Socially aware robot navigation is gaining popularity with the increase in delivery and assistive robots. The research is further fueled by a need for socially aware navigation skills in autonomous vehicles to move safely and appropriately in spaces shared with humans. Although most of these are ground robots, drones are also entering the field. In this paper, we present a literature survey of the works on socially aware robot navigation in the past 10 years. We propose four different faceted taxonomies to navigate the literature and examine the field from four different perspectives. Through the taxonomic review, we discuss the current research directions and the extending scope of applications in various domains. Further, we put forward a list of current research opportunities and present a discussion on possible future challenges that are likely to emerge in the field.
AlahiAGoelKRamanathanV, et al. (2016) Social LSTM: human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 27–30 June,Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 961–971.
2.
AlahiARamanathanVGoelK, et al. (2017) Learning to predict human behavior in crowded scenes. Group and Crowd Behavior for Computer Vision. USA: Academic Press, pp. 183–207.
3.
AngelopoulosGRossiADi NapoliC, et al. (2022) You are in my way: non-verbal social cues for legible robot navigation behaviors. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 23-27 Oct,Kyoto, Japan. IEEE, pp. 657–662.
4.
AnvariBWurdemannHA (2020) Modelling social interaction between humans and service robots in large public spaces. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) [Online],Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 11189–11196.
5.
AraujoARCaminhasDDPereiraGA (2015) An architecture for navigation of service robots in human-populated office-like environments. IFAC-PapersOnLine48: 189–194.
6.
ArndtMBernsK (2015) Safe predictive mobile robot navigation in aware environments. In: 2015 12th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO), 21-23 July,Colmar, France. IEEE, pp. 15–23.
7.
BachillerPRodriguez-CriadoDJorvekarRRBustosPFariaDRMansoLJ (2022) A graph neural network to model disruption in human-aware robot navigation. Multimedia Tools and Applications81(3): 3277–3295.
8.
BanisettySBFeil-SeiferD (2018) Towards a Unified Planner For Socially-Aware Navigation. Online: arXiv, arXiv:1810.00966.
9.
BanisettySBRajamohanVVegaFFeil-SeiferD (2021) A deep learning approach to multi-context socially-aware navigation. In: 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 8-12Aug, Vancouver, Canada. IEEE, pp. 23–30.
10.
BarnaudMLMorgadoNPalluel-GermainRDiardJSpalanzaniA, (2014) Proxemics models for human-aware navigation in robotics: grounding interaction and personal space models in experimental data from psychology. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IROS’ 2014 workshop “Assistance and Service Robotics in a Human Environment”, 14 - 18 Sep,Chicago, USA.
11.
BartoliFLisantiGBallanLDel BimboA (2018) Context-aware trajectory prediction. In: 201824th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR),20-24 Aug, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 1941–1946.
12.
BayazitOBLienJMAmatoNM (2004) Better group behaviors using rule-based roadmaps. Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics95: 111.
13.
BecerraISuomalainenMLozanoEMimnaughKJMurrieta-CidRLaValleSM (2020) Human perception-optimized planning for comfortable vr-based telepresence. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(4): 6489–6496.
14.
BeraARandhavaneTKubinEWangAGrayKManochaD (2018) The socially invisible robot navigation in the social world using robot entitativity. In: 2018IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1-5 Oct,Madrid, Spain. IEEE, pp. 4468–4475.
15.
BeraARandhavaneTPrinjaRKapsaskisKWangAGrayKManochaD (2019) The Emotionally Intelligent Robot: Improving Social Navigation in Crowded Environments. Online: arXiv, arXiv:1903.03217.
16.
BeraARandhavaneTPrinjaRManochaD (2017) Sociosense: robot navigation amongst pedestrians with social and psychological constraints. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 24-28 Sep,Vancouver, Canada. IEEE, pp. 7018–7025.
17.
BeraARandhavaneTWangAManochaDKubinEGrayK (2018) Classifying group emotions for socially-aware autonomous vehicle navigation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 18-22 June,Salt Lake City, USA. IEEE, pp. 1039–1047.
18.
BevinsADuncanBA (2021) Aerial flight paths for communication: how participants perceive and intend to respond to drone movements. In: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’21, 8-11 Mar,Boulder, USA. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 16–23.
19.
BisagnoNZhangBConciN (2018) Group LSTM: group trajectory prediction in crowded scenarios. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV) workshops, 8-14 Sep,Munich, Germany. Springer-Verlag, pp. 213–225.
20.
BiswasAWangASilveraGSteinfeldAAdmoniH (2022) Socnavbench: A grounded simulation testing framework for evaluating social navigation. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI)11(3): 1–24.
21.
BoldrerMAntonucciABevilacquaPPalopoliLFontanelliD (2022) Multi-agent navigation in human-shared environments: A safe and socially-aware approach. Robotics and Autonomous Systems149: 103979.
22.
BoosAZimmermannMZychMBenglerK (2022) Polite and unambiguous requests facilitate willingness to help an autonomous delivery robot and favourable social attributions. In: 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 29 Aug - 2 Sep,Naples, Italy. IEEE, pp. 1620–1626.
23.
BritoBEverettMHowJPAlonso-MoraJ (2021) Where to go next: learning a subgoal recommendation policy for navigation in dynamic environments. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters6: 4616–4623.
24.
BruckschenLBungertKDenglerNBennewitzM (2020) Human-aware robot navigation by long-term movement prediction. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 11032–11037.
25.
BucheggerKTodoranGBaderM (2019) Safe and efficient autonomous navigation in the presence of humans at control level. In: Advances in Service and Industrial Robotics: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Robotics in Alpe-Adria Danube Region (RAAD 2018), 15-19 June,Limassol, Cyprus. Springer, pp. 504–511.
26.
CarpinellaCMWymanABPerezMAStroessnerSJ (2017) The robotic social attributes scale (rosas) development and validation. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on human-robot interaction, 6-9 Mar,Vienna, Austria, pp. 254–262.
27.
CarreteroV (2017) Comfort-oriented social force model and learned lessons. Online: openaccess.uoc.edu, 8.
28.
CauchardJR EJLZhaiKYLandayJA (2015) Drone & me: an exploration into natural human-drone interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing - UbiComp ’15, 7-11 Sep,New York, USA. ACM Press, pp. 361–365.
29.
ChandraRGuanTPanugantiSMittalTBhattacharyaUBeraAManochaD (2020) Forecasting trajectory and behavior of road-agents using spectral clustering in graph-lstms. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5: 4882–4890.
30.
CharalampousKKostavelisIGasteratosA (2016) Robot navigation in large-scale social maps: An action recognition approach. Expert Systems with Applications66: 261–273.
31.
CharalampousKKostavelisIGasteratosA (2017) Recent trends in social aware robot navigation: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems93: 85–104.
32.
CheYOkamuraAMSadighD (2020) Efficient and trustworthy social navigation via explicit and implicit robot-human communication. IEEE Transactions on Robotics36(3): 692–707.
33.
ChenCHuSNikdelPMoriGSavvaM (2020) Relational graph learning for crowd navigation. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 10007–10013.
34.
ChenCLiuYKreissSAlahiA (2019) Crowd-robot interaction: Crowd-Aware Robot Navigation with Attention-Based Deep Reinforcement Learning. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 20-24 May,Montreal, Canada. IEEE, pp. 6015–6022.
35.
ChenXLiuYZhangD (2017a) A deep learning approach to generating natural language instructions for indoor robot navigation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems95: 110–125.
36.
ChenYLouY (2022) A unified multiple-motion-mode framework for socially compliant navigation in dense crowds. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering19(4): 3536–3548.
37.
ChenYFEverettMLiuMHowJP (2017) Socially aware motion planning with deep reinforcement learning. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 24-28 Sep, Vancouver, Canada: IEEE, pp. 1343–1350.
38.
ChikSYeongCSuELimTSubramaniamYChinP (2016) A review of social-aware navigation frameworks for service robot in dynamic human environments. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering8: 41–50.
39.
CiouPHHsiaoYTWuZZTsengSHFuLC (2018) Composite reinforcement learning for social robot navigation. In: 2018IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1-5 Oct,Madrid, Spain. IEEE, 2553–2558.
40.
ClarkeVBraunVHayfieldN (2015) Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods3: 222–248.
41.
CunninghamAGGalceranEMehtaDFerrerGEusticeRMOlsonE (2019) Mpdm: multi-policy decision-making from autonomous driving to social robot navigation. Control Strategies for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Autonomous Driving Functions. Development. Testing and Verification1: 201–223.
42.
DalmassoMGarrellADomínguezJEJiménezPSanfeliuA (2021) Human-robot collaborative multi-agent path planning using Monte Carlo tree search and social reward sources. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 30 May - 5 June, Xi'an, China. IEEE, pp. 10133–10138.
43.
de VicenteJPSotoA (2021) DeepSocNav: Social Navigation by Imitating Human Behaviors. Online: arXiv, arXiV:2107.09170.
44.
DeoNTrivediMM (2017) Learning and predicting on-road pedestrian behavior around vehicles. In: 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 16-19 Oct,Yokohama, Japan. IEEE, pp. 1–6.
45.
DeshpandeNVaufreydazDSpalanzaniA (2020) Behavioral decision-making for urban autonomous driving in the presence of pedestrians using deep recurrent q-network. In: 2020 16th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), 13-15 Dec,Shenzhen, China. IEEE, pp. 428–433.
46.
DeyDTerkenJ (2017) Pedestrian interaction with vehicles: roles of explicit and implicit communication. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 24-27 Sep,New York, USA. ACM, pp. 109–113.
47.
Di CarloJWensingPMKatzBBledtGKimS (2018) Dynamic locomotion in the MIT cheetah 3 through convex model-predictive control. In: 2018IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1-5 Oct,Madrid, Spain. IEEE, pp. 1–9.
48.
Domínguez-VidalJERodríguezNSanfeliuA (2023) Perception-intention-action cycle as a human acceptable way for improving human-robot collaborative tasks. In: Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 13-16 Mar,Stockholm, Sweden. ACM, pp. 567–571.
49.
DondrupCHanheideM (2016) Qualitative constraints for human-aware robot navigation using velocity costmaps. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN),26-31 Aug, New York, USA. IEEE, pp. 586–592.
50.
DugasDNietoJSiegwartRChungJJ (2020) Ian: multi-behavior navigation planning for robots in real, crowded environments. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 11368–11375.
51.
DuncanBAMurphyRR (2013) Comfortable approach distance with small unmanned aerial vehicles. In: 2013 IEEE RO-MAN. 26-29 Aug, Gyeongju, Korea (South): IEEE, pp. 786–792.
52.
EiffertSLiKShanMWorrallSSukkariehSNebotE (2020) Probabilistic crowd GAN: multimodal pedestrian trajectory prediction using a graph vehicle-pedestrian attention network. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(4): 5026–5033.
53.
EndsleyMR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society37: 32–64.
54.
EtesamiENematiAMeghdariAFGeSSTaheriA (2021) Design and fabrication of a floating social robot: Ceb the social blimp. In: Social Robotics: 13th International Conference, ICSR 2021, 10–13 Nov,Singapore, Singapore. Springer, Vol. 13, 660–670.
55.
EvensBSchuurmansMPatrinosP (2022) Learning MPC for interaction-aware autonomous driving: A game-theoretic approach. In: 2022 European Control Conference (ECC), 12-15 July,London, UK. IEEE, pp. 34–39.
56.
FahadMYangGGuoY (2020) Learning human navigation behavior using measured human trajectories in crowded spaces. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 11154–11160.
57.
FavierASingamaneniPTAlamiR (2022) An intelligent human avatar to debug and challenge human-aware robot navigation systems. In: 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 7-10 Mar,Sapporo, Japan. IEEE, pp. 760–764.
58.
Fernandez CarmonaMParekhTHanheideM (2019) Making the case for human-aware navigation in warehouses. Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 11650, 449–453.
59.
FerraraARubagottiM (2007) Sliding mode control of a mobile robot for dynamic obstacle avoidance based on a time-varying harmonic potential field. In: ICRA 2007 Workshop: Planning, Perception and Navigation for Intelligent Vehicles. 10-14, Apr, Rome, Italy.: Citeseer, 160.
60.
FerrerGGarrellASanfeliuA (2013) Robot companion: A social-force based approach with human awareness-navigation in crowded environments. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 3-7 Nov,Tokyo, Japan. pp. 1688–1694.
61.
FerrerGGarrellASanfeliuA (2013) Social-aware robot navigation in urban environments. In: 2013 European Conference on Mobile Robots, 25-27 Sep,Barcelona, Spain. pp. 331–336.
62.
FerrerGSanfeliuA (2014) Proactive kinodynamic planning using the extended social force model and human motion prediction in urban environments. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems,14-18 Sep,Chicago, USA. IEEE, pp. 1730–1735.
63.
FerrerGZuluetaAGCotareloFHSanfeliuA (2017) Robot social-aware navigation framework to accompany people walking side-by-side. Autonomous robots41: 775–793.
64.
FisacJFBajcsyAHerbertSLFridovich-KeilDWangSTomlinCJDraganAD (2018) Probabilistically Safe Robot Planning with Confidence-Based Human Predictions. In: Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems, 26-30 June, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. RobotProceedings. Available from:https://www.roboticsproceedings.org/rss14/p69.html.
65.
ForerSBanisettySBYliniemiLNicolescuMFeil-SeiferD (2018) Socially-aware navigation using non-linear multi-objective optimization. In: 2018IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1-5 Oct,Madrid, Spain. IEEE, pp. 1–9.
66.
GalvanMRepisoESanfeliuA (2019) Robot navigation to approach people using g2-spline path planning and extended social force models. In: Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference, 20–22 Nov,Porto, Portugal. Springer International Publishing, 15–27.
67.
GaoYHuangCM (2022) Evaluation of socially-aware robot navigation. Frontiers in Robotics and AI8: 721317.
68.
GarrellACollCAlquezarRSanfeliuA (2019) Teaching a drone to accompany a person from demonstrations using non-linear ASFM. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 3-8 Nov,Macau, China. IEEE, pp. 1985–1991.
69.
GarrellAGarza-ElizondoLVillamizarMHerreroFSanfeliuA (2017) Aerial social force model: A new framework to accompany people using autonomous flying robots. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 24-28 Sep,Vancouver, Canada. IEEE, pp. 7011–7017.
70.
GilOGarrellASanfeliuA (2021) Social robot navigation tasks: combining machine learning techniques and social force model. Sensors21(21): 7087.
71.
GilOSanfeliuA (2019) Effects of a social force model reward in robot navigation based on deep reinforcement learning. In: Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 20-22 Nov,Porto, Portugal. Springer International Publishing, pp. 213–224.
72.
GilÓSanfeliuA (2022) Robot navigation anticipative strategies in deep reinforcement motion planning. ROBOT2022: Fifth Iberian Robotics Conference: Advances in Robotics2: 67–78. Springer.
73.
GolchoubianMGhafurianMAzadNLDautenhahnK (2021) What are social norms for low-speed autonomous vehicle navigation in crowded environments? An online survey. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, 9-11 Nov, Virtual Event,Japan. ACM, pp. 148–156.
74.
GómezJVMavridisNGarridoS (2013) Social path planning: generic human-robot interaction framework for robotic navigation tasks. In: 2nd Intl. workshop on cognitive robotics systems: replicating human actions and activities. 3-7 Nov, Tokyo, Japan: Online.
75.
GononDJPaez-GranadosDBillardA (2022) Robots’ motion planning in human crowds by acceleration obstacles. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(4): 11236–11243.
76.
GulFRahimanWNazli AlhadySS (2019) A comprehensive study for robot navigation techniques. Cogent Engineering6: 1632046.
77.
GuldenringRGörnerMHendrichNJacobsenNJZhangJ (2020) Learning local planners for human-aware navigation in indoor environments. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 6053–6060.
78.
GuzziJGiustiAGambardellaLMTheraulazGDi CaroGA (2013) Human-friendly robot navigation in dynamic environments. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 06-10 May,Karlsruhe, Germany. IEEE, pp. 423–430.
79.
HartJMirskyRXiaoXTejedaSMahajanBGooJBaldaufKOwenSStoneP (2020) Using human-inspired signals to disambiguate navigational intentions. In: Social Robotics: 12th International Conference, ICSR 2020, 14-18 Nov,Golden, USA. Springer, pp. 320–331.
80.
HassanalianMAbdelkefiA (2017) Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review. Progress in Aerospace Sciences91: 99–131.
81.
HautervilleOFernándezCSingamaneniPTFavierAMatellánVAlamiR (2022) Interactive social agents simulation tool for designing choreographies for human-robot-interaction research. ROBOT2022: Fifth Iberian Robotics Conference: Advances in Robotics2: 514–527. Springer International Publishing Cham.
82.
HelbingDMolnarP (1995) Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics51: 4282–4286.
83.
HetheringtonNJLeeRHaaseMCroftEAMachiel Van der LoosHF (2021) Mobile robot yielding cues for human-robot spatial interaction. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 27 Sep - 1 Oct, Prague, Czech Republic.IEEE, pp. 3028–3033.
84.
HoltzJBiswasJ (2022) Socialgym: A framework for benchmarking social robot navigation. In:2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 23-27 Oct,Kyoto, Japan. IEEE, pp. 11246–11252.
85.
HonigSSOron-GiladTZaichykHSarne-FleischmannVOlatunjiSEdanY (2018) Toward socially aware person-following robots. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems10: 936–954.
86.
HsuYCGopalswamySSaripalliSShellDA (2020) A pomdp treatment of vehicle-pedestrian interaction: Implicit coordination via uncertainty-aware planning. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 1984–1991.
87.
HuaJZengLLiGJuZ (2021) Learning for a robot: Deep reinforcement learning, imitation learning, transfer learning. Sensors21(4): 1278.
88.
JensenWHansenSKnocheH (2018) Knowing you, seeing me: investigating user preferences in drone-human acknowledgement. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 21-26 Apr,Montreal, Canada. Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–12.
89.
JiangDWorrallSShanM (2022) The design of a pedestrian aware contextual speed controller for autonomous driving. In: 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 8-12 Oct,Macau, China. IEEE, pp. 3899–3906.
90.
JiangRGeSSTangiralaNTLeeTH (2016) Interactive navigation of mobile robots based on human’s emotion. In: Social Robotics: 8th International Conference, ICSR 2016, 1-3 Nov,Kansas City, USA. Springer, pp. 243–252.
91.
JohnsonCKuipersB (2018) Socially-aware navigation using topological maps and social norm learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society - AIES ’18, 2-3 Feb,New Orleans, USA. ACM Press, pp. 151–157.
92.
KabtoulM (2021) Proactive and social navigation of autonomous vehicles in shared spaces. PhD Thesis. Université Grenoble Alpes. Available from:https://theses.fr/2021GRALM059
93.
KabtoulMMartinetPSpalanzaniA, (2020) Proactive longitudinal velocity control in pedestrians-vehicle interaction scenarios. In: 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 20-23 Sep,Rhodes, Greece. IEEE, pp. 1–6.
94.
KabtoulMSpalanzaniAMartinetP (2020) Towards proactive navigation: a pedestrian-vehicle cooperation based behavioral model. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 31 May - 31Aug, Paris, France. IEEE, pp. 6958–6964.
95.
KabtoulMSpalanzaniAMartinetP (2022) Proactive and smooth maneuvering for navigation around pedestrians. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 23–27 May,Philadelphia, USA. IEEE, pp. 4723–4729.
96.
KannanSSLeeAMinBC (2021) External human-machine interface on delivery robots: expression of navigation intent of the robot. In: 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 8-12Aug, Vancouver, Canada. IEEE, pp. 1305–1312.
97.
KarnanHNairAXiaoXWarnellGPirkSToshevAHartJBiswasJStoneP (2022) Socially compliant navigation dataset (SCAND): A large-scale dataset of demonstrations for social navigation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7: 11807–11814.
98.
KästnerLLilJShenZLambrechtJ (2022) Enhancing navigational safety in crowded environments using semantic-deep-reinforcement-learning-based navigation. In: 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (SSRR), 8-10 Nov,Sevilla, Spain. IEEE, pp. 87–93.
99.
KaurPLiuZShiW (2022) Simulators for mobile social robots: state-of-the-art and challenges. In: 2022 Fifth International Conference on Connected and Autonomous Driving (MetroCAD), 28-29 Apr,Los Alamitos, USA. IEEE, pp. 47–56.
100.
KenkMHassaballahMBrethéJF (2019) Human-aware robot navigation in logistics warehouses. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics, 29-31 July, Prague, Czech Republic.SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, pp. 371–378.
101.
KhambhaitaHAlamiR (2017) Assessing the social criteria for human-robot collaborative navigation: A comparison of human-aware navigation planners. In: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN),28-31 Aug, Lisbon, Portugal. IEEE, pp. 1140–1145.
102.
KhambhaitaHAlamiR (2017) Viewing robot navigation in human environment as a cooperative activity. Robotics Research: The 18th International Symposium ISRR. 11-14, Dec, Puerto Varas, Chile: Springer, pp. 285–300.
103.
KhambhaitaHRios-MartinezJAlamiR (2016) Head-body motion coordination for human aware robot navigation. In: 9th International workshop on Human-Friendlly Robotics (HFR 2016), ICRA. 16-21 May, Stockholm, Sweden: Online, 8p.
104.
KivrakHCakmakFKoseHYavuzS (2018) Socially aware robot navigation using the collision prediction based pedestrian model. In: IEEE/RSJ IROS: Workshop on Robotic Co-workers. 1-5 Oct, Madrid, Spain: Online.
105.
KollmitzMHsiaoKGaaJBurgardW (2015) Time dependent planning on a layered social cost map for human-aware robot navigation. In: 2015 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), 2-4 Sep,Lincoln, UK. IEEE, pp. 1–6.
106.
KollmitzMKollerTBoedeckerJBurgardW (2020) Learning human-aware robot navigation from physical interaction via inverse reinforcement learning. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Oct 25 2020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, pp. 11025–11031.
107.
KorkmazM (2021) Human-aware dynamic path planning. In: 2021 International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA), 25-27 Aug, Kocaeli, Turkey. IEEE, 1–5.
108.
KostavelisIGiakoumisDMalassiotisSTzovarasD (2016) Human aware robot navigation in semantically annotated domestic environments. In: AntonaMStephanidisC (eds). Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Techniques and Environments, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Copenhagen, Denmark: Springer International Publishing, pp. 414–423.
109.
KostavelisIKargakosAGiakoumisDTzovarasD (2017) Robot’s workspace enhancement with dynamic human presence for socially-aware navigation. Computer Vision Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Shenzhen, China: Springer International Publishing, pp. 279–288.
110.
KruseTKirschAKhambhaitaHAlamiR (2014) Evaluating directional cost models in navigation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction - HRI ’14, 3-6 Mar,Bielefeld, Germany. ACM Press, pp. 350–357.
111.
KruseTPandeyAKAlamiRKirschA (2013) Human-aware robot navigation: A survey. Robotics and Autonomous Systems61: 1726–1743.
112.
LiHZhangQZhaoD (2019) Deep reinforcement learning-based automatic exploration for navigation in unknown environment. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems31(6): 2064–2076.
113.
LiangXWangTYangLXingE (2018) Cirl: Controllable imitative reinforcement learning for vision-based self-driving. In: Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 8-14 Sep,Munich, Germany. Springer, pp. 584–599.
114.
LichtenthälerCKirschA (2013) Towards legible robot navigation-how to increase the intend expressiveness of robot navigation behavior. International Conference on Social Robotics-Workshop Embodied Communication of Goals and Intentions, 27-29 Oct. Bristol, UK: Online.
115.
LichtenthälerCPetersAGriffithsSKirschA (2013) Social navigation-identifying robot navigation patterns in a path crossing scenario. In: Social Robotics: 5th International Conference, ICSR2013, 2784–2993Oct, Bristol, UK. Springer.
116.
LichtenthälerCLorenzTKargMKirschA (2012) Increasing perceived value between human and robots — Measuring legibility in human aware navigation. In: 2012 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO). 21-23 May, Munich, Germany: IEEE, pp. 89–94.
117.
LiewCFYairiT (2013) Quadrotor or blimp? noise and appearance considerations in designing social aerial robot. In: 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 3-6 Mar,Tokyo, Japan. IEEE, pp. 183–184.
118.
LiuLDugasDCesariGSiegwartRDubéR (2020) Robot navigation in crowded environments using deep reinforcement learning. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 5671–5677.
119.
LobatoCVega-MagroANúñezPMansoL (2019) Human-robot dialogue and collaboration for social navigation in crowded environments. In: 2019 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Robot Systems and Competitions (ICARSC), 24-26 Apr,Porto, Portugal. IEEE, pp. 1–6.
120.
LuDVSmartWD (2013) Towards more efficient navigation for robots and humans. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 3-7 Nov,Tokyo, Japan. IEEE, pp. 1707–1713.
121.
LuberMSpinelloLSilvaJArrasKO (2012) Socially-aware robot navigation: A learning approach. In: 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 7-12 Oct,Vilamoura-Algarve, Portugal. IEEE, pp. 902–907.
122.
LuoYCaiPBeraAHsuDLeeWSManochaD (2018) Porca: modeling and planning for autonomous driving among many pedestrians. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters3: 3418–3425.
123.
MacenskiSMartínFWhiteRClaveroJG (2020) The marathon 2: A navigation system. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 2718–2725.
124.
MajdKYaghoubiSYamaguchiTHoxhaBProkhorovDFainekosG (2021) Safe navigation in human occupied environments using sampling and control barrier functions. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 27 Sep - 1 Oct, Prague, Czech Republic.IEEE, pp. 5794–5800.
125.
ManhHAlaghbandG (2018) Scene-LSTM: A model for human trajectory prediction. Online: arXiv, arXiv:1808.04018.
126.
MansoLJJorvekarRRFariaDRBustosPBachillerP (2019) Graph Neural Networks for Human-aware Social Navigation. Online: arXiv, arXiv:1909.09003.
127.
MansoLJNuñezPCalderitaLVFariaDRBachillerP (2020) Socnav1: A dataset to benchmark and learn social navigation conventions. Data5(1): 7.
128.
MargeMBonialCFootsAHayesCHenryCPollardKArtsteinRVossCTraumD (2017) Exploring variation of natural human commands to a robot in a collaborative navigation task. In: Proceedings of the first workshop on language grounding for robotics,Aug, Vancouver, Canada. ACL Anthology, pp. 58–66.
129.
MateusARibeiroDMiraldoPNascimentoJC (2019) Efficient and robust pedestrian detection using deep learning for human-aware navigation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems113: 23–37.
130.
MavrogiannisCBaldiniFWangAZhaoDTrautmanPSteinfeldAOhJ (2023) Core challenges of social robot navigation: A survey. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction12(3): 1–39.
131.
MavrogiannisCHutchinsonAMMacdonaldJAlves-OliveiraPKnepperRA (2019) Effects of distinct robot navigation strategies on human behavior in a crowded environment. In: 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 11-14 Mar, Daegu, Korea (South).IEEE, 421–430.
132.
MavrogiannisCIThomasonWBKnepperRA (2018) Social momentum: A framework for legible navigation in dynamic multi-agent environments. In: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI ’18, 5-8 Mar,Chicago USA. ACM Press, 361–369.
133.
MayADDondrupCHanheideM (2015) Show me your moves! Conveying navigation intention of a mobile robot to humans. In: 2015 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR), 2-4 Sep,Lincoln, UK. IEEE, 1–6.
134.
MeadRMatarićMJ (2017) Autonomous human–robot proxemics: socially aware navigation based on interaction potential. Autonomous Robots41(5): 1189–1201.
135.
MirskyRXiaoXHartJStoneP (2021) Prevention and resolution of conflicts in social navigation–a survey. Online: arXiv, arXiv:2106.12113.
136.
MizuchiYInamuraT (2017) Cloud-based multimodal human-robot interaction simulator utilizing ROS and unity frameworks. In: 2017 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII), 11-14 Dec,Taipei, Taiwan. IEEE, pp. 948–955.
137.
MöllerRFurnariABattiatoSHärmäAFarinellaGM (2021) A survey on human-aware robot navigation. Robotics and Autonomous Systems145: 103837.
138.
MoralesYMiyashitaTHagitaN (2017) Social robotic wheelchair centered on passenger and pedestrian comfort. Robotics and Autonomous Systems87: 355–362.
139.
NarayananVKMiyashitaTHagitaN (2018) Formalizing a transient-goal driven approach for pedestrian-aware robot navigation. In: 201827th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 27-31Aug, Nanjing, China. IEEE, 862–867.
140.
NarayananVKMiyashitaTHorikawaYHagitaN (2018) A transient-goal driven communication-aware navigation strategy for large human-populated environments. In: 2018IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1-5 Oct,Madrid, Spain. IEEE, pp. 1–9.
141.
NarayananVKSpalanzaniABabelM (2016) A semi-autonomous framework for human-aware and user intention driven wheelchair mobility assistance. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 9-14 Oct, Daejeon, Korea (South).IEEE, pp. 4700–4707.
142.
NeggersMMCuijpersRHRuijtenPA (2018) Comfortable passing distances for robots. In: Social Robotics: 10th International Conference, ICSR 2018, Qingdao, China, November 28-30, 2018, Proceedings 10. Springer, 431–440.
143.
NeggersMMCuijpersRHRuijtenPAIJsselsteijnWA (2022) Determining shape and size of personal space of a human when passed by a robot. International Journal of Social Robotics14: 561–572.
144.
NeggersMMCuijpersRHRuijtenPAIJsselsteijnWA (2022b) The effect of robot speed on comfortable passing distances. Frontiers in Robotics and AI9: 915972.
145.
NeggersMMRuijtenPACuijpersRHIJsselsteijnWA (2022) Effect of robot gazing behavior on human comfort and robot predictability in navigation. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), 28-30 May,Long Beach, USA. IEEE, 1–6.
146.
NgoHQT (2021) Recent researches on human-aware navigation for autonomous system in the dynamic environment: An international survey. In: Context-Aware Systems and Applications: 10th EAI International Conference, ICCASA 2021, Virtual Event, October 28–29, 2021, Proceedings 10. Springer, 267–282.
147.
NishimuraMYonetaniR (2020) L2B: Learning to balance the safety-efficiency trade-off in interactive crowd-aware robot navigation. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Oct 25 2020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA: IEEE, 11004–11010.
148.
OboT (2018) Intelligent fuzzy controller for human-aware robot navigation. In: 201812th France-Japan and 10th Europe-Asia Congress on Mechatronics, 10-12 Sep,Tsu, Japan. IEEE, 392–397.
149.
Paez-GranadosDGuptaVBillardA (2022) Unfreezing social navigation: dynamical systems based compliance for contact control in robot navigation. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 23–27 May,Philadelphia, USA. IEEE, 8368–8374.
150.
PalinkoORamírezERJuelWKKrügerNBodenhagenL (2020) Intention indication for human aware robot navigation. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision,Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, 27-29Feb64, Valletta, Malta. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 74.
151.
ParhiDSinghM (2010) Heuristic-rule-based hybrid neural network for navigation of a mobile robot. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture224(7): 1103–1118.
152.
ParkCOndřejJGilbertMFreemanKO’SullivanC (2016) HI Robot: human intention-aware robot planning for safe and efficient navigation in crowds. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 9-14 Oct, Daejeon, Korea (South).IEEE, pp. 3320–3326.
153.
PatompakPJeongSChongNYNilkhamhangI (2016) Mobile robot navigation for human-robot social interaction. In: 2016 16th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS), 16-19 Oct, Gyeongju, Korea (South).IEEE, 1298–1303.
154.
PeddiRDi FrancoCGaoSBezzoN (2020) A data-driven framework for proactive intention-aware motion planning of a robot in a human environment. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, 5738–5744.
155.
Pérez-HiguerasNCaballeroFMerinoL (2018) Learning human-aware path planning with fully convolutional networks. In: 2018IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), 21-25 May,Brisbane, Australia. IEEE, 5897–5902.
156.
Pérez-HiguerasNOteroRCaballeroFMerinoL (2022) Hunavsim: A ros2 human navigation simulator for benchmarking human-aware robot navigation. IEEE/RSJ IROS Workshop: Benchmarking for Motion Planning Applications49: 6.
157.
Pérez-HiguerasNRamón-VigoRCaballeroFMerinoL (2014) Robot local navigation with learned social cost functions. In: 2014 11th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics (ICINCO), 1-3 Sep,Vienna, Austria. IEEE, pp. 618–625.
158.
PetrakBSopperGWeitzKAndreE (2021) Do you mind if I pass through? Studying the appropriate robot behavior when traversing two conversing people in a Hallway setting. In: 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 8-12Aug, Vancouver, Canada. IEEE, 369–375.
159.
PimentelFDAMAquino-PTJr (2021) Evaluation of ROS navigation stack for social navigation in simulated environments. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems102: 1–18.
160.
PolRSMuruganM (2015) A review on indoor human aware autonomous mobile robot navigation through a dynamic environment survey of different path planning algorithm and methods. In: 2015 International conference on industrial instrumentation and control (ICIC), IEEE, 28-30 May,Pune, India. IEEE, 1339–1344.
161.
PrédhumeauMManchevaLDugdaleJSpalanzaniA, (2021) An agent-based model to predict pedestrians trajectories with an autonomous vehicle in shared spaces. In: AAMAS '21: 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 3-7 May, Virtual Event, UK. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 1–9.
162.
PrédhumeauMSpalanzaniADugdaleJ (2021) Pedestrian behavior in shared spaces with autonomous vehicles: An integrated framework and review. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8: 438–457.
163.
Puig-PeyAZamoraJMorenoAJBGarrellAGrauABoleaYSantamariaASanfeliuA, (2023) Human acceptance in the human-robot interaction scenario for last-mile goods delivery. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts(ARSO), 5-7 June,Berlin, Germany. IEEE, 1–6.
164.
QianKMaXDaiXFangFZhouB (2013) Decision-theoretical navigation of service robots using POMDPs with human-robot co-occurrence prediction. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems10(2): 143.
165.
QiuQYaoSWangJMaJChenGJiJ (2022) Learning to socially navigate in pedestrian-rich environments with interaction capacity. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 23–27 May,Philadelphia, USA. IEEE, 279–285.
166.
RamirezOAIKhambhaitaHChatilaRChetouaniMAlamiR (2016) Robots learning how and where to approach people. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN),26-31 Aug, New York, USA. IEEE, 347–353.
167.
RandhavaneTBeraAKubinEWangAGrayKManochaD (2019) Pedestrian dominance modeling for socially-aware robot navigation. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 20-24 May,Montreal, Canada. IEEE, 5621–5628.
168.
RasouliATsotsosJK (2019) Autonomous vehicles that interact with pedestrians: A survey of theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation systems21: 900–918.
169.
RatsameePMaeYOharaKKojimaMAraiT (2013) Social navigation model based on human intention analysis using face orientation. In: 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 3-7 Nov,Tokyo, Japan. IEEE, 1682–1687.
170.
RenaultBSaraydaryanJSimoninO (2019) Towards s-namo: socially-aware navigation among movable obstacles. In: RoboCup 2019: Robot World CupXXIII23, 02-08 July, Sydney, Australia. Springer, 241–254.
171.
RepisoEFerrerGSanfeliuA (2017) On-line adaptive side-by-side human robot companion in dynamic urban environments. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 24-28 Sep,Vancouver, Canada. IEEE, pp. 872–877.
172.
RepisoEGarrellASanfeliuA (2018) Robot approaching and engaging people in a human-robot companion framework. In: 2018IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 1-5 Oct,Madrid, Spain. IEEE, 8200–8205.
173.
RepisoEGarrellASanfeliuA (2020) Adaptive side-by-side social robot navigation to approach and interact with people. International Journal of Social Robotics12: 909–930.
174.
RepisoEGarrellASanfeliuA (2020b) People’s adaptive side-by-side model evolved to accompany groups of people by social robots. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2): 2387–2394.
175.
RepisoEGarrellASanfeliuA (2022) Adaptive social planner to accompany people in real-life dynamic environments. International Journal of Social Robotics1: 1–33.
176.
RepisoEZanlungoFKandaTGarrellASanfeliuA (2019) People’s V-formation and side-by-side model adapted to accompany groups of people by social robots. In: 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 3-8 Nov,Macau, China. IEEE, pp. 2082–2088.
177.
RidelDRehderELauerMStillerCWolfD (2018) A literature review on the prediction of pedestrian behavior in urban scenarios. In: 201821st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 4-7 Nov,Maui, USA. IEEE, pp. 3105–3112.
178.
Rios-MartinezJEscobedoASpalanzaniALaugierC (2012) Intention driven human aware navigation for assisted mobility. In: Workshop on Assistance and Service robotics in a human environment at 2012 IEEE/RSJ IROS. 7-12, Oct, Vilamoura, Portugal: Online.
179.
Rios-MartinezJSpalanzaniALaugierC (2015) From proxemics theory to socially-aware navigation: A survey. International Journal of Social Robotics7: 137–153.
180.
RösmannCOeljeklausMHoffmannFBertramT (2017) Online trajectory prediction and planning for social robot navigation. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 3-7 July,Munich, Germany. IEEE, pp. 1255–1260.
181.
RudenkoAKucnerTPSwaminathanCSChadalavadaRTArrasKOLilienthalAJ (2020a) THÖR: human-robot navigation data collection and accurate motion trajectories dataset. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(2): 676–682.
182.
RudenkoAPalmieriLHermanMKitaniKMGavrilaDMArrasKO (2020b) Human motion trajectory prediction: A survey. The International Journal of Robotics Research39: 895–935.
183.
SalviniPPaez-GranadosDBillardA (2022) Safety concerns emerging from robots navigating in crowded pedestrian areas. International Journal of Social Robotics14: 441–462.
184.
SamarakoonSMBPMuthugalaMAVJJayasekaraAGBP (2022) A review on human–robot proxemics. Electronics11: 2490.
185.
SathyamoorthyAJPatelUGuanTManochaD (2020) Frozone: Freezing-free, pedestrian-friendly navigation in human crowds. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5: 4352–4359.
186.
SenftESatakeSKandaT (2020) Would you mind me if I pass by you?: socially-appropriate behaviour for an omni-based social robot in narrow environment. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 23-26 Mar,Cambridge, UK. ACM, pp. 539–547.
187.
ShahrezaieRSManaloBNBrantleyAGLynchCRFeil-SeiferD (2022) Advancing socially-aware navigation for public spaces. In: 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 29 Aug - 02 Sep,Napoli, Italy. IEEE, 1015–1022.
188.
ShinHYoonSE (2020) Optimization-based path planning for person following using following field. In: 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS),Oct252020 - Jan 24 2021, Las Vegas, USA. IEEE, pp. 11352–11359.
189.
ShresthaMCNohisaYSchmitzAHayakawaSUnoEYokoyamaYYanagawaHOrKSuganoS (2015) Using contact-based inducement for efficient navigation in a congested environment. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. (RO-MAN), 31 Aug - 4 Sep,Kobe, Japan. IEEE, pp. 456–461.
190.
SingamaneniPT (2022) Combining proactive planning and situation analysis for human-aware robot navigation. PhD Thesis. Université Paul Sabatier ToulouseIII.Available from:https://www.theses.fr/2022TOU30226
191.
SingamaneniPTFavierAAlamiR (2021) Human-aware navigation planner for diverse human-robot contexts. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 27 Sep - 1 Oct, Prague, Czech Republic.IEEE, pp. 5817–5824.
192.
SingamaneniPTFavierAAlamiR (2022) Watch out! there may be a human. addressing invisible humans in social navigation. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 23-27 Oct,Kyoto, Japan. IEEE, pp. 11344–11351.
SkrzypczykK (2021) Game against nature based control of an intelligent wheelchair with adaptation to pedestrians’ behaviour. In: 2021 25th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), 23-26Aug, Międzyzdroje, Poland. IEEE, pp. 285–290.
195.
SongCChenZQiXZhaoBHuYLiuSZhangJ (2018) Human trajectory prediction for automatic guided vehicle with recurrent neural network. The Journal of Engineering 20182018: 1574–1578.
196.
SongYNajiSKaufmannELoquercioAScaramuzzaD (2021) Flightmare: A flexible quadrotor simulator. In: 2021 Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL), 8-11 Nov,London, UK. PMLR, pp. 1147–1157.
197.
SorrentinoAKhalidOCovielloLCavalloFFioriniL (2021) Modeling human-like robot personalities as a key to foster socially aware navigation. In: 2021 30th IEEE International Conference on Robot & Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 8-12Aug, Vancouver, Canada. IEEE, pp. 95–101.
198.
SzafirDMutluBFongT (2014) Communication of intent in assistive free flyers. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, 3-6 Mar,Bielefeld, Germany. ACM, pp. 358–365.
199.
SzafirDMutluBFongT (2015) Communicating directionality in flying robots. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 2-5 Mar,Portland, USA. ACM, pp. 19–26.
200.
TadokoroSHayashiMManabeYNakamiYTakamoriT (1995) On motion planning of mobile robots which coexist and cooperate with human. In: Proceedings 1995 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Human Robot Interaction and Cooperative Robots, 5-9Aug, Pittsburgh, USA. IEEE, Vol. 2, 518–523.
201.
TalebpourZNavarroIMartinoliA (2015) On-board human-aware navigation for indoor resource-constrained robots: A case-study with the ranger. 2015 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII). 11-13 Dec, Nagoya, Japan: IEEE, pp. 63–68.
202.
TalebpourZViswanathanDVenturaREnglebienneGMartinoliA (2016) Incorporating perception uncertainty in human-aware navigation: A comparative study. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN),26-31 Aug, New York, USA. IEEE, pp. 570–577.
203.
TaylorAVMamantovEAdmoniH (2022) Observer-aware legibility for social navigation. In: 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 29 Aug - 02 Sep,Napoli, Italy. IEEE, pp. 1115–1122.
204.
TejaSPAlamiR (2020) HATEB-2: reactive planning and decision making in human-robot co-navigation. In: 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 31 Aug - 04 Sep,Naples, Italy. IEEE, pp. 179–186.
205.
ToghiBValienteRSadighDPedarsaniRFallahYP (2021) Altruistic Maneuver Planning for Cooperative Autonomous Vehicles Using Multi-agent Advantage Actor-Critic, Online: arXiv, arXiv:2107.05664.
206.
ToghiBValienteRSadighDPedarsaniRFallahYP (2022) Social coordination and altruism in autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems23: 24791–24804.
207.
TrautmanPMaJMurrayRMKrauseA (2015) Robot navigation in dense human crowds: Statistical models and experimental studies of human–robot cooperation. The International Journal of Robotics Research34(3): 335–356.
208.
TriebelRArrasKAlamiRBeyerLBreuersSChatilaRChetouaniMCremersDEversVFioreMHungHRamírezOAIJoosseMKhambhaitaHKucnerTLeibeBLilienthalAJLinderTLohseMMagnussonMOkalBPalmieriLRafiUvan RooijMZhangL (2016) Spencer: A socially aware service robot for passenger guidance and help in busy airports. Field and Service Robotics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 113, 607–622.
209.
TrucJSingamaneniPTSidobreDIvaldiSAlamiR (2022) KHAOS: a kinematic human aware optimization-based system for reactive planning of flying-coworker. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 23–27 May,Philadelphia, USA. IEEE, pp. 4764–4770.
210.
TruongXTNgoTD (2017) Toward socially aware robot navigation in dynamic and crowded environments: a proactive social motion model. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering14(4): 1743–1760.
211.
TruongXTNgoTD (2018) “To approach humans?”: A unified framework for approaching pose prediction and socially aware robot navigation. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems10(3): 557–572.
212.
TruongXTNgoTD (2019) An integrative approach of social dynamic long short-term memory and deep reinforcement learning for socially aware robot navigation. Long-term Human Motion Prediction Workshop ICRA. 20-24 May, Montreal, Canada.: Online.
213.
TruongXTYoongVNNgoTD (2017) Socially aware robot navigation system in human interactive environments. Intelligent Service Robotics10(4): 287–295.
214.
TsoiNHusseinMEspinozaJRuizXVázquezM (2020) Sean: social environment for autonomous navigation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, 10-13 Nov,New York, USA. ACM, pp. 281–283.
215.
TsoiNHusseinMFugikawaOZhaoJDVazquezM (2021) An approach to deploy interactive robotic simulators on the web for HRI experiments: results in social robot navigation. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 27 Sep - 1 Oct, Prague, Czech Republic.IEEE, pp. 7528–7535.
216.
TsoiNVazquezM (2017) Early Prototyping and Human Evaluation of Social Robot Navigation via Online Interactive Simulations. Online: Yale Robotics.
217.
TsoiNXiangAYuPSohnSSSchwartzGRameshSHusseinMGuptaAWKapadiaMVázquezM (2022) Sean 2.0: Formalizing and generating social situations for robot navigation. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters7(4): 11047–11054.
218.
UnhelkarVVPerez-D’ArpinoCStirlingLShahJA (2015) Human-robot co-navigation using anticipatory indicators of human walking motion. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 26-30 May,Seattle, USA. IEEE, pp. 6183–6190.
219.
ValienteRToghiBPedarsaniRFallahYP (2022) Robustness and adaptability of reinforcement learning-based cooperative autonomous driving in mixed-autonomy traffic. IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems3: 397–410.
220.
VarshneyaDSrinivasaraghavanG (2017) Human trajectory prediction using spatially aware deep attention models. Online: arXiv, arXiv:1705.09436.
221.
VasconcelosPAPereiraHNMacharetDGNascimentoER (2015) Socially acceptable robot navigation in the presence of humans. In: 2015 12th Latin American Robotics Symposium and 2015 3rd Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (LARS-SBR), 29-31 Oct,Uberlandia, Brazil. IEEE, pp. 222–227.
222.
VasquezDOkalBArrasKO (2014) Inverse reinforcement learning algorithms and features for robot navigation in crowds: An experimental comparison. In: 2014 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 14-18 Sep,Chicago, USA. IEEE, pp. 1341–1346.
223.
VasquezDSteinPRios-MartinezJEscobedoASpalanzaniALaugierC (2013) Human aware navigation for assistive robotics. Experimental Robotics. Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing, 88, 449–462.
224.
VegaAMansoLJCintasRNúñezP (2019a) Planning human-robot interaction for social navigation in crowded environments. In: Advances in Physical Agents: Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop of Physical Agents (WAF 2018), Madrid, Spain, November 22-23, 2018: Springer, pp. 195–208.
225.
VegaAMansoLJMacharetDGBustosPNúñezP (2019b) Socially aware robot navigation system in human-populated and interactive environments based on an adaptive spatial density function and space affordances. Pattern Recognition Letters118: 72–84.
226.
Vega-MagroAMansoLBustosPNunezPMacharetDG (2017) Socially acceptable robot navigation over groups of people. In: 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN),28-31 Aug, Lisbon, Portugal. IEEE, pp. 1182–1187.
227.
Vega-MagroAMansoLJBustosPNunezP (2018) A flexible and adaptive spatial density model for context-aware social mapping: towards a more realistic social navigation. In: 201815th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), 18-21 Nov,Singapore. IEEE, pp. 1727–1732.
228.
VemulaAMuellingKOhJ (2018) Social attention: modeling attention in human crowds. In: 2018IEEE international Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 21-25 May,Brisbane, Australia. IEEE, pp. 4601–4607.
229.
WangABiswasAAdmoniHSteinfeldA (2022) Towards rich, portable, and large-scale pedestrian data collection. Online: arXiv, arXiv:2203.01974.
230.
WangCLiYGeSSLeeTH (2016) Adaptive control for robot navigation in human environments based on social force model. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 16-21 May,Stockholm, Sweden. IEEE, pp. 5690–5695.
231.
WangJChanWPCarreno-MedranoPCosgunACroftE (2022) Metrics for evaluating social conformity of crowd navigation algorithms. In: 2022 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Robotics and Its Social Impacts (ARSO), 28-30 May,Long Beach, USA. IEEE, pp. 1–6.
232.
WangRWangWMinBC (2022) Feedback-efficient active preference learning for socially aware robot navigation. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 23-27 Oct,Kyoto, Japan. IEEE, pp. 11336–11343.
233.
WangWLiRChenYDiekelZMJiaY (2018) Facilitating human–robot collaborative tasks by teaching-learning-collaboration from human demonstrations. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering16(2): 640–653.
234.
WangWWangLZhangCLiuCSunL (2022) Social Interactions for Autonomous Driving: A Review and Perspectives. Now Foundations and Trends: IEEE, ISBN 978-1-63828-128-3. DOI: 10.1561/9781638281290.
235.
WeissABartneckC (2015) Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed questionnaire series. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 31 Aug - 4 Sep,Kobe, Japan. IEEE, pp. 381–388.
XieZXinPDamesP (2021) Towards safe navigation through crowded dynamic environments. In: 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 27 Sep - 1 Oct, Prague, Czech Republic.IEEE, pp. 4934–4940.
238.
YaoNAnayaETaoQChoSZhengHZhangF (2017) Monocular vision-based human following on miniature robotic blimp. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 29 May - 3 June,Singapore. IEEE, pp. 3244–3249.
239.
YaoNsTaoQyLiuWyLiuZTianYWangPyLiTZhangF (2019) Autonomous flying blimp interaction with human in an indoor space. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering20(1): 45–59.
240.
YeJKimYLeeKM (2020) Context-aware natural language instructions for social robot navigation in indoor environments. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems12(2): 143–152.
241.
YehARatsameePKiyokawaKUranishiYMashitaTTakemuraHFjeldMObaidM (2017) Exploring proxemics for human-drone interaction. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction, 6-9 Mar,Vienna, Austria. ACM, pp. 81–88.
242.
YenGGHickeyTW (2004) Reinforcement learning algorithms for robotic navigation in dynamic environments. ISA transactions43(2): 217–230.
243.
YoonHJWiddowsonCMarinhoTWangRFHovakimyanN (2019) Socially aware path planning for a flying robot in close proximity of humans. ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems3(4): 1–24.
244.
ZhuKZhangT (2021) Deep reinforcement learning based mobile robot navigation: a review. Tsinghua Science and Technology26(5): 674–691.
245.
ZimmermannSPoranneRCorosS (2021) Go fetch!-dynamic grasps using Boston dynamics spot with external robotic arm. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 30 May - 5 June, Xi'an, China. IEEE, pp. 4488–4494.
