Research on citizen satisfaction has emphasized the role of service quality (including expectations for quality) in shaping citizens’ evaluations of public services. This article considers an understudied but important aspect of public service delivery—equity—and investigates how disparities in service outcomes between disadvantaged and advantaged groups affect citizens’ evaluations of service providers. This study also examines whether citizens with different socioeconomic status (SES) have different perceptions toward the outcome disparities. Using individual-level data from secondary schools, we find that service users appear to recognize and care about a performance gap among social strata. Even when a student’s individual outcome is held constant, satisfaction varies with the school-level performance gap between high-SES and low-SES students. This finding suggests that service users are concerned about not just their outcomes but also the relative positioning of outcomes for those of their own social group compared with other groups.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice: Abridged. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
2.
AndersenL. B.BoesenA.PedersenL. H. (2016). Performance in public organizations: Clarifying the conceptual space. Public Administration Review, 76, 852-862.
3.
AndersenL. B.HeinesenE.PedersenL. H. (2016). Individual performance: From common source bias to institutionalized assessment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 63-78.
4.
AndersenS. C.HjortskovM. (2015). Cognitive biases in performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 647-662.
5.
AndrewsR.BoyneG. A.WalkerR. M. (2006). Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration. In BoyneG. A.MeierK. J.O’TooleL. J.WalkerR. M. (Eds.), Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management (pp. 14-34). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University of Press.
6.
BaekgaardM.SerritzlewS. (2016). Interpreting performance information: Motivated reasoning or unbiased comprehension. Public Administration Review, 76, 73-82.
7.
BarrowsS.HendersonM.PetersonP. E.WestM. R. (2016). Relative performance information and perceptions of public service quality: Evidence from American school districts. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 571-583.
8.
BeckD. E.MarantoR.LoW.-J. (2014). Determinants of student and parent satisfaction at a cyber charter school. The Journal of Educational Research, 107, 209-216.
9.
BillinghamC. M.HuntM. O. (2016). School racial composition and parental choice: New evidence on the preferences of White parents in the united states. Sociology of Education, 89, 99-117.
10.
BohmertM. N.DeMarisA. (2015). Interracial friendship and the trajectory of prominority attitudes: Assessing intergroup contact theory. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 225-240.
11.
BoyneG. A. (2002). Concepts and indicators of local authority performance: An evaluation of the statutory frameworks in England and Wales. Public Money & Management, 22(2), 17-24.
12.
BoyneG. A. (2003). What is public service improvement?Public Administration, 81, 211-227.
13.
BrownB.BenedictW. R. (2002). Perceptions of the police: Past findings, methodological issues, conceptual issues and policy implications. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25, 543-580.
14.
BrownK.CoulterP. B. (1983). Subjective and objective measures of police service delivery. Public Administration Review, 43, 50-58.
15.
BrudneyJ. L.EnglandR. E. (1982). Urban policy making and subjective service evaluations: Are they compatible?Public Administration Review, 42, 127-135.
16.
BuckleyJ.SchneiderM. (2009). Charter schools: Hope or hype?Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
BurgessS.WilsonD.LuptonR. (2005). Parallel lives? Ethnic segregation in schools and neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 42, 1027-1056.
18.
CharbonneauÉ.Van RyzinG. G. (2012). Performance measures and parental satisfaction with New York City schools. The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 54-65.
19.
CheonO.SongM.McCreaA. M.MeierK. J. (2019). Health care in America: The relationship between subjective and objective assessments of hospitals. International Public Management Journal. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10967494.2018.1553808
20.
ChungJ.-E.JinB. (2011). In-group preference as opportunism governance in a collectivist culture: Evidence from Korean retail buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 26, 237-249.
21.
CyertR. M.MarchJ. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22.
DuncanO. D.FeathermanD. L.DuncanB. (1972). Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York, NY: Seminar Press.
23.
FaveroN.MeierK. J. (2013). Evaluating urban public schools: Parents, teachers, and state assessments. Public Administration Review, 73, 401-412.
24.
FredericksonH. G. (1990). Public administration and social equity. Public Administration Review, 50, 228-237.
25.
GlazermanS.DotterD. (2017). Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39, 593-619.
26.
HjortskovM. (2016). Citizen satisfaction: Political voice and cognitive biases (Doctoral thesis). Forlaget Politica, Aarhus, Denmark.
27.
HjortskovM. (2019). Citizen expectations and satisfaction over time: Findings from a large sample panel survey of public school parents in Denmark. The American Review of Public Administration, 49, 353-371. doi:10.1177/0275074018765822
28.
JacobsenR.SnyderJ. W.SaultzA. (2015). Understanding satisfaction with schools: The role of expectations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 831-848.
29.
JamesO. (2007). Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 107-123.
30.
JamesO. (2011). Managing citizens’ expectations of public service performance: Evidence from observation and experimentation in local government. Public Administration, 89, 1419-1435.
31.
JamesO.MoseleyA. (2014). Does performance information about public services affect citizens’ perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information. Public Administration, 92, 493-511.
32.
JamesO.Van RyzinG. G. (2017). Incredibly good performance: An experimental study of source and level effects on the credibility of government. The American Review of Public Administration, 47, 23-35.
33.
JhaA. K.OravE. J.ZhengJ.EpsteinA. M. (2008). Patients’ perception of hospital care in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 359, 1921-1931.
34.
JilkeS.BaekgaardM. (2019). The political psychology of citizen satisfaction: Does functional responsibility matter?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/jopart/muz012
35.
JimenezB. S. (2014). Externalities in the fragmented metropolis: Local institutional choices and the efficiency-equity trade-off. The American Review of Public Administration, 46, 314-3–36.
36.
KellyJ. M. (2003). Citizen satisfaction and administrative performance measures is there really a link?Urban Affairs Review, 38, 855-866.
37.
KellyJ. M.SwindellD. (2002). A multiple-indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: Correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62, 610-621.
38.
KellyJ. M.SwindellD. (2003). The case for the inexperienced user: Rethinking filter questions in citizen satisfaction surveys. The American Review of Public Administration, 33, 91-108.
39.
Korean Statistical Information Service. (2017). Available from http://kosis.kr/
40.
LeeS.BrintonM. C. (1996). Elite education and social capital: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 69, 177-192.
41.
LeeY. T. (1993). Ingroup preference and homogeneity among African American and Chinese American students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 225-235.
42.
LewisJ. H.HamiltonD. K. (2011). Race and regionalism: The structure of local government and racial disparity. Urban Affairs Review, 47, 349-384.
43.
LyonsW. E.LoweryD.DeHoogR. H. (1992). The politics of dissatisfaction: Citizens, services, and urban institutions. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
44.
MarvelJ. D. (2015). Unconscious bias in citizens evaluations of public sector performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26, 143-158.
45.
MeierK. J.WrinkleR. D.PolinardJ. L. (1999). Equity versus excellence in organizations: A substantively weighted least squares analysis. The American Review of Public Administration, 29, 5-18.
46.
MintromM.WalleyR. (2013). Education governance in comparative perspective. In MannaP.McGuinnP. (Eds.), Education governance for the twenty-first century: Overcoming the structural barriers to school reform (pp. 252-274). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
47.
MorgesonF. V. (2013). Expectations, disconfirmation, and citizen satisfaction with the US federal government: Testing and expanding the model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 289-305.
48.
OlsenA. L. (2015). Citizen(dis) satisfaction: An experimental equivalence framing study. Public Administration Review, 75, 469-478.
49.
OlsenA. L. (2017). Compared to what? How social and historical reference points affect citizens’ performance evaluations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27, 562-580.
50.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
51.
O’TooleL. J.Jr.MeierK. J. (2014). Public management, context, and performance: In quest of a more general theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 237-256.
52.
ParkB. K. (1988). The state, class and educational policy: A case study of South Korea’s High School Equalization Policy (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin–Madison.
53.
PetrovskyN.MokJ. Y.León-CázaresF. (2017). Citizen expectations and satisfaction in a young democracy: A test of the expectancy-disconfirmation model. Public Administration Review, 77, 395-407.
54.
PoisterT. H.ThomasJ. C. (2011). The effect of expectations and expectancy confirmation/disconfirmation on motorists’ satisfaction with state highways. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 601-617.
55.
RaineyH. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
56.
RingquistE. J. (2005). Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 223-247.
57.
RobinsonJ. (1994). Social status and academic success in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38, 506-530.
58.
RochC. H.PoisterT. H. (2006). Citizens, accountability, and service satisfaction: The influence of expectations. Urban Affairs Review, 41, 292-308.
59.
RossiP. H. (1972). Community social indicators. In CampbellA.ConverseP. E. (Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 87-126). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
60.
SalamonL. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 29-49.
61.
SaporitoS. (2003). Private choices, public consequences: Magnet school choice and segregation by race and poverty. Social Problems, 50, 181-203.
62.
SchachterH. L. (2010). Objective and subjective performance measures: A note on terminology. Administration & Society, 42, 550-567.
63.
SethM. J. (2002). Education fever: Society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
64.
SigelmanL.BledsoeT.WelchS.CombsM. W. (1996). Making contact? Black-White social interaction in an urban setting. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1306-1332.
65.
SirinS. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453.
66.
SongM.MeierK. J. (2018). Citizen satisfaction and the kaleidoscope of government performance: How multiple stakeholders see government performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28, 489-505.
67.
StipakB. (1979). Citizen satisfaction with urban services: Potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review, 39, 46-52.
68.
StipakB. (1980). Local governments’ use of citizen surveys. Public Administration Review, 40, 521-525.
69.
TajfelH. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 5, 7-24.
70.
ValantJ.NewarkD. A. (2016). The politics of achievement gaps: U.S. public opinion on race-based and wealth-based differences in test scores. Educational Researcher, 45, 331-346.
71.
Van RyzinG. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 433-448.
72.
Van RyzinG. G. (2006). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 599-611.
73.
Van RyzinG. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy-disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32, 597-614.
74.
Van RyzinG. G.ImmerwahrS.AltmanS. (2008). Measuring street cleanliness: A comparison of New York City’s scorecard and results from a citizen survey. Public Administration Review, 68, 295-303.
75.
Van RyzinG. G.MuzzioD.ImmerwahrS.GulickL.MartinezE. (2004). Drivers and consequences of citizen satisfaction: An application of the American customer satisfaction index model to New York City. Public Administration Review, 64, 331-341.
76.
VerbaS. (1996). The citizen as respondent: Sample surveys and American democracy presidential address, American Political Science Association, 1995. American Political Science Review, 90(1), 1-7.
77.
WalkerR. M.BoyneG. A.BrewerG. A. (2010). Public management and performance: Research directions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
78.
WeiherG. R.TedinK. L. (2002). Does choice lead to racially distinctive schools? Charter schools and household preferences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 79-92.
79.
WilsonJ. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
