Achievement of goals and organizational effectiveness has continued to suffer from abusive delegation by managers because a gap exists between delegation principles and what some managers actually do and there is no known study till date that attempts to empirically develop an abusive delegation measure. Using exploratory factor analysis this study develops and validates the abusive delegation scale among managers. Employing triangulation techniques, focused group discussion, and in-depth interview for superiors and subordinates across organizations, 123 positive and negative question items were generated and developed into a survey questionnaire using 5-point Likert scale for the study construct. Stratified, snowball and simple random sampling techniques were employed to draw participants from the study setting. The instrument was administered to 450 managers in the middle and senior level positions from public and private organizations out of which n = 341 managers participated in the study. Data was analysed using principal component factoring with varimax rotation to establish total-item correlations and exploratory factors. Three dimensions of the abusive delegation construct; (Skewed-delegation, authority-responsibility parity, egocentric-delegation), emerged with reliability values of between .71 and .92. Further evidence of the construct and criterion validity was established from the main study. Implications of this evidences are discussed.
AnthonyM. K.VidalK. (2010). Mindful communication: A novel approach to improving delegation and increasing patient safety. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No2Man02
AshforthB. E. (1999). Leadership as an embedded process: Some insights from Sayles’ managerial behavior. Leadership Quarterly, 10(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(99)80006-X
BassB. M. (1990). Bass and Stodgil’s handbook of leadership (3rd ed.). Free Press.
6.
BennisW.NanusB. (1985). The strategies for taking charge. Harper & Row.
7.
BiesR. J. (1999). Interactional (in) justice: The sacred and profane. In GreenbergJ.CropanzanoR. (Eds.), Advances in organisational behaviour (pp. 89–118). New Lexington Press.
8.
ChandanJ. S. (1999). Management theory and practice. Vikas Publishing House.
9.
ChenZ.PoonK. T.JiangT.TengF. (2025). Psychosocial and behavioural consequences of ostracism across contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 4(2), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-024-00393-y
10.
Chénard-PoirierL.-A.MorinA. J. S.BoudriasJ. S. (2017). On the merits of coherent leadership empowerment behaviours: A mixture regression approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 103, 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.08.003
11.
ChoyJ.McCormackD.DjurkovicN. (2016). Leader-member exchange and job performance: The mediating roles of delegation and participation. Journal of Management Development, 35(1), 104–119. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-06-2015-0086
12.
ChurchillJr. G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64–73.
13.
CiprianoR. E. (2011). Facilitating a collegial department in higher education: Strategies for success. John Wiley and Sons.
14.
DardenT. R.BrekashviliP.Schurer LambertL.CurrieR.HardtG. F. (2025). A psychological contract perspective of supervisors’ satisfaction with employees. Journal of Management & Organization, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2024.50
15.
De VellisJ. C. (2003). Patenting industry standards: Balancing the rights of patent holders with the need for industry-wide standards. AIPLA QJ, 31(3), 301.
16.
DewhirstH. D.MettsV.LaddR. T. (1987). Exploring the delegation decision: Managerial responses to multiple contingencies. Annual meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans.
17.
DuffyM. K.GansterD. C.PagonM. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069350
FarhC. I. C.ChenZ. (2014). Beyond the individual victim: Multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1074–1095. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037636
20.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
21.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
22.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. Perarson.
23.
HamannP. M.SchiemannF.BelloraL.GuentherT. W. (2013). Exploring the dimensions of organizational performance: A construct validity study. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470007
24.
HamlinR. G.PatelT.RuizC.WhitfordS. (2012). Towards a universal taxonomy of perceived managerial and leadership effectiveness: A multiple cross-case/cross-nation study of effective and ineffective managerial behaviour. In: Proceedings of the 13th UFHRD International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice across Europe, Universidade Lusiada de Vila Nova de Famalicao (Portugal), 23–25 May.
25.
HattieJ. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and ltenls. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139–164.
26.
HinkinT. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121.
27.
HollingsworthA. T.Al-JafaryA. R. (1983). Why supervisors don't delegate and employees won't accept responsibility. Supervisory Management, 28(4), 12–17.
28.
KoontzT. M. (2003). An introduction to the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework for forest management research. In: Paper prepared for “First Nations and Sustainable Forestry: Institutional Conditions for Success”. University of British Columbia Faculty of Forestry, Vancouver, B.C., October 2003.
29.
KreitnerR. (2005). Foundations of management: Basics and best practices. Houghton Mifflin Company.
30.
Law, M., Stewart, D., Letts, L., Pollock, N., Bosch, J., & Westmorland, M. (1998). Guidelines for critical review of qualitative studies. McMaster University occupational therapy evidence-based practice research Group, 1.
31.
LeanaC. R. (1986). Predictors and consequences of delegation. Academy of Management Journal, 29(4), 754–774. https://doi.org/10.2307/255943
32.
LipkinJ.LipkinJ. R. F. (1999). From delegation to participation [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford.
33.
Llorens-SerranoC.Salas-NicásS.Navarro-GinéA.LluísS. M. (2022). Delegation and consultation on operational and tactical issues: Any difference in their potentialities for a healthier psychosocial work environment?American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 65(10), 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23414
34.
MalhotraN. K.DashS. (2011). Marketing research: An applied orientation. Pearson Publishing.
35.
MathewP. I. (1980). Higher education in a developmental framework: Problems and prospects in India. International Education, 9(2), 12.
36.
NetemeyerR. G.BeardenW. O.SharmaS. (2003). Scale development in the social sciences: Issues and applications. Sage Publications.
37.
NunnallyJ. C.BernsteinI. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw- Hill.
38.
ParkH. M.CarterK. M.PhillipsJ. M. (2023). Resisting delegation: The influence of incivility and developmental tasks on commitment to the supervisor and delegation resistance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(6), 1245–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09898-4
39.
PayneB. K.GawronskiB. (2010). A history of implicit social cognition: Where is it coming from? Where is it now? Where is it going. In Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (Vol. 1, pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
PerryM. D. (2016). A new leadership approach to motivation and delegation.
41.
RoseS.SpinksN.CanhotoA. I. (2015). Management research: Applying the principles (p. 440). Routledge.
42.
RossiterJ. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 19(4), 305–335.
43.
Schriesheim, C. A., & Neider, L. L. (2010). Abusive and supportive leadership: Two sides of the same coin. In L. L. Neider & C. Schriesheim (Eds.), The ‘‘Dark'’ side of management (pp. 49-67). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
44.
SchrieshenC. A.NeiderL. L.ScanduraT. A. (1998). Delegation and leader- member exchange; main effects, moderators, and measurement issues. Academy of Management Journal, 41(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.5465/256909
45.
SchweigerD. M.LeanaC. R. (1986). Participation in decision making. In E. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings: Research findings from Industrial-Organizational Psychology, organizational behavior, and human resource management (pp. 147–166). Lexington: D. C. Health & Co.
46.
SpectorP. E. (1992). A consideration of the validity and meaning of self-report measures of job conditions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 123–151.
47.
StraussL. (1963). The political philosophy of Hobbes: its basis and its genesis. University of Chicago Press.
48.
TangW. G.VandenbergheC. (2021). Role overload and work performance: The role of psychological strain and leader–member exchange. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 691207. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.691207
49.
TepperB. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556375
50.
TepperB. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33(3), 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812
TepperB. J.MossS. E.LockhartD. E.CarrJ. C. (2007). Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1169–1180. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.20159918
53.
ViswesvaranC.OnesD. S. (2000). Measurement error in “Big Five Factors” personality assessment: Reliability generalization across studies and measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970475
54.
WagnerJ. A.III (1994). Participation's effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19(2), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410210753
55.
YangJ.WangX. H.TreadwayD. C.LiuY. (2024). How and when does abusive supervision influence employees’ promotive and prohibitive voice?Current Psychology, 43(2), 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04304-x
56.
ZaghmoutB. (2024). Unmasking toxic leadership: Identifying, addressing, and preventing destructive leadership behaviours in modern organizations. Open Journal of Leadership, 13(3), 244–265. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2024.133015
