Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-10
Positive Perceived School Climate and Cyberbullying in Chinese Adolescents: A Moderated Mediation Model From the Perspective of Internet Characteristics
Although substantive research has shown that a positive perceived school climate is an essential protective factor for cyberbullying among adolescents, little research revealed the mechanisms underlying this relationship. This study examined whether normative beliefs about aggression mediate the association between a positive perceived school climate and cyberbullying and whether this process is moderated by Internet morality. Anonymous questionnaires measuring these variables were administered to 649 junior high school students in China. After controlling for traditional bullying, mediation analysis indicated that normative beliefs about aggression played a full mediating role in the relationship between a positive perceived school climate and cyberbullying. Moderated mediation analysis further revealed that Internet morality moderated the predictive effect of normative beliefs about aggression on cyberbullying. The mediating effect of normative beliefs about aggression was stronger in individuals with lower levels of Internet morality. These findings provide insight into making existing interventions more suitable for cyberbullying.
AcostaJ.ChinmanM.EbenerP.MaloneP. S.PhillipsA.WilksA. (2019). Evaluation of a whole-school change intervention: Findings from a two-year cluster-randomized trial of the restorative practices intervention. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 876-890. doi:10.1007/s10964-019-01013-2
2.
AlisdairA. G. (2006). Cyber-bullying and harassment of teenagers: The legal response. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 28, 123-136.
3.
AndersonC. A.BushmanB. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
4.
AngR. P.TanK. A.TalibM. A. (2011). Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator of narcissistic exploitativeness and cyberbullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 2619-2634.
5.
AnsaryN. S. (2020). Cyberbullying: Concepts, theories, and correlates informing evidence-based best practices for prevention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50, 101343. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2019.101343
6.
AwiriaO.OlweusD.ByrneB. (1994). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do coping with bullying in schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 42, 403.
7.
BanduraA. (2010). Selective activation and disengagement of moral control. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 27-46.
8.
BradleyK. (2005). Internet lives: Social context and moral domain in adolescent development. New Directions for Youth Development, 108, 57-76.
9.
BrewerG.KerslakeJ. (2015). Cyberbullying, self-esteem, empathy and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 255-260.
10.
BurtonK. A.FlorellD.GoreJ. S. (2013). Differences in proactive and reactive aggression in traditional bullies and cyberbullies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 22, 316-328.
11.
CaiH. J.HuangZ. H.LinL.ZhangM. Y.WangX. O.. . . JinY. M. (2020). The change of Chinese psychology over the past half century: Empirical research. Advances in Psychological Science, 28, 1599-1618.
12.
CalveteE.OrueI.Gámez-GuadixM. (2016). Cyberbullying victimization and depression in adolescents: The mediating role of body image and cognitive schemas in a one-year prospective study. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 22, 271-284.
13.
ChuX. W.FanC. Y. (2017). Revision of the Revised Cyberbullying Inventory among junior high school students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 1031-1034.
14.
ChuX. W.ZhouZ. K.FanC. Y. (2020). Relationship between peer rejection and cyberbullying: The mediating role of anger and the moderating role of perceived anonymity. Psychological Development and Education, 36, 584-593.
15.
CohenJ.McCabeL.MichelliN. M.PickeralT. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111, 180-213.
16.
ColeD. A.ZelkowitzR. L.NickE.MartinN. C.SpinelliT. (2016). Longitudinal and incremental relation of cybervictimization to negative self-cognitions and depressive symptoms in young adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 1321-1332.
17.
CushmanF.HauserY. M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082-1089.
18.
DetertJ. R.TreviñoL. K.SweitzerV. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 374-391.
19.
DotyJ. L.GowerA. L.RudiJ. H.McMorrisB. J.BorowskyI. W. (2017). Patterns of bullying and sexual harassment: Connections with parents and teachers as direct protective factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 2289-2304.
20.
EdwardsO. W.MumfordV. E.Serra-RoldanR. (2016). A positive youth development model for students considered at-risk. School Psychology International, 28, 29-45.
21.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
22.
GaffneyH.FarringtonD. P.EspelageD. L.TtofiM. M. (2019). Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 134-153. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002
23.
GendronB. P.WilliamsK. R.GuerraN. G. (2011). An analysis of bullying among students within schools: Estimating the effects of individual normative beliefs, self-esteem, and school climate. Journal of School Violence, 10, 150-164.
24.
GriffinC. B.CooperS. M.MetzgerI. W.GoldenA. R.WhiteC. N. (2017). School racial climate and the academic achievement of African American high school students: The mediating role of school engagement. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 673-688.
25.
GuerraN. G.WilliamsK. R.SadekS. (2011). Understanding bullying and victimization during childhood and adolescence: A mixed methods study. Child Development, 82, 295-310.
26.
HayesA. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
27.
HenryD.GuerraN.HuesmannR.TolanP.VanackerR.EronL. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 59-81.
28.
HirschiT. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
29.
HuH.LiuT.HsiaoR. C.NiH. C.LiangS. H. Y.LinC. F.YenC. F. (2019). Cyberbullying victimization and perpetration in adolescents with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: Correlations with depression, anxiety, and suicidality. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 49, 4170-4180. doi:10.1007/s10803-019-04060-7
30.
HuesmannL. R.GuerraN. G. (1997). Children’s normative beliefs about aggression and aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(2), 408-419.
31.
JadambaaA.ThomasH. J.ScottJ. G.GravesN.BrainD.PacellaR. (2019). Prevalence of traditional bullying and cyberbullying among children and adolescents in Australia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 53, 878-888. doi:10.1177/0004867419846393
32.
JiaY. M.WayN.LingG. M.YoshikawaH.ChenX. Y.HughesD.LuZ. H. (2009). The influence of student perceptions of school climate on socioemotional and academic adjustment: A comparison of Chinese and American adolescents. Child Development, 80, 1514-1530.
33.
JinT. L. (2018). The relationship between violence exposure and online aggressive behavior in college students: The role of ruminative responses and Internet moral (Master’s dissertation). Harbin Normal University, Harbin, China.
34.
JinT. L.LuG. Z.ZhangL.WuY. T. N.JinX. Z. (2018). The effect of violent exposure on online aggressive behavior of college students: The role of ruminative responses and internet moral. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50, 127-136.
35.
KesslerR. C.MatthiasA.AnthonyJ. C.De GraafR.DemyttenaereK.GasquetI.. . . KawakamiN. (2007). Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry, 6, 168-176.
36.
KonishiC.MiyazakiY.HymelS.WaterhouseT. (2017). Investigating associations between school climate and bullying in secondary schools: Multilevel contextual effects modeling. School Psychology International, 38, 240-263.
37.
KowalskiR. M.GiumettiG. W.SchroederA. N.LattannerM. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073-1137.
38.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P. (2013). Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, S13-S20.
39.
KowalskiR. M.LimberS. P.MccordA. (2019). A developmental approach to cyberbullying: Prevalence and protective factors. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 20-32. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.02.009
40.
Lapidot-LeflerN.HosriH. (2016). Cyberbullying in a diverse society: Comparing Jewish and Arab adolescents in Israel through the lenses of individualistic versus collectivist cultures. Social Psychology of Education, 19(3), 1-17.
41.
LiJ. M.SidibeA. M.ShenX. Y.HeskethT. (2019). Incidence, risk factors and psychosomatic symptoms for traditional bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 107, 104511. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104511
42.
LiuH. (2006). Current situation and educational countermeasures of Internet moral among junior high school students (Master’s dissertation). Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
43.
LondonB.DowneyG.BonicaC. (2007). Social causes and consequences of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17, 481-506.
44.
LuoX. L. (2007). Internet psycho-structure of moral trait, moral consciousness and their relationship of undergraduates (Master’s dissertation). Central China Normal University, Wuhan, China.
45.
MaX. H.LeiL. (2010). Adolescents’ Internet morality and deviant behavior online. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 988-997.
46.
MaX. H.LeiL. (2011). Adolescents’ Internet morality and pro-social behaviors online. Psychological Science, 34, 2423-2428.
47.
McewanB.ZanollaD. (2013). When online meets offline: A field investigation of modality switching. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1565-1571.
48.
MojdehiA. S.LeducK.MojdehiA. S.TalwarV. (2019). Examining cross-cultural differences in youth’s moral perceptions of cyberbullying. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 22, 243-248.
49.
PabianS.VandeboschH. (2014). Using the theory of planned behavior to understand cyberbullying: The importance of beliefs for developing interventions. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11, 463-477.
50.
PabianS.VandeboschH. (2016). Short-term longitudinal relationships between adolescents’ (cyber)bullying perpetration and bonding to school and teachers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(2), 1-11.
51.
PearceN.CrossD.MonksH.WatersS.FalconerS. (2011). Current evidence of best practice in whole-school bullying intervention and its potential to inform cyberbullying interventions. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 21, 1-21.
52.
PecjakS.PircT. (2017). Bullying and perceived school climate: Victims’ and bullies’ perspective. Studia Psychologica, 59, 22-33.
53.
PodsakoffP. M.MackenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: Aa critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
54.
RuthW. L.DorothyL. E.KathleenC. B.JordanP. D. (2019). Traditional and cyber bullying and sexual harassment: A longitudinal assessment of risk and protective factors. Aggressive Behavior, 45, 181-192.
55.
SampsonR. J.LaubJ. H. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In ThornberryT. P. (Ed.), Developmental theories of crime and delinquency (pp. 165-182). London, England: Transaction Publishers.
56.
ShaoR.WangY. Q. (2017). Reliability and validity of normative beliefs about aggression scale among middle school students. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 25, 1035-1038.
57.
SouranderA.KlomekA. B.IkonenM.LindroosJ.LuntamoT.KoskelainenM.HeleniusH. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 720-728.
58.
SteinbergL.MorrisA. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83.
59.
TianL.YanY.HuebnerE. S. (2018). The effects of cyberbullying and cybervictimization on early adolescents’ mental health: The differential mediating roles of perceived peer relationship stress. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 21, 429-436.
60.
TurhanŞ. (2017). Negative effects of media on children and youth’ socialization process: A study on violent and aggressive behaviors. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 46(2), 368-398.
61.
VaillancourtT.FarisR.MishnaF. (2017). Cyberbullying in children and youth: Implications for health and clinical practice. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 62, 368-373.
62.
VandeboschH.CleemputK. V. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1349-1371.
63.
van ReemstL.FischerT. F. C.ZwirsB. W. C. (2016). Social information processing mechanisms and victimization: A literature review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17, 3-25.
64.
Van ZalkN. (2020). The development of internalizing behaviors in early adolescence: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Early Adolescence, 40, 1281-1290. doi:10.1177/0272431620919174
65.
WangC. W.MusumariP. M.TechasrivichienT.SuguimotoS. P.NakayamaT. (2019). Overlap of traditional bullying and cyberbullying and correlates of bullying among Taiwanese adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19, Article 1756. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-8116-z
66.
WangM. J.YogeeswaranK.AndrewsN. P.HawiD. R.SibleyC. G. (2019). How common is cyberbullying among adults? Exploring gender, ethnic, and age differences in the prevalence of cyberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 22(11), 736-741.
67.
WangM. T.SelmanR. L.DishionT. J.StormshakE. A. (2010). A tobit regression analysis of the covariation between middle school students’ perceived school climate and behavioral problems. Journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 20, 274-286.
68.
WangX. C.ZhaoF. Q.LeiL. (2019). School climate and adolescents’ cyberbullying perpetration: A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and friends’ moral identity. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi:10.1177/0886260519860089
69.
WernerN. E.BumpusM. F.RockD. (2010). Involvement in Internet aggression during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 607-619.
70.
WernerN. E.NixonC. L. (2005). Normative beliefs and relational aggression: An investigation of the cognitive bases of adolescent aggressive behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 229-243.
71.
WilliamsK. R.GuerraN. G. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescence Health, 41, 14-21.
72.
WillifordA.ElledgeL. C.BoultonA. J.DepaolisK. J.LittleT. D.SalmivalliC. (2013). Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization frequency among Finnish youth. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42, 820-833.
73.
WongD. S. W.ChanH. C.ChengC. H. K. (2014). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 133-140.
74.
YangJ. P.WangX. C. (2012). Effect of moral disengagement on adolescents’ aggressive behavior: Moderated mediating effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44, 1075-1085.
75.
ZhangW. X.WuJ. F.JonesK. (1999). Revision to the Chinese version of Olweus Child Bullying Questionnaire. Psychological Development and Education, 2, 7-11, 37.
76.
ZhaoJ. T.BearG. G.YangC. Y.QianN.ChengG. (2020). Moral disengagement and bullying perpetration: A longitudinal study of the moderating effect of school climate. School Psychology, 35, 99-109. doi:10.1037/spq0000348
77.
ZhengY. L.YangX. J.LiuQ. Q.ChuX. W.ZhouZ. K. (2020). Perceived stress and online compulsive buying among women: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 13-20. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.012
78.
ZhuX. W.ChuX. W.ZhangY. H.LiZ. H. (2020). Exposure to online game violence and cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents: Normative beliefs about aggression as a mediator and trait aggressiveness as a moderator. Journal of Aggression Maltreatment & Trauma, 29, 148-166. doi:10.1080/10926771.2018.1550830
79.
ZychI.TtofiM. M.LlorentV. J.FarringtonD. P.RibeaudD.EisnerM. P. (2020). A longitudinal study on stability and transitions among bullying roles. Child Development, 91, 527-545.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
