In the United States, trust in government across the federal, state, and local levels has been on the decline for decades. With increasing polarization and politicization, the work of public administrators is frequently made more difficult by challenges that stem from low levels of public trust—responding to these challenges as well as recent calls that encourage public administrators to regain the trust of the public they serve. Could public service motivation (PSM) promote trust in government? We examine the association between PSM and trust in government across the federal, state, and local levels of government in the United States. We find that the association between PSM and governmental trust varies by level of government. At the state and local levels, PSM is positively associated with trust in government. However, we find no significant relationship between PSM and trust at the federal level. Thus, there exists the potential for state and local administrators to use PSM to build trust in the government and to facilitate improved policy implementation. Our findings also provide insight into how key predictors of public trust in government vary at the federal, state, and local levels of the U.S. government.
AbramowitzA. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. Yale University Press.
2.
BandaK. K.KirklandJ. H. (2018). Legislative party polarization and trust in state legislatures. American Politics Research, 46(4), 596–628. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17727317
3.
BelléN. (2013). Experimental evidence on the relationship between public service motivation and job performance. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02621.x
4.
BergM.JohanssonT. (2020). Building institutional trust through service experiences—private versus public provision matter. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(2), 290–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muz029
5.
BoxR. C.MussoJ. A. (2004). Experiments with local federalism: Secession and the neighborhood Council Movement in Los Angeles. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074004267848
BrooksC.ChengS. (2001). Declining government confidence and policy preferences in the US: Devolution, regime effects, or symbolic change?. Social Forces, 79(4), 1343–1375.
8.
BullockJ. B.StritchJ. M.RaineyH. G. (2015). International comparison of public and private employees’ work motives, attitudes, and perceived rewards. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 479–489. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12356
9.
CarpiniM. X. D.KeeterS.KennamerJ. D. (1994). Effects of the news media environment on citizen knowledge of state politics and government. Journalism Quarterly, 71(2), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909407100217
10.
ChanleyV. A.RudolphT. J.RahnW. M. (2000). The origins and consequences of public trust in government: A time series analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(3), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1086/317987
11.
CharronN.RothsteinB. (2016). Does education lead to higher generalized trust? The importance of quality of government. International Journal of Educational Development, 50, 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.05.009
12.
ChristensenR. K.PaarlbergL.PerryJ. L. (2017). Public service motivation research: Lessons for practice. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 529–542.
13.
ChristensenT.LægreidP. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors, and demography. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), 487–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2005.11051848
14.
ClerkinR. M.PaynterS. R.TaylorJ. K. (2009). Public service motivation in undergraduate giving and: Volunteering decisions. The American Review of Public Administration, 39(6), 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074008327512
15.
ColeR. L.KincaidJ. (2000). Public opinion and American federalism: Perspectives on taxes, spending, and trust—An ACIR update. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 30(1), 189–201.
16.
CooperC. A.KnottsH. G.BrennanK. M. (2008). The importance of trust in government for public administration: The case of zoning. Public Administration Review, 68(3), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00882.x
17.
CramerK. J. (2016). The politics of resentment: Rural consciousness in Wisconsin and the rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press.
18.
DahlR. A. (1994). A democratic dilemma: System effectiveness versus citizen participation. Political Science Quarterly, 109(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151659
19.
DeslatteA. (2020). The erosion of trust during a global pandemic and how public administrators should counter it. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020941676
20.
FitzgeraldJ.WolakJ. (2016). The roots of trust in local government in Western Europe. International Political Science Review, 37(1), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512114545119
21.
GerberA. S.GruberJ.HungermanD. M. (2016). Does church attendance cause people to vote? Using blue laws’ repeal to estimate the effect of religiosity on voter turnout. British Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000416
22.
GrimmelikhuijsenS. G.MeijerA. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus048
23.
Hetherington, M. J., & Nugent, J. D. (2001). Explaining public support for devolution: The role of political trust. In J. R. Hibbing, & E. Theiss-Morse (Eds.). What is it about government that Americans dislike? (pp. 134–151). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
HetheringtonM. J.LongM. T.RudolphT. J. (2016). Revisiting the myth: New evidence of a polarized electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 321–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw003
25.
HoltS. B. (2018). For those who care: The effect of public service motivation on sector selection. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12906
IntawanC.NicholsonS. P. (2018). My trust in government is implicit: Automatic trust in government and system support. The Journal of Politics, 80(2), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1086/694785
29.
JenningsM. K.CookK. S.HardinR. (1998). Political trust and the roots of devolution. In BraithwaiteV.LeviM. (Eds.), Trust and governance (Vol. 1, pp. 218–244). Russell Sage Foundation.
30.
JesuitD. K.WilliamsR. A. (2019). Public policy, governance and polarization: Making governance work (First issued in paperback). Routledge.
31.
KimS.-E. (2005). The role of trust in the modern administrative state: An integrative model. Administration & Society, 37(5), 611–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705278596
32.
KincaidJ.ColeR. L. (2011). Citizen attitudes toward issues of federalism in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 41(1), 53–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjq035
33.
LelandS.ChattopadhyayJ.MaestasC.PiatakJ. (2021). Policy venue preference and relative trust in government in federal systems. Governance, 34(2), 373–393.
34.
LiebermanR. C.MettlerS.PepinskyT. B.RobertsK. M.ValellyR. (2019). The Trump presidency and American democracy: A historical and comparative analysis. Perspectives on Politics, 17(02), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718003286
35.
LiuB.ZhangX.DuL.HuQ. (2015). Validating the construct of public service motivation in for-profit organizations: A preliminary study. Public Management Review, 17(2), 262–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.798023
36.
LongJ. S.FreeseJ. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (third edition). Stata Press Publication, StataCorp LP.
37.
MabillardV. (2022). Trust in government: Assessing the impact of exposure to information in a local context. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(9), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1868505
38.
MarienS.HoogheM. (2011). Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law compliance: Does political trust matter?European Journal of Political Research, 50(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2010.01930.x
McCarthyA. F.DavisN. T.GarandJ. C.OlsonL. R. (2016). Religion and attitudes toward redistributive policies among Americans. Political Research Quarterly, 69(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915623868
41.
McFaddenD. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In ZarembkaP. (Ed.), In frontiers of econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press.
42.
Meyer-SahlingJ.-H.MikkelsenK. S.SchusterC. (2019). The causal effect of public service motivation on ethical behavior in the public sector: Evidence from a large-scale survey experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy071
43.
MiyachiT.TakitaM.SenooY.YamamotoK. (2020). Lower trust in national government links to no history of vaccination. The Lancet, 395(10217), 31–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32686-8
44.
MoynihanD.HerdP.HarveyH. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu009
45.
MuñozJ. (2017). Political trust and multilevel government. In ZmerliS.van der MeerT. (Eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 69–88). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545118.00015
46.
NaffK. C.CrumJ. (1999). Working for America: Does public service motivation make a difference?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X9901900402
47.
OECD (2017). Trust and public policy: How better governance can help rebuild public trust. OECD Public Governance Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264268920-en
48.
ParkS. M. (2012). Toward the trusted public organization: Untangling the leadership, motivation, and trust relationship in U.S. federal agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(5), 562–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011410417
PedersenM. J. (2015). Activating the forces of public service motivation: Evidence from a low-intensity randomized survey experiment. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 734–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12325
51.
PerryJ. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5–22.
52.
PerryJ. L.WiseL. R. (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 367–373. https://doi.org/10.2307/976618
PiatakJ. S. (2016). Public service motivation, prosocial behaviours, and career ambitions. International Journal of Manpower, 37(5), 804–821. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2014-0248
55.
PiatakJ. S.HoltS. B. (2020). Disentangling altruism and public service motivation: Who exhibits organizational citizenship behavior?Public Management Review, 22(7), 949–973. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1740302
56.
PiatakJ. S.HoltS. B. (2021). Public service motivation and public opinion: Examining antecedents and attitudes. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108966672
57.
PiatakJ. S.SowaJ. E.JacobsonW. S.McGinnisJ. (2021). Infusing public service motivation (PSM) throughout the employment relationship: A review of PSM and. International Public Management Journal, 24(1), 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1805381
58.
PorumbescuG. (2017). Linking transparency to trust in government and voice. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(5), 520–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015607301
59.
ProszowskaD.JansenG.DentersB. (2023). Political trust in a multilevel polity: Patterns of differentiation among more and less politically sophisticated citizens. International Review of Administrative Sciences. 002085232110228. https://doi.org/10.1177/00208523211022826
60.
RahnW. M.RudolphT. J. (2005). A tale of political trust in American cities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(4), 530–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi056
61.
RaineyH. G.BackoffR. W.LevineC. H. (1976). Comparing public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 36(2), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.2307/975145
62.
RayV.HerdP.MoynihanD. (2023). Racialized burdens: Applying racialized organization theory to the administrative state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac001
63.
ReinhardtG. Y. (2015). First-hand experience and second-hand information: Changing trust across three levels of government. Review of Policy Research, 32(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12123
64.
RitzA.BrewerG. A.NeumannO. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12505
65.
RubadoM. E.JenningsJ. T. (2020). Political consequences of the endangered local watchdog: Newspaper decline and mayoral elections in the United States. Urban Affairs Review, 56(5), 1327–1356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087419838058
66.
Schaffner, B., Ansolabehere, S., & Luks, S. (2021). Cooperative election study common content, 2020. Harvard Dataverse V4, 1. https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/E9N6PH
67.
ShorB.McCartyN. (2011). The ideological mapping of American legislatures. American Political Science Review, 105(3), 530–551. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000153
StrykerS.BurkeP. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 284–297.
70.
TorcalM.ChristmannP. (2019). Congruence, national context and trust in European institutions. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(12), 1779–1798. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1551922
71.
van AsscheD.DierickxG. (2007). The decentralisation of city government and the restoration of political trust. Local Government Studies, 33(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930601081069
72.
VandenabeeleW.RitzA.NeumannO. (2018). Public service motivation: State of the art and conceptual cleanup. In OngaroE.Van ThielS. (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (pp. 261–278). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_13
73.
Van de WalleS.BouckaertG. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8-9), 891–913. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120019352
74.
Van RyzinG. (2007). Pieces of a puzzle: Linking government performance, citizen satisfaction, and trust. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300403
75.
Van RyzinG. G. (2015). Service quality, administrative process, and citizens’ evaluation of local government in the US. Public Management Review, 17(3), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841456
76.
WebsterS. W.AbramowitzA. I. (2017). The ideological foundations of affective polarization in the U.S. electorate. American Politics Research, 45(4), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X17703132
77.
WeissertC. S.UttermarkM. J.MackieK. R.ArtilesA. (2021). Governors in control: Executive orders, state-local preemption, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 51(3), 396–428. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjab013
78.
WitesmanE. M.WaltersL.ChristensenR. K. (2023). Creating a public service topology: Mapping public service motivation, public service ethos, and public service values. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12939
79.
WolakJ. (2016). Core values and partisan thinking about devolution. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 46(4), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjw021
80.
WolakJ.PalusC. K. (2010). The dynamics of public confidence in US state and local government. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(4), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/153244001001000407
81.
WordJ.CarpenterH. (2013). The new public service? Applying the public service motivation model to nonprofit employees. Public Personnel Management, 42(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026013495773
82.
WrightB. E.ChristensenR. K.PandeyS. K. (2013). Measuring public service motivation: Exploring the equivalence of existing global measures. International Public Management Journal, 16(2), 197–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2013.817242
83.
WrightB. E.HassanS.ChristensenR. K. (2017). Job choice and performance: Revisiting core assumptions about public service motivation. International Public Management Journal, 20(1), 108–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1088493
84.
WynenJ.Op de BeeckS.VerhoestK.GlavinaM.SixF.Van DammeP.BeutelsP.HendrickxG.PepermansK. (2022). Taking a COVID-19 vaccine or not? Do trust in government and trust in experts help US to understand vaccination intention?Administration & Society, 54(10), 1875–1901. 009539972110734. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211073459
