The purpose of this study was to provide information about what characteristics from the variety of inclusive early childhood programs are most valued and least valued by families and professionals. Participants were 10 family members of young children with disabilities being served in inclusive programs and 10 early childhood professionals working in inclusive programs. A combination of Q-sort and qualitative research techniques were used. Participants generated one general factor viewpoint concerning what characteristics of inclusive early childhood programs are the most and least valuable. Interviews provided qualitative clarification concerning why participants did or did not value certain program characteristics and information about participants’ beliefs concerning inclusive early childhood programs.
Baggaley, A.R. ( 1982). Deciding on the ratio of number of subjects to number of variables in factor analysis. Multivariate Experimental Clinical Research, 6, 81-85.
2.
Bailey, D.B., McWilliam, R.A., Buysse, V., & Wesley, P.W. ( 1998). Inclusion in the context of competing values in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(1), 27-47.
3.
Bricker, D.D. ( 1978). A rationale for the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children (pp. 3-26). Baltimore: University Park Press.
4.
Bruns, D.A., & Moogharreban, C.C. (2007). The gap between beliefs and practices: Early childhood practitioners’ perceptions about inclusion . Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 2(3), 299-241.
5.
Buysse, V., & Hollingsworth, H.L. (2009). Research synthesis points on early childhood inclusion: What every practitioner and all families should know. In C. A. Peterson, L. Fox, & A. Santos (Eds.), Young exceptional children: Monograph series No . 11. Quality inclusive services in a diverse society (pp. 18-30) Missoula, MT: DEC.
6.
Buysse, V., Skinner, D., & Grant, S. ( 2001). Towards a definition of quality inclusive child care: Perspectives of parents and practitioners, Journal of Early Intervention, 24, 146-161.
7.
Carr, S.C. ( 1992). A primer on the use of Q-technique factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 25, 133-138.
8.
Cattell, R.B. ( 1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276. Dennis, K.E. (1986). Q methodology: Relevance and application to nursing research. Advances in Nursing Sciences, 8(3), 6-17.
9.
Denzin, M.K. ( 1978). The research act: An introduction to sociological methods . New York: McGraw-Hill.
10.
Division of Early Childhood & National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Early childhood inclusion. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute. Retrieved on August 21, 2010, from http://www.dec-sped.org/Store/PositionStatements_and_Concept_Papers
11.
Fantuzzo, J., Grim, S., Mordell, M., McDerott, P., Miller, L., & Coolahan, K., (2001). A multivariate analysis of the revised Conners’ teacher rating scale with low-income, urban preschool children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29(2), 141-152.
12.
Green, J.C., Caracelli, V.J., & Graham, W.F. ( 1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
13.
Guralnick, M. J. (Ed.). (2001). Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change. Baltimore: Brookes.
14.
Guralnick, M.J. ( 2005). An overview of the developmental systems model for early intervention. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), The developmental systems approach to early intervention (pp. 3-28) Baltimore : Brookes.
15.
Hanson, M.J., Horn, E., Sandall, S., Beckman, P., Morgan, M., Marquart, J., et al. (2001). After preschool inclusion: Children’s educational pathways over the early school years. Exceptional Children, 68(1), 65-73.
16.
Hitchcock, C., Meyer, A., Rose, D., & Jackson, R. ( 2002). Providing new access to the general curriculum: Universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 35, 8-17.
17.
Kerlinger, F.N. ( 1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18.
Li, S., Marquart, J.M., & Zercher, C. ( 2000). Conceptual issues and analytic strategies in mixed-method studies of preschool inclusion. Journal of Early Intervention , 23(2), 116-132.
19.
Lieber, J., Horn, E., Palmer, S., & Fleming, K. ( 2008). Access to the general curriculum for preschoolers with disabilities. Children’s School Success. Exceptionality , 16, 18-32.
Nicholson, A., & Cushman, L. ( 2000). Developing successful employees: Perceptions of industry leaders and academicians. Education and Training, 42(6), 366-371.
22.
Odom, S.L., Horn, E., Marquart, J., Hanson, M., Wolfberg, P., Beckman, P., et al. (1999). On the forms of inclusion: Organizational context and individualized service models. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 185-199.
23.
Odom, S.L., Peck, C.A., Hanson, M., Beckman, P., Kaiser, A., Lieber, J., et al. (1996). Inclusion at the preschool level: An ecological systems analysis. Social Policy Report: Society for Research in Child Development, 10(2/3), 18-30.
24.
Odom, S.L., Vitztum, J., Wolery, R., Lieber, J., Sandall, S., Hanson, M., et al. (2004). Preschool inclusion in the United States: A review of research from an ecological systems perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 4(1), 17-49.
25.
Purcell, M., Horn, E., & Palmer, S. ( 2007). A qualitative study of the initiation and continuation of preschool inclusion programs. Exceptional Children, 74, 85-99.
26.
Sexton, D., Snyder, P., Wadsworth, D., Jardine, A., & Ernest, J. ( 1998). Applying Q-methodology to investigations of subjective judgments of early intervention effectiveness. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 95-107.
27.
Snyder, P. ( 1998, May). Using Q-methodology to examine consumer viewpoints about the relative importance of family-centered practice indicators: A pilot study. Paper presented at the Conference on Research Innovations in Early Intervention, Charleston, SC.
28.
Velicer, W.F., & Fava, J.L. ( 1998). Effects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231-251.
