Split bolus technique in polytrauma: a prospective study on scan protocols for trauma analysis

Abstract

Background

For the evaluation of severely injured trauma patients a variety of total body computed tomography (CT) scanning protocols exist. Frequently multiple pass protocols are used. A split bolus contrast protocol can reduce the number of passes through the body, and thereby radiation exposure, in this relatively young and vitally threatened population.

Purpose

To evaluate three protocols for single pass total body scanning in 64-slice multidetector CT (MDCT) on optimal image quality.

Material and Methods

Three total body CT protocols were prospectively evaluated in three series of 10 consecutive trauma patients. In Group A unenhanced brain and cervical spine CT was followed by chest–abdomen–pelvis CT in portovenous phase after repositioning of the arms. Group B underwent brain CT followed without arm repositioning by a one-volume contrast CT from skull base to the pubic symphysis. Group C was identical to Group A, but the torso was scanned with a split bolus technique. Three radiologists independently evaluated protocol quality scores (5-point Likert scale), parenchymal and vascular enhancement and artifacts.

Results

Overall image quality was good (4.10) in Group A, more than satisfactory (3.38) in Group B, and nearly excellent (4.75) in Group C (P < 0.001). Interfering artifacts were mostly reported in Group B in the liver and spleen.

Conclusion

In single pass total body CT scanning a split bolus technique reached the highest overall image quality compared to conventional total body CT and one-volume contrast CT.

Keywords

Adult intravenous contrast agents computed tomography trauma

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Hauser

Bohndorf

. Radiologic emergency management in multiple trauma cases. Radiologe 1998; 38: 637–644.

Ptak

Rhea

Novelline

. Radiation dose is reduced with a single-pass whole-body multi-detector row CT trauma protocol compared with a conventional segmented method: initial experience. Radiology 2003; 229: 902–905.

Philipp

Kubin

Hormann

. Radiological emergency room management with emphasis on multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 2003; 48: 2–4.

Gralla

Spycher

Pignolet

. Evaluation of a 16-MDCT scanner in an emergency department: initial clinical experience and workflow analysis. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 185: 232–238.

Prokop

Hötte

Krüger

. Multislice CT in diagnostic work-up of polytrauma. Unfallchirurg 2006; 109: 545–550.

Rieger

Czermak

El Attal

. Initial clinical experience with a 64-MDCT whole-body scanner in an emergency department: better time management and diagnostic quality? J Trauma 2009; 66: 648–657.

Van Vugt

Deunk

Brink

. Influence of routine computed tomography on predicted survival from blunt thoracoabdominal trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2011; 37: 185–190.

Stengel

Ottersbach

Matthes

. Accuracy of single-pass whole-body computed tomography for detection of injuries in patients with major blunt trauma. CMAJ 2012; 184: 869–876.

Huber-Wagner

Lefering

Qvick

. Effect of whole body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet 2009; 373: 1455–1461.

10.

Brenner

Hall

. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277–2284.

11.

Tien

Tremblay

Rizoli

. Radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging in severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma 2007; 62: 151–156.

12.

Inaba

Branco

Lim

. The increasing burden of radiation exposure in the management of trauma patients. J Trauma 2011; 70: 1366–1370.

13.

Awai

Imuta

Utsunomiya

. Contrast enhancement for whole-body screening using multidetector row helical CT: comparison between uniphasic and biphasic injection protocols. Radiat Med 2004; 22: 303–309.

14.

Fanucci

Fiaschetti

Rotili

. Whole body 16-row multislice CT in emergency room: effects of different protocols on scanning time, image quality and radiation exposure. Emerg Radiol 2007; 13: 251–257.

15.

Saltzherr

Bakker

Beenen

. Randomized clinical trial comparing the effect of computed tomography in the trauma room versus the radiology department on injury outcomes. Br J Surg 2012; 99(Suppl. 1): 105–113.

16.

Fung Kon Jin

Dijkgraaf

Alons

. Improving CT scan capabilities with a new trauma workflow concept: Simulation of hospital logistics using different CT scanner scenarios. Eur J Radiol 2011; 80: 504–509.

17.

Landis

Koch

. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159–174.

18.

Van Der Molen

Cowan

Mueller-Lisse

. CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 4–17.

19.

Gandrup KL, Nordling J, Balslev I, et al. Upper urinary tract tumors: how does the contrast enhancement measured in a split-bolus CTU correlate to histological staging? Acta Radiol 2014; 55: 761–768.

20.

Loupatatzis

Schindera

Gralla

. Whole-body computed tomography for multiple traumas using a triphasic injection protocol. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 1206–1214.

21.

Yaniv

Portnoy

Simon

. Revised protocol for whole-body CT for multi-trauma patients applying triphasic injection followed by a single-pass scan on a 64-MDCT. Clin Radiol 2013; 68: 668–675.

22.

Nguyen

Platon

Shanmuganathan

. Evaluation of a single-pass continuous whole-body 16-MDCT protocol for patients with polytrauma. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 192: 3–10.

23.

Boscak

Shanmuganathan

Mirvis

. Optimizing trauma multidetector CT protocol for blunt splenic injury: need for arterial and portal venous phase scans. Radiology 2013; 268: 79–88.

24.

Sliker

Shanmuganathan

Mirvis

. Diagnosis of blunt cerebrovascular injuries with 16-MDCT: accuracy of whole-body MDCT compared with neck MDCT angiography. Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 790–799.

25.

Chokshi

Munera

Rivas

. 64-MDCT angiography of blunt vascular injuries of the neck. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: W309–W315.

26.

Borisch

Boehme

Butz

. Screening for carotid injury in trauma patients: image quality of 16-detector-row computed tomography angiography. Acta Radiol 2007; 48: 798–805.

27.

Biffl

Egglin

Benedetto

. Sixteen-slice computed tomographic angiography is a reliable noninvasive screening test for clinically significant blunt cerebrovascular injuries. J Trauma 2006; 60: 745–752.

28.

Roos

Desbiolles

Willmann

. Multidetector-row helical CT: analysis of time management and workflow. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 680–685.

29.

Heyer

Rduch

Kagel

. Prospective randomized trial of a modified standard multislice CT protocol for the evaluation of multiple trauma patients. Rofo 2005; 177: 242–249.

30.

Wurmb

Frühwald

Hopfner

. Whole-body multislice computed tomography as the first line diagnostic tool in patients with multiple injuries: the focus on time. J Trauma 2009; 66: 658–665.

31.

Brink

de Lange

Oostveen

. Arm raising at exposure-controlled multidetector trauma CT of thoracoabdominal region: higher image quality, lower radiation dose. Radiology 2008; 249: 661–670.

32.

Bayer

Pache

Strohm

. Influence of arm positioning on radiation dose for whole body computed tomography in trauma patients. J Trauma 2011; 70: 900–905.

33.

Karlo

Gnannt

Frauenfelder

. Whole-body CT in polytrauma patients: effect of arm positioning on thoracic and abdominal image quality. Emerg Radiol 2011; 18: 285–293.

34.

Sierink

Saltzherr

Beenen

. A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of immediate total-body CT scanning in trauma patients (REACT-2). BMC Emerg Med 2012; 12: 4–4.