In this study, we examined the language- and literacy-learning opportunities (LLLO) that children with disabilities experienced across early childhood general (ECE) and special education (ECSE) classroom contexts and compare those opportunities to those experienced by their typically developing peers. We examined differences in the amount of LLLO that children with (n = 258) and without (n = 1,274) identified disabilities experienced in 315 ECE and 116 ECSE classrooms, and whether the association between child status and LLLO varied as a function of differences in these classroom contexts. Results indicated that average LLLO ranged from less than 1 min to 7 min. There were some differences in the LLLO based on context, and the reading opportunities that children experienced varied based on both child status and classroom context. Overall, children with identified disabilities were not provided with increased LLLO, as theory and practical recommendations suggest. Results and implications are discussed.
AlbinR. W.HornerR. H. (1988). Generalization with precision. In HornerR. H.DunlapG.KoegelR. L. (Eds.), Generalization and maintenance: Life-style changes in applied settings (pp. 99–120). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
2.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
3.
CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284.
4.
ConnorC. M.AdamsA.ZargarE.WoodT. S.HernandezB. E.VandellD. L. (2020). Observing individual children in early childhood classrooms using optimizing learning opportunities for students (OLOS): A feasibility study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 52, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.10.001
5.
ConnorC. M.MorrisonF. J.FishmanB. J.PonitzC. C.GlasneyS.UnderwoodP. S.PiastaS. B.CroweE. C.SchatschneiderC. (2009). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38, 85–99.
6.
ConnorC. M.PiastaS. B.FishmanB.GlasneyS.SchatschneiderC.CroweE.UnderwoodP.MorrisonF. J. (2009). Individualizing student instruction precisely: Effects of child× instruction interactions on first graders’ literacy development. Child Development, 80, 77–100.
7.
CunninghamA.ZibulskyJ.CallahanM. (2009). Starting small: Building preschool teacher knowledge that supports early literacy development. Reading and Writing, 22, 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9164-z
EarlyD. M.IrukaI. U.RitchieS.BarbarinO. A.WinnD.-M. C.CrawfordG. M.FromeP. M.CliffordR. M.BurchinalM.HowesC.BryantD. M.PiantaR. C. (2010). How do pre-kindergarteners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity, and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.003
10.
EndersC. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. Guilford Press.
11.
Endrew F. vs. Douglas County School District. (2017). 580 U.S.
12.
ErbeliF.RiceM.XuY.BishopM. E.GoodrichJ. M. (2024). A meta-analysis on the optimal cumulative dosage of early phonemic awareness instruction. Scientific Studies of Reading. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2024.2309386
13.
FerrerE.ShaywitzB. A.HolahanJ. M.MarchioneK. E.MichaelsR.ShaywitzS. E. (2015). Achievement gap in reading is present as early as first grade and persists through adolescence. The Journal of Pediatrics, 167(5), 1121–1125.
14.
GadermannA. M.GuhnM.ZumboB. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13.
15.
GardnerW.MulveyE.ShawE. (1995). Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed poisson, and negative binomial models. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 392–404.
16.
GeigerW. L.CrutchfieldM. D.MainzerR. (2003). The status of licensure of special education teachers in the 21st century (COPSSE Document No. RS-7E). University of Florida, Center on Personnel Studies in Special Education.
17.
GirolamettoL.HoakenL.WeitzmanE.LieshoutR. V. (2000). Patterns of adult-child linguistic interaction in integrated day care groups. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 31, 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3102.155.
18.
GoldfeldS.BeatsonR.WattsA.SnowP.GoldL.LeH. N.EdwardsS.ConnellJ.StarkH.ShinglesB.BarnettT.EadieP. (2022). Tier 2 oral language and early reading interventions for preschool to grade 2 children: A restricted systematic review. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 27(1), 65–113.
19.
GoldsteinH. (2011). Knowing what to teach provides a roadmap for early literacy intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111429464
20.
GordonR. A.FarranD. (2022). Introduction to ECRQ special issue measuring quality in early care and education: Past, present, and future. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60, 374–378.
21.
GreenwoodC. R.HortonB. T.UtleyC. A. (2002). Academic engagement: Current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychology Review, 31(3), 328–349.
22.
GuoY.DyniaJ. M.PelattiC. Y.JusticeL. M. (2014). Self-efficacy of early childhood special education teachers: Links to classroom quality and children’s learning for children with language impairment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.005
23.
GuoY.SawyerB. E.JusticeL. M.KaderavekJ. N. (2013). Quality of the literacy environment in inclusive early childhood special education classrooms. Journal of Early Intervention, 35, 40–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113500343
24.
HarnB. A.ChardD. J.BiancarosaG.Kame’enuiE. J. (2011). Coordinating instructional supports to accelerate at risk first-grade readers’ performance. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 332–355.
25.
HarnB. A.Linan-ThompsonS.RobertsG. (2008). Intensifying instruction: Does additional instructional time make a difference for the most at risk first graders?Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407313586
26.
HindmanA. H.WasikB. A. (2008). Head start teachers’ beliefs about language and literacy instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 479–492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2008.06.002
27.
HoxJ.MoerbeekM.Van de SchootR. (2018). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
JohnsonE. S.ZhengY.CrawfordA. R.MoylanL. A. (2019). Developing an explicit instruction special education teacher observation rubric. The Journal of Special Education, 53(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918796224
30.
JusticeL. M.LoganJ. A. R.KaderavekJ. N.DyniaJ. M. (2015). Print-focused read-alouds in early childhood special education programs. Exceptional Children, 81, 292–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563693
31.
JusticeL. M.MashburnA. J.HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2008). Quality of language and literacy instruction in preschool classrooms serving at risk pupils. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2007.09.004
32.
MashburnA. J.PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.DownerJ. T.BarbarinO. A.BryantD.BurchinalM.EarlyD. M.HowesC. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79, 732–749.
33.
McCullaghP.NelderJ. A. (1989). Generalized linear models (Vol. 37). CRC Press.
NeumanS. B.CunninghamL. (2009). The impact of professional development and coaching on early language and literacy instructional practices. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 532–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208328088
38.
Noldus Information Technology, (2010). Version 10.5. Noldus.
39.
O’ConnellA. A.BhakthaN.ZhangJ. (2022). Single and multilevel models for count outcomes. In O’ConnellA. A.McCoachD. B.BellB. A. (Eds.), Multilevel modeling methods with introductory and advanced applications (pp. 255–304). Information Age Publishing.
40.
OdomS. L.BuysseV.SoukakouE. (2011). Inclusion for young children with disabilities: A quarter century of research perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 33, 344–356.
PelattiC. Y.DyniaJ. M.LoganJ. A. R.JusticeL. M.KaderavekJ. (2016). Examining quality in two preschool settings: Publicly funded early childhood education and inclusive early childhood education classrooms. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9359-9
43.
PelattiC. Y.PiastaS. B.JusticeL. M.O’ConnellA. (2014). Language- and literacy-learning opportunities in early childhood classrooms: Children’s typical experiences and within-classroom variability. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 445–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.004
44.
PhillipsD.AustinL. J.WhitebookM. (2016). The early care and education workforce. The Future of Children, 26(2), 139–158.
45.
PiastaS. B.FarleyK. S.MauckS. A.Soto RamirezP.SchachterR. E.O’ConnellA. A.JusticeL. M.SpearC. F.Weber-MayrerM. (2020). At-scale, state-sponsored language and literacy professional development: Impacts on early childhood classroom practices and children’s outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000380
46.
PiastaS. B.JusticeL. M.O’ConnellA. A.MauckS.Weber-MayrerM.SchachterR. E.FarleyK. S.SpearC. F. (2017). Effectiveness of large-scale, state-sponsored language and literacy professional development on early childhood educator outcomes. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10, 354–378.
47.
PiastaS. B.LoganJ. A. R.Zettler-GreeleyC. M.BailetL. L.LewisK.ThomasL. J. G. (2023). Small-group, emergent literacy intervention under two implementation models: Intent-to-treat and dosage effects for preschoolers at risk for reading difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 56(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194221079355
48.
RiceM.ErbeliF.ThompsonC. G.SalleseM. R.FogartyM. (2022). Phonemic awareness: A meta-analysis for planning effective instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 57(4), 1259–1289. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.473
49.
RobertsG. J.DumasD. G.McNeishD.CotéB. (2022). Understanding the dynamics of dosage response: A nonlinear meta-analysis of recent reading interventions. Review of Educational Research, 92(2), 209–248. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211051423
50.
RoystonJ. P. (1982). An extension of Shapiro and Wilk’s W test for normality to large samples. Applied Statistics, 31(2), 115–124.
51.
SchachterR. E.SpearC. F.PiastaS. B.JusticeL. M.LoganJ. A. (2016). Early childhood educators’ knowledge, beliefs, education, experiences, and children’s language-and literacy-learning opportunities: What is the connection?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 281–294.
52.
SeefeldtC. (2004). Preschool teacher literacy beliefs questionnaire. Johns Hopkins University Center for the Social Organization of Schools.
53.
ShaeferE. S.EdgertonM. (1985). Parent and child correlates of parental modernity. In SigelI. E. (Ed.), Parental belief systems (pp. 287–318). Lawrence Erlbaum.
54.
SimmonsD. C.Kame’enuiE. J.HarnB.CoyneM. D.StoolmillerM.SantoroL. E.SmithS. B.BeckC. T.KaufmanN. K. (2007). Attributes of effective and efficient kindergarten reading intervention: An examination of instructional time and design specificity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194070400040401
55.
SpearC. F.PiastaS. B.OttleyJ. R.Yeomans-MaldonadoG.JusticeL. J.O’ConnellA. (2018). Early childhood special and general educators: An examination of similarities and differences in beliefs, knowledge, and practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 69, 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487117751401
56.
StipekD. J.BylerP. (1997). Early childhood education teachers: Do they practice what they preach?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(97)90005-3
57.
U.S. Department of Education. (2020). EDFacts Data Warehouse (EDW): IDEA Part B child count and educational environments collection, 2018–19. http://go.usa.gov/xdp4T.
58.
van BuurenS.Groothuis-OudshoornK. (2011). mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67.
59.
WarrenS. F.FeyM. E.YoderP. J. (2007). Differential treatment intensity research: A missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13, 70–77.
60.
WeilandC. (2016). Impacts of the Boston prekindergarten program on the school readiness of young children with special needs. Developmental Psychology, 52(11), 1763.
61.
WeilandC.MoffettL.RosadaP. G.WeissmanA.ZhangK.MaierM.SnowC.McCormickM.HsuehJ.SachsJ. (2023). Learning experiences vary across young children in the same classroom: Evidence from the individualizing student instruction measure in the Boston public schools. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 63, 313–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.11.008
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
