Using science majors as an example, we examined how social climate, intrinsic motivation, agreeableness, extraversion, and conscientiousness interact to affect three types of student imagination. We tested 11 hypotheses by using data collected from six universities across Taiwan; 547 science majors participated in the study. Our results showed that conscientiousness predicted both conceiving and transforming imagination, whereas extraversion only predicted initiating imagination. Agreeableness affected none of these types of imagination directly, whereas both social climate and intrinsic motivation predicted all three types of imagination. Moreover, the interaction of conscientiousness and social climate exerted a significant effect on conceiving imagination, whereas the interaction between extraversion and social climate affected transforming imagination. Lastly, intrinsic motivation moderated the effects of extraversion and agreeableness on initiating imagination.
Al-BalushiS. M. (2009) Factors influencing pre-service science teachers' imagination at the microscopic level in chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education7(6): 1089–1110.
2.
AmabileT. M. (1983) Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45(2): 357–376.
3.
AmabileT. M.PillemerJ. (2012) Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior46(1): 3–15.
4.
American College Personnel Association (1994) The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs, Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association.
5.
ArianiD. W. (2013) Personality and learning motivation. European Journal of Business and Management5(10): 26–35.
6.
Barati AhmadabadiH.OreiziH. R.NouriA. (2010) Relationship between organizational climate and work conscientiousness with job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology4(1): 65–81.
7.
BarrickM. R.MountM. K.JudgeT. A. (2001) Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next?International Journal of Selection and Assessment9(1/2): 9–30.
8.
BarrickM. R.StewartG. L.PiotrowskiM. (2002) Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology87(1): 43–51.
9.
BateyM.Chamorro-PremuzicbT.FurnhamA. (2009) Intelligence and personality as predictors of divergent thinking: The role of general, fluid and crystallized intelligence. Thinking Skills and Creativity4(1): 60–69.
10.
BateyM.Chamorro-PremuzicT.FurnhamA. (2010) Individual differences in ideation behavior: Can the big five and psychometric intelligence predict creativity scores?Creativity Research Journal22(1): 90–97.
11.
BrackettM. A.MayerJ. D. (2007) The life space: A framework and method to describe the individual's external “traits”. Imagination Cognition & Personality26(1): 3–41.
12.
BrislinR. W. (1980) Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In: TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (eds) Handbook of cross-cultural psychologyVol. 2, Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, pp. 349–444.
13.
ChenS.-C.HuangY.LiangC. (2012) The combined effects of learning environment and personality traits on student imagination. Instructional Technology and Media102: 62–78.
14.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2003) Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral science, 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
CsíkszentmihályiM. (1996) Creativity, New York, NY: HarperCollins.
16.
De CauzH.de SmedtJ. (2010) Science as structured imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior44(1): 29–44.
17.
FatemiA. H.PishghadamR.AsghariA. (2012) Attribution theory and personality traits among EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics4(2): 229–243.
18.
FeistG. J. (2006) The psychology of science and the origins of the scientific mind, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19.
FornellC.LarckerD. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
20.
FrazierP. A.TixA. P.BarronK. E. (2004) Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology51(1): 115–134.
21.
FunderD. C.FastL. A. (2010) Personality in social psychology. In: GilbertD.FiskeS. (eds) Handbook of social psychology, 5th ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 668–697.
22.
FurnhamA. (1995) The relationship of personality and intelligence to cognitive thinking style and achievement. In: SaklofskeD.ZeidnerM. (eds) International handbook of personality and intelligence, New York, NY: Plenum, pp. 397–413.
23.
FurnhamA.ZhangJ.ChamoroT. (2006) The relationship between psychometric and self-estimated intelligence, creativity, personality and academic achievement. Imagination Cognition and Personality25(2): 119–145.
24.
GaltonM. (2009) Moving to secondary school: Initial encounters and their effects. Perspectives on education. Primary-secondary transfer in scienceVol. 2, London, England: Wellcome Trust, pp. 5–21.
25.
GautB. (2003) Creativity and imagination. In: GautB.LivingstonP. (eds) The creation of art, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 148–173.
26.
Gelm, A. (2013, February 6). Be afraid, be very afraid, of the world's tech crisis. Financial Times, Comment, p. 9.
27.
GungorA.EryılmazA.FakıogluT. (2007) The relationship of freshmen's physics achievement and their related affective characteristics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching44(8): 1036–1056.
28.
HairJ. F.BlackW. C.BabinB. J.AndersonR. E. (2010) Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
29.
HayesA. F.MatthesJ. (2009) Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods41: 924–936.
30.
HeathG. (2008) Exploring the imagination to establish frameworks for learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education27(2): 115–123.
31.
HennesseyB. A. (2003) The social psychology of creativity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Psychology47(3): 253–271.
32.
HoltonG. (1998) Scientific imagination: With a new introduction, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33.
HongZ. R.LinH.-S. (2011) An investigation of students' personality traits and attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education33(7): 1001–1028.
34.
HsuY.LiangC.ChangC.-C. (2013) The mediating effects of generative cognition on imagination stimulation. Innovations in Education and Teaching International51: 544–555. doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.796715.
35.
IsaksenS. G.EkvallG. (2010) Managing for innovation: The two faces of tension in creative climates. Creativity and Innovation Management19(2): 73–88.
36.
KneževićJ. (2013) Predictive value of personality traits-extraversion, neuroticism, and conscientiousness: To different types of work motivation. Primenjena Psihologija6(1): 81–93.
37.
KomarrajuM.KarauS. J.SchmeckR. R. (2009) Roles of the big five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences19(1): 47–52.
38.
LiangC.ChangC.-C.HsuY. (2013a) Personality and psychological factors predict imagination: Evidence from Taiwan. Learning and Individual Differences27: 67–74.
39.
LiangC.ChangC.-C.HsuY. (2013b) Differential effects of personality traits and environmental predictors on reproductive and creative imagination. Journal of Creative Behavior48: 237–253. doi:10.1002/jocb.50.
40.
LiangC.HsuY.ChangC.-C. (2013) Intrinsic motivation as a mediator on imaginative capability development. Thinking Skills and Creativity8(1): 109–119.
41.
Liang, C., & Lin, W.-S. (in press). The interplay of creativity, imagination, personality traits and academic performance. Imagination, Cognition and Personality.
42.
LinW.-S.HsuY.LiangC. (2014) The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education24(1): 73–89.
43.
LiuE.Noppe-BrandonS. (2009) Imagination first: Unlocking the power of possibilities, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
44.
LounsburyJ. W.FosterN.PatelH.CarmodyP.GibsonL. W.StairsD. R. (2012) An investigation of the personality traits of scientists versus nonscientists and their relationship with career satisfaction. R&D Management42(1): 47–59.
45.
McCraeR. R.CostaP. T.Jr. (1991) The NEO personality inventory: Using the five-factor model in counseling. Journal of Counseling and Development69(4): 367–372.
46.
MaeyerJ.TalanquerV. (2010) The role of intuitive heuristics in students' thinking: Ranking chemical substances. Science Education94(6): 963–984.
47.
OldhamG. R.CummingsA. (1996) Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal39(3): 607–634.
48.
OliveiraS. E.SadlerJ. E. (2008) Interactive patterns and conceptual convergence during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching45(5): 634–658.
PetroskiH. (2010) Engineers and scientists: Similarities and differences. The Bent of tau Beta PiC1(3): 22–26.
52.
PrabhuV.SuttonC.SauserW. (2008) Creativity and certain personality traits: Understanding the mediating effect of intrinsic motivation. Creativity Research Journal20(1): 53–66.
53.
PughK. J.Linnenbrink-GarciaL.KoskeyK. L. K.StewartV. C.ManzeyC. (2010) Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: A study of deep engagement in science. Science Education94(1): 1–28.
54.
SchneiderB.GoldsteinH. W.SmithD. B. (1995) The ASA framework: An update. Personnel Psychology48(4): 747–773.
55.
ShinU. (1994) The role of imagination in integrative knowledge: A Polanyian view. Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical21(2): 16–28.
56.
SimontonD. K. (1988) Scientific genius: A psychology of science, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57.
SteelP. (2007) The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin133(1): 65–94.
58.
StinnerA. (2003) Scientific method, imagination, and the teaching of physics. Physics in Canada59(6): 335–346.
TaasoobshiraziG.SinatraG. M. (2011) A structural equation model of conceptual change in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching48(8): 901–918.
61.
TaylorA. R.JonesM. G.BroadwellB.OppewalT. (2008) Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists' and teachers' perceptions of science education. Science Education92(6): 1058–1075.
62.
ThompsonE. R. (2008) Development and validation of an international English big-five mini-markers. Personality and Individual Differences45(6): 542–548.
63.
TrotmanD. (2006) Evaluating the imaginative: Situated practice and the conditions for professional judgment in imaginative education. International Journal of Education & the Arts7(3)): Retrieved from http://ijea.asu.edu/v7n3/.
64.
Van der HelmG. H. P.StamsG. J. J. M.van GenabeekM.van der LaanP. H. (2012) Group climate, personality and self-reported aggression in incarcerated male youth. Journal of Forensic psychiatry and Psychology23(1): 23–39.
65.
Van EijckM.RothW. (2013) Imagination of science in education: From epics to novelization, New York, NY: Springer.
66.
Vedder-WeissD.FortusD. (2012) Adolescents' declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching49(9): 1057–1095.
67.
VygotskyL. S. (2004) Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology42(1): 7–97.
68.
WatanabeS.KanazawaY. (2009) A test of a personality-based view of intrinsic motivation. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science22(2): 117–130.
YehH.-T.LinW.-S.LiangC. (2014) The effects of imagination between psychological factors and academic performance: The differences between science and engineering majors. International Journal of Engineering Education30(3): 746–755.
71.
YoungL. D. (2012) How to promote innovative behavior at work? The role of justice and support within organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior46(3): 220–243.
72.
YuehH.-P.ChangC.-C.LiangC. (2013) Are there differences between science and engineering majors regarding the imagination-mediated model?Thinking Skills and Creativity10: 79–90.
73.
ZafarS.MeenakshiK. (2012) A study on the relationship between extraversion-introversion and risk-taking in the context of second language acquisition. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning1(1): 33–40.
