Victimization in early adolescence can have severe negative consequences later in life. Friendships are especially important in this time period. The present study investigated friendship selection and influence (contagion) processes with regard to victimization, as well as prosocial and aggressive characteristics of victims’ friends. Using social network analyses (RSiena), we longitudinally analyzed data of five fourth-grade classrooms, including 185 students (56.8% girls; age at Time 1 = 10 years old). Results showed that early adolescents who experience peer victimization were not likely to select peers with similar levels of victimization as friends but selected prosocial peers as friends. Moreover, friends did not become more similar over time in their victimization levels. Prosocial students selected similar peers as friends. The discussion highlights the relevance of fostering positive peer relations for targeting victimization and discusses the defending role of friends in victimization situations.
AllenJ. P.WeissbergR. P.HawkinsJ. (1989). The relation between values and social competence in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 25, 458-464. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.3.458
2.
AndrewsN. Z.HanishL. D.UpdegraffK. A.MartinC. L.SantosC. E. (2016). Targeted victimization: Exploring linear and curvilinear associations between social network prestige and victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1772-1785. doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0450-1
3.
BagwellC. L.SchmidtM. E. (2011). The friendship quality of overtly and relationally victimized children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 57, 158-185. doi:10.1353/mpq.2011.0009
4.
BassE. C.SaldarriagaL.CunhaJ.ChenB. B.SantoJ. B.BukowskiW. M. (2018). A cross-cultural analysis of the relations of physical and relational aggression with peer victimization. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42, 132-142. doi:10.1177/0165025416677846
5.
BergerC.RodkinP. C. (2009). Male and female victims of male bullies: Social status differences by gender and informant source. Sex Roles, 61, 72-84. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9605-9
6.
BjereldY.DanebackK.PetzoldM. (2015). Differences in prevalence of bullying victimization between native and immigrant children in the Nordic countries: A parent-reported serial cross-sectional study. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41, 593-599. doi:10.1111/cch.12184
7.
BlockP. (2015). Reciprocity, transitivity, and the mysterious three-cycle. Social Networks, 40, 163-173. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2014.10.005
8.
BoultonM. J. (2013). The effects of victim of bullying reputation on adolescents’ choice of friends: Mediation by fear of becoming a victim of bullying, moderation by victim status, and implications for befriending interventions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 146-160. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.001
9.
BukowskiW.SippolaL. (2005). Friendship and development: Putting the most human relationship in its place. In JensenL.LarsonR. (Eds.), New horizons in developmental theory and research (pp. 91-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10.
CaravitaS. C. S.Di BlasioP.SalmivalliC. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18, 140-163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x
11.
CasulloM. M.SolanoA. C. (2000). Evaluación del bienestar psicológico en estudiantes adolescentes argentinos [Evaluation of psychological wellbeing in Argentinian adolescents]. Revista de Psicología, 18, 35-68. Retrieved from http://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/psicologia/article/view/6840/6974
12.
Chile, Ministerio de Educación. (2015). Variación de matrícula y tasas de permanencia por sector [Variation in enrollment and permanence rates by sector]. Santiago, Chile: Author.
13.
Chile, Ministerio de Planificación. (2005). Estadísticas sociales de los pueblos indígenas en Chile. Censo 2002 [Social statistics of native population in Chile. 2002 census]. Santiago, Chile: Programa Orígenes MIDEPLAN-BID.
14.
CillessenA. H. N. (2011). Towards a theory of popularity. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 273-279). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
15.
CillessenA. H. N.MayeuxL. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00660.x
16.
ClossonL.WatanabeL. (2018). Popularity in the peer group and victimization within friendship cliques during early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 38, 327-351. doi:10.1177/0272431616670753
17.
CookC. R.WilliamsK. R.GuerraN. G.KimT. E. (2010). Variability in the prevalence of bullying and victimization: A cross-national and methodological analysis. In JimersonS. R.SwearerS. M.EspelageD. L. (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp 347-362). New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
CraigW.Harel-FischY.Fogel-GrinvaldH.DostalerS.HetlandJ.Simons-MortonB.. . . PickettW. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 216-224. doi:10.1007/s00038-009-5413-9
19.
CrapanzanoA. M.FrickP. J.ChildsK.TerranovaA. M. (2011). Gender differences in the assessment, stability, and correlates to bullying roles in middle school children. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 677-694. doi:10.1002/bsl.1000
20.
CuadrosO.BergerC. (2016). The protective role of friendship quality on the wellbeing of adolescents victimized by peers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 1877-1888. doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0504-4
21.
DueP.HolsteinB. E.LynchJ.DiderichsenF.GabhainS. N.ScheidtP., . . . Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Bullying Working Group. (2005). Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: International comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 128-132. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki105
22.
ElgarF. J.McKinnonB.WalshS. D.FreemanJ. D.DonnellyP.de MatosM. G.. . . CurrieC. (2015). Structural determinants of youth bullying and fighting in 79 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57, 643-650. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.08.007
23.
ElgarF. J.PickettK. E.PickettW.CraigW.MolchoM.HurrelmannK.LenziM. (2013). School bullying, homicide and income inequality: A cross-national pooled time series analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 237-245. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0380-y
24.
EspelageD. L.HoltM. L. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 123-142. doi:10.1300/J135v02n02_08
25.
GangelM. J.KeaneS. P.CalkinsS. D.ShanahanL.O’BrienM. (2017). The association between relational aggression and perceived popularity in early adolescence: A test of competing hypotheses. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37, 1078-1092. doi:10.1177/0272431616642327
26.
GeoffroyM. C.BoivinM.ArseneaultL.TureckiG.VitaroF.BrendgenM.. . . CotéS. (2016). Associations between peer victimization and suicidal ideation and suicide attempt during adolescence: Results from a prospective population-based birth cohort. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 55, 99-105. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2015.11.010
27.
GiniG.CarliG.PozzoliT. (2009). Social support, peer victimisation, and somatic complaints: A mediational analysis. Journal of Pediatrics and Child Health, 45, 358-363. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1754.2009.01501.x
28.
HawleyP. H.LittleT. D.CardN. A. (2007). The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 170-180. doi:10.1177/0165025407074630
29.
HodgesE. E.MaloneM. J.PerryD. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032-1039. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.1032
30.
HodgesE. E.PerryD. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677-685. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.677
31.
HoltM. K.EspelageD. L. (2007). Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 984-994. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9153-3
32.
HuismanM.SnijdersT. A. (2003). Statistical analysis of longitudinal network data with changing composition. Sociological Methods & Research, 32, 253-287.
33.
HuitsingG.MonksC. (2018). Who victimizes whom and who defends whom? A multivariate social network analysis of victimization, aggression, and defending in early childhood. Aggressive Behavior, 44, 394-405. doi:10.1002/ab.21760
34.
HuitsingG.SnijdersT. B.Van DuijnM. J.VeenstraR. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26, 645-659. doi:10.1017/S0954579414000297
35.
HuitsingG.VeenstraR. (2012). Bullying in classrooms: Participant roles from a social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 494-509. doi:10.1002/ab.21438
36.
HunterS. C.BoyleJ. M. E.WardenD. (2004). Help seeking amongst child and adolescent victims of peer-aggression and bullying: The influence of school-stage, gender, victimisation, appraisal, and emotion. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 375-390.
37.
KollerováL.SmolíkF. (2016). Victimization and its associations with peer rejection and fear of victimization: Moderating effects of individual-level and classroom-level characteristics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 640-656. doi:10.1111/bjep.12129
38.
KraftC.MayeuxL. (2018). Associations among friendship jealousy, peer status, and relational aggression in early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 38, 385-407. doi:10.1177/0272431616670992
39.
LambeL. J.Della CioppaV.HongI. K.CraigW. M. (2019). Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51-74. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.007
40.
LodderG. A.ScholteR. J.CillessenA. N.GilettaM. (2016). Bully victimization: Selection and influence within adolescent friendship networks and cliques. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45, 132-144. doi:10.1007/s10964-015-0343-8
41.
LogisH. A.RodkinP. C.GestS. D.AhnH. J. (2013). Popularity as an organizing factor of preadolescent friendship networks: Beyond prosocial and aggressive behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 413-423. doi:10.1111/jora.12033
42.
LópezC. B.Rodríguez-CárdenasD. E. (2014). Percepción de amistad en adolescentes: el papel de las redes sociales [Perception of friendship among adolescents: The role of social networks]. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 23, 325-338. doi:10.15446/rcp.v23n2.37359
43.
OldenburgB.Van DuijnM.VeenstraR. (2018). Defending one’s friends, not one’s enemies: A social network analysis of children’s defending, friendship, and dislike relationships using XPNet. PLoS ONE, 13(5), e0194323. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0194323
44.
OlthofT.GoossensF. A.VermandeM. M.AlevaE. A.van der MeulenM. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 339-359. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.003
45.
OyanedelJ. C.AlfaroJ.MellaC. (2015). Bienestar subjetivo y calidad de vida en la infancia en Chile [Subjective wellbeing and quality of life during childhood in Chile]. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 13, 313-327. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rlcs/v13n1/v13n1a19.pdf
46.
PouwelsJ. L.LansuT. A. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2016). Participant roles of bullying in adolescence: Status characteristics, social behavior, and assignment criteria. Aggressive Behavior, 42, 239-253. doi:10.1002/ab.21614
47.
PöyhönenV.JuvonenJ.SalmivalliC. (2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 143-163. doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0046
48.
PuckettM. B.AikinsJ. W.CillessenA. H. N. (2008). Moderators of the association between relational aggression and perceived popularity. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 563-576. doi:10.1002/ab.20280
49.
RipleyR. M.SnijdersT. A. B.BodaZ.VörösA.PreciadoP. (2017). Manual for RSiena (Version 1.1-301). Oxford, UK: Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
50.
RodkinP. C.HodgesE. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384-400.
51.
RudolphK. D.LansfordJ. E.AgostonA. M.SugimuraN.SchwartzD.DodgeK. A.. . . BatesJ. E. (2014). Peer victimization and social alienation: Predicting deviant peer affiliation in middle school. Child Development, 85, 124-139. doi:10.1111/cdev.12112
52.
SainioM.VeenstraR.HuitsingG.SalmivalliC. (2011). Victims and their defenders: A dyadic approach. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 144-151. doi:10.1177/0165025410378068
53.
SalmivalliC. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112-120. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
54.
SalmivalliC.LagerspetzK.BjorkqvistK.OstermanK.KaukiainenA. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
55.
SalmivalliC.VoetenM.PoskipartaE. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 668-676. doi:10.1080/15374416.2011.597090
56.
SchacterH.JuvonenJ. (2018a). Dynamic changes in peer victimization and adjustment across middle school: Does friends’ victimization alleviate distress?Child Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/cdev.13038
57.
SchacterH.JuvonenJ. (2018b). You’ve got a friend(ly school): Can school prosocial norms and friends similarly protect victims from distress?Social Development, 27, 636-651. doi:10.1111/sode.12281
58.
ScholteR. H. J.OverbeekG.ten BrinkG.RommesE.de KempR. A.GoossensL.EngelsR. C. (2009). The significance of reciprocal and unilateral friendships for peer victimization in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 89-100. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9287-6
59.
SchwartzD.LansfordJ.DodgeK.PettitG.BatesJ. (2014). Peer victimization during middle childhood as a lead indicator of internalizing problems and diagnostic outcomes in late adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 393-404. doi:10.1080/15374416.2014.881293
60.
SentseM.DijkstraJ. K.SalmivalliC.CillessenA. H. N. (2013). The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: A longitudinal social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 229-238. doi:10.1002/ab.21469
61.
SijtsemaJ. J.RambaranA. J.OjanenT. J. (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: Selection, de-selection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8, 177-195. doi:10.1080/15534510.2012.739097
62.
SnijdersT. A. B.BaerveldtC. (2003). A multilevel network study of the effects of delinquent behavior on friendship evolution. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 27, 123-151. doi:10.1080/00222500305892
63.
SnijdersT. A. B.vandeBuntG. G.SteglichC. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44-60. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
64.
SteglichC.SnijdersT. A.PearsonM. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329-393. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x/full
65.
ThornbergR. (2015). School bullying as a collective action: Stigma processes and identity struggling. Children & Society, 29, 310-320. doi:10.1111/chso.12058
66.
ThornbergR.TenenbaumL.VarjasK.MeyersJ.JungertT.VanegasG. (2012). Bystander motivation in bullying incidents: To intervene or not to intervene?Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 13, 247-252. doi:10.5811/westjem.2012.3.11792
67.
Troop-GordonW.UnhjemL. (2018). Is preventing peer victimization sufficient? The role of prosocial peer group treatment in children’s socioemotional development. Social Development, 27, 619-635. doi:10.1111/sode.12283
68.
TuranovicJ. J.YoungJ. T. N. (2016). Violent offending and victimization in adolescence: Social network mechanisms and homophily. Criminology, 54, 487-519. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12112
69.
van der PloegR.KretschmerT.SalmivalliC.VeenstraR. (2017). Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers?Journal of School Psychology, 65, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002
70.
VargasH. B.SaavedraJ. E. (2012). Factores asociados a la conducta suicida en adolescentes [Factors associated to suicidal behavior in adolescents]. Revista de Neuropsiquiatría, 75, 19-28.
71.
VeenstraR.DijkstraJ. K.KraegerD. A. (2018). Pathways, networks, and norms. A sociological perspective on peer research. In BukowskiW. M.LaursenB.RubinK. H. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 45-63). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
72.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1-48. doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
73.
WangW.VaillancourtT.BrittainH.McDougallP.KrygsmanA.SmithD.. . . HymelS. (2014). School climate, peer victimization, and academic achievement: Results from a multi-informant study. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 360-377. doi:10.1037/spq0000084
74.
WitkowM. R.FuligniA. J. (2011). Ethnic and generational differences in the relations between social support and academic achievement across the high school years. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 531-552. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01713.x
75.
XieH.SwiftD. J.CairnsB. D.CairnsR. B. (2002). Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence. Social Development, 11, 205-224. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00195
76.
Zimmer-GembeckM. J.TrevaskisS.NesdaleD.DowneyG. (2014). Relational victimization, loneliness and depressive symptoms: Indirect associations via self and peer reports of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 568-582. doi:10.1007/s10964-013-9993-6
77.
ZwierzynskaK.WolkeD.LereyaT. S. (2013). Peer victimization in childhood and internalizing problems in adolescence: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 309-323. doi:10.1007/s10802-012-9678-8
