HaugeIHRPedersenKOlerudHM. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50–69 years is minimal. Acta Radiol2014; 55: 1174–1179. (this issue)..
2.
HendeeWRO’ConnorMK. Radiation risks of medical imaging: separating fact from fantasy. Radiology2012; 264: 312–321.
3.
HendrickRE. Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology2010; 257: 246–253.
4.
YaffeMJMainprizeJG. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology2011; 258: 98–105.
5.
CiattoSHoussamiNBernardiD. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol2013; 14: 583–589.
6.
OlgarTKahnTGoschD. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Fortschr Roentgenstr2012; 184: 911–918.
7.
DrukteinisJSMooneyBPFlowersCI. Beyond mammography: new frontiers in breast cancer screening. Am J Med2013; 126: 472–479.
8.
ZuleyMLGuoBCatulloVJ. Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images. Radiology2014. doi/1148/radiol.13131530.
9.
KopansDB. Just the facts: mammography saves lives with little if any radiation risk to the mature breast. Health Phys2011; 101: 578–582.
