We quantify the impact of implementing a stroke system of care requiring transport of individuals believed to have stroke to a primary stroke center, in rural and urban settings, based on time from symptom recognition to treatment, probability of receiving treatment within 3 hours of stroke onset, and probability of overcrowding. We use Indiana as an example.
Methods
We used discrete-event simulation to estimate outcomes for 2 scenarios: stroke system of care with enabling technology (mobile stroke unit, stroke team expansion) and stroke system of care with no enabling technology, as compared with the status quo. We considered patient flow from symptom recognition to treatment. Patient locations and stroke events were generated for the 92 Indiana counties in Indiana, subdivided into 1009 locations. We considered time from emergency medical service (EMS) arrival at onset to treatment, probability of tissue plasminogen activator administered within 3 h of onset, and percentage of patients admitted beyond the occupancy level at the comprehensive stroke center.
Results
Results varied by urbanicity. Under no enabling technology, having a stroke system of care improved outcomes for individuals in urban and suburban settings. However, in rural settings, the implementation of stroke system of care guidelines decreased the average rate of treatment within 3 h of stroke onset and increased the EMS arrival to treatment times compared with sending the individual to the closest provider. Enabling technologies improved outcomes regardless of setting.
Discussion
Geographic disparities tend to increase the number of transfers, decrease the rate of treatment within 3 h of onset, and increase transit time. This could be overcome through federal and state initiatives to reduce quality gaps in stroke care in rural settings and promote care with dedicated stroke wards.
YanQTongXSchiebL. Vital signs: recent trends in stroke death rates—United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;6:6933–9.
2.
BenjaminEJBlahaMJChiuveSE, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:229–445.
3.
HowardGKliendorferDOCushmanM, et al. Contributors to the excess stroke mortality in rural areas in the United States. Stroke. 2017;48:1773–8.
SmithWSLevMHEnglishJD, et al. Significance of large vessel intracranial occlusion causing acute ischemic stroke and TIA. Stroke. 2009;40:3834–40.
6.
GoyalMYuAYXMenonBK, et al. Endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2016;47:548–53.
7.
SarrajAGuptaA. Endovascular treatment for ischemic strokes with large vessel occlusion. Stroke. 2015;46:1431–2.
8.
BroderickJP. Haemostatic treatment for intracerebral haemorrhage. Lancet. 2018;6736:31040–7.
9.
AdamsHPDel ZoppoGAlbertsMJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke. Circulation. 2007;115:e478–534.
10.
SaverJL. Time is brain-quantified. Stroke. 2006;37:263–6.
11.
GoldsteinLBAdamsRAlbertsMJ. Primary prevention of ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council. Stroke. 2006;37:1583–633.
12.
PowersWJRabinsteinAAAckersonT, et al. 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2018;49:e46–11.
13.
GroverJMMoralesCIBriceJH. EMS and acute stroke care: evidence for policies to reduce delays to definitive treatments. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2016;10:21.
14.
SanossianNLiebeskindDSEcksteinM. Routing ambulances to designated centers increases access to stroke center care and enrollment in prehospital research. Stroke. 2015;46:2866–90.
15.
UchinoKManSScholdJD, et al. Stroke legislation impacts distribution of certified stroke centers in the United States. Stroke. 2015;46:1903–8.
16.
SchwammLHHollowayRGAmarencoP, et al. A review of the evidence for the use of telemedicine within stroke systems of care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2009;40:2616–34.
17.
WechslerLRDemaerschalkBMSchwammLH, et al. Telemedicine quality and outcomes in stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2017;48:e3–e25.
18.
SeaburySBognarKXuY, et al. Regional disparities in the quality of stroke care. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35:1234–9.
19.
MullenMTBranasCCKasnerSE. Optimization modeling to maximize population access to comprehensive stroke centers. Neurology. 2015;84:1196–205.
20.
VoungSMCarrollCPTacklaRD, et al. Application of emerging technologies to improve access to ischemic stroke care. Neruosurg Focus. 2017;42:e8.
21.
DorseyERTopolEJ. State of telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:154–61.
BlissRLKatzJNWrightEALosinaE. Estimating proximity to care: are straight line and zipcode centroid distances acceptable proxy measures?Med Care. 2012;50(1):99–106.
26.
ShinoharaY. Hemorrhagic stroke syndromes: clinical manifestations of intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage. Handb Clin Neurol. 2008;93:577–94.
27.
SmithWSLevMHEnglishJD, et al. Significance of large vessel intracranial occlusion causing acute ischemic stroke and TIA. Stroke. 2009;40(12):3834–40.
28.
HackeWKasteMBluhmkiE, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med, 2008;359(13):1317–29.
ZhouMAkashP. Effect of routing paradigm on patient-centered outcomes in acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointervent Surg. 2019;3:251–6.
32.
Wojner-AlexandrovAAlexandrovARodriguezDPersseDGrottaJ, Houston paramedic and emergency stroke treatment and outcomes study (HoPSTO). Stroke. 2005;36:1512–8.
33.
BayerSChristinaPBenitaCAlasdairHJamesB. Facilitating stroke care planning through simulation modelling. Health Informat J. 2010;16(2):129–43.
34.
GaneshAKLindsayPMFangJD, et al. Integrated systems of stroke care and reduction in 30-day mortality: a retrospective analysis. Neurology. 2016;86(10):898–904.
35.
BaezaJAlecFBoazA. Integration in stroke services: the challenges for primary and community care services. Lond J Prim Care. 2013;5(1):24–8.
36.
HigashidaRJAlbertsMNAlexanderDM, et al. Interactions within stroke systems of care: a policy statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(10):2961–84.
37.
PurruckerJHametnerCEngelbrechtABrucknerTPoppEPoliS. Comparison of stroke recognition and stroke severity scores for stroke detection in a single cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86(9):1021–8.
38.
GroverJMoralesMBriceC. EMS and Acute stroke care: evidence for policies to reduce delays to definitive treatments. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2016;10(6):1–6.
39.
Joint Commission Resources. Improving Care in the ICU. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations; 2004.
40.
O’TooleLJSladePBrewerAGaseN. Barriers and facilitators to implementing primary stroke center policy in the United States: results from 4 case study states. Am J Public Health. 2011;202(3):561–6.
41.
LeiraEHessDTornerJAdamsH. Rural-urban differences in acute stroke management practices: a modifiable disparity. Arch Neurol. 2008;65(7):887–91.
42.
GonzalesSTMullenMPSkolarusLWThibaultDUdoeyoUWillisA. Progressive rural–urban disparity in acute stroke care. Neurology. 2017;88(5):441–8.
43.
HeMWangJGongL, et al. Community-based stroke system of care for Chinese rural areas. Stroke. 2014;45(8):2385–90.
44.
KapralMKAustinPCJeyakumarG, et al. Rural-urban differences in stroke risk factors, incidence, and mortality in people with and without prior stroke: rhe CANHEART Stroke Study. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019;12(2):E004973.
45.
KatzBMcmullanJSucharewH, et al. Design and validation of a prehospital scale to predict stroke severity. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1508–12.
46.
MoselyINicolMDonnanG, et al. Stroke symptoms and the decision to call for ambulance. Stroke. 2007;38(2):361–6.
47.
TorabiEFroehleCLindsellC, et al. Monte Carlo Simulation Modeling of a Regional Stroke Team’s Use of Telemedicine. Academic Emergency Medicine. 2016;23(1):55–62.
48.
KisselaBKhouryJAlwellK, et al. 2015. Abstract W P155: Racial Differences in Ischemic Stroke Subtypes: The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study (GCNKSS). Stroke. 2015; 46(suppl_1): AWP155-AWP155.
49.
JainSSinghV. Water resources systems planning and management. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier: 1st ed., Developments in water science; 2003
50.
ElmerJPallinDLiuJ, et al. Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay is not Associated with Worse Outcomes in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurocritical Care. 2012;17(3):334–342.
51.
NelsenML. A Historical Account of Stroke and the Evolution of Nursing Care for Stroke Patients. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing. 2010;42(1):19–27.
52.
SilvaGSchwammS. Use of telemedicine and other strategies to increase the number of patients that may be treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012;12(1):10–6.
53.
SchwammLHPancioliAEAckerJB, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: recommendations from the American Stroke Association’s Task Force on the Development of Stroke Systems. Circulation. 2005;111(8):1078–91.
54.
WechslerLR. Telemedicine quality and outcomes in stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals. Stroke. 2017;48(1):e3–25.
55.
AngileriFCardaliSContiA, et al. Telemedicine-assisted treatment of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurosurg Focus. 2012;32(8):6.
56.
MaddaliARazackFCattamanchiSRamakrishnanT. Validation of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2018;11(2):111–4.
57.
BlissRLKatzJNWrightEALosinaE. Estimating proximity to care: are straight line and zipcode centroid distances acceptable proxy measures?Med Care. 2012;50(1):99–106.
58.
KleindorferOKhouryJMoomawJ, et al. Stroke incidence is decreasing in whites but not in blacks: a population based estimate of temporal trends in stroke incidence from the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study. Stroke. 2010;41:1326–31.
59.
XieBJiaoJAnZ, et al. Deciphering the stroke-built environment nexus in transitional cities: conceptual framework, empirical evidence, and implications for proactive planning intervention. Cities. 2019;94:116–28.
60.
BorekAParlikadAKWebbJWoodallP, eds. Risk assessment technique for TIRM. In: Total Information Risk Management. Burlington (MA): Morgan Kaufmann; 2014. p 217–35.
61.
FroehlerTSaverJZaidatO, et al. Interhospital transfer prior to thrombectomy is associated with delayed treatment and worse outcome in the STRATIS registry. Circulation. 2017;136(24):2311–21.
62.
ZweiflerMMendizabalECunninghamKShahFRothrockF. Hospital presentation after stroke in a community sample: the mobile stroke project. South Med J. 2002;95(11):1263–8.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
