Children and adolescents spend considerable time online. The current study investigated moderators of short-term longitudinal associations from social media use to changes in body satisfaction and physical activity. Participants (144 girls, 152 boys) were third–sixth grade students (ages 8–13) attending public schools in Florida (USA). Self-reports of social media use, body satisfaction, physical activity, and susceptibility to peer influence were completed twice, approximately 13.5 weeks apart. The results indicated that higher initial social media use was associated with greater subsequent decreases in body satisfaction and physical activity, but only for children high on susceptibility to peer influence. The findings suggest that peer conformity amplifies the risks of social media use. The fact that meaningful change can be identified across a relatively short period of time is noteworthy and demonstrates the need for careful monitoring of those who participate in social media at an early age.
BearmanS. K.MartinezE.SticeE.PresnellK. (2006). The skinny on body image dissatisfaction: A longitudinal study of adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9010-9
2.
BrierleyM.-E.BrooksK. R.MondJ.StevensonR. J.StephenI. D. (2016). The body and the beautiful: Health, attractiveness and body compositions in men’s and women’s bodies. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156722
3.
ChenF. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
4.
Choukas-BradleyS.MaheuxA. J.RobertsS. R.HutchinsonE. A.LuC.LadouceurC. D. (2022). Picture perfect during a pandemic? Body image concerns and depressive symptoms in U.S. Adolescent girls during the COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Children and Media. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2022.2039255
5.
Choukas-BradleyS.NesiJ. (2020). Applying developmental theory to adolescent peer influence processes in the social media context. In van ZalkN.MonksC. P. (Eds.), Online peer engagement in adolescence. (pp. 140–162). Routledge.
6.
ChuaT. H. H.ChangL. (2016). Follow me and like my beautiful selfies: Singapore teenage girls’ engagement in self-presentation and peer comparison on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 55(A), 190–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.011
7.
de VriesD. A.PeterJ.de GraafH.NikkenP. (2016). Adolescents’ social network site use, peer acceptance-related feedback, and body dissatisfaction: Testing a mediation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0266-4
8.
DohntH. K.TiggemannM. (2006). Body image concerns in young girls: The role of peers and media prior to adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(2), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-9020-7
9.
DuntonG. F.DoB.WangS. D. (2020). Early effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on physical activity and sedentary behavior in children living in the U.S. BMC Public Health, 20(1351). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09429
10.
EcclesJ. S (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In SpendJ. T. (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation. (pp. 75–146). Freeman.
11.
EngbergE.LeppanenM. H.SarkkolaC.ViligakaninenH. (2021). Physical activity among preadolescents modifies the long-term association between sedentary time spent using digital media and the increased risk of being overweight. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 18(9), 1105–1112. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2021.0163
12.
EvansE. H.TovéeM. J.BoothroydL. G.DrewettR. F. (2013). Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating attitudes in 7- to 11-year-old girls: Testing a sociocultural model. Body Image, 10, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.10.001
13.
FergusonG. M.HafenC. A.LaursenB. (2010). Adolescent psychological and academic adjustment as a function of discrepancies between actual and ideal self-perceptions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(12), 1485–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-009-9461-5
GötzF. M.GoslingS. D.RenfrowP. J. (2022). Small effects: The indispensable foundation for a cumulative psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620984483
17.
GuimondF. A.LaursenB. (2022). Low body image satisfaction predicts declining academic engagement in primary school children. School Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-022-09503-8
18.
GüroğluB.VeenstraR. (2021). Neural underpinnings of peer experiences and interactions: A review of social neuroscience. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 67(4), 416–455. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.67.4.0416
HarterS. (1985). Manual for the self-perception profile for children. University of Denver.
21.
HollandG.TiggemannM. (2016). A systematic review of the impact of the use of social networking sites on body image and disordered eating outcomes. Body Image, 17, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.02.008
22.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternative. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
23.
KleemansM.DaalmansS.CarbaatI.AnschützD. (2018). Picture perfect: The direct effect of manipulated Instagram photos on body image in adolescent girls. Media Psychology, 21(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2016.1257392
24.
KowalskiK. C.CrockerP. R.FaulknerR. A. (1997). Validation of the physical activity questionnaire for older children. Pediatric Exercise Science, 9(2), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1123/pes.9.2.174
25.
LaFontanaK. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38(5), 635–647. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.38.5.635
26.
LaursenB. (2018). Peer influence. In BukowskiW. M.LaursenB.RubinK. H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. (pp. 447–469). Guilford.
27.
LaursenB.FaurS. (2022). What does it mean to be susceptible to influence? A brief primer on peer conformity and developmental changes that affect it. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(3), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254221084103
28.
LaursenB.VeenstraR. (2021). Toward understanding the functions of peer influence: A summary and synthesis of recent empirical research. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 889–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12606
29.
MacArthurB. A.RacineN.BrowneD.McDonaldS.ToughS.MadiganS. (2021). Recreational screen time before and during COVID-19 in school-aged children. Acta Pediatrica, 110(10), 2805–2807. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15966
30.
McPhieM. L.RawanaJ. S. (2015). The effect of physical activity on depression in adolescence and emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 40(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.01.008
31.
MeeusA.BuellensK.EggermontS. (2019). Like me (please?): Connecting online self-presentation to pre- and early adolescents’ self-esteem. News and Media Society, 21(11–12), 2386–2403. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819847447
ParkerJ. G.AsherS. R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: Links with peer group acceptance and feelings of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.611
Rauste-von WrightM. (1989). Body image satisfaction in adolescent girls and boys: A longitudinal study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139247
RudolphK. D.AbaiedJ. L.FlynnM.SugimuraN.AgostonA. M. (2011). Developing relationships, being cool, and not looking like a loser: Social goal orientation predicts children’s responses to peer aggression. Child Development, 82(5), 1518–1530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01631.x
SaiphooA. N.VahediZ. (2019). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between social media use and body image disturbance. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.028
41.
SalomonI.BrownC. S. (2019). The selfie generation: Examining the relationship between social media use and early adolescent body image. Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(4), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618770809
SticeE. (2003). Puberty and body image. In HaywardC. (Ed), Gender differences at puberty. (pp. 61–76). Cambridge University Press.
44.
TiggemannM. (2011). Sociocultural perspectives on human appearance and body image. In CashT. F.SmolakL. (Eds), Body image: A handbook of science, practice, and prevention. (pp. 12–19). Guilford.
45.
ValkenbergP. M.PeterJ. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12024
WilkschS. M.O’SheaA.HoP.ByrneS.WadeT. D. (2019). The relationship between social media use and disordered eating in young adolescents. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 53(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23198
49.
YangH.WangJ. J.TngG. Y. Q.YangS. (2020). Effects of social media and smartphone use on body esteem in female adolescents: Testing a cognitive and affective model. Children, 7(9), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.3390/children7090148
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
