Although families are recognized as educational decision-makers for their children, inequitable family-professional partnerships persist in early childhood and early childhood special education (EC/ECSE), particularly for marginalized families. In this article, we argue that to promote equitable decision-making and best meet the needs of young children from birth through age five and their families, EC/ECSE professionals can reframe family-professional partnerships through an alternate lens to disrupt and transform entrenched power dynamics. To this end, we first introduce two perspectives of knowledge and power, functionalism and humanism, and discuss how they contribute to decision-making in EC/ECSE. Then, we present a model to examine power and apply the model to contrast decision-making rooted in functionalist and humanist framings. To conclude, we provide recommendations for policy, research, and practice through the humanist frame.
AlasuutariM. (2020). Documents in interaction: A case study on parent-teacher meetings. In AlasuutariM.KelleH.KnaufH. (Eds.), Documentation in institutional contexts of early childhood: Normalisation, participation and professionalism (pp. 205–224). Springer.
2.
ArtilesA. J. (2023). Beyond responsiveness to identity badges: Future research on culture in disability and implications for response to intervention. In MartinJ.BowlM.BanksG. (Eds.) Mapping the field: 75 years of educational review (Vol. 2, pp. 310–331). Routledge.
3.
BaconJ. K.Causton-TheoharisJ. (2013). ‘It should be teamwork’: A critical investigation of school practices and parent advocacy in special education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(7), 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2012.708060
4.
BakerD.AckermanL.PohlP.KimH. (2020). Somali American boys with autism: Examining three educational transitions through capital theory. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 23(2), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.9782/18-00006
5.
BatzR.YadavA. (2023). Parents’ experiences navigating early intervention and early childhood special education services: A qualitative metasynthesis. Journal of Early Intervention, 46(1), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151231164902
6.
BenekeM. R.CheathamG. A. (2016). Inclusive, democratic family–professional partnerships: (Re)Conceptualizing culture and language in teacher preparation. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(4), 234–244. https://doi.org/f75jdp
7.
BenekeM. R.CollinsS.PowellS. (2021). Who may be competent? Mothering young children of color with disabilities and the politics of care. Equity & Excellence in Education, 54(3), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2021.1992604
8.
BenekeM. R.LoveH. R. (2022). A DisCrit analysis of quality in early childhood: Toward pedagogies of wholeness, access, and interdependence. Teachers College Record, 124(12), 192–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221147348
9.
BertrandM.LozenskiB. D. (2023). YPAR dreams deferred? Examining power bases for YPAR to impact policy and practice. Educational Policy, 37(2), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048211019975
10.
BlanchardS. B.Ryan NewtonJ.DidericksenK. W.DanielsM.GlossonK. (2021). Confronting racism and bias within early intervention: The responsibility of systems and individuals to influence change and advance equity. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 41(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121421992470
11.
BurrellG.MorganG. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organizational analysis: Elements of the sociology of corporate life. Ashgate
12.
CastnerD. J. (2021). Reconsidering early childhood curriculum leadership in light of reconceptualization: Moving beyond DAP technologies. International Critical Childhood Policy Studies Journal, 8(2), 104–114.
13.
ChangY.-C.HuntN.DoddsR. (2023). Building better bridges: Perceptions of transition from early intervention programs to preschool from culturally and linguistically diverse parents, early interventionists, and preschool special educators. Infants & Young Children, 36(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000237
14.
CheathamG. A.OstroskyM. M. (2011). Whose expertise? An analysis of advice giving in early childhood parent-teacher conferences. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 25(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2011.533116
15.
CheathamG. A.OstroskyM. M. (2013). Goal setting during early childhood parent-teacher conferences: A comparison of three groups of parents. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27(2), 166–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2013.767291
16.
ChristieN. (1977). Conflicts as property. The British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15.
17.
Cioè-PeñaM. (2020). Planning inclusion: The need to formalize parental participation in individual education plans (and meetings). The Educational Forum, 84(4), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2020.1812970
DuránL.CycykL. M.BatzR. (2023). Voces de la gente: Spanish-Speaking families’ perspectives on early childhood special education. Journal of Early Intervention, 45(3), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151221131514
HancockC. L.CheathamG. A. (2021). Decision-making during early intervention home visits: From minimal to meaningful parent participation. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 35(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2020.1782546
26.
HancockC. L.CheathamG. A. (2024). How Early Head Start home visitors foster or impede shared decision-making with families. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 38(1), 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2023.2195460
27.
HarryB.Ocasio-StoutenburgL. (2020). Meeting families where they are: Building equity through advocacy with diverse schools and communities. Teachers College Press.
28.
HongS. (2019). Natural allies: Hope and possibility in teacher-family partnerships. Harvard Education Press.
29.
HongS.BalochM. H.ConklinK. H.WarrenH. W. (2022). Teacher-family solidarity as culturally sustaining pedagogy and practice. Urban Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221131809
30.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446 (2004).
31.
IshimaruA. M. (2019). Just schools: Building equitable collaborations with families and communities. Teachers College Press.
32.
KalyanpurM.HarryB.SkrticT. (2000). Equity and advocacy expectations of culturally diverse families’ participation in special education. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(2), 119–136.
33.
KeiltyB.TrivetteC. M.GillespieJ. (2022). Parent agency in promoting child learning: Family perceptions of focusing on family strengths during early childhood assessment and planning practices. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 20(3), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X221083420
34.
KielD. C. (1995). The radical humanist view of special education and disability: Consciousness, freedom, and ideology. In SkrticT. M. (Ed.), Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity (pp. 135–149). Teachers College Press.
35.
KuttnerP. J.YanaguiA.LópezG. R.BartonA.Mayer-GlennJ. (2022). Moments of connection: Building equitable relationships between families and educators through participatory design research. Journal of Family Diversity in Education, 4(2), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2022.160
36.
LoveH. R.NyegenyeS. N.WiltC. L.AnnammaS. A. (2021). Black families’ resistance to deficit positioning: Addressing the paradox of black parent involvement. Race Ethnicity and Education, 24(5), 637–653. https://doi.org/mdtc
37.
McCallZ.SkrticT. M. (2009). Intersectional needs politics: A policy frame for the wicked problem of disproportionality. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 11(2), 3–23.
38.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2011). Code of ethical conduct & statement of commitment: A Position statement of the National Association for the Education of Young Children.
39.
ParkS. (2024). Reframing deficit narratives to honor the community cultural wealth of immigrant families of children with disabilities. Journal of Family Diversity in Education, 6(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2024.186
40.
PaulickJ.ParkS.CornettA. (2022). Power dynamics and positioning in teacher home visits with marginalized families. American Journal of Education, 129(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/721872
41.
RavenB. H. (2008). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/cx2s85
42.
SkrticT. M. (Ed.) (1995). Disability and democracy: Reconstructing (special) education for postmodernity. Teachers College Press.
43.
SkrticT. M. (2013). The civic professional in Deweyan democracy. Borderlands, 2, 1–16.
44.
SpinoM. A.DinnebeilL. A.McInerneyW. F. (2013). Social power and influence: Understanding its relevance in early childhood consultation. Young Exceptional Children, 16(4), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250613493191
45.
TurnbullA. P.TurnbullR.ErwinE. J.SoodakL. C.ShogrenK. A. (2015). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: Positive outcomes through partnerships and trust (6th ed.). Pearson.
46.
VaughanK. P.SuperG. (2019). Theory, practice, and perspectives: Disability studies and parenting children with disabilities. Disability & Society, 34(7–8), 1102–1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1621741
47.
VoulgaridesC. K. (2024). Equity, parental/caregiver ‘power,’ and disability policy in the U.S. context. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 28, 326–343. https://doi.org/mdtb
48.
VoulgaridesC. K.BarrioB. L. (2021). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and the equity imperative: Examining early childhood transitions to special education. Multiple Voices for Ethnically Diverse Exceptional Learners, 21(1), 40–54.
