ThomsenHSDorphSMygindT. Subtraction nephrotomography during urography of transplanted kidneys. Acta Radiol Diagn1984; 25: 495–500.
2.
Van WaesPFGM. High-dose urography in oliguric and anuric patients, Amsterdam: Excepta Medica, 1972.
3.
BartelsEDBrunGCGammeltoftA. Acute anuria following intravenous pyelography in a patient with myelomatosis. Acta Med Scand1954; 40: 297–302.
4.
McCarthyCSBeckerJA. Multiple myeloma and contrast media. Radiology1992; 183: 519–521.
5.
BarrettJBParfreyPSVavasourHM. Contrast nephropathy in patients with impaired renal function: high versus low osmolar media. Kidney Int1992; 41: 1274–1279.
6.
AspelinPAubryPFranssonS-G. Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med2003; 348: 491–499.
7.
LaskeyWAspelinPDavidsonC. Nephrotoxicity of iodixanol versus iopamidol in patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary angiographic procedures. Am Heart J2009; 158: 822–828.
8.
HeinrichMCHäberleLMüllerV. Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Radiology2009; 250: 68–86.
9.
RaoQANewhouseJH. Risk of nephropathy after intravenous administration of contrast material: a critical literature analysis. Radiology2006; 239: 392–397.
10.
NewhouseJFKhoDRaoQA. Frequency of serum creatinine changes in the absence of iodinated contrast material: Implications of studies of contrast nephrotoxicity. Am J Roentgenol2008; 191: 376–382.
11.
AzzouzMRømsingJThomsenHS. Fluctuations in eGFR in relation to unenhanced and enhanced MRI and CT outpatients. Eur J Radiol2014; 83: 886–892.
McDonaldJSMcDonaldRJCarterRE. Risk of intravenous contrast material-mediated acute kidney injury: A propensity score – matched study stratified by baseline-estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology2014; 271: 65–73.
15.
McDonaldJSMcDonaldRJCominJ. Frequency of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast administration: A systemic review and meta-analysis. Radiology2013; 267: 119–128.
DavenportMSCohanRHKhalatbariS. The challenges in assessing contrast-induced nephropathy: Where are we now?Am J Roentgenol2014; 202: 784–789.
19.
Thomsen HS. Gadolinium- or iodine-based contrast media: Which choice? Acta Radiol 2014 (in press).
20.
AzzouzMRømsingJThomsenHS. Acute non-renal adverse events after unenhanced and enhanced CT and MR. Open J Clin Diagn2013; 3: 85–93.
21.
StaculFvan der MolenAJReimerP. on behalf of the Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol2011; 21: 2527–2541.
