Dual-energy CT with virtual monochromatic images and metal artifact reduction software for reducing metallic dental artifacts

Abstract

Background

Metallic dental prostheses may degrade image quality on head and neck computed tomography (CT). However, there is little information available on the use of dual-energy CT (DECT) and metal artifact reduction software (MARS) in the head and neck regions to reduce metallic dental artifacts.

Purpose

To assess the usefulness of DECT with virtual monochromatic imaging and MARS to reduce metallic dental artifacts.

Material and Methods

DECT was performed using fast kilovoltage (kV)-switching between 80-kV and 140-kV in 20 patients with metallic dental prostheses. CT data were reconstructed with and without MARS, and with synthesized monochromatic energy in the range of 40–140-kiloelectron volt (keV). For quantitative analysis, the artifact index of the tongue, buccal, and parotid areas was calculated for each scan. For qualitative analysis, two radiologists evaluated 70-keV and 100-keV images with and without MARS for tongue, buccal, parotid areas, and metallic denture. The locations and characteristics of the MARS-related artifacts, if any, were also recorded.

Results

DECT with MARS markedly reduced metallic dental artifacts and improved image quality in the buccal area (P < 0.001) and the tongue (P < 0.001), but not in the parotid area. The margin and internal architecture of the metallic dentures were more clearly delineated with MARS (P < 0.001) and in the higher-energy images than in the lower-energy images (P = 0.042). MARS-related artifacts most commonly occurred in the deep center of the neck.

Conclusion

DECT with MARS can reduce metallic dental artifacts and improve delineation of the metallic prosthesis and periprosthetic region.

Keywords

Dual energy computed tomography (CT)virtual monochromatic imaging metallic dental artifact metal artifact reduction software

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

De Crop

Casselman

Van Hoof

et al.

Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference?

Neuroradiology 2015; 57: 841–849.

Gong

Meyer

et al.

Clinical evaluation of the normalized metal artefact reduction algorithm caused by dental fillings in CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013; 42: 20120105–20120105.

Lee

Kim

Lee

et al.

Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multi-detector CT. Radiographics 2007; 27: 791–803.

Wang

Qian

et al.

Metal artifacts reduction using monochromatic images from spectral CT: evaluation of pedicle screws in patients with scoliosis. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: e360–366.

Kuchenbecker

Faby

Sawall

et al.

Dual energy CT: how well can pseudo-monochromatic imaging reduce metal artifacts?

Med Phys 2015; 42: 1023–1036.

Lee

Park

Song

et al.

Metal artefact reduction in gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy CT with and without metal artefact reduction software. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 1331–1340.

Verburg

Seco

. CT metal artifact reduction method correcting for beam hardening and missing projections. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57: 2803–2818.

Pomerantz

Kamalian

Zhang

et al.

Virtual monochromatic reconstruction of dual-energy unenhanced head CT at 65-75 keV maximizes image quality compared with conventional polychromatic CT. Radiology 2013; 266: 318–325.

Nahmias

Lemmens

Faul

et al.

Does reducing CT artifacts from dental implants influence the PET interpretation in PET/CT studies of oral cancer and head and neck cancer?

J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 1047–1052.

10.

Kotsenas

Michalak

DeLone

et al.

CT metal artifact reduction in the spine: can an iterative reconstruction technique improve visualization?

Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 2184–2190.

11.

Bamberg

Dierks

Nikolaou

et al.

Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1424–1429.

12.

Zhao

Liu

et al.

Gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy computed tomography: a novel technique to determine urinary stone composition. Urology 2013; 81: 727–730.

13.

Yagi

Ueguchi

Koizumi

et al.

Gemstone spectral imaging: determination of CT to ED conversion curves for radiotherapy treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2013; 14: 173–186.

14.

Lin

Miao

et al.

High-definition CT Gemstone spectral imaging of the brain: initial results of selecting optimal monochromatic image for beam-hardening artifacts and image noise reduction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35: 294–297.

15.

Matsumoto

Jinzaki

Tanami

et al.

Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: improved image quality as compared with that obtained with conventional 120-kVp CT. Radiology 2011; 259: 257–262.

16.

Kaza

Platt

Cohan

et al.

Dual-energy CT with single- and dual-source scanners: current applications in evaluating the genitourinary tract. Radiographics 2012; 32: 353–369.

17.

Zhou

Zhao

Luo

et al.

Monoenergetic imaging of dual-energy CT reduces artifacts from implanted metal orthopedic devices in patients with factures. Acad Radiol 2011; 18: 1252–1257.

18.

Bongers

Schabel

Thomas

et al.

Comparison and combination of dual-energy- and iterative-based metal artefact reduction on hip prosthesis and dental implants. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0143584–e0143584.

19.

Wichmann

Noske

Kraft

et al.

Virtual monoenergetic dual-energy computed tomography: optimization of kiloelectron volt settings in head and neck cancer. Invest Radiol 2014; 49: 735–741.

20.

Toepker

Czerny

Ringl

et al.

Can dual-energy CT improve the assessment of tumor margins in oral cancer?

Oral Oncol 2014; 50: 221–227.

21.

Brook

Gourtsoyianni

Brook

et al.

Spectral CT with metal artifacts reduction software for improvement of tumor visibility in the vicinity of gold fiducial markers. Radiology 2012; 263: 696–705.

22.

Barrett

Keat

. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics 2004; 24: 1679–1691.

23.

Douglas-Akinwande

Buckwalter

Rydberg

et al.

Multichannel CT: evaluating the spine in postoperative patients with orthopedic hardware. Radiographics 2006; 26(Suppl. 1): S97–110.