Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Research exploring a student’s “path to purchase” when considering course selection has revealed a number of influential factors including course content, reputation, and professor style. To date, little is known about the direct (or indirect) influence that course titles and course descriptions have on student interest and enrollment in courses, or how easy-sounding (simple) versus difficult-sounding (complex) information is inferred and interpreted as it relates to various enrollment markers. Using ideas from metacognition research, this research explores the impact of subjective assessment of simple versus complex course titles and course descriptions on general interest in a course and enrollment intentions. Findings indicate that not only does an easy versus complex course description affect enrollment intention, but it also affects subjective interpretations of course interest, expected workload, and learning outcomes, whereas course title has few meaningful effects. Application of these ideas for specific students and future research opportunities are discussed.

Keywords

course description enrollment intention metacognition recruitment perception

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alter

A. L.

(2013). The benefits of cognitive disfluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413498894

Babad

(2001). Students’ course selection: Differential consideration for first and last course. Research in Higher Education, 42(4), 469-492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011058926613

Babad

Darley

J. M.

Kaplowitz

(1999). Developmental aspects in students’ course selection. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(1), 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.1.157

Babad

Tayeb

(2010). Experimental analysis of students’ course selection. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(3), 373-393. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709903322275894

Chapman

D. W.

(1981). A model of student college choice. Journal of Higher Education, 52(5), 490-505. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981837

Conger

A. J.

(1974). A revised definition for suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400105

Davies

M. A. P.

Tikoo

(2019). Motives driving the choice of a business concentration: A four-country study of marketing, accounting and finance, and management undergraduates. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(3), 185-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318773501

Davies

M. A. P.

Tikoo

Ding

Salama

(2016). Motives underlying the choice of business majors: A multi-country comparison. International Journal of Management Education, 14(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2016.01.001

Hanssens

Pauwels

Srinivasan

Vanhuele

Yildirim

(2014). Consumer attitude metrics for guiding marketing mix decisions. Marketing Science, 33(4), 534-550. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2013.0841

10.

Hayes

A. F.

(2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Methodology in the Social Sciences; 2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

11.

Hugstad

(1997). Marketing the marketing major. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(Spring), 4-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/027347539701900102

12.

Jimenez

J. D. D.

Salas-Velasco

(2000). Modeling educational choices: A binomial logit model applied to the demand for higher education. Higher Education, 40, 293-311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004098300436

13.

Labroo

A. A.

Pocheptsova

(2016). Metacognition and consumer judgment: Fluency is pleasant but disfluency ignites interest. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10(August), 154-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.01.008

14.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Krull

J. L.

Lockwood

C. M.

(2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding, and suppression effect. Prevention Science, 1(4), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371

15.

Moogan

Baron

Bainbridge

(2001). Timings and trade-offs in the marketing of higher education courses: A conjoint approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 19(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500110391726

16.

Mourey

J. A.

Lam

B. C. P.

Oyserman

(2015). Consequences of cultural fluency. Social Cognition, 33(4), 308-344. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2015.33.4.308

17.

Novemsky

Dhar

Schwarz

Simonson

(2007). Preference fluency in choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.3.347

18.

Reber

Schwarz

Winkielman

(2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364-382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3

19.

Schwarz

(2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332-348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2

20.

Schwarz

Sanna

L. J.

Skurnik

Yoon

(2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 127-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X

21.

Simões

Soares

A. M.

(2010). Applying to higher education: Information sources and choice factors. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903096490

22.

Song

Schwarz

(2008). If it’s hard to read, it’s hard to do: Processing fluency affects effort prediction and motivation. Psychological Science, 19(10), 986-988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02189.x

23.

Song

Schwarz

(2009). If it’s difficult to pronounce, it must be risky: Fluency, familiarity, and risk perception. Psychological Science, 20(2), 135-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02267.x

24.

Srinivasan

Rutz

O. J.

Pauwels

(2016). Paths to and off purchase: Quantifying the impact of traditional marketing and online consumer activity. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(4), 440-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-015-0431-z

25.

Stafford

T. F.

(1994). Consumption values and the choice of marketing electives: Treating students like customers. Journal of Marketing Education, 16(Summer), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/027347539401600204

26.

Thompson

Ince

E. C.

(2013). When disfluency signals competence: The effect of processing difficulty on perceptions of service agents. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(2), 228-240. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.11.0340

27.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9

28.

Wilhelm

W. B.

(2004). The relative influence of published teaching evaluations and other instructor attributes on course choice. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475303258276

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB

Dazzling Descriptions and Tantalizing Titles: How Simple Versus Complex Course Information Influences Course Selection

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material