Drawing upon conservation of resources and social bonding theories, the present study examined the associations between job embeddedness and employee work behaviors (altruism and organizational deviance) by exploring the moderating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) in these associations. Using a cross-sectional research design, data were collected from a sample of 637 employees in Turkey. The data were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and bootstrapping. The findings indicated that job embeddedness was positively related to employee altruism while negatively related to organizational deviance. This study also provided support for the moderating role of LMX in job embeddedness-altruism and job embeddedness-organizational deviance relationships. More specifically, job embeddedness had a stronger positive relationship with altruism and a stronger negative relationship with organizational deviance when LMX quality was high. These findings substantiate the pivotal role of focusing on both job embeddedness and the treatment by supervisors in the organization to inculcate desirable workplace behaviors and employee performance motivation. The implications are discussed as well as limitations, and directions for future research are provided.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
2.
AllenD. G.PeltokorpiV. M.RubensteinA. L. (2016). When “embedded” means “stuck”: Moderating effects of job embeddedness in adverse work environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(12), 1670–1686. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000134
3.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
BauerT. N.GreenS. G. (1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538–1567. https://doi.org/10.5465/257068
6.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. In TriandisH. C.LambertW. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 349–444). Allyn & Bacon.
7.
BurtonJ. P.HoltomB. C.SablynskiC. J.MitchellT. R.LeeT. W. (2010). The buffering effects of job embeddedness on negative shocks. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.06.006
8.
CollinsB. J.MossholderK. W. (2017). Fairness means more to some than others: Interactional fairness, job embeddedness, and discretionary work behaviors. Journal of Management, 43(2), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527132
9.
CrossleyC. D.BennettR. J.JexS. M.BurnfieldJ. L. (2007). Development of a global measure of job embeddedness and integration into a traditional model of voluntary turnover. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1031–1042. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1031
10.
DarratM. A.AmyxD. A.BennettR. J. (2017). Examining the impact of job embeddedness on salesperson deviance: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.10.012
11.
DieneschR. M.LidenR. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 618–634. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4306242
12.
ErdoganB.KraimerM. L.LidenR. C. (2002). Person-organization fit and work attitudes: The moderating role of leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 2002(1), F1–F6. https://doi.org/10.5465/APBPP.2002.7517561
13.
FerrisD. L.BrownD. J.HellerD. (2009). Organizational supports and organizational deviance: The mediating role of organization-based self-esteem. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(2), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.09.001
14.
GhoshD.GurunathanL. (2015). Job embeddedness: A ten-year literature review and proposed guidelines. Global Business Review, 16(5), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915591652
15.
GouldnerA. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092623
16.
GraenG. B.Uhl-BienM. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6(2), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5
17.
GreeneJ.MeroN.WernerS. (2018). The negative effects of job embeddedness on performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-02-2017-0074
18.
GürbüzS.AyhanÖ. (2017). Lidere yakın olmanın dayanılmaz hafifliği: Lider-üye etkileşimi, görev performansı, tecrübe ve terfi edebilirlik arasındaki ilişkilerin testi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi.
19.
HarrisK. J.WheelerA. R.KacmarK. M. (2011). The mediating role of organizational job embeddedness in the LMX–outcomes relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.003
20.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press, 1969.
21.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. The American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.44.3.513
22.
HobfollS. E.HalbeslebenJ.NeveuJ. P.WestmanM. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104640
23.
HodwitzO. (2014). Social bonding theory (pp. 1–5). The Encyclopedia of Criminology and Criminal Justice.
HoltomB. C.BurtonJ. P.CrossleyC. D. (2012). How negative affectivity moderates the relationship between shocks, embeddedness, and worker behaviors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.12.006
26.
HoltomB. C.DarabiT. (2018). Job embeddedness theory as a tool for improving employee retention. In Psychology of retention (pp. 95–117).
27.
KapilK.RastogiR. (2018). Promoting organizational citizenship behaviour: The roles of leader–member exchange and organizational job embeddedness. South Asian Journal of Human Resources Management, 5(1), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/2322093718766803
28.
KiazadK.HoltomB. C.HomP. W.NewmanA. (2015). Job embeddedness: A multifoci theoretical extension. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 641–659. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038919
29.
LeeT. W.MitchellT. R.SablynskiC. J.BurtonJ. P.HoltomB. C. (2004). The effects of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship, job performance, volitional absences, and voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159613
30.
LevS.KoslowskyM. (2012). Teacher gender as a moderator of the on-the-job embeddedness OCB relationship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00868.x
31.
LoiR.NgoH. Y.ZhangL.LauV. P. (2011). The interaction between leader–member exchange and perceived job security in predicting employee altruism and work performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(4), 669–685. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317910x510468
32.
MarasiS.CoxS. S.BennettR. J. (2016). Job embeddedness: Is it always a good thing?Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(1), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-05-2013-0150
33.
MehmoodS. A.MalikA. R.NadarajahD.Saood AkhtarM. (2022). A moderated mediation model of counterproductive work behaviour, organisational justice, organisational embeddedness, and psychological ownership. Personnel Review, 52(1), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-05-2021-0330
34.
MitchellT. R.HoltomB. C.LeeT. W.SablynskiC. J.ErezM. (2001). Why people stay: Using job embeddedness to predict voluntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1102–1121. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069391
35.
NewtonC.PerlowR. (2021). The role of leader-member exchange relations and individual differences on counterproductive work behavior. Psychological Reports. Advance online publication.
36.
NgT. W. H.FeldmanD. C. (2009). Occupational embeddedness and job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 863–891. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.580
37.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
ObengA. F.ZhuY.AzingaS. A.QuansahP. E. (2021). Organizational climate and job performance: Investigating the mediating role of harmonious work passion and the moderating role of leader–member exchange and coaching. Sage Open.
39.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
40.
RestubogS. L. D.BordiaP.TangR. L.KrebsS. A. (2010). Investigating the moderating effects of leader–member exchange in the psychological contract breach–employee performance relationship: A test of two competing perspectives. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 422–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00673.x
41.
SarwarA.NaseerS.ZhongJ. Y. (2020). Effects of bullying on job insecurity and deviant behaviors in nurses: Roles of resilience and support. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(2), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12917
42.
SekiguchiT.BurtonJ. P.SablynskiC. J. (2008). The role of job embeddedness on employee performance: The interactive effects with leader–member exchange and organization-based self-esteem. Personnel Psychology, 61(4), 761–792. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00130.x
43.
SimsR. L. (2002). Ethical rule breaking by employees: A test of social bonding theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 40(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1020330801847
44.
SinghB.ShafferM. A.SelvarajanT. T. (2018). Antecedents of organizational and community embeddedness: The roles of support, psychological safety, and need to belong. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2223
45.
SinghR. (2019). Engagement as a moderator on the embeddedness-deviance relationship. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(4), 1004–1016. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-08-2018-1512
46.
SmithC. A.OrganD. W.NearJ. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 653–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.68.4.653
47.
SongY. H.SkarlickiD. P.ShaoR.ParkJ. (2021). Reducing customer-directed deviant behavior: The roles of psychological detachment and supervisory unfairness. Journal of Management, 47(8), 2008–2036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320925877
48.
ThauS.CrossleyC.BennettR. J.SczesnyS. (2007). The relationship between trust, attachment, and antisocial work behaviors. Human Relations, 60(8), 1155–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726707081658
49.
TianA. W.CorderyJ.GambleJ. (2016). Staying and performing: How human resource management practices increase job embeddedness and performance. Personnel Review, 45(5), 947–968. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2014-0194
50.
ValleM.KacmarK. M.ZivnuskaS.HartingT. (2019). Abusive supervision, leader-member exchange, and moral disengagement: A moderated-mediation model of organizational deviance. The Journal of Social Psychology, 159(3), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2018.1466776
51.
VitoA. G.SchaeferB.HigginsG. E.MarcumC.RickettsM. (2019). Self-control, social learning theory, social bonds, and binge drinking: Results from a national sample. Journal of Substance Use, 24(6), 655–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659891.2019.1642406
52.
WagnerS. L.RushM. C. (2000). Altruistic organizational citizenship behavior: Context, disposition, and age. The Journal of Social Psychology, 140(3), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540009600478
53.
WayneS. J.ShoreL. M.LidenR. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management journal, 40(1), 82–111.
54.
WeiZ.LiC. J.LiF.ChenT. (2021). How proactive personality affects psychological strain and job performance: The moderating role of leader–member exchange. Personality and Individual Differences, 179, 110910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110910
55.
WijayantoB. R.KismonoG. (2004). The effect of job embeddedness on organizational citizenship behavior the mediating role of sense of responsibility. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 6, 335–354. https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.5554
56.
William LeeT.BurchT. C.MitchellT. R. (2014). The story of why we stay: A review of job embeddedness. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1, 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091244
57.
XuF.XuS.ZhuJ.ZhouJ.ZhangB.YangC. (2021). Why and when do good soldiers behave unethically? Introducing conservation of resources theory to explain the curvilinear effects of organizational citizenship behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 619657. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.619657
58.
YuT. W. (2021). The effects of organizational justice, trust, and supervisor–subordinate guanxi on organizational citizenship behavior: A social-exchange perspective. Management Research Review, 45(8), 985–1000. https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-03-2021-0238
59.
ZhangM.FriedD. D.GriffethR. W. (2012). A review of job embeddedness: Conceptual, measurement issues, and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 22(3), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.02.004
