BudoffM.J.CohenM.C.GarciaM.J.ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and TrainingJ Am Coll Cardiol2005; 46:383–402.
2.
JacobsJ.E.BoxtL.M.DesjardinsB.ACR practice guideline for the performance and interpretation of cardiac computed tomography (CT)J Am Coll Radiol2006; 3:677–685.
3.
BluemkeD.A.AchenbachS.BudoffM.Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the youngCirculation2008; 118:586–606.
4.
SchroederS.AchenbachS.BengelF.Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear CardiologyEur Heart J2008; 29:531–556.
5.
GreenlandP.BonowR.O.BrundageB.H.ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Clinical Expert Consensus Task Force (ACCF/AHA Writing Committee to Update the 2000 Expert Consensus Document on Electron Beam Computed Tomography)Circulation2007; 115:402–426.
6.
SangiorgiG.RumbergerJ.A.SeversonA.Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodologyJ Am Coll Cardiol1998; 31:126–133.
7.
BeckerC.R.KleffelT.CrispinA.Coronary artery calcium measurement: agreement of multirow detector and electron beam CTAJR Am J Roentgenol2001; 176:1295–1298.
8.
DaniellA.L.WongN.D.FriedmanJ.D.Concordance of coronary artery calcium estimates between MDCT and electron beam tomographyAJR Am J Roentgenol2005; 185:1542–1545.
9.
DetranoR.C.AndersonM.NelsonJ.Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility—MESA studyRadiology2005; 236:477–484.
10.
VliegenthartR.OudkerkM.HofmanA.Coronary calcification improves cardiovascular risk prediction in the elderlyCirculation2005; 112:572–577.
11.
AradY.SpadaroL.A.GoodmanK.Prediction of coronary events with electron beam computed tomographyJ Am Coll Cardiol2000; 36:1253–1260.
12.
GreenlandP.LaBreeL.AzenS.P.Coronary artery calcium score combined with Framingham score for risk prediction in asymptomatic individualsJAMA2004; 291:210–215.
13.
KondosG.T.HoffJ.A.SevrukovA.Electron-beam tomography coronary artery calcium and cardiac events: a 37-month follow-up of 5635 initially asymptomatic low- to intermediate-risk adultsCirculation2003; 107:2571–2576.
14.
LaMonteM.J.FitzGeraldS.J.ChurchT.S.Coronary artery calcium score and coronary heart disease events in a large cohort of asymptomatic men and womenAm J Epidemiol2005; 162:421–429.
15.
TaylorA.J.BindemanJ.FeuersteinI.Coronary calcium independently predicts incident premature coronary heart disease over measured cardiovascular risk factors: mean three-year outcomes in the Prospective Army Coronary Calcium (PACC) projectJ Am Coll Cardiol2005; 46:807–814.
16.
WilsonP.W.D'AgostinoR.B.LevyD.Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categoriesCirculation1998; 97:1837–1847.
17.
AssmannG.CullenP.SchulteH.Simple scoring scheme for calculating the risk of acute coronary events based on the 10-year follow-up of the prospective cardiovascular Munster (PROCAM) studyCirculation2002; 105:310–315.
18.
ConroyR.M.PyöräläK.FitzgeraldA.P.Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE projectEur Heart J2003; 24:987–1003.
19.
NaghaviM.FalkE.HechtH.S.From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient—part III: executive summary of the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force reportAm J Cardiol2006; 98:2H–15H.
20.
O'RourkeR.A.BrundageB.H.FroelicherV.F.American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Expert Consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery diseaseCirculation2000; 102:126–140.
21.
BudoffM.J.AchenbachS.BlumenthalR.S.Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical CardiologyCirculation2006; 114:1761–1791.
22.
HoriguchiJ.MatsuuraN.YamamotoH.Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness images on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CTEur Radiol2008; 18:209–216.
23.
GroenJ.M.GreuterM.J.VliegenthartR.Calcium scoring using 64-slice MDCT, dual source CT and EBT: a comparative phantom studyInt J Cardiovasc Imaging2008; 24:547–556.
24.
AchenbachS.GieslerT.RopersD.Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomographyCirculation2001; 103:2535–2538.
25.
KoppA.F.SchroederS.KuettnerA.Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patientsEur Heart J2002; 23:1714–1725.
26.
HamonM.MorelloR.RiddellJ.W.Coronary arteries: diagnostic performance of 16- versus 64-section spiral CT compared with invasive coronary angiography—meta-analysisRadiology2007; 245:720–731.
27.
VanhoenackerP.K.Heijenbrok-KalM.H.Van HesteR.Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT angiography for assessment of coronary artery disease: meta-analysisRadiology2007; 244:419–428.
28.
LeschkaS.AlkadhiH.PlassA.Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experienceEur Heart J2005; 26:1482–1487.
29.
RopersD.RixeJ.AndersK.Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenosesAm J Cardiol2006; 97:343–348.
30.
LeberA.W.KnezA.von ZieglerF.Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasoundJ Am Coll Cardiol2005; 46:147–154.
31.
MolletN.R.CademartiriF.van MieghemC.A.High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiographyCirculation2005; 112:2318–2323.
32.
OngT.K.ChinS.P.LiewC.K.Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: influence of calcificationAm Heart J15120061323 e1-6
33.
RaffG.L.GallagherM.J.O'NeillW.W.Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomographyJ Am Coll Cardiol2005; 46:552–557.
34.
SchuijfJ.D.PundziuteG.JukemaJ.W.Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery diseaseAm J Cardiol2006; 98:145–148.
35.
WeustinkA.C.MeijboomW.B.MolletN.R.Reliable high-speed coronary computed tomography in symptomatic patientsJ Am Coll Cardiol2007; 50:786–794.
36.
EharaM.SurmelyJ.F.KawaiM.Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiographyCirc J2006; 70:564–571.
37.
NikolaouK.KnezA.RistC.Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart diseaseAJR Am J Roentgenol2006; 187:111–117.
38.
MeijboomW.B.MolletN.R.Van MieghemC.A.Pre-operative computed tomography coronary angiography to detect significant coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac valve surgeryJ Am Coll Cardiol2006; 48:1658–1665.
39.
MühlenbruchG.SeyfarthT.SooC.S.Diagnostic value of 64-slice multi-detector row cardiac CTA in symptomatic patientsEur Radiol2007; 17:603–609.
40.
PlassA.GrünenfelderJ.LeschkaS.Coronary artery imaging with 64-slice computed tomography from cardiac surgical perspectiveEur J Cardiothorac Surg2006; 30:109–116.
41.
OngK.ChinS.P.ChanW.L.Feasibility and accuracy of 64-row MDCT coronary imaging from a centre with early experience: a review and comparison with established centresMed J Malaysia2005; 60:629–636.
42.
SunZ.LinC.DavidsonR.Diagnostic value of 64-slice CT angiography in coronary artery disease: a systematic reviewEur J Radiol2008; 67:78–84.
43.
MowattG.CookJ.A.HillisG.S.64-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysisHeart2008; 94:1386–1393.
44.
SteinP.D.YaekoubA.Y.MattaF.64-slice CT for diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic reviewAm J Med2008; 121:715–725.
45.
PhillipsW.C.ScottJ.A.BlasczcynskiG.Statistics for diagnostic procedures. I. How sensitive is “sensitivity”; how specific is “specificity”?AJR Am J Roentgenol1983; 140:1265–1270.
BrennerH.GefellerO.Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalenceStat Med1997; 16:981–991.
48.
HusmannL.SchepisT.ScheffelH.Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low, intermediate, and high cardiovascular riskAcad Radiol2008; 15:452–461.
49.
MeijboomW.B.van MieghemC.A.MolletN.R.64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery diseaseJ Am Coll Cardiol2007; 50:1469–1475.
50.
MustoC.SimonP.NicolE.64-multislice computed tomography in consecutive patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease: initial single center experienceInt J Cardiol2007; 114:90–97.
51.
BrodoefelH.ReimannA.BurgstahlerC.Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracyEur J Radiol2008; 66:134–141.
52.
BudoffM.J.DoweD.JollisJ.G.Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without know coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trialJ Am Coll Cardiol2008; 52:1724–1732.
53.
DelhayeD.Remy-JardinM.RozelC.Coronary artery imaging during preoperative CT staging: preliminary experience with 64-slice multidetector CT in 99 consecutive patientsEur Radiol2007; 17:591–602.
54.
BurgstahlerC.ReimannA.BrodoefelH.Quantitative parameters to compare image quality of non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-slice, 64-slice and dual-source computed tomographyEur Radiol2009; 19:584–590.
55.
LeschkaS.WildermuthS.BoehmT.Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image qualityRadiology2006; 241:378–385.
56.
LeschkaS.ScheffelH.HusmannL.Effect of decrease in heart rate variability on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-MDCT coronary angiographyAJR Am J Roentgenol2008; 190:1583–1590.
57.
UrenN.G.MelinJ.A.De BruyneB.Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosisN Engl J Med1994; 330:1782–1788.
58.
MeijboomW.B.Van MieghemC.A.van PeltN.Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable anginaJ Am Coll Cardiol2008; 52:636–643.
59.
GaemperliO.SchepisT.ValentaI.Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECTRadiology2008; 248:414–423.
60.
SchuijfJ.D.WijnsW.JukemaJ.W.Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imagingJ Am Coll Cardiol2006; 48:2508–2514.
61.
ScholteA.J.SchuijfJ.D.KharagjitsinghA.V.Different manifestations of coronary artery disease by stress SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging, coronary calcium scoring, and multislice CT coronary angiography in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitusJ Nucl Cardiol2008; 15:503–509.
62.
HerzogC.ZwernerP.L.DollJ.R.Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiographyRadiology2007; 244:112–120.
63.
LeberA.W.JohnsonT.BeckerA.Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source multi-slice CT-coronary angiography in patients with an intermediate pretest likelihood for coronary artery diseaseEur Heart J2007; 28:2354–2360.
64.
BuschS.JohnsonT.R.NikolaouK.Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiographyEur Radiol2007; 17:1445–1451.
65.
HusmannL.GaemperliO.SchepisT.Accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography with computed tomography and its dependency on plaque composition: plaque composition and accuracy of cardiac CTInt J Cardiovasc Imaging2008; 24:895–904.
66.
TobisJ.AzarbalB.SlavinL.Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratoryJ Am Coll Cardiol2007; 49:839–848.
67.
SunJ.ZhangZ.Q.SunJ.Y.Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasoundAJR Am J Roentgenol2008; 190:748–754.
68.
GregoryS.A.FerencikM.AchenbachS.Comparison of sixty-four-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography to coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound for the detection of transplant vasculopathyAm J Cardiol2006; 98:877–884.
69.
SatoA.HiroeM.TamuraM.Quantitative measures of coronary stenosis severity by 64-Slice CT angiography and relation to physiologic significance of perfusion in nonobese patients: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imagingJ Nucl Med2008; 49:564–572.
70.
CaussinC.LarchezC.GhostineS.Comparison of coronary minimal lumen area quantification by sixty-four-slice computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound for intermediate stenosisAm J Cardiol2006; 98:871–876.
71.
LeberA.W.BeckerA.KnezA.Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography to classify and quantify plaque volumes in the proximal coronary system: a comparative study using intravascular ultrasoundJ Am Coll Cardiol2006; 47:672–677.
72.
OtsukaM.BruiningN.Van PeltN.C.Quantification of coronary plaque by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparison with quantitative intracoronary ultrasoundInvest Radiol2008; 43:314–321.
73.
HoffmannU.MoselewskiF.NiemanK.Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomographyJ Am Coll Cardiol2006; 47:1655–1662.
74.
HuangW.C.WuM.T.ChiouK.R.Assessing culprit lesions and active complex lesions in patients with early acute myocardial infarction by multidetector computed tomographyCirc J2008; 72:1806–1813.
75.
NakazawaG.TanabeK.OnumaY.Efficacy of culprit plaque assessment by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography to predict transient no-reflow phenomenon during percutaneous coronary interventionAm Heart J2008; 155:1150–1157.
76.
MotoyamaS.KondoT.SaraiM.Multislice computed tomographic characteristics of coronary lesions in acute coronary syndromesJ Am Coll Cardiol2007; 50:319–326.
77.
TanakaA.ShimadaK.YoshidaK.Non-invasive assessment of plaque rupture by 64-slice multidetector computed tomography—comparison with intravascular ultrasoundCirc J2008; 72:1276–1281.
78.
ChoiB.J.KangD.K.TahkS.J.Comparison of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with spectral analysis of intravascular ultrasound backscatter signals for characterizations of noncalcified coronary arterial plaquesAm J Cardiol2008; 102:988–993.
79.
MaintzD.SeifarthH.RaupachR.64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stentsEur Radiol2006; 16:818–826.
HechtH.S.ZaricM.JelninV.Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteriesAm J Cardiol2008; 101:820–824.
82.
CarrabbaN.BamoshmooshM.CarusiL.M.Usefulness of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for detecting drug eluting in-stent restenosisAm J Cardiol2007; 100:1754–1758.
83.
CarboneI.FranconeM.AlgeriE.Non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery stent patency with retrospectively ECG-gated 64-slice CT angiographyEur Radiol2008; 18:234–243.
84.
DasK.M.El-MenyarA.A.SalamA.M.Contrast-enhanced 64-section coronary multidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessmentRadiology2007; 245:424–432.
85.
SchuijfJ.D.PundziuteG.JukemaJ.W.Evaluation of patients with previous coronary stent implantation with 64-section CTRadiology2007; 245:416–423.
86.
OncelD.OncelG.KaracaM.Coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis: determination with 64-section multidetector CT coronary angiography—initial experienceRadiology2007; 242:403–409.
87.
RixeJ.AchenbachS.RopersD.Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomographyEur Heart J2006; 27:2567–2572.
88.
CademartiriF.SchuijfJ.D.PuglieseF.Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosisJ Am Coll Cardiol2007; 49:2204–2210.
89.
EharaM.KawaiM.SurmelyJ.F.Diagnostic accuracy of coronary in-stent restenosis using 64-slice computed tomography: comparison with invasive coronary angiographyJ Am Coll Cardiol2007; 49:951–959.
90.
RistC.von ZieglerF.NikolaouK.Assessment of coronary artery stent patency and restenosis using 64-slice computed tomographyAcad Radiol2006; 13:1465–1473.
91.
SunZ.DavidsonR.LinC.H.Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis: a systematic reviewEur J Radiol2007 In press
92.
PouleurA.C.le Polain de WarouxJ.B.PasquetA.Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographyRadiology2007; 244:745–754.
93.
MalaguttiP.NiemanK.MeijboomW.B.Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteriesEur Heart J2007; 28:1879–1885.
94.
PacheG.SaueressigU.FrydrychowiczA.Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass graftsEur Heart J2006; 27:976–980.
95.
DikkersR.WillemsT.P.TioR.A.The benefit of 64-MDCT prior to invasive coronary angiography in symptomatic post-CABG patientsInt J Cardiovasc Imaging2007; 23:369–377.
96.
RopersD.PohleF.K.KuettnerA.Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography in patients after bypass surgery using 64-slice spiral computed tomography with 330-ms gantry rotationCirculation2006; 114:2334–2341 quiz 2334
97.
MeyerT.S.MartinoffS.HadamitzkyM.Improved noninvasive assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts with 64-slice computed tomographic angiography in an unselected patient populationJ Am Coll Cardiol2007; 49:946–950.
98.
JabaraR.ChronosN.KleinL.Comparison of multidetector 64-slice computed tomographic angiography to coronary angiography to assess the patency of coronary artery bypass graftsAm J Cardiol2007; 99:1529–1534.
99.
OnumaY.TanabeK.ChiharaR.Evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts and native coronary arteries using 64-slice multidetector computed tomographyAm Heart J2007; 154:519–526.
100.
FeuchtnerG.M.SchachnerT.BonattiJ.Diagnostic performance of 64-slice computed tomography in evaluation of coronary artery bypass graftsAJR Am J Roentgenol2007; 189:574–580.
101.
AngeliniP.VelascoJ.A.FlammS.Coronary anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, and clinical relevanceCirculation2002; 105:2449–2454.
102.
MaronB.J.Sudden death in young athletesN Engl J Med2003; 349:1064–1075.
103.
IshikawaT.BrandtP.W.Anomalous origin of the left main coronary artery from the right anterior aortic sinus: angiographic definition of anomalous courseAm J Cardiol1985; 55:770–776.
104.
DattaJ.WhiteC.S.GilkesonR.C.Anomalous coronary arteries in adults: depiction at multi-detector row CT angiographyRadiology2005; 235:812–818.
105.
DuranC.KantarciM.Durur SubasiI.Remarkable anatomic anomalies of coronary arteries and their clinical importance: a multidetector computed tomography angiographic studyJ Comput Assist Tomogr2006; 30:939–948.
106.
KimS.Y.SeoJ.B.DoK.H.Coronary artery anomalies: classification and ECG-gated multi-detector row CT findings with angiographic correlationRadiographics2006; 26:317–334.
107.
SchmidM.AchenbachS.LudwigJ.Visualization of coronary artery anomalies by contrast-enhanced multi-detector row spiral computed tomographyInt J Cardiol2006; 111:430–435.
108.
SchepisT.GaemperliO.KoepfliP.Comparison of 64-slice CT with gated SPECT for evaluation of left ventricular functionJ Nucl Med2006; 47:1288–1294.
109.
CuryR.C.NiemanK.ShapiroM.D.Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CTRadiology2008; 248:466–475.
110.
MahnkenA.H.KoosR.KatohM.Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarctionEur Radiol2005; 15:714–720.
111.
BelgeB.CocheE.PasquetA.Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imagingEur Radiol2006; 16:1424–1433.
112.
DeweyM.MullerM.EddicksS.Evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function with 16-slice computed tomography, biplane cineventriculography, and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imagingJ Am Coll Cardiol2006; 48:2034–2044.
113.
HennemanM.M.BaxJ.J.SchuijfJ.D.Global and regional left ventricular function: a comparison between gated SPECT, 2D echocardiography and multi-slice computed tomographyEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging2006; 33:1452–1460.
114.
HennemanM.M.SchuijfJ.D.JukemaJ.W.Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function and volumes with 64-slice MSCT: a comparison with 2D echocardiographyJ Nucl Cardiol2006; 13:480–487.
115.
MuhlenbruchG.DasM.HohlC.Global left ventricular function in cardiac CT. Evaluation of an automated 3D region-growing segmentation algorithmEur Radiol2006; 16:1117–1123.
116.
PueskenM.FischbachR.WenkerM.Global left-ventricular function assessment using dual-source multidetector CT: effect of improved temporal resolution on ventricular volume measurementEur Radiol2008; 18:2087–2094.
117.
SchlosserT.MohrsO.K.MagedanzA.Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imagingActa Radiol2007; 48:30–35.
118.
SchlosserT.PagonidisK.HerbornC.U.Assessment of left ventricular parameters using 16-MDCT and new software for endocardial and epicardial border delineationAJR Am J Roentgenol2005; 184:765–773.
119.
SugengL.Mor-AviV.WeinertL.Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance referenceCirculation2006; 114:654–661.
120.
van der VleutenP.A.de JongeG.J.LubbersD.D.Evaluation of global left ventricular function assessment by dual-source computed tomography compared with MRIEur Radiol2009; 19:271–277.
121.
van der VleutenP.A.WillemsT.P.GotteM.J.Quantification of global left ventricular function: comparison of multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. a meta-analysis and review of the current literatureActa Radiol2006; 47:1049–1057.
122.
PlumhansC.MuhlenbruchG.RapaeeA.Assessment of global right ventricular function on 64-MDCT compared with MRIAJR Am J Roentgenol2008; 190:1358–1361.
123.
DoganH.KroftL.J.BaxJ.J.MDCT assessment of right ventricular systolic functionAJR Am J Roentgenol186Suppl 22006S366–S370.
124.
DelhayeD.Remy-JardinM.TeisseireA.MDCT of right ventricular function: comparison of right ventricular ejection fraction estimation and equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography, part 1AJR Am J Roentgenol2006; 187:1597–1604.
125.
Remy-JardinM.DelhayeD.TeisseireA.MDCT of right ventricular function: impact of methodologic approach in estimation of right ventricular ejection fraction, part 2AJR Am J Roentgenol2006; 187:1605–1609.
126.
CocheE.VlassenbroekA.RoelantsV.Evaluation of biventricular ejection fraction with ECG-gated 16-slice CT: preliminary findings in acute pulmonary embolism in comparison with radionuclide ventriculographyEur Radiol2005; 15:1432–1440.
127.
DoganH.KroftL.J.HuismanM.V.Right ventricular function in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: analysis with electrocardiography-synchronized multi-detector row CTRadiology2007; 242:78–84.
128.
MatsuiH.YasukochiS.HaseyamaK.Quantification of right and left ventricular volumes in children with congenital heart disease by multidetector-row computed tomographyPediatr Cardiol2007; 28:267–271.
129.
FeuchtnerG.M.DichtlW.FriedrichG.J.Multislice computed tomography for detection of patients with aortic valve stenosis and quantification of severityJ Am Coll Cardiol2006; 47:1410–1417.
130.
FeuchtnerG.M.MullerS.BonattiJ.Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve areaAJR Am J Roentgenol2007; 189:197–203.
131.
AlkadhiH.WildermuthS.PlassA.Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiographyRadiology2006; 240:47–55.
132.
TanakaH.ShimadaK.YoshidaK.The simultaneous assessment of aortic valve area and coronary artery stenosis using 16-slice multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with aortic stenosis comparison with echocardiographyCirc J2007; 71:1593–1598.
133.
HabisM.DaoudB.RogerV.L.Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosisJ Heart Valve Dis2007; 16:216–224.
134.
BouvierE.LogeartD.SablayrollesJ.L.Diagnosis of aortic valvular stenosis by multislice cardiac computed tomographyEur Heart J2006; 27:3033–3038.
135.
FeuchtnerG.M.DichtlW.MullerS.64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiographyAJR Am J Roentgenol2008; 191:W1–W7.
136.
JassalD.S.ShapiroM.D.NeilanT.G.64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severityInvest Radiol2007; 42:507–512.
137.
AlkadhiH.DesbiollesL.HusmannL.Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CTRadiology2007; 245:111–121.
138.
AlkadhiH.WildermuthS.BettexD.A.Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16-detector row CT—initial experienceRadiology2006; 238:454–463.
139.
NagaoM.MatsuokaH.KawakamiH.Quantification of myocardial perfusion by contrast-enhanced 64-MDCT: characterization of ischemic myocardiumAJR Am J Roentgenol2008; 191:19–25.
140.
NicolE.D.StirrupJ.ReyesE.Sixty-four-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of functionally significant coronary stenoses in patients with a low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery diseaseJ Nucl Cardiol2008; 15:311–318.
141.
GeorgeR.T.Jerosch-HeroldM.SilvaC.Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomographyInvest Radiol2007; 42:815–822.
142.
KurataA.MochizukiT.KoyamaY.Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphyCirc J2005; 69:550–557.
143.
NikolaouK.SanzJ.PoonM.Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary resultsEur Radiol2005; 15:864–871.
144.
LardoA.C.CordeiroM.A.SilvaC.Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scarCirculation2006; 113:394–404.
145.
NiemanK.ShapiroM.D.FerencikM.Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imagingRadiology2008; 247:49–56.
146.
GerberB.L.BelgeB.LegrosG.J.Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonanceCirculation2006; 113:823–833.
147.
ShahD.C.HaissaguerreM.JaisP.Electrophysiologically guided ablation of the pulmonary veins for the curative treatment of atrial fibrillationAnn Med2000; 32:408–416.
148.
OralH.KnightB.P.TadaH.Pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillationCirculation2002; 105:1077–1081.
149.
MoradyF.Mechanisms and catheter ablation therapy of atrial fibrillationTex Heart Inst J2005; 32:199–201.
150.
OuyangF.BanschD.ErnstS.Complete isolation of left atrium surrounding the pulmonary veins: new insights from the double-Lasso technique in paroxysmal atrial fibrillationCirculation2004; 110:2090–2096.
151.
SchwartzmanD.LacomisJ.WiggintonW.G.Characterization of left atrium and distal pulmonary vein morphology using multidimensional computed tomographyJ Am Coll Cardiol2003; 41:1349–1357.
152.
CroninP.SneiderM.B.KazerooniE.A.MDCT of the left atrium and pulmonary veins in planning radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a how-to guideAJR Am J Roentgenol2004; 183:767–778.
153.
LemolaK.SneiderM.DesjardinsB.Computed tomographic analysis of the anatomy of the left atrium and the esophagus: implications for left atrial catheter ablationCirculation2004; 110:3655–3660.
154.
TopsL.F.BaxJ.J.ZeppenfeldK.Fusion of multislice computed tomography imaging with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping to guide radiofrequency catheter ablation proceduresHeart Rhythm2005; 2:1076–1081.
155.
KistlerP.M.RajappanK.JahngirM.The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillationJ Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2006; 17:1093–1101.
156.
MartinekM.NesserH.J.AichingerJ.Impact of integration of multislice computed tomography imaging into three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping on clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy using radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillationPacing Clin Electrophysiol2007; 30:1215–1223.
157.
BurgstahlerC.TraboldT.KuettnerA.Visualization of pulmonary vein stenosis after radio frequency ablation using multi-slice computed tomography: initial clinical experience in 33 patientsInt J Cardiol2005; 102:287–291.
158.
LacomisJ.M.GoiteinO.DeibleC.CT of the pulmonary veinsJ Thorac Imaging2007; 22:63–76.
159.
AbrahamW.T.HayesD.L.Cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failureCirculation2003; 108:2596–2603.
160.
PuglisiA.LunatiM.MarulloA.G.Limited thoracotomy as a second choice alternative to transvenous implant for cardiac resynchronisation therapy deliveryEur Heart J2004; 25:1063–1069.
161.
JongbloedM.R.LambH.J.BaxJ.J.Noninvasive visualization of the cardiac venous system using multislice computed tomographyJ Am Coll Cardiol2005; 45:749–753.
162.
Van de VeireN.R.MarsanN.A.SchuijfJ.D.Noninvasive imaging of cardiac venous anatomy with 64-slice multi-slice computed tomography and noninvasive assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony by 3-dimensional tissue synchronization imaging in patients with heart failure scheduled for cardiac resynchronization therapyAm J Cardiol2008; 101:1023–1029.
163.
CookS.C.DykeP.C.RamanS.V.Management of adults with congenital heart disease with cardiovascular computed tomographyJ Cardiovasc Computed Tomogr2008; 2:12–22.
164.
EinsteinA.J.HenzlovaM.J.RajagopalanS.Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiographyJAMA2007; 298:317–323.
165.
NicolE.D.GatzoulisM.PadleyS.P.Assessment of adult congenital heart disease with multi-detector computed tomography: beyond coronary lumenographyClin Radiol2007; 62:518–527.
166.
ThomasJ.D.RubinD.N.Tissue harmonic imaging: why does it work?J Am Soc Echocardiogr1998; 11:803–808.
167.
BreenJ.F.Imaging of the pericardiumJ Thorac Imaging2001; 16:47–54.
168.
AraozP.A.MulvaghS.L.TazelaarH.D.CT and MR imaging of benign primary cardiac neoplasms with echocardiographic correlationRadiographics2000; 20:1303–1319.
169.
WangZ.J.ReddyG.P.GotwayM.B.CT and MR imaging of pericardial diseaseRadiographics2003; 23:167–180.
170.
KirschJ.AraozP.A.SteinbergF.B.Prevalence and significance of incidental extracardiac findings at 64-multidetector coronary CTAJ Thorac Imaging2007; 22:330–334.
171.
OnumaY.TanabeK.NakazawaG.Noncardiac findings in cardiac imaging with multidetector computed tomographyJ Am Coll Cardiol2006; 48:402–406.
172.
HallerS.KaiserC.BuserP.Coronary artery imaging with contrast-enhanced MDCT: extracardiac findingsAJR Am J Roentgenol2006; 187:105–110.
173.
SchraginJ.G.WeissfeldJ.L.EdmundowiczD.Non-cardiac findings on coronary electron beam computed tomography scanningJ Thorac Imaging2004; 19:82–86.
174.
HunoldP.SchmermundA.SeibelR.M.Prevalence and clinical significance of accidental findings in electron-beam tomographic scans for coronary artery calcificationEur Heart J2001; 22:1748–1758.
175.
HortonK.M.PostW.S.BlumenthalR.S.Prevalence of significant noncardiac findings on electron-beam computed tomography coronary artery calcium screening examinationsCirculation2002; 106:532–534.
176.
MuellerJ.JeudyJ.PostonR.Cardiac CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery: prevalence of incidental findingsAJR Am J Roentgenol2007; 189:414–419.
177.
LawY.M.HuangJ.ChenK.Prevalence of significant extracoronary findings on multislice CT coronary angiography examinations and coronary artery calcium scoring examinationsJ Med Imaging Radiat Oncol2008; 52:49–56.
178.
DeweyM.SchnapauffD.TeigeF.Non-cardiac findings on coronary computed tomography and magnetic resonance imagingEur Radiol2007; 17:2038–2043.
179.
BudoffM.J.CohenM.C.GarciaM.J.ACCF/AHA clinical competence statement on cardiac imaging with computed tomography and magnetic resonanceCirculation2005; 112:598–617.
180.
KerlJ.M.RavenelJ.G.NguyenS.A.Right heart: split-bolus injection of diluted contrast medium for visualization at coronary CT angiographyRadiology2008; 247:356–364.
181.
KerlJ.M.HofmannL.K.ThiloC.Coronary CTA: image acquisition and interpretationJ Thorac Imaging2007; 22:22–34.
182.
ShumanW.P.BranchK.R.MayJ.M.Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation doseRadiology2008; 248:431–437.
183.
EarlsJ.P.BermanE.L.UrbanB.A.Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation doseRadiology2008; 246:742–753.
184.
HausleiterJ.MeyerT.HadamitzkyM.Radiation dose estimates from cardiac multislice computed tomography in daily practice: impact of different scanning protocols on effective dose estimatesCirculation2006; 113:1305–1310.
SiegelM.J.SchmidtB.BradleyD.Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shapeRadiology2004; 233:515–522.
187.
ChengV.GutsteinA.WolakA.Moving beyond binary grading of coronary artery stenoses on coronary computed tomography: insights for the imager and referring clinicianJ Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imaging2008; 1:460–471.
