This study investigated the significance of classroom-level norm salience, calculated as the within-classroom correlation between a behavior and peer-nominated popularity, by examining the extent to which norm salience moderated the relation of individual classroom behaviors (academic achievement, prosocial behavior, and bullying) with peer acceptance, and was associated with between-classroom differences in student-rated feelings about school and teacher-rated academic performance. Participants were students (n = 3,231, = 13.60) attending 164 school classrooms in 30 secondary schools in the Netherlands. Results of our study demonstrate that norm salience scores are distinct from measures of descriptive norms, moderate the relations of individual classroom behaviors with peer acceptance, and can be used to define an overall profile of classroom peer norms that is related to independent measures of student adjustment.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
BoivinM.DodgeK. A.CoieJ. D. (1995). Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys. The social misfit revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 269-279. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.2.269
4.
ChangL. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691-702. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.5.691
5.
CialdiniR. B. (2007). Descriptive social norms as underappreciated sources of social control. Psychometrika, 72, 263-268. doi:10.1007/s11336-006-1560-6
6.
CialdiniR. B.KallgrenC. A.RenoR. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and re-evaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 201-234. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60330-5
7.
CillessenA. H. N.MayeuxL. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
8.
CillessenA. H. N.RoseA. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00343.x
9.
DeutschM.GerardH. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
10.
De WinterA. F.OldehinkelA. J.VeenstraR.BrunnekreefJ. A.VerhulstF. C.OrmelJ. (2005). Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents. European Journal of Epidemiology, 20, 173-181. doi:10.1007/s10654-004-4948-6
11.
DijkstraJ. K.CillessenA. H. N.BorchC. (2013). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1242-1252. doi:10.1037/a0030098
12.
DijkstraJ. K.CillessenA. H. N.LindenbergS.VeenstraR. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942-958. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00671.x
13.
DijkstraJ. K.LindenbergS.VeenstraR. (2008). Beyond the class norm: Bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1289-1299. doi:10.1007/s10802-008-9251-7
14.
DijkstraJ. K.LindenbergS.VerhulstF. C.OrmelJ.VeenstraR. (2009). The relation between popularity and aggressive, destructive, and normbreaking behaviors: Moderating effects of athletic abilities, physical attractiveness, and prosociality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 401-413. doi:10.1037/a0030098
15.
GalvánA.SpatzierA.JuvonenJ. (2011). Perceived norms and social values to capture school culture in elementary and middle school. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 346-353. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.08.005
16.
GestS. D.OsgoodD. W.FeinbergM. E.BiermanK. L.MoodyJ. (2011). Strengthening program theories and evaluations: Contributions from social network analysis. Prevention Science, 12, 349-360. doi:10.1007/s11121-011-0229-2
17.
GestS. D.RodkinP. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 288-296. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.004
18.
HenryD.GuerraN.HuesmannR.TolanP.VanAckerR.EronL. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 59-81. doi:10.1023/A:1005142429725
19.
HuismanM.OldehinkelA. J.de WinterA.MinderaaR. B.De BildtA.HuizinkA. C.. . . OrmelJ. (2008). Cohort profile: The Dutch TRacking Adolescents Individual Lives Survey; TRAILS. International Journal of Epidemiology, 37, 1227-1235. doi:10.1093/ije/dym273
20.
JonkmannK.TrautweinU.LudtkeO. (2009). Social dominance in adolescence: The moderating role of the classroom context and behavioral heterogeneity. Child Development, 80, 338-355. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01264.x
21.
KeizerK. E.LindenbergS. M.StegL. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681-1685. doi:10.1126/science.1161405
22.
KellamS. G.LingX. G.MeriscaR.BrownC. H.IalongoN. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression on the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 165-185. doi:10.1017/S0954579498001564
23.
KruglanskiA. W.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 331-378). New York, NY: Elsevier.
24.
LeaseA. M.KennedyC. A.AxelrodJ. L. (2002). Children’s social constructions of popularity. Social Development, 11, 87-109. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00188
25.
OsgoodD. W.FeinbergM. E.GestS. D.MoodyJ.RaganD. T.SpothR.. . . RedomondC. (2013). Effects of PROSPER on the influence potential of prosocial versus antisocial youth in adolescent friendship networks. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53, 174-179. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.02.013
26.
RasbashJ.BrowneW.GoldsteinH.YangM.PlewisI.HealyM.. . . LewisT. (2000). A user’s guide to MlwiN. London, England: Institute of Education.
27.
SentseM.ScholteR.SalmivalliC.VoetenM. (2007). Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35, 1009-1019. doi:10.1007/s10802-007-9150-3
28.
StormshakE. A.BiermanK. L.BruschiC.DodgeK. A.CoieJ. D. (1999). The relation between behavior problems and peer preference in different classroom contexts. Child Development, 70, 169-182. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00013
29.
ThomasD. E.BiermanK. L.PowersC. J. (2011). The influence of classroom aggression and classroom climate on aggressive-disruptive behavior. Child Development, 82, 751-757. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01586.x
30.
TsengV.SeidmanE. (2007). A systems framework for understanding social settings. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 217-228. doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9101-8
31.
WrightJ. C.GiammarinoM.ParadH. W. (1986). Social status in small-groups. Individual-group similarity and the social misfit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 523-536. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.3.523
