The aim of this study was to design a test to measure a person’s ability to orient themselves on a “you are-here” map. The Spatial Orientation Skills Test, a test measuring spatial orientation ability, consists of 30 items, each item contains two maps, one is positioned at 0° (the model), and the other is the same map but amplified and rotated. The task participants were required to perform was to find their way around on the model map to get to a specific point by taking as a reference point the position indicated on the amplified and rotated map. A sample of 281 university undergraduates participated in the study. The test obtained a Cronbach alpha of .83. The test was significantly correlated to the test measuring image rotation. The results are discussed, and new lines of research are proposed.
AretzA. J. (1991).
The design of electronic map displays. Human Factors,
33, 85–101. doi:10.1177/001872089103300107
2.
AubreyJ. F.LiK. Z. H.DobbsA. R. (1994).
Age differences in the interpretation of misaligned “you-are-here” maps.Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences,
49, 29–31. doi:10.1093/geronj/49.1.p29
3.
BlazhenkovaO.KozhevnikovM. (2009).
The new object-spatial-verbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology,
23, 638–663. doi:10.1002/acp.1473
4.
BurtonL. J.FogartyG. J. (2003).
The factor structure of visual imagery and spatial abilities. Intelligence,
31, 289–318. doi:10.1016/S0160-2896(02)00139-3
5.
CamposA. (2009).
Spatial imagery: A new measure of the visualization factor. Imagination, Cognition and Personality,
29, 31–39. doi:10.2190/IC.29.1.c
6.
CamposA. (2012).
Measure of the ability to rotate mental images. Psicothema,
24, 431–434. doi:10.1037/t14408-000
7.
CamposA. (2013).
Reliability and percentiles of a measure of spatial imagery. Imagination, Cognition and Personality,
32, 427–431. doi:10.2190/IC.32.e.f
8.
CamposA. (2014).
Gender differences in imagery. Personality and Individual Differences,
59, 107–111. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.10
9.
CamposA.Campos-JuanateyD. (2017).
Importancia de la rotción de imágenes para la comprensión de los “you-are-here maps” [Importance of rotating images for the understanding of you-are-here maps].Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación,
1, A1-020-023. doi:10.17979/reipe.2017.0.01.2149
10.
CamposA.GonzálezM. A.AmorA. (2002).
The Spanish version of the Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire: Factor structure and internal consistency reliability. Psychological Reports,
90, 503–506. doi:10.2466/PR0.90.2.503-506
11.
CamposA.Pérez-FabelloM. J. (2011).
Factor structure of the Spanish version of the Object-Spatial Imagery and Verbal Questionnaire. Psychological Reports,
108, 470–476. doi:10.2466/04.22.PMS.113.5.454-460
12.
CamposA.Pérez-FabelloM. J.Gómez-JuncalR. (2004).
Gender and age differences in measured and self-perceived imaging capacity. Personality and Individual Differences,
37, 1383–1389. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.008
13.
Campos-JuanateyD. (2016). Diseño de mapas you-are-here [Design of you-are-here maps].
A Coruña, Spain:
Andavira Editora.
14.
Campos-JuanateyD.Pérez-FabelloM. J.CamposA. (2018).
Differences in image rotation between undergraduates from different university degrees.Imagination, Cognition and Personality,
38, 173–185. doi:10.1177/0276236617748131
15.
CooperL. A. (1975).
Mental rotation of random two-dimensional shapes. Cognitive Psychology,
7, 20–43. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(75)90003-1
16.
CooperL. A.ShepardR. N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In ChaseW. G. (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 75–176).
New York, NY:
Academic Press.
17.
DelgadoA. R.PrietoG. (1996).
Sex differences in visuospatial ability: Do performance factors play such an important role?Memory & Cognition,
24, 504–510. doi:10.3758/BF03200938
18.
EkstromR. B.FrenchJ. W.HarmanH. H.DermenD. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests.
Princeton, NJ:
Educational Testing Service.
19.
GeorgeD.MalleryP. (2003). SPSS for windows steps by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update.
Boston, MA:
Allyn & Bacon.
20.
HedgesL. V.NowellA. (1995).
Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science,
269, 41–45. doi:10.1126/science.7604277
21.
HoovenC. L.ChabrisC. F.EllisonP. T.KosslynS. M. (2004).
The relationship of male testosterone to components of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia,
42, 782–790. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.012
22.
KimuraD. (1999). Sex and cognition.
Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press.
23.
KlippelA.FreksaC.WinterS. (2006).
You-are-here maps in emergencies – The danger of getting lost. Journal of Spatial Sciences,
51, 117–131. doi:10.1080/14498596.2006.9635068
LevineM.JankovicI. N.PalijM. (1982).
Principles of spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology General,
111, 157–175. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.1
26.
LevineM.MarchonI.HanleyG. (1984).
The placement and misplacement of you-are-here maps. Environment and Behavior,
16, 139–157. doi:10.1177/00139165844162001
27.
LinnM. C.PetersenA. C. (1985).
Emergence and characterisation of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development,
56, 1479–1498. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1985.tb00213.x
28.
LinnM. C.PetersenA. C. (1986). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science performance. In HydeJ.LinnM. C. (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advance through meta-analysis (pp. 67–101).
Baltimore, MD:
Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
MarksD. F. (1973).
Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology,
64, 17–24. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1973.tb01322.x
30.
MarksD. F. (1995).
New directions for mental imagery research. Journal of Mental Imagery,
19, 135–149.
31.
MontelloD. R. (2010).
You-are where? The function and frustration of you-are-here (YAH) maps. Spatial Cognition & Computation,
10, 94–104. doi:10.1080/13875860903585323
32.
OosthuizenS. (1991).
Sex-related differences in spatial ability in a group of South African students. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
73, 51–54. doi:10.2466/pms.1991.73.1.51
33.
Pérez-FabelloM. J.CamposA.FelisbertiF. M. (2018).
Object-spatial imagery in fine arts, psychology, and engineering. Thinking Skills and Creativity,
27, 131–138. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.005
34.
SadallaE. K.MontelloD. R. (1989).
Remembering changes in direction. Environment and Behavior,
21, 346–363. doi:10.1177/0013916589213006
35.
SandersG.SjodinM.de ChastelaineM. (2002).
On the elusive nature of sex differences in cognition: Hormonal influences contributing to within-sex variation. Archives of Sexual Behavior,
31, 145–152. doi:10.1023/A:1014095521499
VandenbergS. G.KuseA. R. (1978).
Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills,
47, 599–604. doi:10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599
40.
VoyerD. (2011).
Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,
18, 267–277. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0042-0
41.
VoyerD.VoyerS.BrydenM. P. (1995).
Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin,
117, 250–270. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
