Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Transitioning to adolescence in the digital age creates both opportunities and challenges for early adolescents, who are at risk for cyberbullying. Parents and youths report perceived incompetence in dealing with cyberbullying; however, most past studies reflect mixed findings on cross-sectional relationships between restrictive media parenting and adolescent cyberbullying. The current study aims to explore longitudinal connections between restrictive media parenting and cyberbullying attitudes and behaviors in early adolescents during the pandemic. Youth reports of perceived restrictive media parenting, cyberbullying attitudes, and cyberbullying behaviors were extracted from a three-wave sample collected through an online longitudinal survey from 2019 to 2021 across the US (N = 288, M_age = 11.81, 50.2% girls). Structural equation modeling path analysis showed that T1 cyberbullying predicted more T2 perceived restrictive media parenting, which then predicted less T3 cyberbullying. Parents utilize restrictive media parenting strategies in response to existing youth cyberbullying behaviors, predicting reduced cyberbullying in the future.

Keywords

cyberbullying media parenting technology use parental restriction

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association . (2023). Health advisory on social media use in adolescence. APA. https://www.apa.org/topics/social-media-internet/health-advisoryadolescent-social-media-use

Ansary

N. S.

(2020). Cyberbullying: Concepts, theories, and correlates informing evidence-based best practices for prevention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50, 101343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.101343

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Barlett

Chamberlin

Witkower

(2016a). Predicting cyberbullying perpetration in emerging adults: A theoretical test of the Barlett gentile cyberbullying model. Aggressive Behavior, 43(2), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21670

Barlett

C. P.

Gentile

D. A.

Dongdong

Khoo

(2019). Predicting cyberbullying behavior from attitudes. Journal of Media Psychology, 31(2), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000231

Barlett

C. P.

Helmstetter

Gentile

D. A.

(2016b). The development of a new cyberbullying attitude measure. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 906–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.013

Barlett

C. P.

Simmers

M. M.

Roth

Gentile

(2021). Comparing cyberbullying prevalence and process before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Journal of Social Psychology, 161(4), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1918619

Bentler

P. M.

(1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software.

Bentler

P. M.

Bonett

D. G.

(1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588

10.

Boas

T. C.

Christenson

D. P.

Glick

D. M.

(2018). Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, mechanical Turk, and Qualtrics. Political Science Research and Methods, 8(2), 232–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.28

11.

Brehm

J. W.

(1966). A theory of psychological reactance.

12.

Browne

M. W.

Cudeck

(1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005

13.

Caivano

Leduc

Talwar

(2020). When you think you know: The effectiveness of restrictive mediation on parental awareness of cyberbullying experiences among children and adolescents. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2020-1-2

14.

Chen

S. S.

Lwin

M. O.

(2016). A meta-analysis of factors predicting cyberbullying perpetration and victimization: From the social cognitive and media effects approach. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1461444816634037. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816634037

15.

Chng

G. S.

Liau

Khoo

(2014). Parental mediation and cyberbullying—a longitudinal study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 199, 98–102. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-401-5-98

16.

Clark

L. S.

(2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21(4), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2011.01391.x

17.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.

18.

Corcoran

Gabrielli

Wisniewski

Little

T. D.

Doty

(2022). A measurement model of media parenting: Differences across parent and child reports and youth age and sex. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 44(3), 898–912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-022-09962-y

19.

Doty

J. L.

Barlett

C. P.

Gabrielli

Yourell

J. L.

Y.-W.

Waasdorp

T. E.

(2024). A model of personal relationships and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: A person*environment model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 41(7), 1980–2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075241227394

20.

Ellis

W. E.

Dumas

T. M.

Forbes

L. M.

(2020). Physically isolated but socially connected: Psychological adjustment and stress among adolescents during the initial COVID-19 crisis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 52(3), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/cbs0000215

21.

Elsaesser

Russell

Ohannessian

C. M.

Patton

(2017). Parenting in a digital age: A review of parents’ role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.06.004

22.

Farrell

A. D.

Sullivan

T. N.

Goncy

E. A.

A. T. H.

(2016). Assessment of adolescents’ victimization, aggression, and problem behaviors: Evaluation of the problem behavior frequency scale. Psychological Assessment, 28(6), 702–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000225

23.

Fikkers

K. M.

Piotrowski

J. T.

Valkenburg

P. M.

(2017). A matter of style? Exploring the effects of parental mediation styles on early adolescents’ media violence exposure and aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.029

24.

Geurts

S. M.

Koning

I. M.

Van den Eijnden

R. J. J. M.

Vossen

H. G. M.

(2023). Predicting adolescents’ problematic social media use from profiles of internet-specific parenting practices and general parenting dimensions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(9), 1829–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01816-4

25.

Glatz

Crowe

Buchanan

C. M.

(2018). Internet-specific parental self-efficacy: Developmental differences and links to Internet-specific mediation. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.014

26.

Hamm

M. P.

Newton

A. S.

Chisholm

Shulhan

Milne

Sundar

Ennis

Scott

S. D.

Hartling

(2015). Prevalence and effect of cyberbullying on children and young people: A scoping review of social media studies. JAMA Pediatrics, 169(8), 770–777. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0944

27.

Heirman

Walrave

(2012). Predicting adolescent perpetration in cyberbullying: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psicothema, 24(4), 614–620. 23079360

28.

Helfrich

E. L.

Doty

J. L.

Y. W.

Yourell

J. L.

Gabrielli

(2020). Parental views on preventing and minimizing negative effects of cyberbullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105377

29.

Hessel

Dworkin

(2017). Paternal monitoring: The relationship between online and in-person solicitation and youth outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(2), 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0490-6

30.

Hinduja

Patchin

J. W.

(2013). Social influences on cyberbullying behaviors among middle and high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9902-4

31.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

32.

IBM Corp . (2020). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (version 27.0). IBM Corp. [Computer software].

33.

Jiow

H. J.

Lim

S. S.

Lin

(2017). Level up! Refreshing parental mediation theory for our digital media landscape. Communication Theory, 27(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12109

34.

LaMontagne

A. D.

Shann

Lolicato

Newton

Owen

P. J.

Tomyn

A. J.

Reavley

N. J.

(2023). Mental health-related knowledge, attitudes and behaviours in a cross-sectional sample of australian university students: A comparison of domestic and international students. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15123-x

35.

Lau

W. W.

Yuen

A. H.

(2013). Adolescents’ risky online behaviours: The influence of gender, religion, and parenting style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2690–2696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.07.005

36.

Legate

Weinstein

Przybylski

A. K.

(2018). Parenting strategies and adolescents’ cyberbullying behaviors: Evidence from a preregistered study of parent–child dyads. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(2), 399–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0962-y

37.

Little

T. D.

Rhemtulla

(2013). Planned missing data designs for developmental researchers. Child Development Perspectives, 7(4), 199–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12043

38.

Livingstone

Ólafsson

Helsper

E. J.

Lupiáñez-Villanueva

Veltri

G. A.

Folkvord

(2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12277

39.

Mantey

D. S.

Yockey

R. A.

Springer

A. E.

(2023). Digital screen time and suicidality during high school: How important is cyberbullying? A mediation analysis using the youth risk behavioral surveillance survey, 2011-2019. Preventive Medicine, 166, 107330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107330

40.

Meter

D. J.

Bauman

(2018). Moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring: Effects on traditional bullying and victimization via cyberbullying involvement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(3), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431616670752

41.

Mishna

Khoury-Kassabri

Gadalla

Daciuk

(2012). Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: Victims, bullies and bully–victims. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.032

42.

Nathanson

A. I.

(2002). The unintended effects of parental mediation of television on adolescents. Media Psychology, 4(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_01

43.

Nelissen

Kuczynski

Coenen

Van den Bulck

(2019). Bidirectional socialization: An actor-partner interdependence model of internet self-efficacy and digital media influence between parents and children. Communication Research, 46(8), 1145–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219852857

44.

Odgers

C. L.

Allen

N. B.

Pfeifer

J. H.

Dahl

R. E.

Nesi

Schueller

S. M.

Williams

J. L.

(2022). Engaging, safe, and evidence-based: What science tells us about how to promote positive development and decrease risk in online spaces for early adolescents (Report No.2). National Scientific Council on Adolescence. https://developingadolescent.semel.ucla.edu/assets/uploads/research/resources/DigitalTechReport_FINAL_WEB_doi.pdf

45.

Olsson-Collentine

van Assen

M. A. L. M.

Hartgerink

C. H. J.

(2019). The prevalence of marginally significant results in psychology over time. Psychological Science, 30(4), 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619830326

46.

Padilla-Walker

L. M.

Coyne

S. M.

Collier

K. M.

(2016). Longitudinal relations between parental media monitoring and adolescent aggression, prosocial behavior, and externalizing problems. Journal of Adolescence, 46, 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.11.002

47.

Patchin

J. W.

Hinduja

(2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006286288

48.

Paulson

S. E.

(1994). Relations of parenting style and parental involvement with ninth-grade students' achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14(2), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/027243169401400208

49.

Pew Research Center . (2022). Teens, social media and technology 2022. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2022/08/10/teens-social-media-and-technology-2022/

50.

R Core Team . (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/

51.

Rega

Gioia

Boursier

(2022). Parental mediation and cyberbullying: A narrative literature review. Marriage & Family Review, 58(6), 495–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/01494929.2022.2069199

52.

Rosseel

(2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02

53.

Rueter

M. A.

Conger

R. D.

(1998). Reciprocal influences between parenting and adolescent problem-solving behavior. Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1470–1482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1470

54.

Sasson

Mesch

(2014). Parental mediation, peer norms and risky online behavior among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.025

55.

Schneider

S. K.

O'donnell

Stueve

Coulter

R. W.

(2012). Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: A regional census of high school students. American Journal of Public Health, 102(1), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.2105%2FAJPH.2011.300308

56.

Selkie

E. M.

Fales

J. L.

Moreno

M. A.

(2016). Cyberbullying prevalence among US middle and high school–aged adolescents: A systematic review and quality assessment. Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 58(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.026

57.

Shapka

J. D.

Law

D. M.

(2013). Does one size fit all? Ethnic differences in parenting behaviors and motivations for adolescent engagement in cyberbullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(5), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9928-2

58.

Shim

Shin

(2016). Peer-group pressure as a moderator of the relationship between attitude toward cyberbullying and cyberbullying behaviors on mobile instant messengers. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.002

59.

Shin

(2018). Empowered parents: The role of self-efficacy in parental mediation of children’s smartphone use in the United States. Journal of Children and Media, 12(4), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2018.1486331

60.

Smetana

J. G.

(1995). Parenting styles and conceptions of parental authority during adolescence. Child Development, 66(2), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00872.x

61.

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

(2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y

62.

UNICEF . (2016). Growing up online. https://www.unicef.org/endviolence/endviolenceonline/files/UNICEF_Growing-up-online.pdf

63.

U.S. Census Bureau . (2021). New vintage 2021 population estimates available for the nation, states, and Puerto Rico. U.S. Census Bureau. https://census.gov/newsroom/pressrelease/2021/2021-population-estimates.html

64.

U.S. Census Bureau . (2023). Population estimates. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045223

65.

van Buuren

Groothuis-Oudshoorn

(2011). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03

66.

Van Petegem

Soenens

Vansteenkiste

Beyers

(2015). Rebels with a cause? Adolescent defiance from the perspective of reactance theory and self‐determination theory. Child Development, 86(3), 903–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12355

67.

Wisniewski

Park

Badillo-Urquiola

Gabrielli

Doty

J. L.

Hartikainen

(2025). Moving beyond fear and restriction to promoting adolescent resilience and intentional technology use. In Handbook of children and screens (pp. 403–410). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69362-5_55

68.

Wright

M. F.

(2017). Parental mediation, cyberbullying, and cybertrolling: The role of gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.059

69.

Young

Tully

(2022). Autonomy vs. control: Associations among parental mediation, perceived parenting styles, and US adolescents’ risky online experiences. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 16(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2022-2-5

70.

Zurcher

J. D.

Holmgren

H. G.

Coyne

S. M.

Barlett

C. P.

Yang

(2018). Parenting and cyberbullying across adolescence. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(5), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0586

Restrictive Media Parenting Associated With Reduced Cyberbullying in Early Adolescents: A Longitudinal Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References