Conscientiousness Predicts Performance on the Stroop Task but Not Other Attentional Control Tasks in Older and Younger Adults

Abstract

The current study examined the relationships between attentional control (AC) and the Big Five personality traits. Older and younger adults (M_age = 38.62 years; Range = 18–90) completed a battery of behavioral attention tasks consisting of Stroop color naming, antisaccade, and operation span, which were designed to assess inhibition, goal maintenance, and working memory processes as a comprehensive assessment of AC. Participants then completed a set of personality scales including the NEO-FFI short form. Regression analyses revealed that Big Five personality scores were not related to the AC composite, but individual task relationships were found. Specifically, participants reporting greater Conscientiousness showed improved Stroop performance, but a Conscientiousness benefit did not extend to the other AC measures. No relationships emerged between other Big Five traits and AC. This work suggests potential cognitive benefits for Conscientiousness in older and younger adults and highlights a fruitful integration of personality and basic cognitive processes.

Keywords

attentional control working memory Stroop Big Five personality Conscientiousness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

T. A.

DeYoung

C. G.

(2017). Personality neuroscience and the Five Factor Model. In Widiger

T. A.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 319–349). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.26

Aschenbrenner

A. J.

Balota

D. A.

(2017). Dynamic adjustments of attentional control in healthy aging. Psychology and Aging, 32(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000148

Benedict

R. H. B.

Schretlen

Groninger

Brandt

(1998). Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: Normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.12.1.43.1726

Booth

J. E.

Schinka

J. A.

Brown

L. M.

Mortimer

J. A.

Borenstein

A. R.

(2006). Five-factor personality dimensions, mood states, and cognitive performance in older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(5), 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390590954209

Bugg

J. M.

DeLosh

E. L.

Davalos

D. B.

Davis

H. P.

(2007). Age differences in Stroop interference: Contributions of general slowing and task-specific deficits. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/138255891007065

Cacioppo

J. T.

Petty

R. E.

(1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R. R.

Zonderman

A. B.

Barbano

H. E.

Lebowitz

Larson

D. M.

(1986). Cross-sectional studies of personality in a national sample: II. Stability in neuroticism, extraversion, and openness. Psychology and Aging, 1(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.1.2.144

DeNeve

K. M.

Cooper

(1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197

Derakshan

Ansari

T. L.

Hansard

Shoker

Eysenck

M. W.

(2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the antisaccade tasks. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.48

10.

DeYoung

C. G.

Hirsh

J. B.

Shane

M. S.

Papdemetris

Rajeevan

Gray

J. R.

(2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21(6), 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610370159

11.

DeYoung

C. G.

Quilty

L. C.

Peterson

J. B.

(2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880

12.

Donnellan

M. B.

Lucas

R. E.

(2008). Age differences in the Big Five across the lifespan: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012897

13.

Draheim

Pak

Draheim

A. A.

Engle

R. W.

(2022). The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(4), 1143–1197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02052-2

14.

Engle

R. W.

Tuholski

S. W.

Laughlin

J. E.

Conway

A. R. A.

(1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309

15.

Erdfelder

Faul

Buchner

(1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630

16.

Eysenck

M. W.

Derakshan

(2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 955–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.019

17.

Fleming

K. A.

Heintzelman

S. J.

Bartholow

B. D.

(2016). Specifying associations between Conscientiousness and executive functioning: Mental set shifting, not prepotent response inhibition or working memory updating. Journal of Personality, 84(3), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12163

18.

Foster

J. L.

Shipstead

Harrison

T. L.

Hicks

K. L.

Redick

T. S.

Engle

R. W.

(2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 43, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0461.7

19.

Hasher

Zacks

R. T.

May

C. P.

(1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In Gopher

Koriat

(Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulations of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). The MIT Press.

20.

Heitz

R. P.

Unsworth

Engle

R. W.

(2005). Working memory capacity, attention control, and fluid intelligence. In Wilhelm

Engle

R. W.

(Eds.), Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence. Sage Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/a781452233529.n5

21.

Helson

Jones

Kwan

V. S. Y.

(2002). Personality change over 40 years of adulthood: Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of two longitudinal samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.752

22.

Hutchison

K. A.

(2007). Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645

23.

Hutchison

K. A.

Heap

S. J.

Neely

J. H.

Thomas

M. A.

(2014). Attentional control and asymmetric associative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035781

24.

Jackson

J. D.

Balota

D. A.

(2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the Sustained Attention to Response Task and reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023933

25.

Kane

M. J.

Hambrick

D. Z.

Tuholski

S. W

Wilhelm

Payne

T. W.

Engle

R. W.

(2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189

26.

Kotov

Gamez

Schmidt

Watson

(2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327

27.

Luchetti

Terracciano

Stephan

Sutin

(2016). Personality and cognitive decline in older adults: Data from a longitudinal sample and meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(4), 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu184

28.

MacLeod

C. M.

(1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163

29.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1

30.

McCrae

R. R.

Costa

P. T.

(2008). The Five-Factor theory of personality. In John

O. P.

Robins

R. W.

, & Pervin

L. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Guilford Press.

31.

Moran

T. P.

(2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 831–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000051

32.

Mroczek

D. K.

Spiro

III Griffin

P. W.

Neupert

S. D.

(2006). Social influences on adult personality, self-regulation, and health. In Schaie

K. W.

Carstensen

L. L.

(Eds.), Social structures, aging, and self-regulation in the elderly (pp. 69–84). Springer Publishing Company.

33.

Muris

de Jong

P. J.

Engelen

(2004). Relationships between neuroticism, attentional control, and anxiety disorders symptoms in non-clinical children. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.007

34.

Musek

(2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(6), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003

35.

Nikolin

Tan

Y. Y.

Schwaab

Moffa

Loo

C. K.

Martin

(2021). An investigation of working memory deficits in depression using the n-back task: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 284, 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.084

36.

Pearman

(2009). Basic cognition in adulthood: Combined effects of sex and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.003

37.

Reinholdt-Dunne

M. L.

Mogg

Benson

Bradley

B. P.

Hardin

M. G.

Liversedge

S. P.

Pine

D. S.

Ernst

(2012). Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces: An antisaccade study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.560111

38.

Reuter-Lorenz

P. A.

Oonk

H. M.

Barnes

L. L.

Hughes

H. C.

(1995). Effects of warning signals and fixation point offsets on the latencies of pro- versus antisaccades: Implications for an interpretation of the gap effect. Experimental Brain Research, 103(2), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231715

39.

Rhodes

M. G.

Kelley

C. M.

(2005). Executive processes, memory accuracy, and memory monitoring: An aging and individual difference analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.014

40.

Roberts

B. W.

Walton

K. E.

Viechtbauer

(2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1

41.

Rueter

A. R.

Abram

S. V.

MacDonald

A. W.

Rustichini

DeYoung

C. G.

(2018). The goal priority network as a neural substrate of Conscientiousness. Human Brain Mapping, 39(9), 3574–3585. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24195

42.

Salthouse

T. A.

(1992). Influence of processing speed on adult differences in working memory. Acta Psychologica, 79(2), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(92)90030-H

43.

Schmeichel

B. J.

Volokhov

R. N.

Demaree

H. A.

(2008). Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1526–1540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013345

44.

Schneider

Eschman

Zuccolotto

(2012). E-Prime Reference Guide. Psychology Software Tools, Inc.

45.

Shi

Sharpe

Abbott

(2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety and attentional control. Clinical Psychology Review, 72, 101754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101754

46.

Soubelet

(2011). Age-cognition relations and the personality trait of Conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(6), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.007

47.

Soubelet

Salthouse

T. A.

(2011). Personality-cognition relations across adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021816

48.

Spieler

D. H.

Balota

D. A.

Faust

M. E.

(1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.4.607

49.

Teng

E. L.

Chui

H. C.

(1987). The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 314–318.

50.

Unsworth

Miller

J. D.

Lakey

C. E.

Young

D. L.

Meeks

J. T.

Campbell

W. K.

Goodies

A. S.

(2009). Exploring the relations among executive functions, fluid intelligence, and personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(4), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.4.194

51.

Watson

Hubbard

(1996). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 737–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00943.x

52.

Wechsler

(1997). WAIS-III: Administration and scoring manual: Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). Psychological Corporation.

53.

Wen

(2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In Wen

Borges Mota

McNeill

(Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol, UK: Blue Ridge Summit.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB