Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This exploratory study surveyed 330 U.S. public record requesters on their local, state, and federal experiences and behaviors. Findings showed requesters with more experience submitting requests to local and state governments had better odds of successfully receiving their records. Federal requesting experience was negatively associated with receiving requested records. Structural equation analysis also showed a significant relationship between local requesting experience and satisfaction with the requesting process. However, local and state requesters were more likely to report problems with fees, rudeness from government officials, and barriers from privacy exemptions. Unwarranted delay, an enduring complaint among the requesting community, was found to be a more severe problem for those with more federal requesting experience, whereas local and state requesting experience was negatively associated with a belief that delay was a serious problem. The study advances the understanding that local and federal freedom of information processes are experienced as distinct mechanisms with differing requester bodies, behaviors, and results.

Keywords

transparency freedom of information local government federal government public records

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ben-Aaron

Denny

Desmarais

Wallach

(2016). Transparency by conformity: A field experiment evaluating openness in local governments. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12596

Berliner

(2016). Sunlight or window dressing? Local government compliance with South Africa’s promotion of access to information act. Governance, 30(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12246

Cherry

McMenemy

(2013). Freedom of information and ‘vexatious’ requests – the case of Scottish local government. Government Information Quarterly, 30(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.02.004

Cordis

A. S.

Warren

P. L.

(2014). Sunshine as disinfectant: The effect of state freedom of information act laws on public corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 115, 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.03.010

Cucciniello

Porumbescu

G. A.

Grimmelikhuijsen

(2017). 25 Years of transparency research: Evidence and future directions. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12685

Cuillier

(2004). Public support for press access declines as personal privacy concerns increase. Newspaper Research Journal, 25(4), 95–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739532904025004

Cuillier

(2010). Honey v. vinegar: Testing compliance-gaining theories in the context of freedom of information laws. Communication Law and Policy, 15(3), 203–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2010.489842

Cuillier

(2019). Bigger stick, better compliance? Testing strength of public record statutes on agency transparency in the United States. Proceedings of the 6th Global Research on Transparency Conference. Fundação Getulio Vargas. https://eventos.fgv.br/en/6deg-global-conference-transparency-research/executive-and-advisory-committee

Dahmen

Walth

(2021). Revealing problems, pointing fingers, and creating impact: A survey of investigative reporters/editors regarding journalistic impact. Newspaper Research Journal, 42(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/07395329211029668

10.

Driscoll

P. D.

Splichal

S. L.

Salwen

M. B.

Garrison

(2000). Public support for access to government records: A national survey. In Davis

C. N.

Splichal

S. L.

(Eds.), Access denied: Freedom of information in the information age (pp. 23–36). Iowa State University Press.

11.

Fenster

(2021). Populism and transparency: The political of an administrative norm. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 89(2), 286–343.

12.

Fink

(2018). State FOI laws: More journalist-friendly, or less? In Pozen

D. E.

Schudson

(Eds.), Troubling transparency: The history and future of freedom of information (pp. 91–115). Columbia University Press.

13.

Fink

(2019). Freedom of information in community journalism. Community Journalism, 7(1), 17–37.

14.

Grabell

(2016, July 21). Delayed, denied, dismissed: Failures on the FOIA front. ProPublica. https://www.propublica.org/article/delayed-denied-dismissed-failures-on-the-foia-front#michael-grabell

15.

Grunewald

M. H.

(1998). E-FOIA and the ‘mother of all complaints:’ information delivery and delay reduction. Administrative Law Review, 50(2), 345–370.

16.

Henshaw

(2010). The context and challenges of freedom of information in local government: A practitioner’s perspective. In Chapman

R. A.

Hunt

(Eds.), Freedom of information: Local government and accountability (pp. 11–14). Ashgate Publishing.

17.

Herz

(2009). Law lags behind: FOIA and affirmative disclosure of information. Cardozo Public Law Policy & Ethics Journal, 7(3), 577–598. https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/69

18.

Hunt

Chapman

R. A.

(2010). Freedom of information: Local government. In Chapman

R. A.

Hunt

(Eds.), Freedom of information: Local government and accountability (pp. 1–9). Ashgate Publishing.

19.

Johnson

(2020). Public records officers’ perspectives on transparency and journalism. Journal of Civic Information, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.32473/joci.v2i1.121553

20.

Jones

(2015, March 13). Unnecessary freedom of information act fees. National Security Archive. https://unredacted.com/2015/03/18/unnecessary-freedom-of-information-act-fees/

21.

Kimball

M. B.

(2003). Law enforcement records custodians’ decision-making behaviors in response to Florida’s public records law. Communication Law and Policy, 8(3), 313–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326926CLP0803_02

22.

Kimball

M. B.

(2012). Shining the light from the inside. Access professionals’ perceptions of government transparency. Communication Law and Policy, 17(3), 399–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2012.687954

23.

Koningisor

(2020). Transparency deserts. Northwestern University Law Review, 114(6), 1461–1548.

24.

Kreimer

S. F.

(2018). The ecology of transparency reloaded. In Pozen

D. E.

Schudson

(Eds.), Troubling transparency: The history and future of freedom of information (pp. 135–165). Columbia University Press.

25.

Krumsvik

A. H.

(2014). Stability in times of change: Trends in newspaper executives’ attitudes towards digital media. Nordicom Review, 35(1), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2014-0106

26.

Lerner

Kroll

(2024, October 1). Heritage Foundation staffers flood federal agencies with thousands of information requests. ProPublica, https://www.propublica.org/article/have-government-employees-mentioned-climate-change-voting-or-gender-identity-the-heritage-foundation-wants-to-know

27.

Meiklejohn

(1960). Political freedom: The constitutional powers of the people. Harper.

28.

Michener

Velasco

R. B.

Contreras

Rodrigues

K. F.

(2020). Googling the requester: Identity-questing and discrimination in public service provision. Governance, 33(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12416

29.

Molyneux

Zamith

(2022). Surveying journalists in the ‘new normal’: Considerations and recommendations. Journalism, 23(1), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884920935277

30.

Moon

(1985). The freedom of information act: Fundamental contradiction. American University Law Review, 34(4), 1157–1190.

31.

Peltz-Steele

R. J.

Steinbuch

(2020). Transparency blind spot: A response to transparency deserts. Rutgers Law Record, 48(1), 1–23.

32.

Piotrowski

S. J.

(2010). The operationalization of municipal transparency: Primary administrative functions and intervening factors. Transparencia y Privicidad, 1(1), 1–31.

33.

Piotrowski

S. J.

Van Ryzin

G. G.

(2007). Citizens attitudes toward transparency in local government. American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740062967

34.

Pozen

D. E.

(2017). Freedom of information beyond the freedom of information act. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(5), 1097–1158.

35.

Regan

Berg

(2023, June 14). SPJ concerned about record number of job cuts to newsroom staff. Society of Professional Journalists. https://www.spj.org/news.asp?ref=2946

36.

Reid

(2023). Shading sunshine: The proliferation of exemptions to state open records laws. Duke Law Journal, 73(2), 425–462.

37.

Rosenbloom

D. H.

Newbold

S. P.

Doughty

(2018). Madison’s ratchet: Ambition counteracting ambition and the aggregation of political, managerial, and legal controls over federal administration. American Review of Public Administration, 48(6), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/02750740166889

38.

Seifter

(2018). Further from the people: The puzzle of state administration. New York University Law Review, 93(1), 107–174.

39.

Spac

Voda

Zagrapan

(2018). Does the freedom of information law increase transparency at the local level? Evidence from a field experiment. Government Information Quarterly, 35(3), 408–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.05.003

40.

Tejedo-Romero

Rodrigues

Araujo

J. F. F. E.

(2023). How far is municipal transparency from neighbours? Evidence from Spain and Portugal. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 36(3), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2022-0026

41.

Trautendorfer

Hohnensinn

Hilgers

(2024). From de jure to de facto transparency: Analyzing the compliance gam pin light of freedom of information laws. Regulation & Governance, 19(1), 253–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12615

42.

Trautendorfer

Schmidthuber

Hilgers

(2023). Are the answers all out there? Investigating citizen information requests in the haze of bureaucratic responsiveness. Governance, 37(4), 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12805

43.

Wagner

(2018). “Longstanding, systemic weaknesses”: Hillary Clinton’s emails, FOIA’s defects and affirmative disclosure. University of Florida Journal of Law and Public Policy, 29(3), 359–412. https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/jlpp/vol29/iss3/7

44.

Wagner

(2021a). Inherent frictions and deliberate frustrations: Examining the legal variables of state FOI law administration. Journal of Civic Information, 3(2), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.32473/joci.v3i2.127815

45.

Wagner

(2021b). Piercing the veil: Examining demographic and political variables in state FOI law administration. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101541

46.

Wagner

(2022). Popular information: An analysis of FOI use and behavior. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101677

47.

Wagner

(2023). Whose public virtue? Exploring freedom of information efficacy and support. Administration & Society, 55(1), 93–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997221113223

48.

Wang

Guan

(2023). Can sunlight disperse mistrust? A meta-analysis of the effects of transparency on citizens’ trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(3), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac040

49.

Welch

E. W.

(2012). The relationship between transparent and participative government: A study of local governments in the United States. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852312437982

50.

Worthy

(2010). More open but not more trusted? The effect of the freedom of information act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government. Governance, 23(4), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01498.x

51.

Worthy

(2013). “Some are more open than others”: Comparing the impact of the freedom of information act 2000 on local and central government in the UK. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 15(5), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2013.836300

52.

Worthy

Hazell

(2017). Disruptive, dynamic and democratic? Ten years of freedom of information in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs, 70(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv069

53.

Worthy

John

Vannoni

(2017). Transparency at the parish pump: A field experiment to measure the effectiveness of freedom of information requests in England. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(3), 485–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muw063

54.

Worthy

Waugh

(2024). More open, more democratic or better at hiding. Two decades of local government transparency in the UK. Local Government Studies, 50(6), 1062–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2024.2417222

Hometown Transparency: Differences in Local,State,and Federal Freedom of Information Experiences

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References