Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We present validity evidence for the Expectancy-Value-Cost (EVC) Scale of student motivation. Using a brief, 10-item scale, we measured middle school students’ expectancy, value, and cost for their math and science classes in the Fall and Winter of the same academic year. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the three-factor structure of the EVC Scale, as well as measurement invariance across gender, academic domain, and time. Predictions of the EVC Scale’s relationship with domain-specific future interest and prior achievement provide convergent and discriminant validity evidence. The practical utility of the survey is highlighted by the short administration time and the alignment between observed and latent means, indicating that practitioners can use raw scores rather than latent values. Finally, we discuss methods of how to use the EVC Scale to provide actionable information for educational practitioners, such as identifying which motivation interventions are most needed for students and if those interventions are working.

Keywords

motivation measurement middle school expectancy-value cost

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barron

K. E.

Hulleman

C. S.

(in press). Expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In Eccles

J. S.

Salmelo-Aro

(Eds.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences: Motivational psychology (2nd ed.). New York: NY: Elsevier.

Blackwell

L. S.

Trzesniewski

K. H.

Dweck

C. S.

(2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x

Brophy

J. E.

(2010). Motivating students to learn. New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01135_2_1.x

Bryk

A. S.

Yeager

D. S.

Hausman

Muhich

Dolle

J. R.

Grunow

… & Gomez

(2013, June). Improvement research carried out through networked communities: Accelerating learning about practices that support more productive student mindsets. In A White Paper prepared for the White House meeting on “Excellence in Education: The Importance of Academic Mindsets. Retrieved from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/sites/default/files/improvement_research_NICs_bryk-yeager.pdf

Casillas

Robbins

Allen

Kuo

Y. L.

Ann Hanson

Schmeiser

(2012). Predicting early academic failure in high school from prior academic achievement, psychosocial characteristics, and behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 407-420. doi:10.1037/a0027180

Cheung

G. W.

Rensvold

R. B.

(2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_5

Cohen

G. L.

Garcia

(2005). “ I am us”: negative stereotypes as collective threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 566-582. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.566

Conley

A. M.

(2012). Patterns of motivational beliefs: Combining achievement goals and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1, 32-47. doi:10.1037/a0026042

Durik

A. M.

Vida

Eccles

J. S.

(2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382-393. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382

10.

Dweck

(2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House, LLC. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-2397

11.

Easton

J. Q.

(2013, June). Using measurement as leverage between developmental research and educational practice. Charlottesville, VA: Center for the Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning.

12.

Eccles

J. S.

Adler

T. F.

Futterman

Goff

S. B.

Kaczala

C. M.

Meece

J. L.

Midgley

(1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In Spence

J. T.

(Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 74-146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.

13.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225. doi:10.1177/0146167295213003

14.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2000). Schoolings influences on motivation and achievement. In Danzinger

Waldfogel

(Eds.), Securing the future: Investing in children from birth to college (pp. 153-181). New York, NY: Russell Sage.

15.

Feather

N. T.

(1988). Values, valences, and course enrollment: Testing the role of personal values within an expectancy-valence framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 381-391. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.381

16.

Flake

J. K.

(2012). Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy value theory (Unpublished master’s thesis). James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA.

17.

Flake

J. K.

Barron

K. E.

Hulleman

C. S.

Lazowski

R. A.

Grays

M. P.

Fessler

(2011, May 26-29). Evaluating cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Poster presented at the 23rd annual convention for the Association for Psychological Sciences, Washington, DC.

18.

Getty

S. R.

Hulleman

C. S.

Barron

K. E.

Stuhlsatz

A. M.

Marks

J. C.

(April, 2013). Factors that affect learning in high school science; measuring motivation, achievement, and interest in science. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

19.

Global Science Forum. (2006). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. OECD.

20.

Grays

M. P.

(2013). Measuring motivation for coursework across the academic career: A longitudinal invariance study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA.

21.

Gresham

F. M.

(2004). Current status and future directions of school-based behavioral interventions. School Psychology Review, 33, 326-343. Retrieved from http://www.nasponline.org/publications/spr/index-list.aspx

22.

Gresham

F. M.

Lopez

M. F.

(1996). Social validation: A unifying concept for school-based consultation research and practice. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 204-227. doi:10.1037/h0088930

23.

Hooper

Coughlan

Mullen

M. R.

(2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-59. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com/main.html

24.

Hulleman

C. S.

Barron

K. E.

Kosovich

J. J.

Lazowski

R. A.

(in press) Expectancy-value models of achievement motivation in education. To appear in: Lipnevich

A. A.

Preckel

Robers

R. D.

(Eds.), Psychosocial skills and school systems in the Twenty-First century: Theory, research, and applications. New York, NY: Springer.

25.

Hulleman

C. S.

Godes

Hendricks

Harackiewicz

J. M.

(2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 880-895. doi:10.1037/a0019506

26.

Hulleman

C. S.

Harackiewicz

J. M.

(2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410-1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067

27.

Iacobucci

(2009). Everything you always wanted to know about SEM (structural equations modeling) but were afraid to ask. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 673-680. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.002

28.

Jacobs

J. E.

Lanza

Osgood

D. W.

Eccles

J. S.

Wigfield

(2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509-527. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00421

29.

Kline

R. B.

(2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.

30.

Lazowski

R. A.

Hulleman

C. S.

Barron

K. E.

Getty

(2012, September). Development of an expectancy-value scale for an online science curriculum. Paper presented at the Motivation Retreat, University of Tubingen, Germany.

31.

Little

T. D.

Slegers

D. W.

Card

N. A.

(2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59-72. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1301_3

32.

Marsh

H. W.

Scalas

L. F.

Nagengast

(2010). Longitudinal tests of competing factor structures for the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Traits, ephemeral artifacts, and stable response styles. Psychological Assessment, 22, 366-381. doi:10.1037/a0019225

33.

Messick

(1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50, 741-749. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741

34.

Murphy

P. K.

Alexander

P. A.

(2000). A motivated exploration of motivation terminology. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3-53. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1019

35.

National Research Council. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm, revisited: Rapidly approaching category 5. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

36.

Parsons

J. E.

(1980). Self-perceptions, task perceptions, and academic choice: Origins and change (Unpublished final technical report, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 186577). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

37.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667

38.

Rhemtulla

Brosseau-Liard

P. E.

Savalei

(2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17, 354-373. doi:10.1037/a0029315

39.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(2010). Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika, 75, 243-248. doi:10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y

40.

Silva

White

(2013). Pathways to improvement: Using psychological strategies to help college students master developmental math. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

41.

Snipes

Fancsali

Stoker

(2012). Student academic mindset interventions: A review of the current landscape. San Francisco, CA: The Stupski Foundation.

42.

Steiger

J. H.

(2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893-898. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017

43.

Stewart

R. M.

Benner

G. J.

Martella

R. C.

Marchand-Martella

N. E.

(2007). Three-tier models of reading and behavior: A research review. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 239-253. doi:10.1177/10983007070090040601

44.

Trautwein

Marsh

H. W.

Nagengast

Lüdtke

Nagy

Jonkmann

(2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 763-777. doi:10.1037/a0027470

45.

Vandenberg

R. J.

Lance

C. E.

(2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70. doi:10.1177/109442810031002

46.

Wigfield

Cambria

(2010). Expectancy-value theory: Retrospective and prospective. In Urdan

T. C.

Karabenick

S. A.

(Eds.), The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (Vol. 16, pp. 74-146). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

47.

Yang

Green

(2011). Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 377-392. doi:10.1177/0734282911406668

48.

Yeager

D. S.

Walton

G. M.

(2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81, 267-301. doi:10.3102/0034654311405999

A Practical Measure of Student Motivation

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References