Reducing corruption and improving citizen satisfaction are important aims of government, yet the link between these two policy aims has rarely been explored. This article reports a study into the roles played by transparency and trust in the relationship between governmental corruption and citizen satisfaction with public services. The study was based on data gathered in South Korea to evaluate a specific initiative that had sought to reduce corruption and increase citizen satisfaction with public works programmes. The data indicated that the relationship between corruption and satisfaction was moderated by transparency and partially mediated by trust.
Points for practitioners
The study sheds light on the roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction with public services, and thus provides insights for developing policy aimed at curtailing corruption and improving satisfaction.
Asian Development Bank (1995) Governance: Sound Development Management. WP1-95.
2.
Ball C. ( 2009) What is transparency?Public Integrity11(4): 293-308.
3.
Barker T. and Carter DL ( 1994) Police Deviance (3rd edn). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
4.
Baron RM and Kenny DA ( 1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology51(6): 1173-1182.
5.
Birkinshaw PJ ( 2006) Freedom of information and openness: Fundamental human rights. Administrative Law Review58(1): 177-218.
6.
Bouckaert G. and Van de Walle S. ( 2003) Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘good governance’: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences69(3): 329-344.
7.
Chambers S. ( 2004) Behind closed doors: Publicity, secrecy, and the quality of deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy12(4): 389-410.
8.
Cumberford J., Gordon G. and Sinha MN ( 1999) The creation of a national citizen satisfaction index . Annual Quality Congress53: 595-600.
9.
Cummings LL and Bromily P. ( 1996) The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. In: Kramer R and Tyler T (eds) Trust in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 302-330.
10.
de Jong J. and de Vries MS ( 2007) Toward unlimited transparency? Morals and facts concerning leaking to the press by public officials in the Netherlands. Public Administration and Development27(3): 215-225.
11.
Doig A., McIvor S. and Theobald R. ( 2006) Numbers, nuances and moving targets: Converging the use of corruption indicators or descriptors in assessing state development . International Review of Administrative Sciences72(2): 239-252.
12.
Driscoll JW ( 1978) Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal21(1): 44-56.
13.
Fieschi C. and Heywood P. ( 2004) Trust, cynicism and populist anti-politics. Paper presented at the Workshop of the European Consortium for Political Research, Uppsala, Sweden, April.
14.
Florini AM ( 2007) The battle over transparency. In: Florini A (ed.) The Right to Know: Transparency for an Open World. New York: Columbia University Press, 1-16.
15.
Giannoccaro R., Costantino N., Ludovico A. and Pietroforte R. ( 2008) Measuring citizen satisfaction with aspects of public services from a local authority and determining their importance: A case study . Public Organization Review8(1): 1-15.
16.
Gustafsson A. and Johnson MD ( 2004) Determining attribute importance in a service satisfaction model. Journal of Service Research7(2): 124-141.
17.
Hardin R. ( 1996) Trustworthiness. Ethics107(1): 26-42.
18.
Heald D. ( 2006) Varieties of transparency. In: Hood C and Heald D (eds) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?New York: Oxford University Press, 25-43.
19.
Heise JA ( 1985) Toward closing the confidence gap: An alternative approach to communication between public and government. Public Affairs Quarterly9(2): 196-217.
20.
Holzner B. and Holzner L. ( 2006) Transparency in Global Change: The Vanguard of the Open Society. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21.
Hood C. ( 2006) Transparency in historical perspective. In: Hood C and Heald D (eds) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?New York: Oxford University Press, 3-23.
22.
Jahansoozi J. ( 2006) Organization-stakeholder relationships: Exploring trust and transparency. Journal of Management Development25(10): 942-955.
23.
Kenny DA, Kashy DA and Bolger N. ( 1998) Data analysis in social psychology. In: Gilbert D, Fiske S and Lindzey G (eds) The Handbook of Social Psychology , Vol. 1, (4th edn). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 233-265.
24.
Klitgaard R. ( 1988) Controlling Corruption. Berkeley : University of California Press.
25.
Manzetti L. and Wilson CJ ( 2006) Corruption, economic satisfaction, and confidence in government: Evidence from Argentina. Latin Americanist49(2): 131-139.
26.
Meijer A. ( 2009) Understanding modern transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences75(2): 255-269.
27.
Nas TF, Price AC and Weber CT ( 1986) A policy-oriented theory of corruption. American Political Science Review80(1): 107-119.
28.
Nooteboom B., Berger H. and Noorderhaven NG ( 1997) Effects of trust and governance on relational risk . Academy of Management Journal40(2): 308-338.
29.
Nye JS ( 1967/2002) Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. In: Heidenheimer AJ and Johnston M (eds) Political Corruption: Concepts and Contexts. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 281-302.
30.
Oliver RW ( 2004) What is Transparency?New York : McGraw-Hill.
31.
O’Neill O. ( 2006) Transparency and the ethics of communication. In: Hood C and Heald D (eds) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?New York: Oxford University Press, 75-90.
32.
Parasuraman A., Zeithaml VA and Berry LL ( 1988) SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing64(1): 12-40.
33.
Pasquier M. and Villeneuve J-P. ( 2007) Organizational barriers to transparency: A typology and analysis of organizational behaviour tending to prevent or restrict access to information. International Review of Administrative Sciences73(1): 147-162.
34.
Pathak RD, Singh G., Belwal R., Naz R. and Smith RFI ( 2008) E-governance, corruption and public service delivery: A comparative study of Fiji and Ethiopia. Journal of Administration and Governance3(1): 65-79.
35.
Piotrowski SJ ( 2007) Governmental Transparency in the Path of Administrative Reform. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
36.
Prat A. ( 2006) The more closely we are watched, the better we behave . In: Hood C and Heald D (eds) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?New York: Oxford University Press, 91-103.
37.
Rawlins BL ( 2008) Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust. Public Relations Journal2(2): 1-21.
38.
Rose-Ackerman S. ( 1999) Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform . New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Rose-Ackerman S. ( 2008) Corruption. In: Rowley CK and Schneider FG (eds) Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy. New York: Springer, 551-566.
40.
Rousseau D., Sitkin SB, Burt R. and Camerer C. ( 1998) Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review23(3): 393-404.
41.
Thomas CW ( 1998) Maintaining and restoring public trust in government agencies and their employees. Administration and Society30(2): 166-193.
42.
Tschannen-Moran M. and Hoy WK ( 2000) A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research70(4): 547-593.
43.
Van Ryzin G. ( 2007) Pieces of a puzzle: Linking performance, satisfaction, and trust in government. Public Performance and Management Review30(4): 521-535.
44.
Vigoda E. and Yuval F. ( 2003) Managerial quality, administrative performance and trust in governance: Can we point to causality?Australian Journal of Public Administration62(3): 12-25.
45.
Welch EW, Hinnant CC and Moon MJ ( 2005) Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory15(3): 371-391.
