This article empirically explores the understanding and changes in the concept of administrative capacity in the Korean context. Despite a universal consensus on its importance, administrative capacity is defined differently by regimes and stakeholders (i.e. in this study: the public, members of the National Assembly, and academia). To improve our understanding of administrative capacity, we collected three types of texts (337 academic papers, 1470 National Assembly minutes, and 3316 newspaper articles from 2000 to 2019) and analyzed the data using topic modeling and text-network analysis methods. The results suggest that although academic articles emphasized leadership, manpower, education, and other policymaking capacities, the National Assembly stressed innovation capacity in solving different policy problems. Finally, the media, assumed to reflect public opinion, emphasized capacities related to national security.
Points for practitioners
This study suggests that different types of administrative capacities could be needed according to the developmental stage of states. While managerial and administrative capacity should be developed in countries pursuing state-led economic development, governance capacity could be more requested in countries facing demands for democratization and meeting citizens’ various needs and participation.
AddisonHJ (2009) Is administrative capacity a useful concept? Review of the application, meaning and observation of administrative capacity in political science literature. LSE research paper.
BooH-W (2010)
Korea’s experience with NPM-based reform: Applying the policy fashion concept. The Korean Journal of Policy Studies25(1): 19–33.
4.
CaoJXiaTLiJ, et al. (2009)
A density-based method for adaptive LDA model selection. Neurocomputing72(7–9): 1775–1781.
5.
ChangJGerrishSWangC, et al. (2009) Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) (eds Y Bengio, D Schuurmans, J Lafferty, et al.). Vancouver, Canada, pp. 288–296.
6.
Cho KH and Jin JS (2010) A Competency Assessment Model for Rural Development Administration. Association of Korean Public Personnel Administration.
7.
ChoSHKangJS (2001) A Study of Job Competency Assessment Model. Seoul:
Korea Institute of Public Administration.
8.
ChoiMHJoCH (2007)
Introducing the competency-based curriculum (CBC) in the public sector: The case of the Ministry of Science and Technology. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review6(2): 263–291.
9.
Choi MH and Kim YW (2010) A study on the reinforcement of local public officials' competency: Focused on the competency-based curriculum. Korean Local Government Studies 13(4): 33--59.
10.
ChoiMYImSJ (2004) A study of administrative capacity of local governments from the structuration theory. In: Korean Association of Public Administration Conference Proceedings, Korea Association of Public Administration, Seoul, pp. 151–166.
11.
ChoiWSLeeJMChoiSY (2016)
Analysis of competence level perception of female public officials in local government: Focusing on comparison of competence level perception between men and women. Korean Local Administration Review16(1): 167–198.
12.
ChoiYSHwangSW (2000) A Suggestion for Improving the Education and Training System of Civil Servants.
Seoul: Korea Institute of Public Administration.
13.
DesouzaKCJacobB (2017)
Big data in the public sector: Lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration & Society49(7): 1043–1064.
14.
EomSJ (2016)
Administrative capacity in Korea: Path-dependency and institutional drift of administrative reform. Korean Journal of Public Administration50(4): 91–137.
15.
FarazmandA (2009)
Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: A modest prescription for the twenty-first century. Public Administration Review69(6): 1007–1020.
16.
GhoshDGuhaR (2013)
What are we “tweeting” about obesity? Mapping tweets with topic modeling and Geographic Information System. Cartography and Geographic Information Science40(2): 90–102.
HaMS (2008)
Study on the determinants of the effectiveness of the senior civil service system (SCS): Government officials in Korea. Korean Journal of Public Administration17(3): 167–205.
19.
Ha MS, Kwon YS and Cheon YS (2007) Comparative case study for developing competency assessment systems of Korean civil servants. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review 6(1): 37--79.
20.
HagenLKellerTEYerdenX, et al. (2019)
Open data visualizations and analytics as tools for policy-making. Government Information Quarterly 36(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.06.004.
21.
HanSWChoiKS (2006)
Administrative capacity building in local government. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation16(1): 183–208.
22.
HollibaughGE (2019)
The use of text as data methods in public administration: A review and an application to agency priorities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory29(3): 474–490.
23.
Ingraham PW and Donahue AK (2000) Dissecting the black box revisited: Characterizing government management capacity. Governance and Performance: New Perspectives. Washington,DC: Georgetown University Press, pp. 292--318.
24.
JacobiCVan AtteveldtWWelbersK (2016)
Quantitative analysis of large amounts of journalistic texts using topic modeling. Digital Journalism4(1): 89–106.
25.
JinJG (2009)
Competency-based human resources management in government: Policy issues and lessons. Korean Policy Sciences Review13(1): 1–23.
26.
JonesBDBaumgartnerFR (2005) The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems.
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
KangJSRyuHSParkJH, et al. (2015) A Study on Reestablishment and Internationalization of Public Service Value.
Seoul, South Korea: Korea Institute of Public Administration.
28.
KangSCHaMSKwonYS (2003)
Improvement of long-term overseas education and training system for public officials to improve government capability. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review2(2): 63–88.
29.
KernaghanK (2003)
Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centerpiece. Public Administration Review63(6): 711–719.
30.
KimHJ (2003)
Introduction and development of competency-based human resource management (CBHRM): A situational approach for Korean companies. POSRI Study of Management and Economy3(1): 120–158.
31.
KimPS (2002)
Promoting cooperation between government and corporate training institutions for enhancing the competence of public officials. Korean Policy Studies Review11(1): 81–111.
32.
Kim SH (2007) Recommendations on successful e-learning for competency of fire-fighter. Proceeding of Korean Institute of Fire Science and Engineering 4: 361--366.
33.
KimSM (2017)
Public service values of the civil servants in the Korean central government: Developing and testing the model of public service values.The Korean Journal of Public Administration26(2): 1–41.
34.
KwonYS (2006)
A study on competency-based education and training for public officials. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review5(1): 129–148.
35.
LadoAAWilsonMC (1994)
Human resource systems and sustained competitive advantage: A competency-based perspective. Academy of Management Review19(4): 699–727.
36.
LeeSWRyuDA (2015)
The suggestion of the local government public service reform. The Korea Local Administration Review29(2): 3–29.
37.
LeeTJ (2018)
Antecedents and consequences of performance appraisal system towards government communication capacity: On the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in the Republic of Korea.Journal of Communication Science18(2): 185–221.
38.
LimDJ (2008)
Administrative reform—Korea, Japan, the UK, and the US: A comparative perspective. Korean Association for Policy Science12(2): 197–230.
39.
LuciaADLepsingerR (1999) Art & Science of Competency Models.
San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
40.
MaierDWaldherrAMiltnerP, et al. (2018)
Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: Toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures12(2/3): 93–118.
41.
MarvelJDMcGrathRJ (2016)
Congress as manager: Oversight hearings and agency morale. Journal of Public Policy36(3): 489–520.
42.
Moon MJ and Joo KW (2007) A comparative study on government size, scope of function and strength of government in three administration. Korean Journal of Public Administration 45(3): 51--79.
43.
NewmanDBonillaEVBuntineW (2011)
Improving topic coherence with regularized topic models. In:Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (eds Z Ghahramani, M Welling, C Cortes, et al.), Granada, Spain, pp. 496–504.
PandeySPandeySKMillerL (2017)
Measuring innovativeness of public organizations: Using natural language processing techniques in computer-aided textual analysis. International Public Management Journal20(1): 78–107.
46.
ParkCO (2011)
Changes in public personnel reform (comparative study between 2005 and 2011). Korean Public Personnel Administration Review10(3): 1–22.
47.
ParkJH (2015)
A theoretical evaluation of internalizing public service value: Focusing on the implication for the field of education and training. Korean Public Personnel Administration Review14(3): 191–217.
48.
PerryJL (1993)
Strategic human resource management.Review of Public Personnel Management13(1): 59–71.
49.
PuschmannCSchefflerT (2016)
Topic modeling for media and communication research: A short primer. SSRN Electronic Journal. HIIG Discussion Paper Series No. 2016-05, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2836478.
50.
RamosJ (2003) Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 242 (eds T Fawcett and N Mishra), Washington, DC, pp. 133–142.
51.
RhoSY (2007) Analysis and reestablishment of Korean public service values. Re-examination of Korean public service values and search for new public service value. Paper presented at the Conference of Seoul Association for Public Administration, Jeju Island, pp. 73--97.
52.
SeoDH (2018)
A study on the disparity between the importance and the degree of performance by local public officials’ administrative competency. Korean Journal of Local Government & Administration Studies32(3): 159–176.
53.
SievertCShirleyK (2014) LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics. In: Proceedingsof the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces (eds J Chuang, S Green, M Hearst, et al.), Baltimore, MD, pp. 63–70.
54.
SpencerLMSpencerSM (1993) Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance.
New York, NY:
J. Wiley & Sons.
55.
Van WartM (1998) Changing Public Sector Values.
New York, NY:
Garland.
56.
WalkerRMChandraYZhangJ, et al. (2019) Topic modeling the research–practice gap in public administration. Public AdministrationReview, online, July 28.
57.
WuXRameshMHowlettM (2015)
Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy and Society34(3/4): 165–171.
58.
WuXRameshMHowlettM, et al. (2017) The Public Policy Primer: Managing the Policy Process.
New York, NY: Routledge.
59.
YimDWHahmSD (2001)
Improvement of the educational training program for the public service: Institution, management, incentive. Korean Society and Public Administration21(1): 113–130.
60.
YooJHJungGKimM, et al. (2017)
Analysis of the entry-level training program of Korean public officials: Focusing on the new grade 5 officials program. Korean Society and Administration28(3): 113–149.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
