Aggressive and Prosocial Peer Norms: Change,Stability,and Associations With Adolescent Aggressive and Prosocial Behavior Development

Abstract

This longitudinal study examined the extent to which the development of prosocial and aggressive peer norms was related to individual prosocial and aggressive behavior development across the first year of secondary education (three waves, n = 1,134 adolescents from 51 classes, M_age = 12.66). A distinction was made between descriptive norms (the aggregated average peer-perceived behavior within the classroom) and status norms (the within-classroom correlation between peer-perceived popularity and behavior). Results indicated that descriptive norms represented a stable, static peer ecology, whereas status norms were somewhat more dynamic and changed across the school year. The development of descriptive and status norms was associated with initial levels of individual prosocial and aggressive behavior, whereas the development of status norms was also associated with the development of prosocial behavior.

Keywords

peer conformity peer popularity prosocial behavior aggression classroom behavior/environment developmental trajectories

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abrams

Hogg

M. A.

(1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. London, England: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

Arrow

(1997). Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 75-85.

Arrow

Poole

M. S.

Henry

K. B.

Wheelan

Moreland

(2004). Time, change and development: The temporal perspective on groups. Small Group Research, 35, 73-105. doi:10.1177/1046496403259757

Asch

S. E.

(1987). Social psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Banks

B. D.

Mao

I. L.

Walter

J. P.

(1985). Robustness of restricted maximum likelihood estimator derived under normality as applied to data with skewed distributions. Journal of Dairy Science, 68, 1785-1792. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(85)81028-6

Bukowski

W. M.

Gauze

Hoza

Newcomb

A. F.

(1993). Differences and consistency between same-sex and other-sex peer relationships during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 29, 255-263. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.29.2.255

Bukowski

W. M.

Sippola

L. K.

(2001). Groups, individuals, and victimization: A view of the peer system. In Juvonen

Graham

(Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 355-377). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Chang

(2004). The role of classrooms norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 5, 691-702. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691

Cialdini

R. B.

(2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72, 263-268. doi:10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6

10.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Mayeux

(2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163.

11.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Rose

A. J.

(2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105.

12.

Dijkstra

J. K.

Cillessen

A. H. N.

Lindenberg

Veenstra

(2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942-958. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00671.x

13.

Dijkstra

J. K.

Gest

S. D.

(2014). Peer norm salience for achievement, prosocial behavior and bullying: Implications for adolescent school experiences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35, 79-96. doi:10.1177/0272431614524303

14.

Dijkstra

J. K.

Kretschmer

Pattiselanno

Franken

Harakeh

Vollebergh

W. A. M.

Veenstra

(2015). Explaining adolescents’ delinquency and substance use: A test of the maturity gap: The SNARE study. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 52, 747-767. doi:10.1177/0022427815582249

15.

Dijkstra

J. K.

Lindenberg

Veenstra

(2008). Beyond the class norm: Bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1289-1299. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9251-7

16.

Eisenberg

Morris

(2004). Moral cognitions and prosocial responding in adolescence. In Lerner

Steinberg

(Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 155-188). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

17.

Espelage

D. L.

Holt

M. K.

Henkel

R. R.

(2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205-220.

18.

Festinger

(1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202

19.

Finch

W. H.

Bronk

K. C.

(2011). Conducting confirmatory latent class analyses using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 18, 132-151.

20.

Franken

Moffitt

T. E.

Steglich

C. E. G.

Dijkstra

J. K.

Harakeh

Vollebergh

W. A. M.

(2016). The role of self-control and early adolescents’ friendships in the development of externalizing behavior: The SNARE study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1800-1811. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0287-z

21.

Gest

S. D.

Rodkin

P. C.

(2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 288-296. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.004

22.

Hamre

B. K.

Pianta

R. C.

(2006). Student-teacher relationships. In Bear

G. G.

Minke

K. M.

(Eds.), Children’s needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (pp. 59–71). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.

23.

Hartup

W. W.

(1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1-13.

24.

Hawley

P. H.

(2003). Prosocial and coercive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 279-309.

25.

Henry

Guerra

Huesmann

Tolan

VanAcker

Eron

(2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 59-81. doi:10.1023/A:1005142429725

26.

Jones

S. M.

Brown

J. L.

Hoglund

W. L. G.

Aber

J. L.

(2010). A school-randomized clinical trial of an integrated social-emotional learning and literacy intervention: Impacts after 1 school year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78, 829-842.

27.

Juvonen

A. Y.

(2008). Social motives underlying antisocial behavior across middle school grades. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 747-756. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9272

28.

Kaplan

(2000). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

29.

Kaplan

(2008). An overview of Markov chain methods for the study of stage-sequential developmental processes. Developmental Psychology, 44, 457-467. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.457

30.

Kline

(2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

31.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Shah

Fishback

Friedman

Chun

W. Y.

Sleeth-Keppler

(2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331-378.

32.

Laninga-Wijnen

Harakeh

Steglich

Dijkstra

J. K.

Veenstra

D. R.

Vollebergh

W. A. M.

(2017). The norms of popular peers moderate friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression. Child Development, 88, 1265–1283.

33.

Lease

A. M.

Kennedy

C. A.

Axelrod

J. L.

(2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87-109. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00188

34.

Logis

Rodkin

P. C.

Gest

S. D.

Ahn

H. J.

(2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413-423. doi:10.1111/jora.12033

35.

McCormick

M. P.

Cappella

(2015). Conceptualizing academic norms in middle school: A social network perspective. Journal of Early Adolescence, 4, 441-446. doi:10.1177/0272431614535093

36.

Meeus

van de Schoot

Keijsers

Schwartz

S. J.

Branje

(2010). On the progression and stability of adolescent identity formation: A five-wave longitudinal study in early-to-middle and middle-to-late adolescence. Adolescent Development, 81, 1565-1581. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x

37.

Meeus

van de Schoot

Klimstra

Branje

(2011). Personality types in adolescence: Change and stability and links with adjustment and relationships: A five-wave longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 2011, 47, 1181-1195. doi:10.1037/a0023816

38.

Miller

D. T.

Prentice

(1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 541-550.

39.

Moffitt

T. E.

(1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701.

40.

Molano

Jones

Brown

Aber

J. L.

(2013). Selection and socialization of aggressive and prosocial behavior: The moderating role of social-cognitive processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 424-436. doi:10.1111/jora.12034

41.

Neal

J. W.

Neal

Z. P.

(2013). Nested or networked? Future directions for ecological systems theory. Social Development, 22, 722-737.

42.

Nylund

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535-569.

43.

Pellegrini

A. D.

Long

J. D.

(2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280.

44.

Preacher

K. J.

Wichman

A. L.

MacCallum

R. C.

Briggs

N. E.

(2008). Latent growth curve modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

45.

Prinstein

M. J.

Dodge

K. A.

(2008). Current issues in peer influence research. In Prinstein

M. J.

Dodge

K. A.

(Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 3-13). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

46.

Reinecke

(2006). Longitudinal analysis of adolescents’ deviant and delinquent behavior. Methodology, 2, 100-112.

47.

Sandstrom

(2011). The power of popularity: Influence processes in childhood and adolescence. In Cillessen

A. H. N.

Schwartz

Mayeux

(Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 219-244). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

48.

Shaw

(1981). Group dynamics (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

49.

Speece

D. L.

(1994). Cluster analysis in perspective. Exceptionality, 5, 31-44. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex0501_3

50.

Thomas

D. E.

Bierman

K. L.

Powers

C. J.

(2011). The influence of classroom aggression and classroom climate on aggressive-disruptive behavior. Child Development, 82, 751-757.

51.

Vaillancourt

Hymel

(2006). Aggression and social status: The moderating roles of gender and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 396-406. doi:10.1002/ab.20138

52.

Veenstra

Dijkstra

J. K.

(2011). Transformations in adolescent peer networks. In Laursen

Collins

W. A.

(Eds.), Relationship pathways: From adolescence to young adulthood (pp. 135-154). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

53.

Wellman

(1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In Wellman

Berkowitz

S. D.

(Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 19-61). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

54.

Wentzel

K. R.

Filisetti

Looney

(2007). Adolescent prosocial behavior: The role of self-processes and contextual cues. Child Development, 78, 895-910.

55.

Werner

N. E.

Hill

L. G.

(2010). Individual and peer group normative beliefs about relational aggression. Child Development, 81, 826-836.

56.

Wright

J. C.

Giammarino

Parad

H. W.

(1986). Social status in small groups: Individual-group similarity and the social “misfit.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523-536. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.523