The current study examined the relationships between attentional control (AC) and the Big Five personality traits. Older and younger adults (Mage = 38.62 years; Range = 18–90) completed a battery of behavioral attention tasks consisting of Stroop color naming, antisaccade, and operation span, which were designed to assess inhibition, goal maintenance, and working memory processes as a comprehensive assessment of AC. Participants then completed a set of personality scales including the NEO-FFI short form. Regression analyses revealed that Big Five personality scores were not related to the AC composite, but individual task relationships were found. Specifically, participants reporting greater Conscientiousness showed improved Stroop performance, but a Conscientiousness benefit did not extend to the other AC measures. No relationships emerged between other Big Five traits and AC. This work suggests potential cognitive benefits for Conscientiousness in older and younger adults and highlights a fruitful integration of personality and basic cognitive processes.
AllenT. A.DeYoungC. G. (2017). Personality neuroscience and the Five Factor Model. In WidigerT. A. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the Five Factor Model (pp. 319–349). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199352487.013.26
2.
AschenbrennerA. J.BalotaD. A. (2017). Dynamic adjustments of attentional control in healthy aging. Psychology and Aging, 32(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000148
3.
BenedictR. H. B.SchretlenD.GroningerL.BrandtJ. (1998). Hopkins verbal learning test-revised: Normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.12.1.43.1726
4.
BoothJ. E.SchinkaJ. A.BrownL. M.MortimerJ. A.BorensteinA. R. (2006). Five-factor personality dimensions, mood states, and cognitive performance in older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(5), 676–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390590954209
5.
BuggJ. M.DeLoshE. L.DavalosD. B.DavisH. P. (2007). Age differences in Stroop interference: Contributions of general slowing and task-specific deficits. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/138255891007065
CostaP. T.McCraeR. R.ZondermanA. B.BarbanoH. E.LebowitzB.LarsonD. M. (1986). Cross-sectional studies of personality in a national sample: II. Stability in neuroticism, extraversion, and openness. Psychology and Aging, 1(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.1.2.144
8.
DeNeveK. M.CooperH. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 197–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
9.
DerakshanN.AnsariT. L.HansardM.ShokerL.EysenckM. W. (2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the antisaccade tasks. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.48
10.
DeYoungC. G.HirshJ. B.ShaneM. S.PapdemetrisX.RajeevanN.GrayJ. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience: Brain structure and the Big Five. Psychological Science, 21(6), 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610370159
11.
DeYoungC. G.QuiltyL. C.PetersonJ. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
12.
DonnellanM. B.LucasR. E. (2008). Age differences in the Big Five across the lifespan: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging, 23(3), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012897
13.
DraheimC.PakR.DraheimA. A.EngleR. W. (2022). The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29(4), 1143–1197. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-02052-2
14.
EngleR. W.TuholskiS. W.LaughlinJ. E.ConwayA. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128(3), 309–331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.128.3.309
15.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
16.
EysenckM. W.DerakshanN. (2011). New perspectives in attentional control theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(7), 955–960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.019
17.
FlemingK. A.HeintzelmanS. J.BartholowB. D. (2016). Specifying associations between Conscientiousness and executive functioning: Mental set shifting, not prepotent response inhibition or working memory updating. Journal of Personality, 84(3), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12163
18.
FosterJ. L.ShipsteadZ.HarrisonT. L.HicksK. L.RedickT. S.EngleR. W. (2015). Shortened complex span tasks can reliably measure working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 43, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0461.7
19.
HasherL.ZacksR. T.MayC. P. (1999). Inhibitory control, circadian arousal, and age. In GopherD.KoriatA. (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulations of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 653–675). The MIT Press.
20.
HeitzR. P.UnsworthN.EngleR. W. (2005). Working memory capacity, attention control, and fluid intelligence. In WilhelmO.EngleR. W. (Eds.), Handbook of Understanding and Measuring Intelligence. Sage Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4135/a781452233529.n5
21.
HelsonR.JonesC.KwanV. S. Y. (2002). Personality change over 40 years of adulthood: Hierarchical linear modeling analyses of two longitudinal samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.752
22.
HutchisonK. A. (2007). Attentional control and the relatedness proportion effect in semantic priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 645–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.645
23.
HutchisonK. A.HeapS. J.NeelyJ. H.ThomasM. A. (2014). Attentional control and asymmetric associative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 844–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035781
24.
JacksonJ. D.BalotaD. A. (2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the Sustained Attention to Response Task and reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27(1), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023933
25.
KaneM. J.HambrickD. Z.TuholskiS. WWilhelmO.PayneT. W.EngleR. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189
26.
KotovR.GamezW.SchmidtF.WatsonD. (2010). Linking “big” personality traits to anxiety, depressive, and substance use disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 768–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020327
27.
LuchettiM.TerraccianoA.StephanY.SutinA. (2016). Personality and cognitive decline in older adults: Data from a longitudinal sample and meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71(4), 591–601. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu184
28.
MacLeodC. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109(2), 163–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
29.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (2004). A contemplated revision of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(3), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00118-1
30.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T. (2008). The Five-Factor theory of personality. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W., & PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 159–181). Guilford Press.
31.
MoranT. P. (2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 831–864. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000051
32.
MroczekD. K.SpiroA.IIIGriffinP. W.NeupertS. D. (2006). Social influences on adult personality, self-regulation, and health. In SchaieK. W.CarstensenL. L. (Eds.), Social structures, aging, and self-regulation in the elderly (pp. 69–84). Springer Publishing Company.
33.
MurisP.de JongP. J.EngelenS. (2004). Relationships between neuroticism, attentional control, and anxiety disorders symptoms in non-clinical children. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(4), 789–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.007
34.
MusekJ. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence for the Big One in the Five-Factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41(6), 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003
35.
NikolinS.TanY. Y.SchwaabA.MoffaA.LooC. K.MartinD. (2021). An investigation of working memory deficits in depression using the n-back task: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 284, 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.084
36.
PearmanA. (2009). Basic cognition in adulthood: Combined effects of sex and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(4), 357–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.003
37.
Reinholdt-DunneM. L.MoggK.BensonV.BradleyB. P.HardinM. G.LiversedgeS. P.PineD. S.ErnstM. (2012). Anxiety and selective attention to angry faces: An antisaccade study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2011.560111
38.
Reuter-LorenzP. A.OonkH. M.BarnesL. L.HughesH. C. (1995). Effects of warning signals and fixation point offsets on the latencies of pro- versus antisaccades: Implications for an interpretation of the gap effect. Experimental Brain Research, 103(2), 287–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00231715
39.
RhodesM. G.KelleyC. M. (2005). Executive processes, memory accuracy, and memory monitoring: An aging and individual difference analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(4), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.014
40.
RobertsB. W.WaltonK. E.ViechtbauerW. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.1
41.
RueterA. R.AbramS. V.MacDonaldA. W.RustichiniA.DeYoungC. G. (2018). The goal priority network as a neural substrate of Conscientiousness. Human Brain Mapping, 39(9), 3574–3585. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24195
SchmeichelB. J.VolokhovR. N.DemareeH. A. (2008). Working memory capacity and the self-regulation of emotional expression and experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(6), 1526–1540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0013345
44.
SchneiderW.EschmanA.ZuccolottoA. (2012). E-Prime Reference Guide. Psychology Software Tools, Inc.
45.
ShiR.SharpeL.AbbottM. (2019). A meta-analysis of the relationship between anxiety and attentional control. Clinical Psychology Review, 72, 101754. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101754
46.
SoubeletA. (2011). Age-cognition relations and the personality trait of Conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(6), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.06.007
47.
SoubeletA.SalthouseT. A. (2011). Personality-cognition relations across adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021816
48.
SpielerD. H.BalotaD. A.FaustM. E. (1996). Stroop performance in healthy younger and older adults and in individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 461–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.4.607
49.
TengE. L.ChuiH. C. (1987). The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 48, 314–318.
50.
UnsworthN.MillerJ. D.LakeyC. E.YoungD. L.MeeksJ. T.CampbellW. K.GoodiesA. S. (2009). Exploring the relations among executive functions, fluid intelligence, and personality. Journal of Individual Differences, 30(4), 194–200. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.30.4.194
51.
WatsonD.HubbardB. (1996). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 737–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00943.x
WenZ. (2015). Working memory in second language acquisition and processing: The phonological/executive model. In WenZ.Borges MotaM.McNeillA. (Eds.), Working memory in second language acquisition and processing. Bristol, UK: Blue Ridge Summit.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
