Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2005-12
Autonomous versus Merged Marketing Departments: The Impact of Current Department Structure and Previous Restructuring Experience on Faculty Perceptions
This study details faculty perceptions concerning administrative structure and its impact on issues such as collegiality or student success. Faculty members in autonomous marketing departments are compared with those in combined units. Then, faculty never involved with departmental change are compared with faculty previously involved splitting marketing into an autonomous unit, those with merger experience, and those who have experienced both a split and merger. Participants currently housed in autonomous marketing departments and individuals who have never experienced any departmental change are most satisfied with their department structure. Individuals with merger experience and those in combined departments are least satisfied.
Abbasi, Sami M., and Kenneth W. Hollman. 2000. Turnover: The real bottom line. Public Personnel Management29 (3): 333-342.
2.
Allen, Tammy D., Deena M. Freeman, Richard C. Reizenstein, and Joseph O. Rentz. 1995. Just another transition? Examining survivors’ attitudes over time. Academy of Management JournalSpecial Issue: Best Papers Proceedings: 78-82.
3.
Allen, Tammy D., Deena M. Freeman, Joyce E. A. Russell, Richard C. Reizenstein, and Joseph O. Rentz. 2001. Survivor reactions to organizational downsizing: Does time ease the pain?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology74 (2): 145-164.
4.
Andrus, David M., and Dawne Martin. 2001. The development and management of a department of marketing advisory council. Journal of Marketing Education23 (3): 216-227.
5.
Armstrong, J. Scott, and Terry S. Overton. 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research14 (August): 396-402.
6.
Balasubramanian, Sridhar, and Pradeep Bhardwaj. 2004. When not all conflict is bad: Manufacturing-marketing conflict and strategic incentive design. Management Science50 (4): 489-502.
7.
Baldridge, J. Victor, David V. Curtis, George P. Ecker, and Gary L. Riley. 1991. Alternative models of governance in higher education. In Organization and governance in higher education, 4th ed., edited by Marvin W. Peterson, 30-45. Needham Heights, MA: ASHE Reader Series.
8.
Bartel, Caroline A., and Richard Saavedra. 2000. The collective construction ofwork group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly45 (2): 197-231.
9.
Becher, Tony, and Maurice Kogan. 1992. Process and structure in higher education, 2nd ed.London and New York: Routledge.
Bennett, John L.2001. Change happens. HRMagazine46 (9): 149-156.
12.
Bergquist, William H.1992. The four cultures of the academy: Insights and strategies for improving leadership in collegiate organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Biglan, Anthony. 1973. Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology57 (3): 204-213.
14.
Bovey, Wayne H., and Andrew Hede. 2001. Resistance to organisational change: The role of defence mechanisms. Journal of Managerial Psychology16 (7): 534-548.
15.
Boyd, Harper W., Jr., Ralph Westfall, and Stanley F. Stasch. 1989. Marketing research: Text and cases, 7th ed.Homewood, IL: Irwin.
16.
Byrne, Donn E.1971. The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
17.
Chin, Pauline O., George A. Brown, and Qing Hu.2004. The impact of mergers& acquisitions on ITR governance structures: Acase study. Journal of Global Information Management12 (4): 50-74.
18.
Clark, Burton R.2000. Collegial entrepreneurialism in proactive universities: Lessons from Europe. Change32 (1): 10-19.
19.
Dean, David H., and Robert C. Dolan. 2001. Liberal arts or business: Does the location of the economics department alter the major?Journal of Economic Education32 (1): 18-35.
20.
Decker, Diann, Gloria E. Wheeler, Janell Johnson, and Robert J. Parsons. 2001. Effect of organizational change on the individual employee. The Health Care Manager19 (4): 1-12.
21.
Edwards, Richard. 1993. Bringing the “team approach” to general studies. AAHE Bulletin46 (4): 12-16.
22.
Edwards, Richard. 1999. The academic department: How does it fit into the university reform agenda?Change31 (5): 16-27.
Hodson, Randy. 2002. Demography or respect? Work group demography versus organizational dynamics as determinants of meaning and satisfaction at work. British Journal of Sociology53 (2): 291-317.
25.
Jackson, Susan. 1992. Team composition in organizations. In Group process and productivity, edited by Stephen Worchel, Wendy Wood, and Jeffrey A. Simpson, 1-12. London: Sage.
26.
Jehn, Karen A., Gregory B. Northcraft, and Margaret A. Neale. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly44 (4): 741-763.
27.
Johlke, Mark C., and Dale F. Duhan. 2000. Supervisor communication practices and service employee job outcomes. Journal of Service Research3 (2): 154-165.
28.
Johnson, Pamela R., and Julie Indvik. 2000. Rebels, criticizers, backstabbers, and busybodies: Anger and aggression at work. Public Personnel Management29 (2): 165-174.
29.
Karseth, Berit. 1995. The emergence of neweducational programs in the university. Review of Higher Education18 (2): 195-216.
30.
Kennedy, Donald. 1997. Academic duty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
Khirallah, Diane R.2000. The ABCs of e-business. Informationweek778 (March 20): 46-60.
32.
Kohtamaki, Vuokko, and Anu Lyytinen. 2004. Financial autonomy and challenges to being a regionally responsive higher education institution. Tertiary Education and Management10 (4): 319-336.
33.
Korver, Frank, and Betteke van Ruler. 2003. The relationship between corporate identity structures and communication structures. Journal of Communication Management7 (3): 197-208.
34.
Kushner, Roland J.1999. Curriculum as strategy: The scope and organization of business education in liberal arts colleges. Journal of Higher Education70 (4): 413-440.
35.
Lane, John E.1985. Academic profession in academic organization. Higher Education14 (3): 241-268.
36.
Langfred, Claus W., and Neta A. Moye. 2004. Effects of task autonomy on performance: An extended model considering motivational, informational, and structural mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology89 (6): 934-945.
37.
Layzell, Daniel T.1999. Linking performance to funding outcomes at the state level for public institutions of higher education: Past, present, and future. Research in Higher Education40 (2): 233-246.
38.
Leong, C. S., Adrian Furnham, and Cary L. Cooper. 1996. The moderating effect of organizational commitment on the occupational stress outcome relationship. Human Relations49 (10): 1345-1363.
39.
Lundgren, Terry D.1999. Challenges for business education in the twentyfirst century. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal41 (1): 53-61.
40.
Martensen, Anne, and Lars Gronholdt. 2001. Using employee satisfaction measurement to improve people management: An adaptation of Kano's quality types. Total Quality Management12 (December): 949-957.
41.
Massy, William F., Andrea K. Wilger, and Carol Colbeck. 1994. Overcoming “hollowed” collegiality. Change26 (4): 10-20.
42.
Mauno, Saija, Esko Leskinen, and Ulla Kinnunen. 2001. Multi-wave, multivariable models of job insecurity: Applying different scales in studying the stability of job insecurity. Journal of Organizational Behavior22 (8): 919-937.
McKnight, D. Harrison, Sohel Ahmad, and Roger G. Schroeder. 2001. When do feedback, incentive control, and autonomy improve morale? The importance of employee- management relationship closeness. Journal Managerial Issues13 (4): 466-482.
45.
Morris, Ronald W.2001. The mythic horizon of the university: Problems and possibilities for value-based leadership. Revue canadienne des sciences de l’administration18 (4): 277-290.
46.
Oldham, Mike, and Brian H. Kleiner. 1990. Understanding the nature and use of defence mechanisms in organisational life. Journal of Managerial Psychology5 (5): i-iv.
47.
Parasuraman, A., and R. Rajan Varadarajan. 1988. Robustness of ordinal measures of competitive strategy variables employed in business research: A PIMS data-based analysis. Journal of Business Research17 (1): 101-113.
48.
Pascarella, Ernest T., and Patrick T. Terenzini. 1991. How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49.
Pieper, Paul J., and Rachel A. Willis. 1999. The doctoral origins of economics faculty and the education of new economics doctorates. Journal of Economic Education30 (1): 80-88.
50.
Probst, Tahira M.2003. Exploring employee outcomes of organizational restructuring: A Solomon four-group study. Group & Organizational Management28 (3): 416-439.
51.
Quinlan, Kathleen M., and Gerlese S. Akerlind. 2000. Factors affecting departmental peer collaboration for faculty development: Two cases in context. Higher Education40 (1): 23-52.
52.
Rabinoff, Marc A., Steven R. Murray, Scott A. G. M. Crawford, and E. Newton Jackson Jr.2000. In which department or college of a university should sport studies (sport management, sport administration, etc.) be taught?Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance71 (3): 13-14.
53.
Ramsden, Paul. 1998. Learning to lead in higher education. London and New York: Routledge.
54.
Schein, Edgar H.1992. Organizational culture and leadership, 2nd ed.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
Schibrowsky, John A., James W. Peltier, and Thomas E. Boyt. 2002. A professional school approach to marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education24 (1): 43-55.
56.
Scott, Gail. 2001. Reviving staff spirit: A key to impressive service. Journal of Healthcare Management46 (5): 293-295.
57.
Serow, Robert C.2000. Research and teaching at a research university. Higher Education40 (4): 449-463.
58.
Smart, John C., and Charles F. Elton. 1982. Validation of the Biglan model. Research in Higher Education17 (3): 213-229.
59.
Sommer, Robert. 1999. Paid to teach and... Internal contradictions of studio art at a research university. Change31 (1): 40-45.
60.
Steadman, Mark E.2000. An interdisciplinary health care accounting class: Student response, and lessons learned. Journal of Education for Business75 (5): 267-270.
61.
Steckel, Joel H., Sunil Gupta, and Anirvan Banerji. 2004. Supply chain decision making: Will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-sale information necessarily help?Management Science50 (4): 458-464.
62.
Stoecker, Judith L.1993. The Biglan classification revisited. Research in Higher Education34 (4): 451-464.
63.
Tepper, Bennett J.2001. Health consequences of organizational injustice: Tests of main and interactive effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes86 (2): 197-215.
64.
Traylor, Mark. 1983. Ordinal and interval scaling. Journal of the Market Research Society25 (4): 297-303.
Van Der Werf, Martin. 2001. Loyola of Chicago may eliminate classics dept. The Chronicle of Higher Education47 (March 30): A37-A37.
67.
Volkwein, J. Fredericks, and David A. Carbone. 1994. The impact of departmental research and teaching climates on undergraduate growth and satisfaction. Journal of Higher Education65 (2): 147-167.
68.
Walvoord, Barbara E., Anna K. Carey, Hoke L. Smith, Suzanne W. Soled, Philip K. Way, and Debbie Zorn. 2000. Academic departments: How they work, how they change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
69.
Wergin, Jon F.1994. The collaborative department: How five campuses are inching toward cultures of collective responsibility. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
70.
Wilkie, William L., and Elizabeth S. Moore. 2003. Scholarly research in marketing: Exploring the “4 eras” of thought development. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing22 (2): 116-146.
71.
Willcoxson, Lesley, and Paul Walker. 1995. Valuing teaching: A strategy for changing the organisational culture of an academic department. Higher Education Research and Development14 (2): 269-278.
72.
Zemsky, Robert, and William F. Massy. 1995. Toward understanding our current predicaments: Expanding perimeters, melting cores, and sticky functions. Change27 (6): 40-49.
73.
Zemsky, Robert, William F. Massy, and Penney Odel. 1993. On reversing the ratchet: Restructuring in colleges and universities. Change25 (3): 56-62.
