The objective of this study is to compare the prevalence of bullying victimization and perpetration between a sample of gifted students and a sample of nongifted students, and their relationship in both groups with depression, stress, anxiety, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). A cross-sectional design was performed with two comparison groups: 449 Spanish adolescents identified as gifted (Mage = 11.72, SD = 1.89) and 950 nongifted Spanish students (Mage = 12.72,SD=0.79). Results reveal that 41.1%, 1.1%, and 9.5% of the gifted sample were pure-victims, pure-bullies, and bully-victims, respectively, compared to 21.8%, 2.4%, and 5.8% of the nongifted students. It is observed that gifted students are more likely to be victims (OR = 3.20[2.40, 4.28]). Gifted pure-victims have significantly higher stress scores than nongifted pure-victims (p < .001). In general, pure-victims and bully-victims of gifted and nongifted students both have higher stress, anxiety, and depression scores and lower HRQoL scores than other profiles.
AlbdourM.KrouseH. J. (2014). Bullying and victimization among African American adolescents: A literature review. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 27(2), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcap.12066
2.
BaeH.ChooH.LimC. (2019). Bullying experience of racial and ethnic minority youth in South Korea. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(4), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618776121
3.
BerlinJ. E. (2009). It’s all a matter of perspective: Student perceptions on the impact of being labeled gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 31(4), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190903177580
4.
CompasB. E.Connor-SmithJ. K.SaltzmanH.ThomsenA. H.WadsworthM. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87
5.
CookC. R.WilliamsK. R.GuerraN. G.KimT. E.SadekS. (2010). Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 25(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020149
6.
CourserM. W.ShamblenS. R.LavrakasP. J.CollinsD.DitterlineP. (2009). The impact of active consent procedures on nonresponse and nonresponse error in youth survey data: Evidence from a new experiment. Evaluation Review, 33(4), 370–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X09337228
7.
CraigW.Harel-FischY.Fogel-GrinvaldH.DostalerS.HetlandJ.Simons-MortonB.MolchoM.de MatoM. G.OverpeckM.DueP.PickettW. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54(S2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-009-5413-9
8.
de Morais DalostoM.de AlencarE. M. L. S. (2013). Manifestações e prevalência de bullyng entre alunos com altas habilidades/superdotação. Revista Brasileira de Educação Especial, 19(3), 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-65382013000300005
9.
DazaP.NovyD. M.StanleyM. A.AverillP. (2002). The depression anxiety stress scale-21: Spanish translation and validation with a hispanic sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24(3), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016014818163
10.
ErwinJ. (2015). Prevalence and impact of peer victimization among gifted adolescents. [Tesis Doctoral, University of California, Berkeley].
11.
EspelageD. L.KingM. T. (2018). Bullying and the gifted. In PfeifferS. I.Shaunessy-DedrickE.Foley-NicponM. (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent. (pp. 659–669). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-043
12.
EstellD. B.FarmerT. W.IrvinM. J.CrowtherA.AkosP.BoudahD. J. (2009). Students with exceptionalities and the peer group context of bullying and victimization in late elementary school. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18(2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-008-9214-1
13.
FedewaA. L.AhnS. (2011). The effects of physical activity and physical fitness on children’s achievement and cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599785
14.
FestlR.VogelgesangJ.ScharkowM.QuandtT. (2017). Longitudinal patterns of involvement in cyberbullying: Results from a latent transition analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.027
15.
FouladchangM.KohgardA.SalahV. (2010). A study of psychological health among students of gifted and nongifted high schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 1220–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.264
16.
de França-FreitasM. L. P.Del PretteA.Del PretteZ. A. P. (2014). Social skills of gifted and talented children. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 19(4), 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2014000400006
GarcíaJ. F.PascualJ.FríasM. D.KrunckelsvenD. V. (2008). Diseño y análisis de la potencia: N y los intervalos de confianza de las medias. Psicothema, 20(4), 933–938. http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3578.pdf
19.
González-CabreraJ.MachimbarrenaJ. M.Ortega-BarónJ.Álvarez-BardónA. (2019a). Joint association of bullying and cyberbullying in health-related quality of life in a sample of adolescents. Quality of Life Research, 29, 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02353-z
20.
González-CabreraJ.MontielI.Ortega-BarónJ.CalveteE.OrueI.MachimbarrenaJ. M. (2021). Epidemiology of peer victimization and its impact on health-related quality of life in adolescents: A longitudinal study. School Mental Health, 13, 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-021-09421-1
21.
González-CabreraJ.TourónJ.MachimbarrenaJ. M.León-MejíaA.Gutiérrez-OrtegaM. (2019b). Estudio exploratorio sobre acoso escolar en alumnado con altas capacidades: Prevalencia y afectación psicológica. Revista de Educación, 386, 187–206. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2019-386-432
22.
González‐CabreraJ.Sánchez‐ÁlvarezN.CalveteE.León‐MejíaA.OrueI.MachimbarrenaJ. M. (2020). Psychometric properties of the triangulated version of the European bullying intervention project questionnaire: Prevalence across seven roles. Psychology in the Schools, 57(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22320
23.
Hidalgo-RasmussenC. A.Ramírez-LópezG.RajmilL.SkalickyA.MartínA. H.-S. (2018). Bullying and health-related quality of life in children and adolescent Mexican students. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 23(7), 2433–2441. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018237.16392016
24.
HoltM. K.Vivolo-KantorA. M.PolaninJ. R.HollandK. M.DeGueS.MatjaskoJ. L.WolfeM.ReidG. (2015). Bullying and suicidal ideation and behaviors: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 135(2), e496–e509. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1864
25.
HymelS.McClureR.MillerM.ShumkaE.TrachJ. (2015). Addressing school bullying: Insights from theories of group processes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008
26.
JadambaaA.ThomasH. J.ScottJ. G.GravesN.BrainD.PacellaR. (2020). The contribution of bullying victimisation to the burden of anxiety and depressive disorders in Australia. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 29, e54. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796019000489
27.
KatsarasG. N.VouloumanouE. K.KourlabaG.KyritsiE.EvagelouE.BakoulaC. (2018). Bullying and suicidality in children and adolescents without predisposing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adolescent Research Review, 3(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-018-0081-8
LovibondP. F.LovibondS. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U
30.
LuH.-H.ChenD.-R. (2020). Association of weight with sociometric status in classrooms of Taiwanese adolescents. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 40(6), 789–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431619874405
31.
MerrellK. W.GillS. J.McFarlandH.McFarlandT. (1996). Internalizing symptoms of gifted and non-gifted elementary-age students: A comparative validity study using the internalizing symptoms scale for children. Psychology in the Schools, 33(3), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6807(199607)33:3<185::AID-PITS1>3.0.CO;2-P
32.
ModeckiK. L.MinchinJ.HarbaughA. G.GuerraN. G.RunionsK. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.06.007
33.
OliveiraJ. C.BarbosaA. J. G. (2012). Bullying entre estudantes com e sem características de dotação e talento. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(4), 747–755. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000400014
34.
OlweusD. (1993). Bullying at School: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
35.
Ortega-RuizR.Del ReyR.CasasJ. A. (2016). Evaluar el bullying y el cyberbullying validación española del EBIP-Q y del ECIP-Q. Psicología Educativa, 22(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pse.2016.01.004
36.
PetersM. P.BainS. K. (2011). Bullying and victimization rates among gifted and high-achieving students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 624–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400405
37.
PetersonJ. S.RayK. E. (2006a). Bullying and the gifted: Victims, perpetrators, prevalence, and effects. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000206
PfeifferS. I. (2012). Serving the gifted: Evidence-based clinical and psychoeducational practice (0 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203883587
40.
PiskeF. H. R.StoltzT. (2020). Meeting the socio-emotional dimension of gifted students based on Vygotsky. Culture & Psychology, 27(3), 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X20936929
41.
PiskeF. H. R.StoltzT.MachadoJ. M.VestenaC. L. B.de OliveiraC. S.de FreitasS. P.MachadoC. L. (2016). Working with creativity of gifted students through ludic teaching. Creative Education, 07(11), 1641–1647. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.711167
42.
PiskeF. H. R.StoltzT.RochaA.Costa-LoboC. (2020). Socio-emotional Development and Creativity of gifted students (1.a). Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1770-1
43.
Quintana-OrtsC.ReyL. (2018). Traditional bullying, cyberbullying and mental health in early adolescents: Forgiveness as a protective factor of peer victimisation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), 2389. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112389
44.
ReicherS.SpearsR.HaslamS. A. (2010). The social identity approach in social psychology. In The SAGE handbook of identities (pp. 45–62). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446200889.n4
45.
ReijntjesA.KamphuisJ. H.PrinzieP.TelchM. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(4), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.07.009
46.
ReijntjesA.ThomaesS.KamphuisJ. H.BushmanB. J.ReitzE.TelchM. J. (2013). Youths’ displaced aggression against in- and out-group peers: An experimental examination. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.11.010
47.
Rodríguez-HidalgoA. J.AlcívarA.Herrera-LópezM. (2019). Traditional bullying and discriminatory bullying around special educational needs: Psychometric properties of two instruments to measure it. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(1), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16010142
48.
RomanoJ. L.KromreyJ. D.HibbardS. T. (2010). A Monte Carlo study of eight confidence interval methods for coefficient alpha. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355690
49.
RyooJ. H.WangC.SwearerS. M.ParkS. (2017). Investigation of transitions in bullying/victimization statuses of gifted and general education students. Exceptional Children, 83(4), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402917698500
Sureda-GarciaI.López- PenádesR.Rodríguez-RodríguezR.Sureda-NegreJ. (2020). Cyberbullying and Internet Addiction in Gifted and Nongifted Teenagers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(3), 192–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220919338
52.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole Pub. Co.
53.
TourónJ. (2020). Las altas capacidades en el sistema educativo español: Reflexiones sobre el concepto y la identificación. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 38(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.396781
54.
TourónJ.FreemanJ. (2018). Gifted education in Europe: Implications for policymakers and educators. In APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 55–70). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-004
55.
TourónJ.TourónM. (2016). Identification of verbal and mathematical talent: The relevance of ‘out of level’ measurement. Anales de Psicología, 32(3) 638–651. http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.3.259401
56.
VílloraB.LarrañagaE.YuberoS.AlfaroA.NavarroR. (2020). Relations among poly-bullying victimization, subjective well-being and resilience in a sample of late adolescents. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(2), 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020590
57.
XuM.MacrynikolaN.WaseemM.MirandaR. (2020). Racial and ethnic differences in bullying: Review and implications for intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50, 101340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.101340
58.
YusteC. (1989). Batería de aptitudes diferenciales y generales. BADYG-S. Madrid: Manual técnico. Madrid: Ed. CEPE
59.
ZychI.Ortega-RuizR.Del ReyR. (2015). Systematic review of theoretical studies on bullying and cyberbullying: Facts, knowledge, prevention, and intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.10.001
