How Nonprofit Arts Organizations Sustain Communities: Examining the Relationship Between Organizational Strategy and Engagement in Community Sustainability

Abstract

This article investigates the relationship between several elements of organizational strategy and arts and culture nonprofits perceived contributions to community sustainability. We ask the following research question: What are the drivers of arts and culture nonprofits’ engagement in community sustainability? Drawing on data collected from a survey of 175 nonprofits in the state of Michigan, this article reports the findings about arts and culture organizations perceived engagement in community sustainability and factors that may foster or inhibit such engagement. The study advances our understanding of the role that nonprofit organizations play in fostering local sustainable development, and it also informs broader scholarly discourse on the role of arts and culture organizations in a society.

Keywords

community sustainability arts and culture nonprofits organizational strategy human resource capacity performance measurement

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albert

Whetten

D. A.

(1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.

Anderson

J. C.

Gerbing

D. W.

(1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.

Baruch

Ramalho

(2006). Communalities and distinctions in the measurement of organizational performance and effectiveness across for-profit and nonprofit sectors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 39-65.

Boorsma

Chiaravalloti

(2010). Arts marketing performance: An artistic-mission-led approach to evaluation. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 40, 297-317.

Brown

M. W.

Cudeck

(1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen

K. A.

Long

J. S.

(Eds.), Testing structural equation model (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Brown

T. A.

(2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford.

Bryson

J. M.

(2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: Stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6, 21-53.

Bryson

J. M.

Gibbons

M. J.

Shaye

(2001). Enterprise schemes for nonprofit survival, growth, and effectiveness. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11, 271-288.

Byrne

B. M.

(2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.

10.

Chan

(2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad. In Lance

C. E.

Vandenberg

R. J.

(Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity and fable in the organizational and social sciences (pp. 309-336). New York, NY: Routledge.

11.

Dart

(2004). Being “business-like” in a nonprofit organization: A grounded and inductive typology. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 290-310.

12.

Dillman

D. A.

(2011). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

13.

DiMaggio

Mukhtar

(2004). Arts participation as cultural capital in the United States, 1982-2002: Signs of decline? Poetics, 32, 169-194.

14.

Faulk

Willems

McGinnis Johnson

Stewart

A. J.

(2016). Network connections and competitively awarded funding: The impacts of board network structures and status interlocks on nonprofit organizations’ foundation grant acquisition. Public Management Review, 18, 1425-1455.

15.

Fiorino

D. J.

(2010). Sustainability as a conceptual focus for public administration. Public Administration Review, 70(Suppl. 1), 78-88.

16.

Fornell

Larcker

D. F.

(1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 382-388.

17.

Freeman

R. E.

(1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

18.

Frumkin

(2002). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

19.

Gainer

Padanyi

(2002). Applying the marketing concept to cultural organizations: An empirical study of the relationship between market orientation and performance. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7, 182-193.

20.

Gori

Fissi

(2013). From cash to accrual accounting: A model to evaluate the performance of public museums. Review of International Comparative Management, 14, 519-541.

21.

Hager

M. A.

Winkler

M. K.

(2012). Motivational and demographic factors for performing arts attendance across place and form. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 474-496.

22.

Hair

J. F.

Anderson

R. E.

Tatham

R. L.

Black

W. C.

(1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

23.

Hatcher

Prus

J. S.

Englehard

Farmer

T. M.

, (1991). A measure of academic situational constraints: Out-of-class circumstances that inhibit college student development. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51(4), 953-962.

24.

Hoyle

R. H.

(1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In Hoyle

R. H.

(Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

25.

Hsieh

(2010). Strategic stakeholder orientations and performance consequences: A case of private nonprofit performing arts in the US. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 15, 13-27.

26.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55.

27.

Hughes

Luksetich

(2004). Nonprofit arts organizations: Do funding sources influence spending patterns? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 203-220.

28.

Kim

(2017). Characteristics of civically engaged nonprofit arts organizations: The results of a national survey. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46, 175-198. doi:0899764016646473

29.

Kline

R. B.

(2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.

30.

Koteen

(1997). Strategic management in public and nonprofit organizations: Managing public concerns in an era of limits. Westport, CT: Praeger.

31.

Kushner

R. J.

Cohen

(2011). Measuring national-level cultural capacity with the national arts index. International Journal of Arts Management, 13(3), 20-40.

32.

Kushner

R. J.

Poole

P. P.

(1996). Exploring structure-effectiveness relationships in nonprofit arts organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 7, 119-136.

33.

LeRoux

(2009). Managing stakeholder demands balancing responsiveness to clients and funding agents in nonprofit social service organizations. Administration & Society, 41, 158-184.

34.

LeRoux

Bernadska

(2014). Impact of the arts on individual contributions to US civil society. Journal of Civil Society, 10, 144-164.

35.

LeRoux

Wright

N. S.

, (2010). Does performance measurement improve strategic decision making? Findings from a national survey of nonprofit social service agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 571-587.

36.

Leuenberger

D. Z.

Bartle

J. R.

(2009). Sustainable development for public administration. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

37.

Light

P. C.

(2004). Sustaining nonprofit performance: The case for capacity building and the evidence to support it. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

38.

Liket

K. C.

Maas

(2015). Nonprofit organizational effectiveness: Analysis of best practices. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44, 268-296.

39.

Malatesta

Smith

C. R.

(2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74, 14-25.

40.

Markusen

(2014). Creative cities: A 10-year research agenda. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36, 567-589.

41.

McCarthy

K. F.

Ondaatje

E. H.

Novak

J. L.

(2007). Arts and culture in the metropolis: Strategies for sustainability. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

42.

Milward

H. B.

Provan

K. G.

(2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-380.

43.

Milward

H. B.

Provan

K. G.

(2003). Managing the hollow state: Collaboration and contracting. Public Management Review, 5, 1-18.

44.

Mitchell

G. E.

(2013). The construct of organizational effectiveness: Perspectives from leaders of international nonprofits in the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42, 324-345.

45.

Moldavanova

A. V.

, (2013). Sustainability, ethics, and aesthetics. The International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice, 8(1), 109-120.

46.

Moldavanova

A. V.

, (2014). Sustainability, aesthetics, and future generations: Towards a dimensional model of the arts’ impact on sustainability. In Humphreys

Stober

S. S.

(Eds.), Transitions to sustainability: Theoretical debates for a changing planet (pp. 172-193). Campaign, IL: Common Ground Publishing.

47.

Moldavanova

A. V.

, (2016). Two narratives of intergenerational sustainability: A framework for sustainable thinking. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(5), 526-545.

48.

Moldavanova

A. V.

, (2018). Sustainability research in U.S. Public Administration: Pillar tensions and synergies. In Frederickson

H. G.

Stazyk

(Eds.), The Handbook of American Public Administration (pp. 304-332). Northampton, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.

49.

Moulton

Eckerd

(2012). Preserving the publicness of the nonprofit sector resources, roles, and public values. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41, 656-685.

50.

Opp

S. M.

Saunders

K. L.

(2013). Pillar talk: Local sustainability initiatives and policies in the United States—Finding evidence of the “three e’s”: Economic development, environmental protection, and social equity. Urban Affairs Review, 49, 678-717.

51.

Pandey

S. K.

Coursey

D. H.

Moynihan

D. P.

(2007). Organizational effectiveness and bureaucratic red tape: A multimethod study. Public Performance & Management Review, 30, 398-425.

52.

Pfeffer

Salancik

G. R.

(1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

53.

Porter

M. E.

(2008). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, NY: Free Press.

54.

Portney

K. E.

Cuttler

(2010). The local nonprofit sector and the pursuit of sustainability in American cities: A preliminary exploration. Local Environment, 15, 323-339.

55.

Rushton

Landesman

(2013). Creative communities: Art works in economic development. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

56.

Salamon

L. M.

(2012). The state of nonprofit America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

57.

Sawhill

J. C.

Williamson

(2001). Mission impossible? Measuring success in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 11, 371-386.

58.

Smith

S. R.

(2010). Nonprofits and public administration: Reconciling performance management and citizen engagement. American Review of Public Administration, 40, 129-152.

59.

Smith

S. R.

Lipsky

(2009). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

60.

Sowa

J. E.

Selden

S. C.

Sandfort

J. R.

(2004). No longer unmeasurable? A multidimensional integrated model of nonprofit organizational effectiveness. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 711-728.

61.

Stone

M. M.

Ostrower

(2007). Acting in the public interest? Another look at research on nonprofit governance. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 416-438.

62.

Suárez

D. F.

(2011). Collaboration and professionalization: The contours of public sector funding for nonprofit organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 307-326.

63.

Throsby

(1995). Culture, economics and sustainability. Journal of Cultural Economics, 19, 199-206.

64.

Toepler

Wyszomirski

M. J.

(2012). Arts and culture. In Salamon

L. M.

(Ed.), The state of nonprofit America (pp. 229-266). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

65.

Tubadji

Osoba

B. J.

Nijkamp

(2015). Culture-based development in the USA: Culture as a factor for economic welfare and social well-being at a county level. Journal of Cultural Economics, 39, 277-303.

66.

Turbide

Laurin

(2009). Performance measurement in the arts sector: The case of the performing arts. International Journal of Arts Management, 11, 56-70.

67.

Turbide

Laurin

(2014). Governance in the arts and culture nonprofit sector: Vigilance or indifference? Administrative Sciences, 4, 413-432.

68.

Ullman

J. B.

Bentler

P. M.

(2003). Structural equation modeling. In Schinka

J. A.

Velicer

W. F.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (pp. 607-634). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

69.

Varbanova

(2013). Strategic management in the arts. New York, NY: Routledge.

70.

Wang

Hawkins

C. V.

Lebredo

Berman

E. M.

(2012). Capacity to sustain sustainability: A study of US cities. Public Administration Review, 72, 841-853.

71.

Weerawardena

McDonald

R. E.

Mort

G. S.

(2010). Sustainability of nonprofit organizations: An empirical investigation. Journal of World Business, 45, 346-356.

72.

Wilks-Heeg

North

(2004). Cultural policy and urban regeneration: A special edition of local economy. Local Economy, 19, 305-311.

73.

World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development: Our common future. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf

74.

Wright

N. S.

, (2010). Revitalizing American Cities: Do Community Development Corporations Matter? RGKCenter for Philanthropy and Community Service, Working Paper No, 23.

75.

Youker

B. W.

(2010). The logic of evaluation and not-for-profit arts organizations: The perspective of an evaluation consultant. International Journal of Arts Management, 12(3), 4-12.

76.

Zorloni

(2012). Designing a strategic framework to assess museum activities. International Journal of Arts Management, 14(2), 31-47.