In this commentary, developments related to conducting randomized controlled trials in authentic preschool settings that include young children with disabilities are discussed in relation to the Strain and Bovey study.
BrickerD.BaileyE.BruderM. B. (1984). The efficacy of early intervention and the handicapped infant: A wise or wasted resources. In WolriachR.RouthD. (Eds.), Advances in developmental and behavioral pediatrics: A research annual (Vol. 5, pp. 373–423). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
BuysseV.WesleyP. W. (Eds.). (2006). Evidence-based practice in the early childhood field. Washington, DC: ZERO TO THREE Press.
3.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
4.
DaneA. V.SchneiderB. H. (1998). Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: Are implementation effects out of control?Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 23–45.
GuralnickM. J. (Ed.). (1997). The effectiveness of early intervention. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
8.
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 201 (2004).
9.
Institute of Education Sciences. (2011). Request for applications: Special education research grants: CFDA Number 84.324A. Available from www.ies.ed.gov
10.
OdomS. L. (2009). The tie that binds: Evidence-based practice, implementation science, and outcomes for children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 53–61.
11.
O’DonnellC. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84.
12.
SandallS.HemmeterM. L.SmithB. J.McLeanM. E. (2005). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education. Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood.
13.
SmithB. J.McLeanM. E.SandallS.SnyderP.RamseyA. B. (2005). DEC recommended practices: The procedures and evidence base used to establish them. In SandallS.HemmeterM. L.SmithB. J.McLeanM. E. (Eds.), DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical application in early intervention/early childhood special education (pp. 27–39). Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood.
14.
SnyderP. (2006). Best-available research evidence: Impact on research in early childhood. In BuysseV.WesleyP. W. (Eds.), Evidence-based practice in the early childhood field (pp. 35–70). Washington, DC: ZERO TO THREE Press.
15.
SnyderP.ThompsonB.McLeanM. E.SmithB. J. (2002). Examination of quantitative methods used in early intervention research: Linkages with recommended practices. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 137–150.
16.
StrainP. S.BoveyE. H. (2011). Randomized, controlled trial of the LEAP model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 133–154.
17.
WhiteK. R.PezzinoJ. (1986). Ethical, practical, and scientific considerations of randomized experiments in early education special education. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6, 100–116.
18.
WoleryM. (2011). Intervention research: The importance of fidelity measurement. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 155–157.
19.
WolfeM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
