014; 192: 327–335.

18.

ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 10.2 2016. Available at: https://www.acr.org/∼/media/37D84428BF1D4E1B9A3A2918DA9E27A3.pdf (accessed 1st June 2017).

19.

Boscak

Shanmuganathan

Mirvis

et al.

Optimizing trauma multidetector CT protocol for blunt splenic injury: need for arterial and portal venous phase scans. Radiology 2013; 268: 79–88.

20.

Hakim

Kamanahalli

Dick

et al.

Trauma whole-body MDCT: an assessment of image quality in conventional dual-phase and modified biphasic injection. Br J Radiol 2016; 89: 20160160–20160160.

21.

Gunn

Kool

Lehnert

. Improving outcomes in the patient with polytrauma: a review of the role of whole-body computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 2015; 53: 639–656. vii.

22.

Leung

Sastry

Woo

et al.

Implementation of a split-bolus single-pass CT protocol at a UK major trauma centre to reduce excess radiation dose in trauma pan-CT. Clin Radiol 2015; 70: 1110–1115.