This study aimed to find out whether both the ability to mentally form spatial imagery and the ability to rotate mental images exerted any influence on the measure of the ability to move on maps. To that end, a total of 212 university students were asked to complete three tests: one measured the ability to form mental spatial images, one measured the ability to mentally rotate images and the last one measured the ability to move on maps. It was found that people high in spatial imagery and people high in mental rotation had more hits and more hits minus errors in the task of orienting themselves on urban maps than participants low in spatial imagery and those low in mental rotation. Spatial imagery ability and mental rotation ability did not influence the number of errors people made when orienting themselves on urban maps.
AllenG. L.KirasicK. C.DobsonS. H.LongR. G.BeckS. (1996). Predicting environmental learning from spatial abilities: An indirect route. Intelligence, 22(3), 327–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(96)90026-4
2.
BlajenkovaO.KozhevnikovM.MotesM. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 239–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1182
3.
BlazhenkovaO.KozhevnikovM. (2009). The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 638–663. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1473
Campos-JuanateryD.TarríoS.CamposA. (2021). Mental rotation and spatial orientation in maps. North American Journal of Psychology, 23(4), 677–688.
6.
Campos-JuanateyD.CamposA. (2019). Differences among architecture undergraduates in the mental-map representation of a university library. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 36(2), 102–113.
7.
Campos-JuanateyD.TarríoS.DopicoJ. A.CamposA. (2017). Habilidad de los estudiantes de arquitectura para la rotación de mapas urbanos [ability of architecture students to rotate urban maps]. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, 4(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.4.3110
8.
CamposA. (2009). Spatial imagery: A new measure of the visualization factor. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.29.1.c
CamposA. (2013). Reliability and percentiles of a measure of spatial imagery. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 32(4), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.2190/IC.32.4.f
11.
CamposA.Campos-JuanateyD. (2019a). Gender differences in the rotation of city maps. American Journal of Psychology, 132(3), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.132.3.0303
12.
CamposA.Campos-JuanateyD. (2019b). Do gender, discipline, and mental rotation influence orientation on “you-are-here-maps”. Sage Open, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898800
13.
CamposA.Campos-JuanateyD. (2020a). Measure of the ability to mentally rotate maps. North American Journal of Psychology, 22(2), 289–298.
14.
CamposA.Campos-JuanateyD. (2020b). Measure of spatial orientation ability. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 39(4), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236619896268
FieldsA. W.SheltonA. L. (2006). Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(3), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-https://doi.org/ 7393.32.3.506
17.
HegartyM.MontelloD. R.RichardsonA. E.IshikawaT.LovelaceK. (2006). Spatial abilities at different scales: Individual differences in aptitude-test performance and spatial-layout learning. Intelligence, 34(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.intell.2005.09.005
18.
HydeJ. S.LindbergS. M. (2007). Facts and assumptions about the nature of gender differences and the implications for gender equity. In KleinS. S. (Ed.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (pp. 19–32). Lawrence Erlbaun Associates.
19.
KhineM. S. (2017). Visual-spatial ability in STEM education. Springer.
20.
KosslynS. M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. MIT Press.
21.
KosslynS. M.KoenigO. (1992). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. Free Press.
22.
KozhevnikovM.BlazhenkovaO.BeckerM. (2010). Trade-off in object versus spatial visualization abilities: Restriction in the development of visual- processing resources. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(1), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.1.29
23.
KozhevnikovM.HegartyM. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29(5), 745–756. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200477
24.
KozhevnikovM.KosslynS. M.ShepardJ. (2005). Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style. Memory & Cognition, 33(4), 710–726. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03195337
25.
MataixJ.LeónC.ReinosoJ. F. (2015). Métodos de entrenamiento de las habilidades espaciales de los estudiantes de titulaciones técnicas [methods for training the spatial skills of students pursuing technical careers]. EGA. Revista de Expresión Gráfica y Arquitectura, 26(2), 278–287. https://doi.org/10.4995/ega.2015.3324
26.
MeneghettiC.FioreF.BorellaE.De BeniR. (2011). Learning a map of environment: The role of visuo-spatial abilities in young and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 952–959. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1788
27.
MotesM. A.MalachR.KozhevnikovM. (2008). Object-processing neural efficiency differentiates object from spatial visualizers. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 19(17), 1727–1731. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e328317f3e2
28.
VandenbergS. G.KuseA. R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47(2), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
29.
VelázquezJ. S.CavasF.FuentesM.García-RosR. (2023). Educational pathways, spatial skills, and academic achievement in graphic expression in first year of engineering. Education Sciences, 13(7), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070756
