Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Pneumatic actuators are attractive for robotic rehabilitation applications because they are lightweight, powerful, and compliant, but their control has historically been difficult, limiting their use. In this paper we present the pneumatic control system developed for Pneu-WREX: a pneumatically actuated, upper extremity orthosis for rehabilitation after stroke. The developed pneumatic control system combines several novel components to make the entire system stable, reliable, and backdrivable. These components, which are described in this paper, include: (1) a unique two-valve force control subsystem that keeps chamber pressure low (to reduce friction and energy consumption) and adaptively compensates for leakage; (2) a new servovalve characterization approach that uses experimentally measured data in a combined non-linear and least-squares regression to obtain a linear relationship between mass flow and valve voltage; and (3) a new approach to state estimation using accelerometers and a Kalman filter to obtain clean signals for use in a non-linear adaptive feedback control law. Experimental testing of the device demonstrates the efficacy of the developed pneumatic control system.

Keywords

neurorehabilitation kalman filter state estimation Lyapunov’s direct method nonlinear control force control pneumatic control compliance movement training servovalve characterization radial basis functions impairment modeling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Dakkan, K.A. et al. (2003). Energy saving control for pneumatic servo systems. Proceedings 2003 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics, 2003 (AIM 2003).

Bobrow, J.E. and McDonell, B.W. ( 1998). Modeling, identification, and control of a pneumatically actuated, force controllable robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(5): 732-742.

Fite, K.B. et al. (2006). A unified force controller for a proportional-injector direct-injection monopropellantpowered actuator. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 128: 159.

Granosik, G. and Borenstein, J. ( 2004). Minimizing air consumption of pneumatic actuators in mobile robots. Proceedings 2004 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004 (ICRA’04).

He, J. et al. (2005). RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy. 27th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2005 (IEEE-EMBS 2005), 6844-6847.

Leavitt, J. et al. (2006). High bandwidth tilt measurement using low cost sensors. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 11(3): 320-327.

Murray, R.M. et al. (1994). A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation . CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

Rahman, T. et al. (2004). Design and testing of WREX. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, pp. 243- 250.

Reinkensmeyer, D.J. et al. (2006). Tools for understanding and optimizing robotic gait training. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development , 43(5): 657-670.

10.

Richer, E. and Hurmuzlu, Y. ( 2000a). A high performance pneumatic force actuator system: part I-Nonlinear mathematical model. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 122: 416.

11.

Richer, E. and Hurmuzlu, Y. ( 2000b). A high performance pneumatic force actuator system: part II-Nonlinear controller design. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 122: 426.

12.

Sanchez, R.J. et al. (2005). A pneumatic robot for re-training arm movement after stroke: Rationale and mechanical design. 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005 (ICORR 2005) , pp. 500-504.

13.

Sanville, F.E. ( 1971). A new method of specifying the flow capacity of pneumatic fluid power valves. Hydraulic Pneumatic Power, 17: 195.

14.

Shearer, J.L. ( 1956). Study of pneumatic processes in the continuous control of motion with compressed air. Transactions of the ASME, 78: 233-249.

15.

Slotine, J.J.E. and Li, W. ( 1991). Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice-Hall , Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

16.

Surgenor, B.W. and Vaughan, N.D. ( 1997). Continuous sliding mode control of a pneumatic actuator . Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 119(3): 578- 581.

17.

Wolbrecht, E.T. et al. (2006). Control of a pneumatic orthosis for upper extremity stroke rehabilitation. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006 (EMBS ’06), New York.

18.

Wolbrecht, E.T. et al. (2008). Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 16(3): 286-297.

19.

Xiang, F. and Wikander, J. ( 2004). Block-oriented approximate feedback linearization for control of pneumatic actuator system. Control Engineering Practice, 12(4): 387- 399.

Pneumatic Control of Robots for Rehabilitation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References