Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2020-4
Academic Year Changes in Student-Teacher Developmental Relationships and Their Linkage to Middle and High School Students’ Motivation: A Mixed Methods Study
Student-teacher relationships that improve over time may help slow or prevent declines in student motivation. In a diverse sample of 1,274 middle and high school students from three schools, this mixed-methods study found that those who improved in developmental relationships with teachers reported greater academic motivation, and more positive perceptions of school climate and instructional quality. Improvements in teacher-student relationships had some positive effects on students’ grade point averages (GPAs) but they varied by school as well as by aspect of the relationship measured. No differences by poverty status were seen in any of these results. Student focus groups yielded additional understanding of the actions and mechanisms through which student-teacher relationships improve. Results of this study suggest that if individual educators and entire school communities focus on strengthening student-teacher relationships, significant improvements can be made in students’ motivation, engagement, and performance.
AdamsC. M.WareJ. K.MiskellR. C.ForsythP. B. (2014). Self-regulatory climate: A positive attribute of public schools. Journal of Educational Research, 109, 169-180.
2.
AlderN. (2002). Interpretations of the meaning of care: Creating caring relationships in urban middle school classrooms. Urban Education, 37, 241-266.
3.
ArchambaultI.JanoszM.ChouinardR. (2012). Teacher beliefs as predictors of adolescents’ cognitive engagement and achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Research, 105, 319-328.
4.
BarberB. K.OlsenJ. A. (2004). Assessing the transitions to middle and high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 3-30.
5.
BelfieldC. R.CrostaP. M. (2012, February). Predicting success in college: The importance of placement tests and high school transcripts (CCRC Working Paper No. 42). New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
6.
Bernstein-YamashiroB.NoamG. (2013). Teacher-student relationships: A growing field of study. New Directions for Youth Development, 137, 15-26.
7.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246-263.
8.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
CharmazK. (2008). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In Hesse-BiberS. N.LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 155-172). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
11.
CohenJ.McCabeE. M.MichelliN. M.PcikerallT. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111, 180-213.
12.
CollieR.MartinA.PapworthB.GinnsP. (2016). Students’ interpersonal relationships, personal best (PB) goals, and academic engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 65-76.
13.
CollinsW. A.LaursenB. (2004). Changing relationships, changing youth: Interpersonal contexts of adolescent development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 55-62.
14.
Cornelius-WhiteJ. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113-143.
15.
DweckC. S. (2010). Even geniuses work hard. Educational Leadership, 68, 16-20.
16.
ElliotA. J.ChurchM. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
17.
FitzpatrickC.Côté-LussierC.PaganiL. S.BlairC. (2013). I don’t think you like me very much: Child minority status and disadvantage predict relationship quality with teachers. Youth & Society, 47, 727-743.
18.
FredericksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
19.
FredricksJ.EcclesJ. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two “Male-Typed” domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519-533.
20.
GehlbachH.BrinkworthM. E.HarrisA. D. (2012). Changes in techer-student relationships. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 690-704.
21.
GeiserS. (2009). Back to the basics: In defense of achievement (and achievement tests) in college admission. Change—The Magazine of Higher Learning, 41, 16-23.
22.
GlymourM. M.WeuveJ.BerkmanL. F.KawachiI.RobinsJ. M. (2005). When is baseline adjustment useful in analyses of change? An example with education and cognitive change. American Journal of Epidemiology, 162, 267-278.
23.
GnambsT.HanfstinglB. (2016). The decline of academic motivation during adolescence: An accelerated longitudinal cohort analysis on the effect of psychological need satisfaction. Educational Psychology, 36, 1691-1705.
24.
GoodenowC. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationships to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21-43.
25.
GottfriedA.MarcoulidesG.GottfriedA.OliverP.GuerinD. (2007). Multivariate latent change modeling of developmental decline in academic intrinsic math motivation and achievement: Childhood through adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 317-327.
26.
HarwellM.LeBeauB. (2010). Student eligibility for a free lunch as an SES measure in education research. Educational Researcher, 39, 120-131.
27.
HodaraM.LewisK. (2017). How well does high school grade point average predict college performance by student urbanicity and timing of college entry? (REL 2017–250). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs
28.
HughesJ.N. (2011). Lognitudinal effects of teacher and student perceptions of teacher-student relationship qualities on academic adjustment. Elementary School Journal, 112, 38-60.
29.
HughesJ.CaoQ. (2017). Trajectories of teacher-student warmth and conflict at the transition to middle school: Effects on academic engagement and achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 67, 148-162. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2017.10.003
30.
HughesJ. N.ImM. H.AlleeP. J. (2015). Effect of school belonging trajectories in grades 6-8 on achievement: Gender and ethnic differences. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 493-507.
31.
JeffreyA. J.AugerR. W.PepperellJ. L. (2013). “If we’re ever in trouble they’re always there”: A qualitative study of teacher-student caring. The Elementary School Journal, 114, 100-117.
KosovichJ.FlakeJ.HullemanC. (2017). Short-term motivation trajectories: A parallel process model of expectancy-value. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 49, 130-139.
35.
LazowskiR. A.HullemanC. S. (2016). Motivation intervention in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86, 602-640.
36.
LeeS. J. (2012). The effects of the teacher-student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330-340.
37.
LernerR. M.CallinaK. S. (2013). Relational developmental systems theories and the ecological validity of experimental designs. Human Development, 56, 372-380.
38.
LiJ.JulianM. M. (2012). Developmental relationships as the active ingredient: A unifying working hypothesis of “what works” across intervention settings. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82, 157-166. doi:10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01151.x
39.
LiY.LernerR. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47, 233-247.
40.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.. . . UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/~pals/PALS%202000_V13Word97.pdf
41.
MurrayC. E.ZvochK. (2011). The inventory of teacher-student relationships: Factor structure, reliability, and validity among African American youth in low-income urban schools. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31, 493-525.
42.
NiehausK.RudasillK. M.RakesC. R. (2012). A longitudinal study of school connectedness and academic outcomes across sixth grade. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 443-460.
43.
NiuS. X.TiendaM. (2012). Test scores, class rank and college performance: Lessons for broadening access and promoting success. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 2, 199-226. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685191/
44.
NoddingsN. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
OakesJ. M.FeldmanH. A. (2001). Statistical power for nonequivalent pretest-posttest designs: The impact of change-score versus ANCOVA models. Evaluation Review, 25, 3-28.
46.
OvertonW. F. (2015). Processes, relations, and relational-developmental-systems. In OvertonW. F.MolenaarP. C. M.LernerR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Theory and method (pp. 9-62). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
47.
PekelK.RoehlkepartainE. C.SyvertsenA. K.ScalesP. C. (2015). Don’t forget the families: The missing piece in America’s effort to help all children succeed. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
48.
PekelK.RoehlkepartainE. C.SyvertsenA. K.ScalesP. C.SullivanT. K.SethiJ. (2018). Finding the fluoride: Examining how and why developmental relationships are the active ingredient in interventions that work. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 88, 493-502.
49.
PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.AllenJ. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In ChristensonS. L.ReschlyA. L.WylieC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365-386). New York, NY: Springer.
50.
PintrichP. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92-104.
51.
RaufelderD.ScherberS.WoodM. (2016). The interplay between adolescents’ perceptions of teacher-student relationships and their academic self-regulation: Does liking a specific teacher matter?Psychology in the Schools, 53, 736-750.
52.
RoordaD. L.KoomenH. M. Y.SpiltJ. L.OortF. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493-529.
53.
RuzekE. A.HafenC. A.AllenJ. P.GregoryA.MikamiA. Y.PiantaR. C. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating role of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95-103.
54.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
ScalesP. C.BensonP. L. (2007). Building developmental assets to encourage students’ school success. Texas Instructional Leader (Texas Elementary Principals and Supervisors Association), 20, 1-3, 8-10, 12.
57.
ScalesP. C.BensonP. L.RoehlkepartainE. C.SesmaA.van DulmenM. (2006). The role of developmental assets in predicting academic achievement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence29, 691-708.
58.
ScalesP. C.GibbonsJ. L. (1996). Extended family members and unrelated adults in the lives of young adolescents: A research agenda. Journal of Early Adolescence, 16, 365-389.
59.
ScalesP. C.Van BoekelM.PekelK.SyvertsenA. K.RoehlkepartainE. C. (2018). Beyond care and challenge: Effects of student-teacher developmental relationships on middle-school students’ motivation, engagement, and performance. Minneapolis: Search Institute, paper under peer review.
60.
SethiJ.ScalesP.C. (2019). Developmental relationships and school success: How teachers, parents, and friends affect educational outcomes and what actions students say matter most. Minneapolis: Search Institute, paper under peer review.
61.
ShepherdS.OwenD.FitchT. J.MarshallJ. L. (2006). Locus of control and academic achievement in high school students. Psychological Reports, 98, 318-322.
62.
SkinnerE. A.KindermannT. A.ConnellJ. P.WellbornJ. G. (2012). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223-245). New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
SointuE.SavolainenH.LappalainenK.LambertM. (2017). Longitudinal associations of student-teacher relationships and behavioral and emotional strengths on academic achievement. Educational Psychology, 37, 457-467.
64.
ThapaA.CohenJ.GuffeyS.Higgins-D’AlessandroA. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83, 357-385.
65.
ThijsJ.FleischmannF. (2015). Student-teacher relationships and achievement goal orientations: Examining student perceptions in an ethnically diverse sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 53-63.
66.
VolletJ.KindermannT.SkinnerE. (2017). In peer matters, teachers matter: Peer group influences on students’ engagement depend on teacher involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 635-652.
67.
WangM.ChowA.HofkensT.Salmela-AroK. (2015). The trajectories of student emotional engagement and school burnout with academic and psychological development: Findings from Finnish adolescents. Learning and Instruction, 36, 57-65.
68.
WangM.DishionT. (2012). The trajectories of adolescents’ perceptions of school climate, deviant peer affiliation, and behavioral problems during the middle school years. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 40-53.
69.
WangM.EcclesJ. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 31-39.
70.
WangM. C. (1990). Variables important in learning: A meta-review of reviews of the research literature (ERIC #405691). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University, Center for Research in Human Development and Education.
71.
WehlageG.RutterR.SmithF.LeskoN.FernandezR. (1989). Reducing the risk: Schools as communities of support. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
72.
WentzelK.RussellS.BakerS. (2016). Emotional support and expectations from parents, teachers, and peers predict adolescent competence at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 242-255.
73.
WentzelK. R. (2009). Students’ relationships with teachers as motivational contexts. In WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 301-322). New York, NY: Routledge.
74.
WentzelK. R. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and adolescent competence at school. In WubbelsT.den BrokP.van TartwijkJ.LevyJ. (Eds.), Advances in learning environments research (Vol 3): Interpersonal relationships in education (pp. 19-35). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
75.
WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of motivation at school. New York, NY: Routledge.
76.
What Works Clearinghouse. (2017). What Works Clearinghouse procedures handbook, version 4.0. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks
77.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81.
78.
WigfieldA.EcclesJ. S.FredricksJ. A.SimpkinsS.RoeserR. W.SchiefeleU. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In LernerR. M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1002/9781118963418
79.
WubbelsT.BrekelmansM. (2005). Two decades of research on teacher–student relationships in class. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(1-2), 6-24.
80.
YeagerD. S.HendersonM. D.D’MelloS.PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.SpitzerB. J.DuckworthA. L. (2014). Boring but important: A self-transcendent purpose for learning fosters academic self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 559-580.
81.
YuM. V. B.JohnsonH. E.DeutschN. L.VargaS. M. (2018). “She calls me by my last name”: Exploring adolescent perceptions of positive teacher-student relationships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 33, 332-362.
82.
ZahnerD.RamsaranL. M.SteedleJ. T. (2014). Comparing alternatives in the prediction of college success. New York, NY: Council for Aid to Education.
83.
ZwickR. (2013). Disentangling the role of high school grades, SAT scores, and SES in predicting college achievement (ETS-RR-13-09). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
