While both outsiders and defenders have antibullying attitudes, only defenders have the reputation to defend victims. However, outsiders—despite their reputation of avoiding involvement in bullying—do receive some defender nominations and thus defend victims at least occasionally. This study investigated the relationship between these behavioral reputations and social-cognitive antecedents of students’ provictim intervention decision: Is provictim intervention related to a cost-reward analysis or to an analysis based on the presence and reactions of others? A sample of 489 Dutch early adolescents (age = 11.5 years) was presented a scenario in which they were to imagine being witness to victimization. Through a counterfactual thinking item procedure, the relationships between students’ reputations and social cognitions about antecedents of provictim intervention were investigated. Distress awareness and anticipated guilt and shame for not helping victims positively predicted defender behavior. Practical implications with regard to promoting defender behavior in outsiders are discussed.
BanduraA. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3
2.
BerndtT. J. (2002). Friendship quality and social development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 7-10. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00157
3.
BurnS. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60, 779-792. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9581-5
4.
DishionT. J.TipsordJ. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 189-214. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412
5.
FischerP.KruegerJ. I.GreitemeyerT.VogrincicC.KastenmüllerA.FreyD.. . .KainbacherM. (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 517-537. doi:10.1037/a0023304
6.
ForsbergC.ThornbergR.SamuelssonM. (2014). Bystanders to bullying: Fourth- to seventh-grade students’ perspectives on their reactions. Research Papers in Education, 29, 557-576. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2013.878375
7.
GiniG.AlbieroP.BenelliB.AltoèG. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93-105. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002
8.
GoossensF. A.OlthofT.DekkerP. (2006). The New Participant Role Scales: A comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 343-357. doi:10.1002/ab.20133
9.
HawkinsD. L.PeplerD. J.CraigW. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512-527. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00178
10.
LatanéB.DarleyJ. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help?New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
11.
LatanéB.NidaS. (1981). Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 308-324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909/81/8902-0308
12.
MayeuxL.UnderwoodM. K.RisserS. D. (2007). Perspectives on the ethics of sociometric research with children: How children, peers, and teachers help to inform the debate. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 53, 53-78. doi:10.1353/mpq.2007.0002
13.
MenesiniE.CamodecaM. (2008). Shame and guilt as behaviour regulators: Relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behavior. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 489-506. doi:10.1348/026151007X205281
14.
ObermannM.-L. (2011). Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying. Journal of School Violence, 10, 239-257. doi:10.1080/15388220.2011.578.276
15.
O’ConnellP.PeplerD.CraigW. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Issues and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437-452. doi:10.1006/jado.1999.0238
16.
OhI.HazlerR. J. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 291-310. doi:10.1177/0143034309106499
17.
OlthofT. (2012). Anticipated feelings of guilt and shame as predictors of early adolescents’ antisocial and prosocial interpersonal behavior. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 371-388. doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.680300
18.
OlthofT.GoossensF. A. (2008). Bullying and the need to belong: Early adolescents’ bullying-related behavior and the acceptance they desire and receive from particular classmates. Social Development, 17, 24-46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00413.x
19.
OlthofT.GoossensF. A.VermandeM. M.AlevaE. A.Van der MeulenM. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 339-359. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.003
20.
OlweusD. (2010). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In JimersonS. R.SwearerS. M.EspelageD. L. (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 9-33). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
PellegriniA. D. (2002). Affiliative and aggressive dimensions of dominance and possible functions during early adolescence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 21-31. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00033-1
22.
PennerL. A.DovidioJ. F.PiliavinJ. A.SchroederD. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
23.
PeughJ. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85-112. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
24.
PiliavinJ. A.DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS.ClarkR. D. (1981). III. Emergency intervention. New York, NY: Academic Press.
25.
PolaninJ. R.EspelageD. L.PigottT. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47-65. (EJ977426)
26.
PozzoliT.GiniG. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815-827. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-939909
27.
PozzoliT.GiniG. (2013). Why do bystanders of bullying help or not? A multidimensional model. Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 315-340. doi:10.1177/0272431612440172
28.
PozzoliT.GiniG.VienoA. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystander behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83, 1917-1931. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x
29.
PronkJ.GoossensF. A.OlthofT.De MeyL.WillemenA. M. (2013). Intervention strategies in case of victimization by bullying: Social cognitions of outsiders versus defenders. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 669-682. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.002
30.
PronkJ.OlthofT.GoossensF. A.Differential personality correlates of early adolescents’ bullying-related outsider and defender behavior. Journal of Early Adolescence. doi:10.1177/0272431614549628
31.
ReijntjesA.VermandeM. M.GoossensF. A.OlthofT.Van der SchootR.AlevaE. A.Van der MeulenM. (2013). Developmental trajectories of bullying and social dominance in youth. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, 224-234. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.12.004
32.
RigbyK.JohnsonB. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425-440. doi:10.1080/01443410500342047
33.
SalmivalliC. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112-120. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007
34.
SalmivalliC.LagerspetzK. M. J.BjörkqvistK.ÖstermanK.KaukiainenA. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)
35.
SalmivalliC.LappalainenM.LagerspetzK. M. J. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205-218. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)
36.
SalmivalliC.VoetenM. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246-258. doi:10.1080/01650250344000488
37.
SteinbergL.MorrisA. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83-110. doi:10.1891/194589501787383444
38.
SuttonJ.SmithP. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97-111. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)
39.
ThornbergR.JungertT. (2013). Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 475-483. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.02.003
40.
Van den BergY. H. M.CillessenA. H. N. (2013). Computerized sociometric and peer assessment: An empirical and practical evaluation. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 68-76. doi:10.1177/0165025412463508
