Boland G. Radiologists’ performance: assessment using peer review (oral presentation). European Congress of Radiology, Vienna 2013: A–270.
2.
O'KeeffeMDavisTMSiminoskiK. A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study. BMC Medical Imaging2013; 13: 19–19.
3.
MahgereftehSKruskalJBYamCS. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future. RadioGraphics2009; 29: 1221–1231.
4.
No authors listed. Good practice for radiological reporting. Guidelines from the European Society of Radiology (ESR). Insights Imaging2011; 2: 93–96.
5.
NaikSSHanbridgeAWilsonSR. Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. Am J Roentgenol2001; 176: 591–598.
6.
GrieveFMPlumbAAKhanSH. Radiology reporting: a general practitioner's perspective. Br J Radiol2009; 83: 17–22.
7.
BosmansJMWeylerJJDe SchepperAM. The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology2011; 259: 184–195.
8.
PlumbAAGrieveFMKhanSH. Survey of hospital clinicians' preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol2009; 64: 386–394.
BosmansJMWeylerJJParizelPM. Structure and content of radiology reports, a quantitative and qualitative study in eight medical centers. Eur J Radiol2009; 72: 354–358.
11.
RevakCS. Dictation of radiologic reports. Am J Roentgenol1983; 141: 210–210.
