Triple rule-out CT angiography protocol with restricting field of view for detection of pulmonary thromboembolism and aortic dissection in emergency department patients: simulation of modified CT protocol for reducing radiation dose

Abstract

Background

Triple rule-out computed tomography (TRO CT) is a CT protocol designed to simultaneously evaluate the coronary, aorta, and pulmonary arteries.

Purpose

To evaluate potential diagnostic performance of TRO CT with restricted volume coverage for detection of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) and aortic dissection (AD).

Material and Methods

This study included 1224 consecutive patients with acute chest pain who visited the emergency department and underwent TRO CT using a 128-slice dual-source CT. Image data were reconstructed according to the display field of view (DFOV) of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) and TRO CT protocols in each patient. The presence of PTE and AD was evaluated by independent observers in each DFOV. The radiation dose was calculated to evaluate the potential benefits by restricting z-axis coverage to cardiac scan range instead of the whole thorax.

Results

Among all patients, 22 cases with PTE (1.9%) and nine cases with AD (0.8%) were found. Except for one PTE case, all cases were detected on both DFOV of TRO CT and CCTA. Mean effective dose for evaluation of entire thorax and cardiac scan coverage were 5.9 ± 1.1 mSv and 3.5 ± 0.7 mSv, respectively.

Conclusion

Isolated PTE and AD outside the CCTA DFOV rarely occur. Therefore, modified TRO CT protocol using cardiac scan coverage can be adopted to detect PTE and AD with reduced radiation dose.

Keywords

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)coronary artery disease pulmonary thromboembolism aortic dissection radiation dose

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Lee

Goldman

. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1187–1195.

Rusnak

Stair

Hansen

, et al. Litigation against the emergency physician: common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction. Ann Emerg Med 1989; 18: 1029–1034.

Sato

Matsumoto

Ichikawa

, et al. Efficacy of multislice computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circ J 2005; 69: 1047–1051.

Hoffmann

Nagurney

Moselewski

, et al. Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 2006; 114: 2251–2260.

Bastarrika

Thilo

Headden

, et al. Cardiac CT in the assessment of acute chest pain in the emergency department. Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 397–409.

Manheimer

Peters

Wolff

, et al. Comparison of radiation dose and image quality of triple-rule-out computed tomography angiography between conventional helical scanning and a strategy incorporating sequential scanning. Am J Cardiol 2011; 107: 1093–1098.

Madder

Raff

Hickman

, et al. Comparative diagnostic yield and 3-month outcomes of “triple rule-out” and standard protocol coronary CT angiography in the evaluation of acute chest pain. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011; 5: 165–171.

Kohn

Kwan

Gupta

, et al. Prevalence of acute myocardial infarction and other serious diagnoses in patients presenting to an urban emergency department with chest pain. J Emerg Med 2005; 29: 383–390.

Shrimpton

Hillier

Lewis

, et al. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 2006; 79: 968–980.

10.

Lee

Song

Yoo

, et al. Rarity of isolated pulmonary embolism and acute aortic syndrome occurring outside of the field of view of dedicated coronary CT angiography. Acta Radiol 2011; 52: 378–384.

11.

Remy-Jardin

Baghaie

Bonnel

, et al. Thoracic helical CT: influence of subsecond scan time and thin collimation on evaluation of peripheral pulmonary arteries. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 1297–1303.

12.

Schultz

Brasel

Washington

, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in moderately to severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma 2004; 56: 727–731; discussion 731–723.

13.

Musset

Parent

Meyer

, et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 2002; 360: 1914–1920.

14.

Eyer

Goodman

Washington

. Clinicians’ response to radiologists’ reports of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism or inconclusive interpretation of pulmonary embolism using MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 623–628.

15.

Chiles

Carr

. Vascular diseases of the thorax: evaluation with multidetector CT. Radiol Clin North Am 2005; 43: 543–569, viii.

16.

Williams

Lee

Hamilton

, et al. The dissected aorta: part III. Anatomy and radiologic diagnosis of branch-vessel compromise. Radiology 1997; 203: 37–44.

17.

Williams

Lee

Hamilton

, et al. The dissected aorta: percutaneous treatment of ischemic complications–principles and results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1997; 8: 605–625.

18.

Stolzmann

Leschka

Scheffel

, et al. Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. Radiology 2008; 249: 71–80.

19.

Durmus

Rogalla

Lembcke

, et al. Low-dose triple-rule-out using 320-row-detector volume MDCT–less contrast medium and lower radiation exposure. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1416–1423.

20.

Johnson

Nikolaou

Wintersperger

, et al. Optimization of contrast material administration for electrocardiogram-gated computed tomographic angiography of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007; 31: 265–271.

21.

Vrachliotis

Bis

Haidary

, et al. Atypical chest pain: coronary, aortic, and pulmonary vasculature enhancement at biphasic single-injection 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007; 243: 368–376.

22.

Stillman

Oudkerk

Ackerman

, et al. Use of multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of acute chest pain: a consensus statement of the North American Society of Cardiac Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2007; 23: 415–427.

23.

Frauenfelder

Appenzeller

Karlo

, et al. Triple rule-out CT in the emergency department: protocols and spectrum of imaging findings. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 789–799.