Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Many situations in public service delivery are characterized by uncertainty about the potential negative consequences following decisions. These risky situations make the behavior of frontline professionals particularly important. But what shapes the risk perception and subsequent behavior of frontline professionals in risky situations? This article explores the idea that organizational culture provides part of the answer. To examine this, a comprehensive qualitative study with participant observations and interviews at five public hospital wards was conducted. The findings demonstrate the importance of organizational culture on risk perception and behavior in risky situations. Basic cultural assumptions related to professional discussion, administering medicine, grading of adverse events, and prioritizing follow-up activities matter to behavior in risky situations. In organizational cultures with high levels of trust and dialogue about decision-making, the health professionals rely on each other and ask for second opinions, when making decisions in risky situations. Conversely, in organizational cultures with little trust and professional discussion, the health professionals are less likely to ask for second opinions and follow up on risky situations, which increases the possibility of unintended, negative consequences. In this way, organizational culture can be a driver of risk-reducing and risk-seeking behavior among frontline professionals.

Keywords

organizational culture behavior risky situations risk perception frontline professionals interviews participant observations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agar

M. H.

(2008). The professional stranger: An informal introduction to ethnography. Emerald.

Baviskar

Winter

S. C.

(2017). Street-level bureaucrats as individual policymakers: The relationship between attitudes and coping behavior toward vulnerable children and youth. International Public Management Journal, 20(2), 316–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2016.1235641

Brehm

Gates

(1999). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public (Paperback ed.). University of Michigan Press.

Brinkmann

Kvale

(2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Cohen

(2018). How culture affects street-level bureaucrats’ bending the rules in the context of informal payments for health care: The Israeli case. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(2), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016665919

Collins

C. S.

Stockton

C. M.

(2018). The central role of theory in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–10.

Danish Ministry of Finance. (2018). Produktivitetskravet afskaffet på sundhedsområdet—ny styringsmodel fra 2019 [Productivity requirements cancelled in the health care sector—A new governance model from 2019]. Regeringen.dk: Regeringen. https://www.regeringen.dk/media/5343/produktivitetskravet-afskaffet-paa-sundhedsomraadet-ny-styringsmodel-fra-2019_faktaark.pdf

Downs

(1967). Inside bureaucracy (16th printing ed.). Lexington Books.

Evans

(2011). Professionals, managers and discretion: Critiquing street-level bureaucracy. British Journal of Social Work, 41(2), 368–386. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq074

10.

Evans

Harris

(2004). Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion. The British Journal of Social Work, 34(6), 871–895.

11.

Freidson

(1994). Professionalism reborn: Theory, prophecy and policy. Polity Press.

12.

Fry

L. W.

(2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 693–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001

13.

Gerring

(2006). Case study research: Principles and practices. Cambridge University Press.

14.

Harrits

G. S.

(2019). Street-level bureaucracy research and professionalism. In Hupe

(Ed.), Research handbook on street-level bureaucracy: The ground floor of government in context (pp. 193–208). Edward Elgar.

15.

Harrits

G. S.

Møller

M. Ø

. (2014). Prevention at the front line: How home nurses, pedagogues, and teachers transform public worry into decisions on special efforts. Public Management Review, 16(4), 447–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841980

16.

K. Z.

(2009). Liquidated: An ethnography of Wall Street. Duke University Press.

17.

Jakobsen

M. L.

Kjeldsen

A. M.

Pallesen

(2017). Loyal agents or saboteurs? Performance-increasing policies and public service motivation among hospital workers in Denmark. In Meier

K. J.

Rutherford

Avellaneda

C. N.

(Eds.), Comparative public management (pp. 130–153). Georgetown University Press.

18.

Jensen

D. C.

(2018). Does core task matter for decision-making? A comparative case study on whether differences in job characteristics affect discretionary street-level decision-making. Administration & Society, 50(8), 1125–1147.

19.

Jonsen

Jehn

K. A.

(2009). Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 4(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391

20.

Joo

B.-K.

(2012). Leader–member exchange quality and in-role job performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811422233

21.

Kahneman

Tversky

(1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

22.

Korten

D. C.

(1980). Community organization and rural development: A learning process approach. Public Administration Review, 40(5), 480–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/3110204

23.

Kristensen

Bartels

Sabroe

Mainz

(2014). Patient safety culture can be a driver for high clinical quality. Ugeskrift for laeger, 176(32), 1483–1486.

24.

Lavee

Strier

(2019). Transferring emotional capital as coerced discretion: Street-level bureaucrats reconciling structural deficiencies. Public Administration, 97(4), 910–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12598

25.

Lipsky

(2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (30th anniversary expanded ed.). Russell Sage Foundation.

26.

Marsick

V. J.

Watkins

K. E.

(2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422303005002002

27.

Martin

(2002). Organizational culture: Mapping the terrain (3rd printing ed.). SAGE.

28.

Mathison

(1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174583

29.

Maynard-Moody

Musheno

M. C.

(2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.

30.

Monroe

H. A.

(2019). Nurses’ professional values: Influences of experience and ethics education. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 28(9–10), 2009–2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14806

31.

Morello

R. T.

Lowthian

J. A.

Barker

A. L.

McGinnes

Dunt

Brand

(2013). Strategies for improving patient safety culture in hospitals: A systematic review. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000582

32.

Mossialos

Wenzl

Osborn

Sarnak

(2016). International profiles of health care systems. London School of Economics and Political Science, The Commonwealth Fund.

33.

Nothdurfter

Hermans

(2018). Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street-level research in public management, social policy and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3), 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12308

34.

Nowell

Albrecht

(2019). A reviewer’s guide to qualitative rigor. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 29(2), 348–363. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy052

35.

Oberfield

Z. W.

(2010). Rule following and discretion at government’s frontlines: Continuity and change during organization socialization. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 735–755. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mup025

36.

Oberle

Hughes

(2001). Doctors’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethical problems in end-of-life decisions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(6), 707–715. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01710.x

37.

Ogbonna

Wilkinson

(2003). The false promise of organizational culture change: A case study of middle managers in grocery retailing. Journal of Management Studies, 40(5), 1151–1178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00375

38.

Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2017). Tackling wasteful spending on health.

39.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.

40.

Payne

C. M.

(2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Harvard Education Press.

41.

Riccucci

(2005). How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Georgetown University Press.

42.

Roberts

P. S.

Wernstedt

(2019). Decision biases and heuristics among emergency managers: Just like the public they manage for? The American Review of Public Administration, 49(3), 292–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018799490

43.

Sandfort

J. R.

(2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4), 729–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024289

44.

Schein

E. H.

(2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). John Wiley.

45.

Schwartz-Shea

Yanow

(2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. Routledge.

46.

Seawright

Gerring

(2008). Case selection techniques in case study research. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907313077

47.

Simon

H. A.

(1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (4th ed.). Free Press.

48.

Sitkin

S. B.

Pablo

A. L.

(1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. The Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9–38. https://doi.org/10.2307/258646

49.

Spradley

J. P.

(1980). Participant observation. Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

50.

Spradley

J. P.

(2016). Participant observation (New ed.). Waveland Press.

51.

Tavory

Timmermans

(2014). Abductive analysis: Theorizing qualitative research. The University of Chicago Press.

52.

Telléus

P. K.

Holdgaard

D. M.

Thørring

(2018). Physicians and caregivers do differ in ethical attitudes to daily clinical practice. Clinical Ethics, 13(4), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477750918790005

53.

Tummers

(2013). Policy alienation and the power of professionals: Confronting new policies. Edward Elgar.

54.

Twomey

J. J. G.

(1989). Analysis of the claim to distinct nursing ethics: Normative and nonnormative approaches. Advances in Nursing Science, 11(3), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198904000-00007

55.

van Loon

N. M.

Jakobsen

M. L.

(2018). Connecting governance and the front lines: How work pressure and autonomy matter for coping in different performance regimes. Public Administration, 96(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12357

56.

Van Stralen

(2008). High-reliability organizations: Changing the culture of care in two medical units. Design Issues, 24(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2008.24.1.78

57.

Vrangbæk

(2016). The Danish Health Care System, 2015. In: Mossialos

Wenzl

Osborn

Sarnak

(eds.) 2015 International Profiles of Health Care Systems. UK: London School of Economics and Political Science.

58.

Weaver

S. J.

Lubomksi

L. H.

Wilson

R. F.

Pfoh

E. R.

Martinez

K. A.

S. M.

(2013). Promoting a culture of safety as a patient safety strategy: A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(5, Pt 2), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00002

59.

Wilkinson

(2013). Ethnographic methods. In Shepherd

L. J.

(Ed.), Critical approaches to security: An introduction to theories and methods (pp. 129–154). Taylor & Francis.

60.

Xie

(2019). Leadership and organizational learning culture: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Training and Development, 43(1–2), 76–104. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-06-2018-0056

61.

Yin

R. K.

(2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). SAGE.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.01 MB

0.02 MB